COVID-19 is not the problem
Secondary infections and cancers arising from immune deficiencies induced by the injections are...
Covering up evidence of vaccines’ dangers…below
America Works. DEI Doesn’t…more below
Reservatrol and Cancer (4 studies published)…below
Alberta’s Ongoing COVID-19 Review Looks at Whether Data Justified Lockdowns….More Below
Written comments are welcome and encouraged even if you are attending the listening session and should be emailed to OGA.RSVP1@HHS.gov with the subject line “Written Comment Re: Stakeholder Listening Session for WHA77 ” by Friday, May 3, 2023.
See the sample email at the bottom of this article.
OGA.RSVP1@HHS.gov
Watch ←
Sucharit Bhakdi recently created a video that explains why we need to stop rolling out these COVID-19 injectable products. He speaks in the video of the autopsy findings of Arne Burkhardt. It was found that killer T cells had invaded the lungs of the individuals as a response to the presence of the spike protein. One of the things that struck me in this video was the post-injection induced lack of control of pathogens such as Toxoplasma gondii and Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria. This could result in new outbreaks of tuberculosis and it even occurred to me that the re-emergence of Toxo may induce birth defects or spontaneous abortions. Reports of spontaneous abortions and birth defects are expressly more highly reported in VAERS (and from Doctors) when compared to historical data.1 Spontaneous abortions are currently at 3,394 in the Domestic/Foreign VAERS dataset.
Herpes zoster
Everyone knows what shingles are right? Shingles arise as part of a secondary outbreak of a virus that causes chicken pox on the first pass. The virus is a herpes virus is called Varicella-Zoster Virus. Shingles is contagious, painful, can cause blindness and, like all herpes viruses, it is not curable. It is kept at bay in latent form by the immune system. Shingles can also lead to postherpetic neuralgia2.
Most commonly, the rash occurs in a single stripe around either the left or the right side of the body. In other cases, the rash occurs on one side of the face. Shingles on the face can affect the eye and cause vision loss. In rare cases (usually in people with weakened immune systems), the rash may be more widespread on the body and look similar to a chickenpox rash.3
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis is an infectious disease that primarily affects the lungs caused by a bacterium called Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is highly contagious and spreads from person to person in the air. 1/4 of people do carry the bacteria but do not succumb to disease due to functioning immune systems. It’s treatable. In non-multi-drug resistant strains.4
Pneumonia
Pneumonia is lung inflammation caused by bacteria, viruses fungi or parasites as a result of infection setting. This is usually the result of a immune system that is not optimal. Pneumonia can be treated but is very serious and can kill. In the elderly, it kills approximately 94/100,000 per year in the United States.
Toxoplasmosis
Toxoplasmosis is very common and generally is not problematic in people with functioning immune systems. But when one’s immune system is compromised or during pregnancy, toxoplasmosis can become a problem. You can get it from your cat’s poop so don’t scoop the cat poop if you’re pregnant. And I would not recommend these shots either.
Congenital toxoplasmosis is a specific form of toxoplasmosis in which an unborn fetus is infected via the placenta. Congenital toxoplasmosis is associated with fetal death and miscarriage, and in infants, it is associated with hydrocephalus, cerebral calcifications and chorioretinitis, leading to encephalopathy and possibly blindness.5
Cancer
Breast cancer is currently # 1 in VAERS for reported cancers at 94 reports which comprises 16% of all cancers reported in VAERS. Leukemias are big too.
I’m going to post this and hopefully add to it as time passes.
1 Chaudhry SA, Gad N, Koren G. Toxoplasmosis and pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(4):334-336.
2 Gruver C, Guthmiller KB. Postherpetic Neuralgia. [Updated 2021 Jun 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493198/
3 https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/about/symptoms.html
4 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis
5 https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/toxoplasmosis/index.html
Other important results of the survey include:
3.3X higher likelihood you’ll have 1 or more chronic diseases (OR 3.45 [95% CI: 3.02-3.96]). The one-sided p-value was 1.6e-78, something you don’t see very often. It basically means that this was not caused by random chance.
7X higher likelihood you’ll have 5 or more chronic conditions requiring treatment (drugs or therapies) (OR 7.03 [95% CI: 4.24-12.32]).
4X higher likelihood of a birth defect if the mother was vaccinated during the pregnancy (OR 4.31 [95% CI: 2.39-7.51]). That’s a huge effect. Nearly 80% of the birth defects are caused by the mother being vaccinated during pregnancy (actual value is 76.8%).
14.5X higher likelihood of sexual orientation/gender dysphoria issues in people under age 60 (OR 14.49 [95% CI: 2.33- 598.86]). This is a stunning result that isn’t discussed. Basically, 93% of the cases of sexual orientation issues are caused by vaccines.
Australian Fascists?
There is no shortage of fascists in Australia.
Actually, I think we have some of the best in the world.
The ease and speed with which so many corporate CEOs sided with a predatory Government was depressingly breathtaking.
What has motivated me to produce this piece, is the recent “grilling” of Woolworths CEO, Brad Banducci.
Remember, this is one of “their guys”.
Nobody is grilling him for making vaccination a condition of employment at Woolworths (more on that later).
What I want to know, and would like to see, in the company’s annual report, is:
[The size of the employee pool is large enough to do meaningful statistical calculations on deaths above “the average rate.”]
How many staff lost their jobs because of his cowardice and psychopathy?
How many injected employees died?
How many injected employees have come down with cancer?
How many injected employees now have Guillain-Barre syndrome or Bell’s palsy?
How many injected employees have had a stroke, heart attack, myocarditis etc.?
But he is not being grilled for any of that, instead he is being grilled, in this kangaroo circus, on his company’s “return on equity”, apparently, he was asked 39 times without answering.
They want him to admit that Woolworths made “too much money.”
The sick irony is that they, the very Government grilling him, killed small businesses all over the country and created the perfect, Government sponsored, environment so that he could “make all this money.”
The Mafia boss is grilling his foot soldier for stealing “too much.”
And he was grilled about his salary.
Both subjects meant to create the illusion that the government is here to defend you, the citizen, against the financial predation of these ravenous capitalists.
Thank God for the Government!
It was only 8 doses ago that Banducci was fighting the good fight, with the Government, for the Greater Good, and chasing all his staff with a needle.
Anyway…
I have published over 450 stacks so far but have never republished one to date…until now.
In March of 2022 a certain Ken Mubongi wrote an open letter to Brad Banducci, that I published.
I am now ready to come out of the closet and admit that Ken Mubongi was an alias (anagram) to hide my true identity. Unbekoming.
So, in memory of Banducci’s tenure, and his planned exit and “retirement” later this year, here, again, is my open letter to him from 2 years ago.
This letter has a soft spot in my heart.
Dear Mr. Banducci
I rarely write to companies and never before to the CEO, but I thought this letter was warranted to thank you and congratulate you for doing what the weak leadership of this country is clearly unwilling to do, and that is to properly consequence those recalcitrant employees that have abdicated their social responsibility by stubbornly remaining unvaccinated.
I mean, how much more patient can we be with these people?
These are the same people that didn’t want to lockdown to prevent the healthcare system from collapsing. Did the system collapse? No, clearly not, we saved it. Because those of us with an ounce of understanding about the greater good collectively managed to sacrifice, stay at home, and save our healthcare system from collapse despite their protestations. Do you think they’ll ever thank us? I simply don’t understand why they cannot see the evidence that is in front of them.
These are the same people that walk around without a mask. How hard can it be to wear a mask? How hard can it be to do your bit for society by wearing a simple mask that can obviously slow the spread of an airborne virus. We know they are not perfect, but it’s all about layered protection, as I’m sure you know.
These are the same people that keep talking about natural immunity. What is it about the science that they cannot comprehend. There are viruses that natural immunity can deal with and others that it cannot. Look at Ebola, how’s that natural immunity working out there? This virus is unlike other viruses and as the science has repeatedly tried to explain to them, natural immunity doesn’t work on this virus. I’m sure many of them have tried to make the case that “I’ve already had it, so why do I need to be vaccinated” and I’m sure you and your wonderful team have tried to explain this to them. But there is simply no getting through to these people.
These are the same people who insist that the vaccines are not safe and effective. What can I say, I’ve had three doses already and here I am writing this letter to you. I did have a stroke about three months ago, but I’m a retired pensioner in my late sixties who spends most of my time online, and really should get out for a daily walk more often. I have also had some stress because I’m unable to see my grandkids as their parents will not vaccinate them to protect me. So, not surprising really that I got a stroke, it’s quite normal according to my doctor, considering my stress and circumstance.
As a side note, you would have heard that Shane Warne died yesterday of a heart attack at the age of 52. I read that Long Covid is causing heart attacks. I’m sorry to have to point this out, but if the unvaccinated, including your staff, had simply taken the vaccine when they were told to, we might have been able to slow the transmission just that little bit and Shane might still be with us today. They simply don’t care about the consequences of their selfishness.
As for the bleeding hearts, such as Alexandra Marshall, complaining about mothers losing their jobs:
‘It doesn’t make sense that customers can shop without being vaccinated or disclosing medical information, but I cannot work, it is wrong,’ said a Woolworths employee, who has come under increasing pressure from Woolworths to get vaccinated or face termination on Monday.
‘I am one of four mothers at our store who is being affected by this, 12 children between us. I am a good, hard-working person. None of my colleagues have an issue with me continuing to work with them. I am young, fit, healthy, and willing to work. I do not want to lose my job and I do not deserve to lose my job.
‘The mandates need to end.
‘No one has shown me the data, research, or evidence, or assessments to back their policy up.’
To some this may seem callous, but these people need to learn their lesson. They cannot flaunt their dangerous behaviour under the guise of “freedom”. If terminating their employment is what it takes to bring them to heel, so be it. As for their kids, they are being taught all the wrong lessons by these women and will ultimately come to thank you Mr. Banducci for being the pillar of strength that their mothers couldn’t be. A little bit of hunger and homelessness never killed anyone.
You courageously announced on 25 October 2021
“We have 170,000 team members across our stores, distribution centres and support offices, and more than 1,200 retail stores. With each store welcoming an average 20,000 customers a week, a single team member can come into contact with quite literally thousands of people in the course of a normal working week.
You sir understand your responsibility well, certainly better than other CEOs and much better than the weaklings running our governments.
Yes, you ARE responsible for the health and well-being of 170,000 people. If you don’t take on that responsibility, then who will? I’m glad to see that you are comfortable with numbers, as am I. There are so many conspiracists nowadays trying to bamboozle us with numbers. As an example, I came across this Scottish “doctor” whose analysis suggests 1 in 200 vaccinated could get myocarditis. When are they going to cancel the licenses of these fear mongers?
For starters, we know that the condition is mild, and we also know that myocarditis from Covid is much worse. I don’t believe there will be any vaccine induced myocarditis within the Woolworths family as I am sure you will confirm to all shareholders, myself being one, in your upcoming annual report. But even if it turns out that our Scottish “doctor” is right, as even a broken clock is right twice a day, then 850 cases of myocarditis within the Woolworths workforce is a small price to pay for the greater good that you and I are striving for.
I thought that Jacinda Arden’s statement on 4 February 2022 was especially insightful:
“The side effects that people experience with vaccines, which we all have come to expect, a sign that the vaccine’s doing what it should”.
Such common sense from a wonderful leader, don’t you think?
I am sure that your Board would agree. Although I do notice a distinct lack of medical expertise on your board, mostly retailers, corporate advisers, and lawyers (who will come in handy if the Scottish “doctor” is right).
Which is why I was so comforted and impressed with your decision to appoint your own Chief Medical Officer. Dr. Rob McCartney. I have heard it said that you created the role so as to insulate yourself from the downside of any bad medical decisions. I don’t believe that for a minute, that’s not the type of man you are. I can see many other CEOs following your forward-looking lead.
Also, from your 25 October 2021 announcement.
Woolworths Group Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Rob McCartney added: “The medical evidence is clear – vaccination is the best protection against COVID-19 for our team members. A vaccinated team member is far less likely to get COVID, much less likely to pass it on, and also significantly less likely to become seriously ill.
Dr. McCartney is right, off course, you are much less likely to get it and then pass it on if vaccinated. But I have to say that I don’t understand why government health departments in England, Scotland, Denmark and Sweden to name just a few are publishing lies and misinformation suggesting that you are more likely to get Covid if vaccinated. I simply don’t understand why they would do that. What does “negative efficacy” mean anyway and what are nanoparticles?
I have been looking into Dr. McCartney’s background and I have to admit, I think you have hired very well. He founded Resile in 2015 and you can see his commitment to safety and a strong corporate Covid response here in this video. You have certainly found someone who is smart enough to make the most of the current crisis.
I was surprised to see Resile’s poor customer reviews:
But I suspect the one poor review was from an unvaccinated woman whose opinion I wouldn’t value anyway.
It has to be said, that I am not surprised that you have risen to the challenge. It’s no coincidence that you are of Italian heritage. What this world needs is more powerful and strong men, like those found in Italy in the 1930s. I know that it’s not fascionable to talk about those men, but we need strong men like that in these difficult times and you have certainly been a credit to your heritage.
I don’t want to end on a sour note, but I do need to say that I take issue with you allowing unvaccinated people into your store. I don’t understand why you are rewarding their decision to be a pest and menace to society by allowing them to buy food and essentials. Can I suggest that if your hands are tied by our weak laws and governments then at least make them wear some bright coloured symbol while they are in your store so that we can give them a wide berth and not risk infection when we are in your store. I would have thought that was the least you could do. Remember, once they are on your property you can do pretty much whatever you want with them.
I would like to end with a comment from a man I don’t always agree with, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn who wrote an essay titled Live not by lies in 1974.
And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: Will he remain a witting servant of the lies (needless to say, not due to natural predisposition, but in order to provide a living for the family, to rear the children in the spirit of lies!), or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries? And from that day onward he:
Will not write, sign, nor publish in any way, a single line distorting, so far as he can see, the truth;
Will not utter such a line in private or in public conversation, nor read it from a crib sheet, nor speak it in the role of educator, canvasser, teacher, actor;
Will not in painting, sculpture, photograph, technology, or music depict, support, or broadcast a single false thought, a single distortion of the truth as he discerns it;
Will not cite in writing or in speech a single “guiding” quote for gratification, insurance, for his success at work, unless he fully shares the cited thought and believes that it fits the context precisely;
Will not be forced to a demonstration or a rally if it runs counter to his desire and his will; will not take up and raise a banner or slogan in which he does not fully believe;
Will not raise a hand in vote for a proposal which he does not sincerely support; will not vote openly or in secret ballot for a candidate whom he deems dubious or unworthy;
Will not be impelled to a meeting where a forced and distorted discussion is expected to take place;
Will at once walk out from a session, meeting, lecture, play, or film as soon as he hears the speaker utter a lie, ideological drivel, or shameless propaganda;
Will not subscribe to, nor buy in retail, a newspaper or journal that distorts or hides the underlying facts.
And so it is that these dangerous unvaccinated people, who are proven to be disease prone, are choosing to live by lies and in so doing are putting us all at risk. I doubt they could even understand Solzhenitsyn even if they read him. They deserve everything that is coming their way.
Thank you, Mr. Banducci, for standing up for our communal safety and being a symbol of solidarity for the good, vaccinated people of Australia.
Best regards
Ken Mubongi
Sydney, Australia
PS There is more I wanted to say but need to rush off to make it for my fourth dose appointment.
Peter Schweizer: Inside the CCP’s Fentanyl Warfare Strategy to Kill Americans
Views 25.9K •
Apr-18-2024
[FULL TRANSCRIPT BELOW] The fentanyl scourge—the leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 45—is a “CCP-run operation,” says investigative journalist Peter Schweizer. He’s the author of, most recently, “Blood Money: Why the Powerful Turn a Blind Eye While China Kills Americans.”
In this episode, he breaks down the Chinese regime’s disintegration-warfare strategies to destroy America from within—from killing young Americans with fentanyl to radicalizing protests in America so they adopt increasingly violent tactics.
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Jan Jekielek: Peter Schweizer, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders.
Peter Schweizer: Thanks so much for having me.
Mr. Jekielek: Peter, fentanyl has become the number one killer of Americans under the age of 45, about 100,000 people overall per year. You make the case that it’s actually the Chinese regime, the CCP, that is deeply involved in every stage of the process leading to those deaths. Please break that down for us.
Mr. Schweizer: People assume that the major problem here with fentanyl poisoning in America, which is now the leading cause of death for people under the age of 45, is the Mexican drug cartels. The drug cartels are certainly involved, but they are the junior partners. This is a CCP-run operation, and you can look at every link in the chain and discover that.
With the precursor chemicals that make fentanyl, 90 percent of them come from China. Those precursors mainly arrive in a single port in Mexico, the port of Manzanillo on the west coast. The international terminal at the port of Manzanillo is not run by a Mexican company. It’s not run by an American company. It’s run by a Chinese company. That is one of the reasons they have a hard time stopping this flow of precursors.
Those precursors are then moved from the port of Manzanillo up to a town in northern Mexico where they are combined to create this deadly cocktail of fentanyl. According to the Department of Homeland Security, there are some 2,000 Chinese nationals that are helping the drug cartels do this. There is CCP influence, even at this level. The vast majority of people that are dying of fentanyl overdoses don’t even know they’re taking fentanyl. It’s being laced into illegally made pills that look like Vicodin and Adderall. For the drug cartels to do that, they need pill presses and pill molds, these small molds that make these fake pills look like the real thing. The drug cartels do that, and they get those pill presses and pill molds from China.
According to the Department of Homeland Security, China is selling those to the drug cartels basically at cost. In other words, they’re not trying to make money off this part of the deal. Once they’ve created these pills, they smuggle them across the border. The Mexican drug cartels need a secure means of communication, so what do they use? They use Chinese apps and Chinese encrypted communications. They use Chinese communication devices because they know that China will not share those communications with U.S. law enforcement.
The final link in this chain is money laundering. Every drug cartel needs to launder these large cash profits. It used to be in the old days that the drug cartels used Latin American banks when they were selling heroin and cocaine. These days that has changed.
The Mexican drug cartels now use Chinese state banks to launder their money. Often they use Chinese students in the United States on education visas to do so. The cartels are involved, but they are the junior partners. Without China’s involvement, we would not be facing this scourge in America today. It’s part of this broader disintegration warfare that China is involved in.
Mr. Jekielek: It’s not commonly known that there is an unholy trinity of cooperation between Chinese state security, these wealthy Chinese business tycoons, and organized crime itself. For all this to work, all three parts are required. These relationships drive this corruption by the CCP in the West.
Mr. Schweizer: That’s a very important point, because people will often think Chinese organized crime is similar to organized crime in the United States, that is kind of like an outsider looking in. The fact of the matter is that the CCP and the Chinese triads, the organized crime, basically made their peace in the 1980s. Deng Xiaoping sat down with triad leaders and said, “Look, as long as you are patriotic and pro-CCP and not committing major crimes within China itself, we will provide you safe harbor. We will work with you to direct your activities against the West.” Indeed, they have done so.
Today, there are numerous senior organized crime figures that are members of Chinese consulates. These are the consultative bodies that the CCP has set up. These are individuals that are known to be linked to Chinese organized crime and the CCP has brought them into the fold. We know that President Xi himself has a cousin who has been linked to organized crime.
We know that many of the Hong Kong-based billionaires have been identified in intelligence reports in Canada, in the United States and elsewhere as being both pro-CCP and linked to Chinese organized crime. One of those would be Li Ka-shing, the Hong Kong investor who happens to own Hutchison Ports, which is the company that runs that port in Manzanillo, Mexico. He has been linked to Chinese triads for decades, and he’s very close to the CCP.
When you see Chinese organized crime engaged in activities in the West, whether that’s human trafficking, illegal trafficking, or drug distribution, this is part of a cooperative effort with the CCP. The CCP protects these individuals when they’re in China. There are numerous instances of this, including with President Xi when he was the head of Fujian province. He absolutely did this and he continues to do this today. It’s part of this sophisticated form of warfare that China is using against the West. It gives them plausible deniability, but it has these very damaging results on the West, nonetheless.
Mr. Jekielek: Peter, in your book, you mention. “Unrestricted Warfare,” this infamous book written by the two Chinese colonels. This means warfare with no rules whatsoever and using all these different methods like the three warfares. You cover things that are not well known, like the CCP’s rampant use of legal warfare and psychological warfare. This is the kind of warfare that the CCP is using to influence outcomes in America. How does this disintegration warfare that the CCP is using with fentanyl fit into the picture?
Mr. Schweizer: That’s a great question. The book, “Unrestricted Warfare,” published in 1999, essentially was about China resetting the rules of conflict. The book basically says, and this continues to be the Chinese approach, “We don’t want to have a kinetic war with the United States. We’re building aircraft carriers and military capabilities, but the U.S. has military superiority on every level. If we had a kinetic war with America, it would be severely damaging to China itself.
Unrestricted warfare broadens the definition of warfare to include everything, including drug warfare, environmental warfare, and nothing is off the table. In 2010, two senior Chinese military officers published a book called “Disintegration Warfare.” What it really does is set up their main goal. What is their main goal? The goal, as the title implies, is to disintegrate the United States.
On the cover of this book, “Disintegration Warfare,” there is the very famous quote from Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese strategist. The quote says that the best strategist is the one who defeats his enemy without actually fighting him. That is what disintegration warfare is all about.
Essentially, it says, “We’re going to apply unrestricted warfare, and the goal is to disintegrate the United States internally. We’re going to cause deaths by fentanyl or stoke internal violence in the United States. We’re going to pit American against American, by exacerbating social divisions.”
It all fits closely together. The problem is that in Washington, DC, to the extent that people are talking about the China threat to the United States, the focus is almost exclusively on a kinetic war. The response is, “We need to build more aircraft carriers. We need more security and more power projection into the Pacific.” I’m not opposed to any of that.
But the problem is you’re preparing for a different war than China is already waging. China is already engaged in a war that is leading to casualties, social division, and chaos in America. Washington, D.C. is not even paying attention to that. They are focused on the prospect of a future war that may never happen. Because the war that China is fighting right now is successful and is yielding great results for them.
Mr. Jekielek: They are officially fighting a war. Xi Jinping calls it the People’s War, which he announced in 2019, but most people aren’t aware of it.
Mr. Schweizer: Yes, that’s exactly right. President Xi is a different leader than Hu Jintao and some of the other CCP leaders we’ve had. Don’t get me wrong. They all adhere to CCP doctrine—the goals, the concentration of power, and the abuse that we see from CCP leaders going all the way back. But President Xi, I would argue, is tougher and more aggressive than previous leaders.
There are really only two stories that I could tell that would illustrate that point. The first one is that President Xi is married to a very famous singer in China. After the troops in China committed the massacre at Tiananmen Square, it was President Xi’s wife who serenaded those troops right after the massacre. That tells you how these people think and where they are coming from.
The second story is that the Chinese people are not going to be able to do anything. The third story, that highlights where President Xi is coming from, is his relationship to his father. His father was a revolutionary figure. He was purged, but then was resuscitated. President Xi deeply admires his father and even built a mausoleum in his honor that celebrates and highlights his career.
One of those highlights occurred when Xi’s father was 14. His father tried to poison his teacher because his teacher was not sufficiently revolutionary. President Xi thinks this is a good and noble thing that his father tried to do. The point is, this is a political head of state who has a distinctly different view than American or European politicians. He appreciates and respects a certain hardness, and that has been demonstrated by both his wife and his father. It’s important for us to understand precisely who President Xi really is.
Mr. Jekielek: Did you see that clip from the 3 Body Problem series on Netflix, depicting the Cultural Revolution and a struggle session from back then?
Mr. Schweizer: Yes, I have. It is stunning.
Mr. Jekielek: We have Xi Jinping’s father trying to poison his teacher with that revolutionary fervor that we see in the 3 Body Problem clip. Many people were shocked at the barbarity of it. The Red Guard kids were running the insane asylum at the time, so to speak, and killing someone wasn’t actually a big deal. It was something the CCP appreciated. Xi himself was part of that. His father was purged and had to go into the countryside for re-education. He was in disrepute and spent a lot of his life getting back to his original status in the party. It’s interesting that Xi ended up becoming the paramount leader after what happened to his father.
Mr. Schweizer: Yes, it’s interesting, because most of us would recoil and reject a system that had such a devastating effect on our family. That is certainly not President Xi’s reaction. We need to understand this when talking about the fentanyl crisis in America and other things that I highlight in the book that lead to the deaths of Americans. We can’t mirror image them and say, “It’s hard for me to imagine any leader wanting to do that.”
You have to show due respect to the foreign official, meet them where they are, look at what they value, look at what they think is noble behavior, and then understand them accordingly. Certainly when you’re talking about President Xi, if you were killing 100,000 Americans through fentanyl poisoning in alliance with the Mexican drug cartels, you would do it in such a way as to avoid blame. In their strategic doctrine, they call it, “Murder with a borrowed knife.”
In other words, if you’re going to kill somebody, do it with somebody else’s knife so they get the blame. But again, it’s not a far stretch when you look at President Xi’s history, what he values, and who he admires, to see that this would be a totally legitimate strategy for him to employ against the United States.
Mr. Jekielek: A part of this drug warfare in America is this harm reduction strategy. Effectively, you’re not allowed to prevent the addict from taking their drugs. In fact, you facilitate that for them, which has created these open-air drug markets in LA and San Francisco. Is this part of this whole system that delivers those 100,000 deaths per year, and is the CCP involved in this?
Mr. Schweizer: It’s possible, I don’t know. But the notion of treating fentanyl like any other drug, whether it’s heroin or cocaine, completely misses the mark. Yes, you do have some people in San Francisco and other urban areas who are knowingly taking fentanyl, which is a terrible idea because it is so potent. If you get the dosage wrong, you’re dead immediately.
But the vast majority of people that are dying have no idea they’re taking fentanyl. They are college students who are studying for a final exam and a roommate says, “Here, take this Adderall because it'll help you concentrate.” They take the Adderall and they overdose because it actually wasn’t legitimate Adderall. It was something somebody bought on the street. It was made in Mexico, and they got the formula wrong, so to speak. There’s too much Adderall in it and they died.
Treating this as a drug addiction problem like heroin or cocaine completely misses the mark. It’s also extremely convenient for the Biden administration, because by treating it as a drug addiction problem, rather than what it is—poisoning—it absolves you of trying to confront the CCP on this. Essentially, you are saying this is a domestic problem in the United States.
Here’s the reality. Fentanyl overdose deaths are a massive problem in the United States and Canada. They are not much of a problem in Europe right now, but the network and the supply of pharmaceuticals there is going to rise and they’re going to face the same challenge. If you don’t believe fentanyl is a China problem, just look at what happened during the Covid crisis.
During the pandemic in 2020, fentanyl deaths actually went down because supply chain disruption precluded precursors from even getting to Mexico or the United States. That has been demonstrated in medical journals. They are completely off base in the drug addiction approach they are taking. It allows them to avoid having to confront China, who is really behind this poison that is killing so many Americans.
Mr. Jekielek: How easily could Xi Jinping stop this supply chain?
Mr. Schweizer: He could stop it overnight. It’s simply a question of banning the production, enforcing the ban, and throwing people into jail for producing this stuff. A lot of the research demonstrates that about half of the companies that are selling fentanyl precursors online to drug dealers or other people in the West are officially registered companies. As I highlight in the book, many of them are politically connected.
These are not people in the back room somewhere in Shanghai that are throwing this stuff together and covertly shipping it to the West. These are large, politically-connected chemical companies that are doing it. The fact is they do not cooperate with U.S. law enforcement when it comes to the people that are involved in the fentanyl trade. The fact that the CCP embraces drug pushers and brings them in as advisors to the CCP is clear evidence to me that they don’t care. If they decided to fix this, they could fix it, but they just won’t.
I'll give you one brief example from 2021. The Biden administration sanctioned a Chinese gangster that goes by the name Broken Tooth. Our Treasury Department sanctioned him in 2021 for his involvement in the fentanyl trade. Three months later, the Chinese government gave him an award for his activities. During that award ceremony, he gave a rousing speech saying that he was proud of what he did. This is all out in the open. It’s not being sanctioned. The notion that, “China is trying very hard, but they can’t fix this,” is an absolute joke.
Mr. Jekielek: Why isn’t the U.S. government doing anything about this?
Mr. Schweizer: There are a couple of reasons. One is once you acknowledge the reality of what China’s doing to the United States in the area of fentanyl, you realize pretty quickly you cannot have a normal, ordinary relationship with this government until these problems are fixed. That makes life very complicated for political figures in Washington. There are some that are talking about this, but a lot of them, frankly, go along to get along. They don’t want the heavy lift of having to make these hard choices. They don’t want domestic lobbies, Big Tech, and Wall Street coming at them saying, “You can’t disrupt our ties to China.” That’s part of the broader problem.
More specifically, you have figures in the United States who have deep financial entanglements. Some of them brush perilously close to the actual fentanyl trade itself. That means if you highlight this issue, it could be deeply embarrassing and damaging to them. I'll just give you two brief examples.
One would be Joe Biden and the first family of the United States. We first reported back in 2018 that commercial ties exist between the Biden family and these Chinese financiers. Back in 2017, the Biden family received a $5 million interest-free, forgivable loan from a Chinese businessman who, it turns out, was business partners with a Chinese gang leader who goes by the name White Wolf.
White Wolf and his gang are the entity that set up the Sinaloa-based trade war. They’re the ones that set up the Sinaloa cartel in Mexico in the fentanyl trade. Between the Biden family and the fentanyl trade, you literally have one degree of separation, this businessman that gave them this $5 million interest-free loan, which of course, the Bidens never repaid. Honestly, does Joe Biden want to have a conversation about the Chinese involvement in the fentanyl trade? I kind of doubt it.
The other person I would look at is Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate. His family actually does have a legitimate shipping business. But the problem is that they are wholly dependent upon the good graces of the Chinese government to function and make a profit. The Chinese government has built a lot of their ships. They finance the construction of a lot of their ships. They provide crews for those ships. Some of their clients and customers are Chinese state-owned companies.
Again, I ask you, does Mitch McConnell really want to call out the Chinese government on this? I don’t think so, because the Chinese government could destroy the family business overnight. That is the more specific problem that we have. Unfortunately, these people with entanglements are oftentimes at senior positions in our government.
Mr. Jekielek: There was a huge push in the 2000s to get into China at any cost, including setting up these partnerships where you transfer your intellectual property, which has fueled a huge technology transfer. There are many very affluent Americans in the relationships you just described. Graham Allison, one of the paramount scholars of China from Harvard recently wrote an editorial in the Global Times, a mouthpiece of the Chinese regime. In this interview he says that China and the U.S. are inseparable like conjoined Siamese twins. If one tries to strangle the other, it would be suicide. Overall, how would you view that statement?
Mr. Schweizer: It is ridiculous on multiple levels. If you look at what Graham Allison has written about the Thucydides trap, his prescription is to essentially give China what it wants. He says that the United States is this established power, and China is this rising power. His view is that inevitably conflict will result unless both powers act accordingly. His prescription for the United States is essentially to give China what it wants and everything will be fine, which is a ridiculous notion.
No, we are not conjoined twins. We have very different nervous systems, which is part of the problem. China certainly does not view the United States as somebody that they cannot abuse, that they cannot manipulate, and that they cannot do damage to. They do it all of the time.
This is straight out of the tradition of Henry Kissinger. In the 1970s Kissinger said that as we opened up to China, China would become more like us. That certainly has not happened. I don’t give a lot of credence to this establishment line at all. It has not worked out as they predicted it would. It has not mellowed China. It has emboldened China and it has put the United States in peril.
To your broader point, this is one of the challenges that we face. Because as our business community has embraced China, China has been able to turn to our business community and effectively use them as de facto lobbyists against their own government. Let’s remember that when the Trump administration imposed tariffs on Chinese goods and products—set aside whether one thinks that’s a good policy or not—what did China do? They didn’t go to Washington to complain about it. They went to Silicon Valley and Wall Street and said, “You go to Washington.” That’s exactly what these entities did, so it is a dangerous, perilous path.
China calls this elite capture, when you essentially get the elites to do your bidding. What they’re looking for is big help with a little bad mouth. A little bad mouth means, “If you want to talk about the Uyghurs, if you want to talk about human rights, if you want to talk about Taiwan, that’s fine. But help us on the big things, which is access to your technology, to your capital, to your capital markets, and to your commercial markets. If you give us those things, we are going to be very happy.” That is exactly what America’s elites have done over the last several decades, and Beijing must be exceedingly pleased with it.
Mr. Jekielek: The U.S. basically financed building the world’s biggest dictatorship.
Mr. Schweizer: It has. You think of the old John Maynard Keynes line, “If I owe you a thousand pounds, I have a problem. If I owe you 500 million pounds, you have a problem.” Our companies have invested so heavily in China, but have a very difficult, if not impossible, time pulling their assets out of that country. it creates a sense of extortion with America’s political elites. It’s the reason they don’t want to raise questions about fentanyl. They don’t want to raise questions about TikTok or many of these other problems, because if they do, China can damage them overnight.
Just look at the relationship with the American investors in ByteDance, which is the parent company of TikTok. I was stunned. I didn’t even realize this until I read it in Fortune magazine. The American investors in ByteDance, and there are a number of them, signed an agreement when they became shareholders of that company, which says if they disparage or criticize ByteDance publicly, their ownership stake in the company can be seized without compensation.
Think about that for a second. That would not be legal in the United States, but that’s the agreement in China. What has happened? You now have these major investors, the Carlyle Group and Jeff Yass, who are major shareholders in ByteDance, who cannot honestly talk about the fact that ByteDance is a threat to the United States. Because if they did so, they would lose their multi-billion dollar stakes in that company. That’s just a small microcosm of the kind of leverage that China exerts over America’s financial and political elites.
Mr. Jekielek: Let’s talk about TikTok. In “Blood Money,” you do a great job of detailing all the various unconventional weapons that the CCP wields against America and the West. TikTok might actually be the most pernicious and the most effective. What is the threat posed by TikTok?
Mr. Schweizer: I would agree with your assessment, and here’s why. ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, is not just a Chinese company, which is a challenge in and of itself. If you’re a Chinese company, you are going to act at the behest of the CCP and the Ministry of State Security. ByteDance is a Chinese company joined at the hip to the Chinese military/intelligence complex. What do I mean by that?
First of all, the all-important algorithm that TikTok uses to effectively addict users in the West and to give users exactly what they seem to be looking for, is certainly a company secret, but the CCP has also designated it as a state secret. This is not just a normal, proprietary thing that a company in China happens to have. This is something that is valued highly by the Chinese state itself. That should already be a red flag.
The headquarters of ByteDance in Beijing is located not far from the Ministry of State Security, which is the superspy apparatus of China. It’s the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, all of those intelligence agencies rolled into one. ByteDance actually does joint research with the Ministry of State Security. One of the things they research is how to manipulate people online. My point is, it’s not just a Chinese company. It is a Chinese company that works closely with the Chinese intelligence apparatus.
There is all this debate on Capitol Hill asking, “Might China use this as a form of propaganda? Might they use it to manipulate young people?” They’re not having that debate in China. My favorite section of “Blood Money” is where I quote from Chinese military officials and propaganda officials, describing how to use online platforms and how they are using online platforms like TikTok to manipulate people in the West. I quote them extensively, because you don’t have to believe me, you can believe what they’re actually saying.
They talk about how TikTok is the perfect platform because it’s such an emotional medium, especially for young people. Their belief is that if they can get a young person emotionally wrapped up in a video, the young person embraces what they’re feeling as a sign of their own righteous indignation. As a sovereign person, they are choosing to be moved by this video, when in fact they’re being manipulated.
The propagandists say, “Once they cross that line and think they own that feeling, then we’ve got them. Because now we can steer them in the direction we want them to go.” They are already doing that. My view is that this is a highly potent weapon. We are going to allow an entity, which is joined at the hip with the Chinese Ministry of State Security, to have unfettered access to our young people.
We say, “We’re not going to worry about it. They are 13-years-old and they can figure it out on their own,” which is patently absurd. The bill that has been introduced in Congress is a good bill. Certainly there are problems with other Big Tech companies, including those in the United States. But it’s not an either-or thing. We need to be dealing with both. The CCP threat from TikTok is absolutely clear and real, and it’s already yielding results for them.
Mr. Jekielek: That’s certainly what they’re saying in China. Many people have seen “The Social Dilemma,” an excellent documentary that explains how social media companies create detailed profiles on each of us. They also specifically present content to manipulate, to addict, to get us to use these platforms more. There is an ample body of information showing how these various social media giants manipulate people.
What ethical barriers does the CCP have here? There is a much lower level of ethical scrutiny by some of these social media companies or even our agencies in the U.S. I want to contrast that to the CCP. People get so caught up in this new and disturbing reality that you can lose the context here.
Mr. Schweizer: Yes, the context is key. Whether it’s Meta or Microsoft or another platform, when you have the right political leadership in the United States, you can have accountability. You can have shareholder meetings where people actually raise these issues. There are ways to publicly pressure American companies. Are they doing a good job of that on Capitol Hill? Not really. I would give them a C. They’re talking about it, but they’re not doing enough.
The problem presented by a Chinese entity like ByteDance is completely different. First of all, you don’t have the ability to pressure them through shareholder action. You can have U.S. regulators bring the head of the American branch of TikTok to testify before Congress. But ultimately, if decisions are being made, he’s not the one making them. The decision makers are back in Beijing.
Then you add the fact that the Ministry of State Security is closely working with ByteDance, which adds a completely different element. To me, you can’t compare the two. Again, it’s not an either-or question. We should be dealing with both. But the ability that we have to hold American tech companies to account is 10 times greater than our ability to hold to account a foreign entity owning an algorithm that is a Chinese state government secret.
This is an entity working with a foreign spy apparatus on a massive propaganda operation to capture the hearts and minds of young people in the West. Let’s remember, they are very sophisticated about this. It’s not as if they’re going to be sending images on TikTok of Chairman Mao marching through Tiananmen Square. They’re much, much more sophisticated, and that’s what people have to be worried about. If they’re confident that they can recognize CCP propaganda and they don’t need to worry about it, that is the first indication that they are subject to it and could easily be manipulated by CCP propaganda.
Mr. Jekielek: Based on the 2019 Chinese national intelligence law, they are required to spy for the benefit of Chinese state security. There are multiple layers to this, not to mention the doctrine of military-civil fusion, which is one of the top priorities of Xi Jinping. Whenever there’s an opportunity for a military application, it must be enacted, based on Xi Jinping’s policy directions. One more thing I wanted to mention here, TikTok isn’t actually available in China.
Mr. Schweizer: That’s right. They have their own version pronounced Douyun. It is a domestic version of TikTok that is very different. This is what Chinese officials call cognitive warfare, this desire to dumb down the West. On TikTok, you get somebody with blue hair screaming about something. It’s basically cotton candy. Largely what you get on TikTok is entertainment, pranks, and that kind of content.
The Chinese version is very different. They lead with educational, cultural, and scientific videos that supposedly contribute to the cognitive development of young people in China. Our kids are getting cotton candy from ByteDance and children in China are getting spinach. Again, this is part of cognitive warfare, something they’ve refined. They want to match the intellectual capabilities of their young people with ours.
They are engaged in a whole host of destructive behaviors, and TikTok is just one. They are involved with massive illegal marijuana grows in the United States that are three times more potent, which they are selling illegally here in the United States. This is also part of this cognitive warfare that is a designed campaign to dumb down Americans. You can look at the results and see that it is absolutely working.
Mr. Jekielek: I recall during the BLM-Antifa riots in 2020, there were instructional videos on TikTok.
Mr. Schweizer: Yes, there were instructional videos on TikTok. There have been other videos on how to engage in criminal behavior. Some of these TikTok pranks that have gone viral are dangerous. One of them involved loosening the lug nuts on tires on people’s cars. Yes, this is very damaging content culturally in the United States.
It also attempts to sow division and chaos in the United States. Videos get promoted that push content that is highly divisive here in the United States. This is part of the Chinese strategy of using TikTok as a mouthpiece for China to manipulate Americans. One Chinese official said that TikTok is basically China’s Trojan horse to use against the West.
Mr. Jekielek: I saw that headline, but didn’t realize it came from the horse’s mouth, so to speak.
Mr. Schweizer: They are very bullish on TikTok. They like the fact that it’s a Trojan horse, as this one official calls it. They like the short video format because they feel like it is addictive and it’s emotive. They believe that by using that emotion they can steer the values that people have. One Chinese military official believes that TikTok is a key ingredient in basically defeating the West without firing a shot.
In other words, this is the ancient Sun Tzu strategy of trying to defeat your enemy without actually fighting him. Who knows if TikTok is that potent? But China is absolutely bullish on it and sees it as a very, very powerful tool that they are using against the United States already.
Mr. Jekielek: One of the provisions in the legislation gives the president discretion to target a particular country or a particular app. The fear is that this discretion will be used by our own government. There’s been a lot of abuse around the issue of free speech and there are cases about this at the Supreme Court. Does this legislation give the American leaders too much discretion to force divestment on American companies, not just on Chinese-owned companies? Would TikTok under the control of U.S. actors also prove to be highly problematic.
Mr. Schweizer: Those are legitimate questions to ask. My view is to quote Winston Churchill who said, “You can’t make perfect the enemy of the good.” There has to be some decision making mechanism to decide if a forced divestiture needs to take place. I’m not sure where you put that authority other than the president. I understand that you might see abuses of power. We have RICO statutes, the laws were set up to deal with organized crime networks that are now being used against Donald Trump in Georgia. That certainly seems to be an abuse.
But the solution is not to say, “Then we don’t want to have RICO statutes.” What we need is a vigorous judiciary and you have to make sure that the law is specific enough to address concerns about abuse. Could the law be abused? It might be.
But the law specifically says, “A foreign media company that is owned by a foreign adversarial power.” Immediately it is saying if it’s a U.S. based media company like Donald Trump’s Truth Social, it would not fit the definition. Were a president to try and abuse that and to force a divestment of that company, it would certainly be challenged in the courts. I don’t see how that could be upheld.
It narrowly defines it enough to be foreign media companies owned by adversarial powers. That is important. Then the second question is, “If there’s a forced sale of TikTok, who would end up owning that entity?
The law also says that the purchaser acquiring those assets or that company in the United States would have to be approved and pass scrutiny with regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission. What does that mean? The first example is Mark Zuckerberg, who already controls Facebook and Instagram. There is just no way that the Federal Trade Commission would approve Mark Zuckerberg to be able to own this entity. I think there are enough constraints on this.
The question is, “How do you improve this law to make it better?” If it’s specific to TikTok itself, which some people have said, I believe that would be declared unconstitutional almost immediately. You cannot pass a bill that is related to one specific company. There are constraints in place. We have an independent judiciary that would restrict abuses or efforts by a president to abuse the authority. But I believe that when it comes to TikTok action needs to be taken. I think that this law is a good one.
Mr. Jekielek: These types of apps have an inordinately huge influence on their users. That ability to weaponize our psyches is the most potent in TikTok and it’s in the hands of an adversarial foreign power. The vast intelligence gathering of this particular app is above and beyond what U.S. apps take in. That absolutely makes this a national security issue, not a free speech issue, which is how it has been portrayed. There is a very real fear that freedom of speech is being systematically curtailed here in America.
Mr. Schweizer: It is being curtailed in America,in the case of TikTok. It’s not a free speech issue. The only one that would make it a free speech issue is the CCP. They’ve essentially said, “If you force the sale of TikTok to American-based investors from our ownership in China, we’re going to shut the app down.” In other words, they have said they are going to eliminate this platform, which they have the right to do. They own it.
But to me, that’s indicative of what their true interests are. It’s not to provide a platform for commercial activity. It is to create a platform for an influence operation. Free speech is a major issue. The problem is having concentrated power in a handful of companies. In the case of ByteDance with the forced sale, you’re going to have a new company emerge that would be unique to TikTok, and that would be a good thing.
We don’t want it controlled by another Big Tech company. We want it to be a platform that further concentrates and restricts authority. What we need in Washington, D.C. is vigorous political leadership that is holding these major platforms to account. There are reforms and things that can be done on that level. But with ByteDance and TikTok this is a unique circumstance because of the Chinese ownership and the Chinese control and the manipulation that exists uniquely on this app.
Mr. Jekielek: There were these instructional videos on TikTok from Antifa and BLM about how to stage a riot. There is a significant part of this very far-Left protest movement which you document in your book that is closely tied to the CCP. Many people don’t understand this and deny the connection. Could you detail for us how that works?
Mr. Schweizer: That was probably one of the most surprising findings in the book. China’s strategic thought here is captured in the phrase, “Watch the fire burn from across the river.” In other words, maybe you fan the flames of the fire, but you sort of detach yourself and say we’re not involved in that. The fact of the matter is that a lot of the radical protests that we’ve seen in the United States dating back even before 2020 is the work of two very radical groups.
One is called FRSO [Freedom Road Socialist Organization]. The other one is called PSL [Party for Socialism and Liberation]. These are two organizations that have explicitly pledged their allegiance to the CCP. They view them as fraternal parties. That’s not just friends, that’s fraternal parties.
They cheer on the CCP and are supportive of the CCP. We know that some of the leaders in these groups have traveled to China. We also know that some of these groups get money from China, sometimes directly, and sometimes indirectly.
We also know that Beijing tracks these groups. I actually quote from a CCP party organization in Wuhan that tracks the activities of these groups domestically in the United States. They see that these groups have been very successful in radicalizing the conversation in America. Many of the most violent radical protests in 2020 were organized by FRSO and PSL.
You might have had people that showed up that wanted to peacefully protest about race relations in America. Maybe they wanted the police to try to handle situations slightly differently. But these organizations were all about all American cops being racist and needing to abolish the police. They shut down cities like Philadelphia, but they also showed up in small towns in America.
They were very radical groups. According to reports in China, FRSO essentially captured and took over by the late summer of 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement and and ended up radicalizing it. That’s an important component of this. Because if the work that China is doing with TikTok in cyberspace represents the air war, this represents the ground war, the radical, boots-on-the-ground social protests in America.
Those protests have continued. They’re now under a different label. They are now pro-Hamas or pro-Palestinian rights protests. If you look at a lot of the organizers, they are FRSO and PSL, these pro-China groups. When there was a large protest on this topic in November of last year, look at who the keynote speakers were. They were leaders from FRSO and PSL. There were more than half-a-million protesters that shut down Washington, D.C.
The goal here is to radicalize this movement. They don’t want peace in the Middle East, they want a Hamas victory. You can look at the emergence of the so-called trans movement. It is very surprising here, because two of the biggest funders of that movement in America are Chinese-based billionaires.
One is an American who sold his company to an investment fund partly owned by a Chinese sovereign wealth fund. He moved to China and he’s pro-CCP. He has poured tens-of-millions of dollars into the radical protest movement, including the trans movement in America.
Joe Tsai, the co-founder and now the chairman of Alibaba, has poured tens-of-millions of dollars into the trans movement in America. A big tip off is that neither of these individuals are actually supporting this movement in China itself, they only advocate it for it in America, because they know it’s divisive. They know that it sows division and distrust in America, and that is part of the social agenda they are trying to push in the United States.
Mr. Jekielek: The first billionaire that you’re referring to is Roy Singham who funds Code Pink. I’ve seen Code Pink coming to the Select Committee on the CCP events in Congress to protest, and then they leave very quickly.
Mr. Schweizer: Yes, that’s exactly right. In fact, Code Pink and Roy Singham fought aggressively to try to prevent that committee from even being formed. They didn’t want a select, bipartisan committee in Congress to look into what China was doing. Roy Singham has absolutely played a major role in that, as has Code Pink. Again, these are not people who are normal, regular peace activists. These are not people who want a negotiated solution.
They believe that the entire error is with the United States, as opposed to China, in the tensions between those countries. And they believe that the tensions between Hamas and Israel are totally the result of what Israel has done. This is part of the effort to radicalize and divide and sow social division in America. One Chinese official said, “This internal tumult in America is sapping America of its strength.” This is part of a broader strategy, in addition to many of the other things we’ve talked about.
Mr. Jekielek: You cover that very well in, “Blood Money.” I wholeheartedly recommend this book to all our viewers. It is meticulously researched and a great compilation of all of the different methods that the Chinese regime has been using. Thank you for your book. Any final thoughts, Peter, as we finish up?
Mr. Schweizer: This is such an important topic. You and The Epoch Times have been at the forefront of this. I’m encouraged that people are becoming more attentive to these details. But the problem is that the clock is ticking. China’s strategy is working. It’s causing American casualties. This is not an abstract future war. It is a war occurring right now. I encourage everybody to be vigilant and let your elected officials know what’s going on so they can take this seriously and confront it.
Mr. Jekielek: Peter, I have one more question. I recently saw in Politico this idea that the CCP is trying to help former President Trump get reelected. How do you react to that?
Mr. Schweizer: I don’t find that very credible and that’s an example of disinformation. Look, the bottom line is that Joe Biden has essentially given the CCP everything that they want. It’s not to say that Trump was perfect in his approach towards China, but there were so many things that he did that were disruptive to their efforts. He was able to vocalize what a lot of people feel about the threat. I don’t give that idea any credence whatsoever.
All you have to do is look at the results of what the policy prescriptions that Joe Biden has given them—he’s given them what they want. He’s given them big help with a little bad mouth. Donald Trump has certainly challenged them,in very important and significant ways.
Mr. Jekielek: Trump made the first real challenge to this engagement with China philosophy of the Kissinger school that has dominated the whole U.S. establishment for decades now.
Mr. Schweizer: Yes, that’s right. Now, it is the minority view. Trump’s election and his administration’s policies on that front have really changed. The conversation. The statements of Graham Allison or the worldview of Henry Kissinger are no longer the consensus view among the American general population. However, it is among American elites, because they profit from that kind of arrangement. But with the broader public, there is a lot more skepticism about the CCP. That is a good and healthy thing.
Mr. Jekielek: Peter Schweizer, it’s such a pleasure to have you on the show.
Mr. Schweizer: Thanks so much for having me. I really enjoyed the conversation.
Mr. Jekielek: Thank you all for joining Peter Schweizer and me on this episode of American Thought Leaders. I’m your host, Jan Jekielek.
https://jme.bmj.com/content/50/4/246
Covering up evidence of vaccines’ dangers
As parents’ concerns gained traction in the mid-90s, public health institutions launched their own research into the connection between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or ADHD — studies that would become the basis for denying a link between vaccines and autism.
In 1999, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concluded a risk assessment of thimerosal in vaccines and found no “evidence of harm.” Yet, despite those findings, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the CDC issued a statement calling for thimerosal to be removed from vaccines “as soon as possible.”
By the end of 2001, thimerosal could no longer be used in vaccines administered to children under age 6, except for the flu vaccine — although vaccines already produced with thimerosal stayed on the shelves.
The Institute of Medicine also published a series of reports, finalized in 2004, that purported to survey the scientific literature and found the evidence favored “a rejection of the claim of a causal relationship” between thimerosal-containing vaccines or MMR vaccines and autism.
However, while those studies were ongoing, in 2000, the CDC brought together vaccine makers and the public health officials who regulate, mandate and distribute vaccines behind closed doors at the Simpsonwood Retreat and Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia.
Transcripts from the Simpsonwood meeting revealed they discussed a link between mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines and brain injuries, including autism, and debated strategies for keeping the information from the public.
The CDC in 2004 published a study in Pediatrics finding no risk of autism from the MMR vaccine. Ten years later, a CDC senior scientist, Dr. William Thompson, invoked federal whistleblower status to release the raw data sets that he said the CDC ordered him to conceal.
That data showed that African American boys who received the MMR vaccine before age 3, as the CDC recommends – were 3.36 times more likely to receive an autism diagnosis than those who received the vaccine after 3 years of age.
How the ‘vaccine court’ fails parents and children with autism
More ←
America Works. DEI Doesn’t.
My community may be on the bottom of society, but the power of American principles and America’s promise are equally ours
by
Corey Brooks
January 16, 2024
Pastor Corey Brooks camped on the roof of an abandoned motel across from his church to protest the violence on the South Side of Chicago and raise money to build a community center, Dec. 14, 2011
MIRA OBERMAN/AFP via Getty Images
When I step out of my church on Chicago’s South Side onto King Drive, I can see the infamous and massive Parkway Gardens—Michelle Obama’s first home before it became a dilapidated housing project. Behind the projects is an elementary school where only 4% of the kids are proficient in math and 6% in English. The nearby Walgreens and McDonald’s fled not too long ago, leaving us with no pharmacy, fewer jobs, and two boarded-up, graffitied buildings. Few people own their homes. Gangs control the streets. And nearly everybody I see on the street has had a family member shot.
More ←
The Covid-19 vaccine: The true fallout
Reading time: 13 minutes
Brian Hooker, a bioengineer and chemist who holds a PhD from Washington University, teamed up with Robert F. Kennedy Jr to scour the science and uncover all the well-controlled studies comparing the incidence of heart problems and more between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Here’s what they discovered, as adapted from their new book Vax-Unvax
At this writing, only 69.4 percent of the US populace is “fully vaccinated” for Covid-19 (without accounting for boosters),1 despite billions of dollars in advertising, systematic media propaganda, incentives, coercive measures, mandates and numerous photo ops of government officials and celebrities receiving the shot.
The FDA authorized Pfizer’s BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the US starting December 10, 2020. Other Covid-19 vaccines distributed in the US under EUA include the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, the Johnson & Johnson Janssen vaccine, and the Novavax Nuvaxovid and Covovax vaccines. Full FDA approval was given to Pfizer (Comirnaty) and Moderna (Spikevax) vaccines.
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are based on mRNA technology, Novavax vaccines are based on recombinant protein technology and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is based on human adenovirus technology. As of May 7, 2023, the Johnson & Johnson Janssen vaccine is no longer available in the US.
In Europe, the Oxford-AstraZeneca AZD1222 vaccine is based on the modified chimpanzee adenovirus ChAdOx1; and in China, the Sinovac CoronaVac vaccine is an inactivated virus vaccine.
Fallout of the Covid vaccines
Officials have distributed Covid-19 vaccines in the US for approximately 30 months, as of this writing, and the rates of adverse events are extremely high. Medical personnel and patients have reported just over 951,000 adverse events for the vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Novavax) in the US alone.2
In fact, in three years, Covid-19 shots have caused 97 percent of all adverse events reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) since the introduction of this program in 1986. The media is now beginning to acknowledge certain adverse events, albeit with the obligatory disclaimer regarding how “rare” vaccine injuries are.
Before the pandemic, we began searching for publications in which researchers studied the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations among all the common vaccines given. We have so far identified over 100 peer-reviewed articles from open, peer-reviewed, scientific and medical literature.
In addition, many other research papers support the conclusions of these studies.3 Our book Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak is a compendium of these studies.
We also included relevant research studies published by other reputable sources. We then summarized each of the “vax vs unvax” studies and included bar graphs that illustrate the most pertinent results for each of the different vaccines and vaccine components.
Many researchers have published studies investigating links between different types of Covid-19 vaccines and serious adverse events including myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), pericarditis (inflammation of the fluid sac surrounding the heart), blood-clotting disorders, shingles (a reactivation of the chickenpox virus in adulthood), hearing loss, hospitalizations and death.
In this case, we were also able to find numerous credible studies of vaccinated vs unvaccinated individuals.
Here, then, is a summary of the most common side effects we found in this comprehensive list of the best studies of the Covid jab where investigators directly compared vaccinated individuals to unvaccinated controls.
Most common adverse events
Bell’s palsy
Bell’s palsy is a neurological disorder that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the face. Facial paralysis can vary from patient to patient and can be mild or severe.
Patients typically recover some or all of their facial functions within a few weeks to six months. However, facial weakness and paralysis can be permanent.
Most often, practitioners reported the onset of facial nerve palsy three to four days following mRNA vaccination. Patients who received Pfizer’s vaccine showed the highest incidence of Bell’s palsy compared to all other vaccines reported in VAERS.4
In Hong Kong, Dr Eric Yuk Fai Wan, affiliated with the Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research at the University of Hong Kong, published a study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases in 2022 using patient data from the Hong Kong Covid-19 Vaccine Adverse Event Online Reporting system.
Patients receiving Pfizer’s vaccine had a 75 percent higher risk, and those receiving the Chinese CoronaVac mRNA vaccine were nearly two and a half times more likely to develop Bell’s palsy than unvaccinated patients (see graph, below left).5
These kinds of results also appeared in Israel. Dr Rana Shibli at Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, and his team retrieved data on the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccination from December 2020 through April 2021, and on the incidence of Bell’s palsy, from the database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel, which included over 2.5 million vaccine recipients.6
They compared the number of observed cases of Bell’s palsy that occurred within 21 days after the first vaccine dose and within 30 days after the second dose to expected cases, based on 2019 rates. The study, published in The Lancet Regional Health—Europe, concluded that the first vaccine dose was associated with a 36 percent higher risk of Bell’s palsy.
But the risk increased with age, particularly among women. Women aged 45–64 showed a 71 percent higher risk, and those aged 65 or above were two and a half times more likely to develop the palsy. There also appeared to be an increased risk with the second jab.
In a 2023 study, Dr Wan and his team at the University of Hong Kong used data from population-based electronic health records of individuals 16 years or older in Hong Kong to assess the diagnosis of Bell’s palsy in hospitalized patients within 28 days of receiving the Pfizer Covid vaccine between March 2021 and July 2021.7
Vaccination with the Pfizer shot (first or second dose) yielded more than one and a half times the incidence of a Bell’s palsy diagnosis. But the scientists also found the odds of being diagnosed more than doubled during the first 14 days after the second dose (see graph, below right).
Overall, in a study published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Dr Kenichiro Sato and his team at the University of Tokyo found an 84 percent higher risk of Bell’s palsy following the Pfizer vaccine, compared to the unvaccinated, and a 54 percent higher risk after any mRNA vaccine.4
Heart problems
Myocarditis is a severe illness indicating damage to the myocardium (heart muscle). Young adult men are at the highest risk, although women may also develop myocarditis. Almost 20 percent of all sudden deaths in young people are due to myocarditis. The survival rate for myocarditis is 80 percent after one year and 50 percent after five years.8
A 2021 study by Dr Min Seo Kim at Korea University in Seoul compared cardiac adverse events from the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine to those from flu vaccines using the World Health Organization’s VigiBase for adverse events.9
Overall, individuals receiving Covid-19 mRNA vaccines showed a 12.72 times higher incidence of cardiac hypertensive crisis (a sudden, dangerous rise in blood pressure) and a 7.94 times higher incidence of supraventricular tachycardia (an abnormally fast or irregular heartbeat in the upper heart chambers) than those receiving the flu vaccine (see graph, below left).
Other research has focused on sex or particular age groups. For instance, Dr Francisco Taz Tsun Lai and his team at the Hong Kong-based Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research looked at the Pfizer shot given to adolescents aged 12–18.10 Those who received the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine had a 9.15 times greater risk of myocarditis compared to unvaccinated adolescents.
But the statistics leapt up with the second jab. Those who received the second dose had a 29.61 times greater risk of myocarditis compared to unvaccinated adolescents within 28 days of vaccination (see graph, below right). After their second dose of the Pfizer vaccine, they had a 2.06 times greater risk of sleep disturbances/disorders compared to unvaccinated adolescents.
Norwegian research backed up these results. In a study published in JAMA Cardiology in 2022, Dr Øystein Karlstad and his team at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health examined more than 23 million Nordic country residents aged 12 and older.11
Researchers observed the highest risk in boys and men aged 16–24. After the second Moderna mRNA vaccine dose, the rate of myocarditis was 13.83 times higher than in the corresponding unvaccinated group, and after the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, it was 5.31 times as high (see graph, below left).
Britain showed the same results. Researchers from the Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Services in Oxford examined individuals in England aged 13 and older for disease incidence before and after Covid-19 vaccination.12
Men receiving the second dose of the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine showed the highest levels of myocarditis—almost 15 times more men developed it after the vaccine than after a Covid infection.
And in America, a 2022 study by Dr Anthony Simone at the Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center examined all Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients who received one to three doses of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines between December 14, 2020, and February 18, 2022.13 It found the risk of myocarditis within seven days of the second vaccine was 10.23 times higher than in the baseline period, and the risk of myocarditis within seven days of the third vaccine (booster) was 6.08 times higher than in the baseline period (see graph, below right).
To establish the “baseline period,” the researchers examined the incidence of myocarditis among the patients one to two years before the first dose of Covid vaccine. This study showed the second and third jabs had the greatest effect: no statistically significant risk was associated with the first dose.
In Hong Kong, the focus of heart issues was with the Pfizer jab and hospitalized patients. Researchers from the University of Hong Kong looked at 160 hospitalized patients aged 12 and older in Hong Kong given the Pfizer jab from February to August 2021 with carditis (heart inflammation) and elevated troponin levels (indicating a heart attack has occurred).14 Compared with 1,533 control unvaccinated patients, the vaccine recipients had 3.57 times greater odds of carditis than unvaccinated patients.
And for male vaccine recipients, the odds were 4.68 times greater. Once again, the risk was found to be higher after the second dose of the Pfizer jab than after the first.
In Israel, a study of Israeli Ministry of Health data published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that the incidence of myocarditis within 30 days after the second dose of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was 2.35 times higher than in unvaccinated people, and highest among boys aged 16–19 years at 8.96 cases per 10,857, or roughly one in 1,000 (see graph, below left).15
The researchers determined that the rate of myocarditis in the general unvaccinated population was one in 10,857, making the incidence among the adolescent boys nearly nine times higher.
Meanwhile, in Italy, researchers from the National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità in Rome tracked myocarditis and pericarditis in teenagers from age 12 and in adults up to age 39 after receiving mRNA vaccines and published their findings in PLOS Medicine in 2022.16
In the study, boys and men receiving the first or second dose of the Moderna mRNA vaccine had approximately a 12 times greater risk of myocarditis or pericarditis within seven days of vaccination than at any time between December 27, 2020, and September 30, 2021, other than during the 21 days after their first or second dose.
And in California, a team of scientists from Kaiser Permanente Northern California and the CDC looked at participants from eight integrated healthcare delivery systems in the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink. It found a significantly greater risk of myocarditis or pericarditis within seven days after participants received the first or second dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines than within the baseline period of the study from December 14, 2020 to January 15, 2022, before they received a shot (see graph, below right).17
Investigators showed that myocarditis or pericarditis was significantly associated with Covid-19 vaccination in eight different studies identified.18
Thrombocytopenia and thrombosis
Thrombocytopenia is a deficiency of platelets in circulating blood and can lead to spontaneous bleeding. Cerebral venous thrombosis occurs when a blood clot blocks blood flow away from the brain and can be a cause of stroke.
Studies have linked these illnesses with Covid-19 vaccines as well.
The prestigious journal Nature Medicine published a British study carried out by researchers affiliated with Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand and the Usher Institute at the University of Edinburgh.19 It included more than 2.5 million people over age 18 in Scotland who were vaccinated between December 2020 and April 2021, this time with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.
That shot was associated with a 5.77 times higher risk of thrombocytopenic purpura (an autoimmune clotting disorder), an increased relative risk of arterial blood clots and an increased relative risk of excessive bleeding anytime in the first 27 days after the shot (see graph, below, top left).
Nordic countries offered evidence of a similar scenario. Dr Jacob Dag Berild at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health studied the effects of three Covid vaccines (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna) in Norway, Finland and Denmark.20
The team examined hospital registries from the three Nordic countries to measure the incidence of thrombocytopenia and cerebral venous thrombosis (blood clots in the brain) within 28 days following these vaccines.
They observed the highest risks for patients receiving the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine, with a 4.29 times higher risk of thrombocytopenia and a 12.04 times higher risk of cerebral venous thrombosis within 28 days after the shots (see graph, below, bottom left).
Shingles
Another side effect linked to the Covid jabs, according to the research, is shingles, a painful, sometimes serious condition resulting from the reactivation of the herpes zoster virus that causes chickenpox. Anyone who’s had chicken pox or the varicella vaccine may be at risk of this reactivation when their immune system is compromised or suppressed.
Dr Wan and his team at the University of Hong Kong examined patients who’d been hospitalized for shingles after receiving the Chinese CoronaVac or the Pfizer jab.21
The study, published in The Lancet Regional Health—Western Pacific, revealed that patients who received the Pfizer vaccine were more than five times more likely to develop shingles in the first 27 days after the first shot (see graph, below, bottom right), while those who’d received CoronaVac were 2.67 times more likely to contract shingles after 13 days.
Hearing loss
Besides shingles, many of those receiving the Pfizer vaccine experienced sudden loss of hearing. Patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss can experience tinnitus. It can also lead to permanent hearing loss.
Dr Yoav Yanir from Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, published findings in JAMA Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery showing that the first and second doses of the Pfizer shot led to 35 percent and 23 percent higher risks of sudden hearing loss respectively (see graph, below, top right).22
Risks were greatest, 92 percent higher, after the first dose in girls and women aged 16 to 44 and were 68 percent higher in women older than 65. In boys and men of the same ages, the greatest risk occurred after the second dose, making them nearly two and a half times more likely to lose their hearing.
Covid-19 vaccines vs flu vaccines
Many side effects unique to the Covid vaccines are shown in bold relief when you compare the incidence of these effects to those of standard flu vaccines.
In a German study published in Frontiers in Public Health, Dr Diego Montano at the University of Tubingen in Germany compared adverse events reports from EudraVigilance (European Database of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions) and VAERS for Covid-19 and flu vaccines.23 These were then adjusted to account for the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) estimates of the total number of each type of vaccine administered.
Death, hospitalization and life-threatening reaction reports per unit of Covid-19 vaccine given far eclipsed those for the influenza vaccine (see graph, below, top right). The authors also reported significant relative risks of thrombosis, coagulation and sexual organ reactions associated with Covid-19 vaccines.
Adverse events in the elderly
These adverse events and others also show up in those over age 65. An FDA-sponsored prospective study tracked US Medicaid claims data for over 30 million patients aged 65 and older from December 2020 through January 2022.24
Weekly sequential testing revealed four outcomes that stood out enough to raise alarm following Pfizer vaccination compared to pre-Covid-19 vaccine historic levels: pulmonary embolism (blood clot in the lungs), with a risk 54 percent higher than before vaccination between one and 28 days after vaccination; acute heart attack, with a risk 42 percent higher; and abnormal blood clotting throughout the body, with a risk 91 percent higher (see graph, below, bottom).
Immune thrombocytopenia (low blood platelets due to autoimmune attack) showed a risk 44 percent higher than before vaccination for up to 42 days after vaccination.
Serious adverse events
Other studies directly compared vaccine recipients to placebo control recipients, notably one published in Vaccine by a senior editor of The BMJ at the University of Maryland and a scientist from the Thibodaux Regional Health System in Louisiana. It used data from the phase 3 clinical trials for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.25
This time the researchers were looking for serious adverse events as follows:
Death, life-threatening at the time of the event
Inpatient hospitalization, or prolongation of existing hospitalization
Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
A congenital anomaly/birth defect
A medically important event based on medical judgment
The Pfizer vaccine showed a 36 percent higher risk of serious adverse events, while those who received the Moderna jab showed a 6 percent higher risk (see graph, below, top left). Overall, recipients of either of the mRNA vaccines had a 1.16 times greater risk of serious adverse events compared to unvaccinated controls. The result was marginally statistically significant.
But other data emerged that was even more interesting. The study authors also completed a risk-benefit assessment of both vaccines. They found that the Pfizer vaccine showed an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 per 10,000 vaccinees while preventing Covid-19 hospitalizations in 2.3 per 10,000 vaccinees compared to the placebo group.
In other words, you are about five times more likely to have a reaction to the Pfizer shot than to prevent a reaction to Covid-19 serious enough to land you in the hospital.
Likewise, the Moderna vaccine showed an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinees while preventing Covid-19 hospitalizations in 6.4 per 10,000 vaccinees compared to the placebo group.
Again, the risk of a serious side effect from the Moderna shot was more than double the protective effect of the shot.
Why aren’t the necessary studies being conducted?
One reason regulators give to dismiss a more rigorous approach in studying the long-term health effects of any shots in the childhood and adult vaccination schedule is that vaccine adverse events are “one-in-a-million,” and thus we should stop promoting fear of vaccine injury. The government derives its one-in-a million figure by comparing the number of compensated vaccine injuries by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) to the total number of vaccines given in the US.
Unfortunately, most vaccine-injured people don’t even know the NVICP exists, and even fewer get compensated. The Lazarus study, carried out by Ross Lazarus of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, which the CDC funded and then abandoned—likely because the agency didn’t like the results—stands in stark contrast to the one-in-a-million figure.
Specifically, researchers in the Lazarus study found the rate of adverse events was one in 3,823 among a population of about 375,000 individuals given 1.4 million routine vaccines.1
Over the three-year study period, that translated to a one in 10 chance of experiencing an adverse reaction to a vaccine, a far cry from the mythical “one-in-a-million” rhetoric touted by the pharmaceutical industry and government health agencies. The Lazarus study suggests that federal officials and the pharmaceutical industry must pay urgent attention to this astronomical rate of adverse events.
Still, the CDC and FDA steadfastly refuse to study health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations.
Public health experts assert they can’t feasibly do so because it would be unethical to complete a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) in which researchers withhold lifesaving vaccines from a blinded placebo control group.2 Their argument is a sham. Pharmaceutical companies typically use this method during the FDA approval process to test new drugs or biologics when no comparable treatment exists.
For example, the FDA requires randomized controlled clinical studies for certain cancer treatments,3 heart medications4 and respiratory drugs,5 and no one appears to question the ethics of withholding potentially lifesaving remedies from blinded placebo control groups. It is, in fact, standard practice.
Furthermore, researchers can complete many other types of analyses besides RCTs using existing populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated children and adults. According to the Cochrane Collaboration, an international organization that examines the evidence for individual medical drugs and procedures, these analyses produce results equal in reliability.6
These include analyses that are prospective (looking at health effects in the future) or retrospective (looking at past medical data and history).
Adapted from Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Brian Hooker (Skyhorse Publishing, 2023)
Resources
See Healthy shopping: Supplements for Covid vaccine injury for useful supplements and resources for those suffering from Covid vaccine side effects.
1. Larry, could you please start by sharing a bit about your background and what led you to become an advocate for vaccine choice and natural health?
In 2005 I published my book, The Beginner’s Guide to Natural Living, which is an overview of the many topics related to how to live a healthy lifestyle, like why to eat organic food, which supplements to take, detoxification, the suppression of natural medicine modalities, why to choose natural remedies, and so, so much more. That led to co-writing a book in 2006, Victory Over ADHD (no longer in print), where my research led me to understanding how vaccines cause autism, with mercury being a primary culprit. I used my video film background to interview parents and doctors about how vaccines cause autism, recovery of autism through detoxification and other methods, among other video interviews.
In 2015 California Senator Richard Pan introduced SB277, a vaccine mandate bill for school children, which would take away all exemption opportunities except medical, and I just KNEW that was the beginning of adult vaccine mandates, so I got involved. I crowdfunded $10,000 to video interview parents who had vaccine injured children in order to raise awareness about the harms that vaccines cause and also created a website called Stop Mandatory Vaccination (www.StopMandatoryVaccination.com) to give the many, many reasons why vaccines should not be forced onto the population.
I also created a Stop Mandatory Vaccination Facebook Page and Facebook group. By early 2019 the Facebook Page was reaching 2 million to 7 million people per month and my Facebook group had over 160,000 members and we were adding 300 to 500 parents per day to the group. The Facebook Group became extremely popular with parents who would ask questions about vaccines, get very intelligent answers, and say they would never vaccinate again, or never start.
Around this same time mainstream media finally got involved – from all over the world – and started to run hit pieces on me and the Facebook Group, demanding that it be shut down. After hundreds of hit pieces, California Congressman Adam Schiff sent a letter to both Amazon and Facebook in February of 2019 demanding that we (anti-vaxxers) be removed from their platforms. In March 2019 Facebook censored my reach to just 5% and censored my group as well, and Amazon removed numerous documentaries and books that challenged the vaccine narrative.
In November of 2020 Facebook banned me entirely and shut down my Facebook Group and Facebook Page. Twitter banned me two hours later. Instagram, MailChimp, GoFundMe, Pinterest, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, Vimeo and other platforms would ban me in the following months. In early 2023 Twitter (now X) reinstated my account.
2. Over the years, how have you seen the landscape of vaccine advocacy and opposition evolve?
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC.org) has been around for decades, educating parents and politicians about vaccines, usually taking a middle of the road approach to be “safe” and retain their non-profit status. In 2015 and especially in 2016 when more States got involved with introducing vaccine mandate laws, more people got involved. When the Plandemic hit in 2020 we were in full swing everywhere warning people about the dangers of vaccines, but it wouldn’t be until around a year after the COVID vaccine rollout – combined with freedom of speech on X – that a LOT more people would start speaking up because of the massive amount of death and injury the COVID vaccine had caused and continues to cause. Many people who were pro-vaccine prior to COVID went anti-vaccine once they starting to see all the death and destruction caused by the COVID shot (mostly on X).
3. In your experience, what are the main reasons parents decide to opt out of vaccinating their children?
In the beginning, say 5 years ago, the big reason would be risk of vaccine injury. However, now that more information has seeped into the marketplace with books, documentaries, websites, etc., the reason would now be the understanding that vaccines do not confer immunity (e.g., they do not work), that they never saved us from diseases (death had already dramatically dropped prior to vaccines) and then of course, risk of vaccine injury.
Parents are now aware of other parents who have both vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and their stories are always the same: the unvaccinated kids reach milestones sooner, are sick less often, get over illnesses faster, and don’t suffer from chronic health ailments like asthma, allergies, eczema, seizures, autoimmune disorders, autism and other ailments like the vaccinated siblings do. Several small-scale studies say the same thing: the unvaccinated are healthier. The CDC will never do a vax vs unvax health outcomes study and publish the true finding because if they ever did, all parents would immediately stop vaccinating. I discuss these studies and findings in Lesson 1 of my free online course for parents, How To Raise Healthy Vaccine Free Children.
4. You’ve mentioned using hyperbaric oxygen treatment for vaccine injuries. Can you explain how this therapy works and the types of conditions it helps with?
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is the process of laying or sitting inside a pressurized chamber for one hour to two hours per session to “squeeze” ambient oxygen into the cells, which in turn will help improve healing at all levels since oxygen is required for all metabolic action. Hard chamber hyperbaric treatment pressurizes a hard chamber up to 3 times more atmospheric pressure than normal atmospheric pressure and a soft chamber mild hyperbaric oxygen treatment pressurizes 1.3 to 1.5 times normal atmospheric pressure (ATA).
Hard chamber higher pressure hyperbaric oxygen treatment (usually 2.0 ATA or higher) is very useful for wound healing, like for a diabetic foot that may need to be amputated if it is not quickly healed, or when divers surface too quickly and need to be pressurized again to reduce potential problems. Depending on the facility and the chamber, pure oxygen may also be added to the chamber to increase oxygen levels even more. Hard chamber treatments are often priced between $250 and $350 per session, depending on where one lives, and the type of chamber being used.
I give a full overview on my website about Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment right here:
Try Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment for Autism, Vax Injury, Brain Injury, Wounds & More
5. Regarding heavy metal detox, what are the typical symptoms you see that suggest someone might benefit from this treatment?
I’ve been recommending a zeolite-based heavy metal detox spray to my audience for over four years now and some of the biggest improvements are seen in children, especially as better neurological function, better bowel movements, and the clearing of skin issues, like eczema. Children who were nonverbal have sometimes started to talk within days of use, or weeks of use. Or speech has exploded. For adults, the clearing of brain fog, better sleep, less agitation, better skin, ending of fibromyalgia, and more have been reported.
The zeolite detox spray I recommend is nano sized, cleaned, remineralized, and suspended in water molecules so it can go throughout the entire body, exchanging a negative charged mineral ion for a positively charged heavy metal ion. The cage like structure locks onto the heavy metal ion and it is out of the body in 4 to 6 hours. It’s especially good for vaccine injured children and children on the autism spectrum. I have a lot of testimonials and an overview of how it works, right here: Heavy Metal Detox.
6. What impact has your work and stance on vaccination had on your personal relationships, particularly with family and friends?
Not much, really. Some close friends decided not to vaccinate their two children and they have incredibly healthy kids because of that choice. There’s been minimal impact – certainly nothing that affects me.
7. If you could go back in time, what are some things you would do differently in your advocacy or personal health decisions?
I was vaccine injured as a baby – I stopped talking at 18 months and didn’t start talking again until 3 years of age. My parents never figured out I was vaccine injured. I figured it out after being an anti-vaccine activist for a couple of years and then asked my audience if they had ever vaccinated at 18 months had the same thing happen. Lots of parents said yes. I must say, once I figured out I was vaccine injured, a lot of my life made sense. I never got vaccines in my adult life. While I was active on Facebook and putting in 60 hours every week I just KNEW time was of the essence so I pushed myself all the time and I am glad I did. No one knows for sure, but there is plenty of circumstantial evidence to suggest that my work has helped to ensure tens of thousands of newborns will never be vaccinated, and that makes me very happy. I have no regrets (that I had control of) – if I could go back in time and NOT be vaccinated as a baby, I would choose that in a split second.
8. From your perspective, what have been the most effective ways to educate people, and “wake them up” about the risks associated with vaccines?
I always went after the fence sitters – the parents who were not sure. I try to approach my advocacy about natural immunity first – that it is superior to vaccination – and then dive into why vaccines don’t work, and then talk about vaccine injuries last. After many years of watching the various questions come into my Facebook Group from parents, and also doing my own questionnaire for parents in the group, I created a 12-lesson course for parents that is in an actual sequential order of information I believe parents need to understand. I start with natural immunity and go from there. The free online course is called, How To Raise Healthy Vaccine Free Children.
9. Are there any books or documentaries that you have found particularly impactful in helping people understand the vaccine debate?
Yes, absolutely. I own over 25 books on this topic. My top recommendations for parents are to watch both Vaxxed I and Vaxxed II: Vaxxed I is about the CDC coverup of its own findings that the MMR vaccine causes autism, and Vaxxed II is about vaccine injury with a lot of parent interviews. Then I recommend every parent read Vaccines – A Reappraisal by Dr. Richard Moskowitz, who has 50 years’ experience as a doctor. This is the very best first book for parents, in my opinion. And, I also recommend every parent purchase The Unvaccinated Treatment Guide which is a natural remedy book for children written by two Naturopathic Doctors. I discuss these resources a couple more on my web page entitled, Here Are Some Specific Resources To Help Your Loved One Decide Not To Vaccinate.
10. How do you handle the criticism and opposition from mainstream media and other institutions?
I don’t worry about it at all. If someone were to Google my name, “Larry Cook vaccines,” they would find hundreds of mainstream hit pieces on me, from all over the world. I don’t care. I’m on the right side of history and I know I am on the right side of history. The healthy, unvaccinated children are my proof, as are the vaccine injured children.
11. In the face of legal and social pressures, how do you advise parents who are hesitant about vaccinating their children?
Parents have so, so many questions on so many different topics related to vaccines, but in short, I try to use succinct overviews and then lead them to my other resources.
Vaccines do not confer immunity, natural immunity is better, and vaccines always cause some harm, and can cause a lot of lifelong harm, like seizures, autism, or even death. For school, if an exemption is not possible, then home school or move to a freedom state. For friends and family pressure, the children and their health are much more important than other people’s opinions. And those other people, nor the pediatricians, will be there to take care of a vaccine in injured child.
12. You've talked about the "Deep State" in relation to vaccine mandates. Can you elaborate on how you believe this affects public health policy?
Parents in California shared with the Democrat legislators how their children were destroyed by vaccines. Lots, and lots, and lots of parents personally met with these Democrat legislators and shared extensive personal experience about the harm caused to their kids by vaccines, along with other information about how vaccines cause harm. Those Democrat legislators could have cared less and passed vaccine mandate bills anyway. Most of the Republican legislators listened to parents and opposed such legislation. The “Deep State” is the underworld controlling arm of Democrat legislators, and the RINOs too, and these elitists want every living creature force vaccinated across the globe. The Deep State pushes censorship initiatives so that we can’t talk about vaccine harm and why vaccines don’t work. Unless and until the Deep State is removed at a global level, the tyranny of vaccine mandates will continue to close in an everyone who believes in freedom. In reality, this is Good vs Evil – Spiritual Warfare.
13. As someone who has been banned from various platforms, how do you continue to spread your message and engage with your audience?
Mostly on X, but I have an email list as well. Sometimes I do interviews, like this one.
14. What are you currently focusing on in your work, and what are your goals for the near future?
I’d like to produce more videos on the topic but haven’t had the inspiration as to direction for those videos, yet. Mostly I post my opinions on X and grow my audience there.
15. For those interested in following your work or getting involved, how can they stay in touch and what platforms can they find you on?
I’m on X at @stopvaccinating and people can join my email list here:
Join My Email List & Backup Group | Stop Mandatory Vaccination
Thank you for the interview.
Larry Cook
About - Stop Mandatory Vaccination (substack.com)
Larry Cook (@stopvaccinating) / X (twitter.com)
Calling for safeguarding the rule of law, equity and an appropriate review process in the WHO law-making processes on pandemic preparedness and response
APRIL 2024
READ & SIGN THE OPEN LETTER
URGENT AND IMPORTANT FOR YOU!
READ WHY:
In late May of this year, it is planned for 194 Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) to vote on acceptance of two documents that, taken together, are intended to transform international public health and the way States interact when the Director General of WHO declares an emergency. These drafts, a Pandemic Agreement and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), are intended to be legally binding and govern the relationship between States and WHO.
Although they contain significant health, economic and human rights implications, they are still being negotiated by various committees less than two months prior to the intended vote. They have been developed with unusual haste, on the premise that there is a rapidly increasing urgency to mitigate pandemic risk.
While this urgency has now been shown to be contradicted by the data and citations on which WHO and other agencies have relied, the urgency persists. As a result, norms requiring specific review times have been put aside, inevitably undermining equity within the agreements by preventing States with less resources from having time to fully assess the implications for their own populations prior to voting.
This is an extremely poor and dangerous way to develop a legally binding international agreement or treaty. Now is the time to decelerate for the purpose of designing a coherent legal pandemic package instead of rapidly institutionalizing a confusing set of different legal regimes, overriding authorities and proliferation of competing global actors, as ill-advised in a recent public letter.
The Open Letter below calls upon WHO and Member States to extend the deadline for the adoption of the amendments to the International Health Regulations and a new Pandemic Agreement at the 77th WHA to safeguard the rule of law and equity.
Authored by David Bell, Silvia Behrendt, Amrei Muller, Thi Thuy Van Dinh & others
RESVERATROL and CANCER - New research, 4 papers reviewed and potential use in treating COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancer (p53, chemo resistance)
Papers Reviewed:
(2020 April, Berretta et al) - Resveratrol in Cancer Patients: From Bench to Bedside
(2022, April, Almatroodi) - Potential Therapeutic Targets of Resveratrol, a Plant Polyphenol, and Its Role in the Therapy of Various Types of Cancer
(2022 Nov, Jang et al) - Mechanism of Resveratrol-Induced Programmed Cell Death and New Drug Discovery against Cancer: A Review
(2023 Nov, Kursvietiene et al) - Anti-Cancer Properties of Resveratrol: A Focus on Its Impact on Mitochondrial Functions
Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel was stabbed by a young Muslim extremist in the middle of a church service in Sydney last Sunday. Immediately after the stabbing, the Bishop expressed his forgiveness for this young man.
In some media, Bishop Emmanuel was blamed for provoking this stabbing in comments he made about Islam, when comparing Islam to Christianity.
The attacker himself spoke of this motive straight after the attack:
Chilling footage taken moments after the teenager allegedly stabbed bishop Emmanuel shows the 16-year-old smiling and taunting a group of men attempting to pin him to the ground, while speaking in Arabic. Translated to English, the 16-year-old blamed the bishop for "getting involved in my religion".
"If he [the Bishop] didn’t get himself involved in my religion, if he hadn’t spoken about my prophet, I wouldn’t have come here," the teenager said, according to a translation reported by The Guardian.
"If he just spoke about his own religion, I wouldn’t have come." The teen then turns his face to the camera and flashes what's being described on social media as an "evil grin," prompting an enraged response from one of his captors heard in the video.
Freedom of speech means freedom to criticise others’ beliefs.
Australia’s esafety commissioner orders the attack video taken down.
Australia’s esafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, an American who was offered a place in the CIA but ultimately decided that censoring the internet would be a more useful thing to do with her life, ordered the video of Bishop Emmanuel’s stabbing to be taken down from X(twitter) around the world (not just in Australia).
In Monday evening in an urgent last-minute federal court hearing, the court ordered a two-day injunction against X to hide posts globally containing the footage of the alleged stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel on 15 April. The eSafety commissioner had previously directed X to remove the posts, but X had only blocked them from access in Australia pending a legal challenge.
Elon Musk disagrees
Elon Musk responded by taking the video down on Australian X(twitter) but not internationally, while also protesting strongly against this attempted violation of freedom of speech in Australia and pointing out that it is ludicrous to be asking X to censor the video in countries where Australia has no jurisdiction.
Musk tweeted, “If ANY country is allowed to censor content for ALL countries, which is what the Australian ‘eSafety Commissar’ is demanding, then what is to stop any country from controlling the entire Internet?” “We have already censored the content in question for Australia, pending legal appeal, and it is stored only on servers in the USA.”
But the Australian overlords want to censor everyone; the whole globe.
Well of course they should, the Australian government responded, saying in effect, we are the rightful overlords of earth, obey us you pathetic minions! — if we say something is misinformation, then you are not allowed to watch it, ants — you deserve to go to prison you pathetic bacteria if you disagree with us! <satire alert> — (i.e. this is not what they said, literally, but it is what they meant, I would argue.)
When you call someone a “gatekeeper,” you may think you’re saying something about that person, but people who know the true nature of gatekeeping hear something very different. Join James for this short, simple and powerful message detailing how you can defeat the only gatekeeper in the world once and for all.
The Underdog Mentality Is a Destroyer
Jon Rappoport
Apr 25, 2024
I’ve met many underdogs.
I tried to be one several times and failed.
I’m not talking about the person who does his best to fight his way out of a losing proposition and gain a foothold and handhold on life. I admire that guy.
I’m talking about career underdogs, who’ve reached the stage where they’re got that personality well shaped for themselves…and they’ve picked their favorite targets to blame for just about everything. That type of guy.
There are even celebrities with fame and fortune who are underdogs. They’re often Communists. They bleed or pretend to bleed for all underdogs everywhere—and their solution is GOVERNMENT.
Big-time, prime cut, Grade A government that runs things from the top down and actually bleeds the population dry. Like the old Soviet honchos. Killers.
The ultimate solution that’s going to make the world FAIR. Finally.
We’ve got a lot of Communists around these days. Biden is a puppet run by Communists. Wokies may as well be Communists, if they haven’t officially adopted that stance—since they’re too dumb to understand the Communist philosophy.
We’ve got egghead Communists running around in Silicon Valley. They think of themselves as Technocrats, but when you scratch that surface and find out what’s underneath, it’s Communism. The eggheads think of it as SCIENCE. And of course, they contemplate a future in which they’re sitting on top of the heap running the show. Running it with kindness. Uh-huh.
Education is partly to blame for the vast spread of Communism. American teachers and boards of education were, once upon a time, too stupid to realize they needed to TEACH Communism in schools. Teach it thoroughly. To let young people know what it was all about in theory and practice. That should have been a relentless campaign. No one should have been able to graduate high school without scoring an A on a rigorous exam—demonstrating they fully understood what was at stake, if America let Communism, in any of its forms, through the door.
The scumbags at the World Economic Forum are Communists. “You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy,” they say. Because they will be the only owners…of the means of production. They’ll decide who gets how much energy. They’ll decide the terms of having money. You can have a little, if you keep your nose clean and your mouth shut.
DEI is a Communist formulation. Everyone must be equal, even though everyone isn’t.
EVERYONE ISN’T. That should have been taught in schools. The plain truth.
Alberta’s Ongoing COVID-19 Review Looks at Whether Data Justified Lockdowns
Until recently, little was known about a group of Alberta doctors tasked by Premier Danielle Smith with reviewing how health data was used to inform decision-making during the pandemic.
The task force is led by Dr. Gary Davidson, who publicly questioned during the height of the pandemic how the government was using data to justify lockdowns.
Information about the task force came to light April 23 via documents obtained by the Globe and Mail. Ms. Smith answered reporter questions at the legislature later that day, defending the choice of Dr. Davidson to lead the review.
“I needed somebody who was going to look at everything that happened with some fresh eyes and maybe with a little bit of a contrarian perspective because we’ve only ever been given one perspective,” Ms. Smith said.
“I left it to [Dr. Davidson] to assemble the panel with the guidance that I would like to have a broad range of perspectives.”
The task force was formed in November 2022, shortly after Ms. Smith took office, and it’s due to submit its findings in May. Ms. Smith said the report will be made public. A separate review led by former Reform Party leader Preston Manning was published last year, and it aimed more broadly at Alberta’s pandemic response.
The task force led by Dr. Davidson is focused on how health data was used to inform Alberta’s response to the pandemic. Both Mr. Manning’s and Dr. Davidson’s reviews evaluate how Alberta should change its response to any future public emergencies.
Andrea Smith, press secretary for Alberta’s health minister, described in an email to The Epoch Times the guiding questions behind the current review.
Context, Interpretation of Data
“Was the right data being collected?” is one of them. Others relate to how the data was analyzed and interpreted, whether decision-makers had sufficient understanding of the data, and whether the data was corroborated by other sources or experiences.
Dr. Davidson was chief of emergency medicine at the Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre in 2021 when he expressed concern that his personal experience didn’t match the picture painted by publicly reported data.
A video of Dr. Davidson speaking at an event circulated online at the time, as reported by CBC.
He said in the video that health care problems started years before COVID-19 and had to do with funding and other factors. He talked about slow periods in the hospital at the height of the pandemic, and he said lulls in admissions were often followed by lockdowns. He claimed the government arranged it that way so it could credit lockdowns with lowering hospital admissions.
“As soon as the [admittance numbers] droop, we go into a lockdown so it looks like the lockdown fixed everything, and they’ve done this every time,” Dr. Davidson said in the video. “So you know that if you’re into one-and-a-half or two days of a droop, you’re going to have a lockdown. Because if it gets better, they ‘fixed it.’”
He said staff weren’t quitting because of being overloaded with an influx of COVID-19 patients. For instance, he said, a long-time nurse at his hospital quit because a colleague had allegedly called her a “waste of skin” for not getting vaccinated.
Alberta Health Services (AHS) said at the time that his claims about the data and the lockdowns were false.
“This physician’s opinions do not accurately reflect the COVID-19 pandemic, the AHS pandemic response, or the situation at Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre. In addition, they do a disservice to the incredible work our front-line teams do every day. It is disappointing that someone would spread misinformation about COVID-19 in this way,” AHS spokesperson Kerry Williamson told CBC at the time.
While Dr. Davidson has been critical of how the data was used, his task force was aimed at bringing together varying perspectives. For reasons unknown, however, some left the task force.
The Epoch Times sent inquiries to doctors who were previously members, but did not hear back as of publication. Among them are primary-care physician Ernst Greyvenstein and Chris Sarin, a medical officer of health with Indigenous Services Canada. Both were named by the Globe and Mail as former members of the task force and described as holding “more conventional views regarding the pandemic.”
The task force is currently comprised of only three doctors, including Dr. Davidson, according to the health ministry’s Ms. Smith. The other two members are anesthetist Blaine Achen and epidemiologist David Vickers, both of whom have been publicly critical of pandemic measures.
“The task force was designed to include up to 10 health professionals from diverse practice areas, including infectious disease, public health, general practice, acute care, immunology, analytics, and emergency medicine,” the ministry’s Ms. Smith said.
“Like every other jurisdiction in the world, Alberta had to develop and implement approaches to data management and decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic,” she said. “The aim of the task force is to review Alberta’s experience, alongside a jurisdictional scan, to position Alberta’s government to better manage any future pandemic.”
Comfort and Leisure Make You Very Wise
"communism is luxurious"
Apr 24, 2024
We’re testing a theory. And I mean we’re really testing it.
Karl Marx saw the stages of history advancing toward leisure and liberation, and he saw that coming emergence of comfort as a great gift for people whose lives were wasted in labor for the profit of others. “The saving of labor time [is] equal to an increase of free time, i.e. time for the full development of the individual,” he wrote. For Marx, the “true realm of freedom” followed the decline of work. “The shortening of the working-day is its basic prerequisite.”
The British writer Aaron Bastani drags Marx farther down that road:
With the arrival of communism any distinction between mental and physical labour would vanish, with work becoming more akin to play. This also meant a society with greater collective wealth, where all essential wants as well as creative desires are satisfied. Which is where luxury comes in. The concept, under conditions of scarcity, expresses that which is beyond utility, its essence an excess beyond the necessary. So as information, labour, energy and resources become permanently cheaper – and work and the limits of the old world are left behind – it turns out we don’t just satisfy all of our needs, but dissolve any boundary between the useful and the beautiful. Communism is luxurious – or it isn’t communism.
In Marxist theory, the lives of liberated workers become creative. Released from work, they work on themselves; they become healthier, wiser, productively free. See, for the clearest possible expression of the theory, this essay from an academic historian on “Radical Leisure”:
Circularly, the commons and the public sphere require adequate leisure. To restore a social world independent of the market and the workplace, and to keep the commons vital, we need the leisure time to inhabit the commons. We also need our communities to have time to be there with us—hanging on the porch chatting, shooting hoops at the rec center, jamming in the basement. In other words, we need both a vital cultural commons beyond the world of paid labor and we need a leisure ethic, a constant challenge to the very concept and valorization of work. A leisure ethic and the public commons depend on each other. And for both of these, collectivity is key. With the communal revalorization of leisure, by pushing back against the constant attempts of capital to encroach on work-free time and the unmonetized forms of everyday life and community, we take up the most foundational struggle, the struggle against work itself.
Leisure is self-development, education, strong community, open public spaces. When you sit on your ass, you turn smart. Also, if you had more free money, you would turn into Shakespeare:
So.
If the theory is correct, we must be living through a golden age — an astonishing burst of artistic and scientific achievement, a great explosion of disciplined literacy, and a radical expansion of personal health.
Also, at Columbia University, Ivy League undergraduates in keffiyehs and surgical masks are doing political interpretive dance with yarn.
Imagine how wise they’ll become when their student loans are forgiven, liberating their minds entirely.
Other important results of the survey include:
3.3X higher likelihood you’ll have 1 or more chronic diseases (OR 3.45 [95% CI: 3.02-3.96]). The one-sided p-value was 1.6e-78, something you don’t see very often. It basically means that this was not caused by random chance.
7X higher likelihood you’ll have 5 or more chronic conditions requiring treatment (drugs or therapies) (OR 7.03 [95% CI: 4.24-12.32]).
4X higher likelihood of a birth defect if the mother was vaccinated during the pregnancy (OR 4.31 [95% CI: 2.39-7.51]). That’s a huge effect. Nearly 80% of the birth defects are caused by the mother being vaccinated during pregnancy (actual value is 76.8%).
14.5X higher likelihood of sexual orientation/gender dysphoria issues in people under age 60 (OR 14.49 [95% CI: 2.33- 598.86]). This is a stunning result that isn’t discussed. Basically, 93% of the cases of sexual orientation issues are caused by vaccines.
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
One of the byproducts of the COVID-19 mass vaccination debacle has been a critical review of the routine childhood vaccination schedule and rates of chronic childhood diseases including allergies, asthma, need for tympanostomy tubes, epilepsy, attention deficit disorder, and autism spectrum disorder. While the exact cause of autism is not known, there are strong risk factors including older age of parents, siblings with autism, and febrile seizures occurring during childhood. I was delighted to meet Len and Cass Arcuri, young parents who are taking the time to learn and educate their followers:
“We're parents who became All-In Parents after our son’s autism diagnosis. We’ve been on our journey for over a decade and we know the challenges that parents can face. We navigated our son's journey from moderate/severe autism to now where he is thriving! We know how to overcome the challenges, roadblocks and blind spots parents face as they support their child. Personalized coaching support means that we support you as you need to be supported. Every child is different and every parent is different. Our goal is to set you up for success! We equip you with the insights, strategies and tools that fit YOUR needs. We have a unique set of skills that bring a holistic, functional and integrative approach to what we do.”
Please visit their website and enjoy our program.
BitChute Channel Name: Hick James, Cutting Through the Bullshit.
"Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9JiElXBt9kIG/
an interview with Dr John Campbell on YouTube .. talking about GMOs
.. and how all the regulators know .. and knew
Apr 23, 2024
good Substack folk,
.. I rarely spruik my interviews but this one is important because the GMO/Gene Therapy message and story has now started to reach a global audience since early this morning, Australia time, thanks to Dr John Campbell
we went for just over 1&1/2 hours so nearly all the issues were covered
the viewers numbers so far are extraordinary as too the many mounting comments
.. we should wonder how long YouTube will allow this to stay up
some references to people and issues discussed:
the various GMO legal opinions mentioned for the EU, UK, and US showing how regulators avoided assessing the GMOs, (in the EU, US (FDA), and Australia this was done illegally), for avoiding informing of the public, can be found HERE
original post (and many posts followed) by Kevin McKernan evidencing the DNA contamination HERE
preprint science paper by Kevin McKernan et al evidencing the DNA contamination and lab methods used HERE
preprint science paper by Dr David Speicher et al further evidencing the DNA contamination HERE
Dr Jessica Rose (a co-author of the above Speicher paper) has been undertaking relentless research into the Covid drugs .. this article is an interesting hypothesis needing further inquiry HERE
the several other labs about the globe that have confirmed the DNA contamination are detailed in the criminal brief presented to the Australian Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, available to download and read HERE
recent manuscript (Part 1 of 4) by Dr Lissa Johnson looking at Transhumanism and the abundance of evidence pointing to the Covid-19 drugs being a long-term Intelligence community plan-in-action, seen HERE
please share widely
Watch ←