COVID-19 Shots: Canada's Agreement with Pfizer
Pilot warns of airline industry disaster due to COVID-19 Vaccines
Pilot warns of airline industry disaster due to COVID-19 Vaccines
below…
It has been two years, three months, and twenty-four days (845 total days) since the administration of my employer, the University of Guelph, banned me from accessing my office and laboratory.
- B. Bridle -
COVID Chronicles is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscribe
The Canadian Independent (here are their links for YouTube, Substack, and Rumble) did a great job of obtaining a copy of Pfizer Canada’s Manufacturing and Supply Agreement that the Canadian government approved. Specifically, this is the agreement for Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot. It was just made public. Here is a PDF version…
Manufacturing And Supply Agreement With Pfizer Canada
2.01MB ∙ PDF file
I have not had a chance to read it over in detail because I am preparing to go to Bucharest, Romania, to testify in the Romanian parliament about ”Censorship Under the Guise of Public Health” as part of the International Crisis Summit 4. However, I do not want to delay its release to you. I welcome everyone to review it for themselves.
One section of text that was brought to my attention by BrightLight News was this…
"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known." - page 18 -
Of course, this does not surprise me nor will it surprise most readers. However, to see that the government signed off on this on October 26, 2020 caused me to reminisce about the public messaging with respect to this product. Right from the beginning, Health Canada claimed that they knew the product to be "safe and effective".
Notably, this disclaimer from Pfizer proved to be important because the effectiveness of the shots came nowhere close to meeting Health Canada’s definition of an ideal vaccine. Further, many adverse effects, including very serious ones (like myocarditis), were indeed discovered via the grand experiment that was conducted with the Canadian public. Plus, there are still-emerging safety signals (such as changes to the menstrual cycle and pathological vaginal bleeding in girls and women of all ages).
I'd love to see a representative for Health Canada try to defend their confident and never-ending regurgitation of the “safe and effective” mantra alongside the text quoted above, and to do so in the context of their apparent promotion of 'fully informed consent'.
Perhaps “the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known” and “there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known“ didn’t provide a great optic on consent forms, nor as a preface for mandates.
For example, Ontario, Canada’s consent form is here…
Covid 19 Vaccine Consent Form
174KB ∙ PDF file
It provides no information about the shots. Instead, it puts the onus on the recipient to educate themselves, should they choose to, as indicated in this text…
“I acknowledge that I have had the opportunity to ask questions regarding the vaccine I am receiving and have had them answered to my satisfaction.“
Many people didn’t know what questions to ask.
Most people providing answers lacked expertise in the complex fields of science underlying these shots.
Most people regurgitated answers based on their superficial understanding of what the textbook description of an ‘ideal vaccine’ is.
Many people providing answers disseminated misinformation.
It seems to me that the government of Canada threw the principle of informed consent out the window of the plane that the healthy ‘unvaccinated’ (many of whom had superior naturally acquired immunity) were not allowed on.
Are Canadians, regardless of their opinions of the COVID-19 shots, okay with ‘informed consent’ being disposed of?
Are those who took the shots okay with seeing with their own eyes that the government of Canada agreed to adopt the risks of unknown long-term effectiveness and unknown long-term safety on their behalf without telling them?
…and then to only use a highly flawed passive monitoring system that dramatically underestimates harms, especially those that are long-term?
Don’t worry Pfizer, we accept that the shots might prove to be crap in the long-term. We also know there is the possibility that bad things might happen to people. We’ll just seal this document behind closed doors so the public can’t see it (and hopefully won’t ask to see it) and then tell everyone that we have every confidence that the shots are ‘safe and effective’. We look forward to conducting our own nation-wide experiment in the context of our public rollout to test the long-term effectiveness and safety that used to be done in highly controlled clinical trials over a period of a decade or more. And if bad things do happen to anybody you can try to use this piece of paper in court to get off the hook and blame us so the taxpayers can pay for any problems that taxpayers experience. After all, Health Canada diligently serves the Canadian public who don’t provide us with our operating budget. Oh, and thank you, Pfizer, for your payments of half-a-million dollars per application that we review. How could we possibly look out for the best interests of Canadians if we didn’t have you paying us to do so?!?
- The government of Canada -
Pilot warns of airline industry disaster due to COVID-19 vaccines (Squawk 7700 Alerts up 386% in 2023)
NOV 16, 2023
Pilot warns of airline industry disaster due to COVID-19 Vaccines
By: Sally Beck
CAPTAIN Shane Murdock says the air industry is ‘poised on the precipice of disaster’. A pilot for more than 40 years and a qualified air accident investigator, he has found official data that back up his claim of impending global catastrophe. He adds: ‘When correlated, the data indicate there is an enormous problem that is having, and will have, a significant impact on aviation safety worldwide. There is enough evidence to be sending out red flags.’
There have been many tragedies this year. Phil Thomas, a young graduate of the Cadiz, Spain, flight training academy, fell ill and died suddenly in April. There were five pilot incapacitations in March including a British Airways pilot who collapsed and died in Cairo, Egypt not long before he was due to fly.
Pilots are super-fit, so why are so many dying suddenly or collapsing? Cpt Murdock concludes they are suffering severe adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccinations, which has myocarditis (heart inflammation), brain fog, insomnia, blood clots and anaphylaxis as side effects.
He thinks some pilots are ticking timebombs and claims many are not declaring ill-health. He said: ‘They are not reporting brain fog, heart flutters and dizzy spells because they don’t want to lose their jobs.’
Aviators have comprehensive annual health checks, or six-monthly if they have been ill. Rules state they can pass only with a less than 1 per cent chance of suffering an illness that could incapacitate them.
How are they passing medicals if they are suffering serious adverse reactions? Last year the global aviation regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), changed the electrocardiogram (ECG) markers that measure the ‘PR interval’. This is the time it takes for an electrical impulse to travel from one part of heart to another and is an indicator of heart health. The new limit is 50 per cent longer than the previous limit, and means that if a pilot has developed a heart condition, it could slip past.
It was November 15, 2020, when Australian airlines mandated Covid-19 vaccines for 900 pilots, and all air and ground crew. Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna were available in Australia.
Today is the third anniversary of that mandate and Cpt Murdock is one of 12 pilots who refused. He was sacked of course, accused of serious professional misconduct, a charge generally reserved for inappropriate sexual behaviour or reckless and dangerous behaviour.
Mr Murdock, 60, who lives near Sydney, Australia, flew as Captain for Virgin Australia for 20 years, and has held a licence since 1984. He also has an MSc in Aviation Human Factors, the science behind how humans interface with machines. He said: ‘Somewhere on the international network daily, you will find a plane has been turned back because of a health emergency. Either a passenger health emergency or crew health emergency.’
When pilots put out a mayday radio call to air traffic control, it is nicknamed a ‘squawk’. They use the code 7700 for all mayday calls which are reserved for serious incidents like pilot incapacitation or an uncontained fire on board. Few scenarios warrant a mayday; passengers and crew must face genuine peril.
There has been an unprecedented rise in the numbers of mayday calls as tracked by a bot set up by the X account @GCFlightAlerts. It posts when a pilot squawks 7700 anywhere in the world.
Between 2018, and 2019, the mayday average was 29.1 per cent of all distress calls. During 2022, mayday calls increased by 272 per cent. In the first three months of 2023, the increase was 386 per cent. The graph shows there was an instant, steep increase when the vaccines were mandated to pilots.
The average age of death in Australia during the pandemic was 85.3 years. The figures did not justify mandating vaccination to healthy, fit, pilots and implementing a no jab, no job policy. It even violated their own guidance: according to FAA rules, no pilot is allowed to take any type of medicine unless it has been approved and in use in the general population for 12 months. Pilots are forbidden to take part in drug trials and all Covid-19 vaccines were allowed under emergency use authorisation. The final phase of the trial finishes this year.
Cpt Murdock also looked at the number of multi-crew licenses issued by Australia’s regulator, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). They have the authority to impose restrictions on Airline Transport Pilot’s Licenses (APTL). A multi-crew license restricts pilots to operating with multiple crew members and is issued when their medical status shows a possibility that they may become incapacitated whilst flying. CASA monitors and administers medical certification and licensing for all Australian pilots. Freedom of information data shows there has been an unprecedented increase of 126 per cent on limitations.
You would think this would prompt a major review by CASA, but they will do nothing while Australia’s drug watchdog, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), still endorse Covid-19 vaccination for all. It is a revolving door avoiding responsibility that is familiar to those of us investigating vaccine issues.
Cpt Murdock thinks lack of action can have only one result, and bear in mind we have seen many planes make emergency landings because of pilot incapacitations. He is unequivocal and said: ‘Disasters will occur and both aircrew and the traveling public will die unnecessarily.’
My Take…
I reported the pilot deaths and incapacitations that are mentioned in this article.
I have a very thorough record of pilot incapacitations and deaths inflight for 2023, that I have been tracking on my substack and once we have enough data, I will be releasing comparisons of 2022 and 2023 pilot incapacitations, compared to the pre COVID-19 vaccine years.
Squawk codes are four-digit numbers used for communication between aircraft and air traffic control, allowing efficient communication during various situations related to safety and emergencies.
Squawk 7700 is an emergency code that indicates a serious issue onboard the aircraft. It may be due to technical, environmental or medical issues that results in an emergency situation.
It can be input by pilots or instructed by ATC, and it alerts controllers and ground crew to prepare for the arrival of the aircraft.
Other reserved squawk codes include 7500 for hijack situations and 7600 for lost communication with ATC. These codes provide easy notification to anyone monitoring the aircraft and allow ATC to provide the necessary assistance and priority services.