Duration of immune protection of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection against reinfection
More Science. Less $cience
Duration of immune protection of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection against reinfection
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.07.06.22277306v1
“Protection of natural infection against reinfection wanes and may diminish within a few years. Viral immune evasion accelerates this waning. Protection against severe reinfection remains very strong, with no evidence for waning, irrespective of variant, for over 14 months after primary infection.”
Effects of Previous Infection and Vaccination on Symptomatic Omicron Infections
“No notable differences were observed in the effectiveness against BA.1 and BA.2 of previous infection, vaccination, and hybrid immunity.”
NO Notable differences were observed in
Previous Infection (not vaccinated)
Vaccinated
Hybrid; both infected previously, and vaccinated
What does that tell you about the vaccine? I’ll tell you what it tells me…that it’s shit.
Then there are these:
So how does that happen? How do $cientists publish papers when also Con$ulting for Pharmaceutical giants?
Ghostwriters in the Scientific World
“The scientific world is facing a constant problem of ghostwriters. These ghostwriters are often attached to the medical publishing houses and are involved in writing an article for a pharmaceutical company which may, in turn, use the name of an established or a famous scientist as an author to the article. Often, such articles are published in well-known journals and are circulating widely. Many a time the adverse effects are overlooked in such papers. This will result in a corrupt practice of prescribing a drug which is not scientifically useful or may have life-threatening side effects. In this present article, the authors discuss this evil practice of ghostwriting in the context of the present day scientific publishing.”
Why would a big pharmaceutical need to pay Scientists to write favorably about their products?
could this be why:
The 10 Biggest Pfizer Lawsuits in Company History
Here’s a great example:
Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccines
Firstly it’s NIH sponsored, the organization who’s leader emailed Fauci early on when the lab leak news broke. News that almost everyone believes in now, including Fauci’s buddy Dr Brix. Fauci previously denied this under oath. His emails also revealed that he was well aware of it and that his organization even funded “gain of function” research through the Eco Alliance
His boss asked him to cover it all up with a well orchestrated propaganda campaign.
His email leak was well documented that funding was provided to Wuhan labs through the Eco Alliance. This is now common knowledge, except for everyone who’s glued to their TV only. Anything the NIH says is NOT independent. Here’s just one reason why:
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Shane Crotty has consulted for GSK, JP Morgan, Citi, Morgan Stanley, Avalia NZ, Nutcracker Therapeutics, University of California, California State Universities, United Airlines, and Roche. Alessandro Sette is a consultant for Gritstone Bio, Flow Pharma, ImmunoScape, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Avalia, Fortress, Repertoire, Gilead, Gerson Lehrman Group, RiverVest, MedaCorp, and Guggenheim.
They have no reason to write the way they do, even though third party independent research says otherwise, right?