Collapsing the medical system in order to introduce "AI Doctors Inc."
Artificial Intelligence doctors will diagnose you in the future when you have your hydrogel diagnostic patch inserted into your arm...with your digital ID and CDBC...oh yeah, they're passing the laws
Collapsing the medical system in order to introduce "AI Doctors Inc."
Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination.
Study shows that Adverse Events from Vaccine are Underreported
The global elites are in labor. They are giving birth to a robot. They are birthing a managerial robot that-the hope-will help them manage us, useless eaters.
Their pocket politicians are eager midwives. Newsom, for example, signed a California bill abolishing debate in COVID “science.” All to save “our democracy,” for sure! In my home state of New York, Hochul is fighting with tooth and claw for her right to imprison citizens into very democratic quarantine camps on suspicion of maybe being infectious. Speaking of Hochul, in her plight to “protect” us (from our freedom), she has also been a juust a tad nepotistic toward her donors.
More obscure midwives, like, for example, David Schweikert in Arizona, introduced a bill allowing literal robots to issue prescriptions and otherwise legally equating AI with doctors.
What an elegant solution to getting rid of pesky dissenters! With human doctors, one would need to terrify, cajole, or bribe them into compliance. But with robots, bribing isn’t needed! Come, Pfizer! Come, Moderna! It’s a feast day! Elegant and simple.
Eager as they are though, politicians are rookie midwives. They are only allowed to serve as junior-level helpers. The experienced, confident midwives are corporate “leaders.” (Siri, what is fascism? Ah, never mind, Siri. )
Just look at Eric “don’t do evil” Schmidt of Google. Now we are talking! Eric Schmidt has been at it forever, with quite a bit of contempt for us, mortal meat bags. And after being at it forever, in 2019, an obscure government committee he personally headed issued a report that formally listed in-person doctor visits as a hurdle in the way of successfully competing with China in his precious AI race. What is the way of the future, according to Eric? Telemedicine and robots.
Speaking of telemedicine, meet another midwife, the Federation of State Medical Boards. FSMB is a private trade association with a non-profit status, deep connections, and big ambitions.
Their focus is on serving their bosses in Big Pharma and on regulating any dissent that endangers corporate profits straight off the market.
Maybe that is what the servants of global owners mean when they say that they “own science”?
But wait. Politicians, corporate fascists, and shady “respectable” NGOs are not the only midwives. When all else fails, here come the journos!
There are also “flying syringes.” Are you excited? I am so excited. And, speaking of insects on special missions, please meet DARPA, with their dreams of world domination through behavioral and genetic modification. The good fellows at DARPA are here to protect us, and make sure we are excited about the “new normal”!
Oh, and there is also this C.I.A-funded project whose stated goal is to resurrect the wooly mammoth. I mean really, to hell with useless eaters, wooly mammoths are so much better! Although, to be completely fair, I am not convinced that they are actually trying to resurrect the wooly mammoth. It is possible that they are just scamming the investors.
Which brings us to the gazillion dollar question. What in the hell is wrong with the global owners? What are they thinking? And are they actually thinking, or merely acting on inertia, anxiety, and family traditions?
I have spent a lot of time wondering about the inner workings of the minds of technocratic crazies.
Are they just genocidal maniacs, I asked, or do they believe they are doing the right thing for our species?
In the end, my honest answer is, it doesn’t matter. The exact flavor of insanity may vary from one “global owner” to another, but why should I care? Even a serial killer may believe in his own goodness. Thus, I don’t care if our aspiring masters just like to kill people or if they think we need it for the good of the planet. What I care about is that I decline their offer of being dominated, and am not complying.
From what I can gather, some of them are true genocidal maniacs, and some might believe their own bu****t. But as far as I am concerned, in either case, they are a hazard to our existence, and if they love the “new normal” so much, they have my permission to inject themselves with a million GMO mosquitos and go on vacation to a quarantine camp, under the supervision of Hochul.
Study shows that Adverse Events from Vaccine are Underreported
Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. These data were presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.
In addition, ESP:VAERS investigators participated on a panel to explore the perspective of clinicians, electronic health record (EHR) vendors, the pharmaceutical industry, and the FDA towards systems that use proactive, automated adverse event reporting.
Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed. Barriers to reporting include a lack of clinician awareness, uncertainty about when and what to report, as well as the burdens of reporting: reporting is not part of clinicians’ usual workflow, takes time, and is duplicative. Proactive, spontaneous, automated adverse event reporting imbedded within EHRs and other information systems has the potential to speed the identification of problems with new drugs and more careful quantification of the risks of older drugs.
Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.
By way of contrast from 1990-2019 there were a total of 1,415 cases of Aphasia reported following all FDA-approved vaccines covering 30years, for an average of 47 cases per year.
So 2021 saw a 6,808% increase in cases of Aphasia reportd followng C19 shots