Florida's Surgeon General warns against the new Covid Shot + A University of Pennsylvania Medical Student Sent me this Anonymous Note During the Pandemic
Are they trying to kill us?
How the media is ALL controlled ←
During the pandemic, I received hundreds, perhaps thousands of notes, this was one of them from an anonymous med student at UPenn. It is similar to dozens of others.
Let me outline some lessons
Universities failed to host debates. They held ~0 debates on school closure, lockdown, beach closure, masking toddlers, boosting young men even though that was harmful, etc. They capitulated to societal fear, and worried constantly about upsetting their donors. They largely failed to uphold their portion of the social contract. If I were a politician, I would gradually withdraw their tax exemptions and drain their endowments.
Students at universities were forced to get dose after dose of a vaccine that had no efficacy data in people who had COVID. A young man suffered net harm from boosters— given the 1 in 10k risk of myocarditis. Universities worked too closely with the Biden administration to uphold unethical, non-evidence based mandates.
Students were scared to speak freely b/c they worried their careers would be ruined. The UPenn community is not one that fosters intellectual freedom or diversity of thought. Honestly, given their recent press releases, it is clear that licensing patents to corporations (Novartis/ CART) is the primary goal— even though they are so stupid that they lost out on massive revenue and frankly accepted a bad deal.
Universities and journals will die in the next 50 years. Substack and podcasts will destroy them. They are too close minded and fearful of cancellation.
The student’s letter is excellent.
The other day, I had one of those Zoom meetings with a group of people - basically just to catch up - and it turned out to be a really interesting meeting for many reasons. I think our little group represents many, if not all, people scattered around the globe and so I thought it might be important to share some of the questions that popped up and some of the answers or ideas shared.
First of all, I would like to reiterate my sentiments concerning just how very confused I believe everybody is at this point in time. This is by design, in my opinion. Confused about what happened in the past 3 years. Confused about whether or not a zoonotic pathogen called SARS-CoV-2 ever circulated the globe. Confused about this pathogen being constructed by the hands of man. Confused about the validity of the so-called ‘PCR tests’. Confused about whether or not a cabal is trying to eliminate people deemed not worthy to be alive. Confused about how to proceed in this life; having lost businesses, loved ones, the ability to walk, the will to live, among other things.
Even though I still have no solid answer to some of the questions, in my own mind, I do know two things:
People’s lives have been destroyed/taken because of the measures taken to counter something the ‘leaders’ referred to as a zoonotic pathogen.
People continue to suffer because of their treacherous, ongoing and deliberate acts.
I want to go over some the evidences for and against some of the topics above, if I may. By the way, I think that even if you believe that the cabal is trying to kill you, it’s important to go ahead and fully accept that, but then take one step further past acceptance into, ‘bring it on’ territory.
Above all things, it is vital not to despair.
The past 3 years have brought things to all of our lives that none of us have seen before. Some of our elders have surely seen the signs of rising dictatorships scattered around the globe, but global lock ups and persecution of healthy people has no precedent. So why did they do this?
They claim they needed to do it to ‘keep us safe from a deadly pathogen’. They claim there was an emergency.
Fact: There was no pathogen that was deadly to all demographics. This was a manufactured and propagated lie. We knew this early on, as well. Children and people with functioning immune systems were fine. Bit of Vitamin D and some NAC, and off you go. In the infirm and elders, focused care should have been the protocol. Like always, the threat of secondary infections like bacterial pneumonia are always present in the infirm - especially in hospital settings when there is viral pathogen involvement, such as is the case with influenza.
So why did they lie? And why did so many people blindly believe the lie to the point where health care workers and home care workers just left their patients alone to die in many cases?
Answer: Fear of catching ‘the deadly pathogen’. Instilled and distilled like a fine wine of delusion.
Answer: To get the injections into every arm.
Does a pathogen named SARS-CoV-2 exist?
Unless the Genbank is completely farcical (and it might be), something named SARS-CoV-2 (aka: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1) certainly did exist.
Was this pathogen constructed by the hands of man?
I think it was. There’s the Moderna patent thing linked to Bancel and the MSH3 homology thing, the furin cleavage site thing and the “PRRARSV” motif thing, the cutting site thing, and the fact that we already knew that they were doing this kind of frakenwork using coronaviruses. Why wouldn’t they have been playing with newly-made spike studded coronaviruses under the guise of trying to make a new awesome vaccine against it to ‘protect the people’?
I have to ask, do these people ever think - like actually think - about the idiocy behind what must be their own thought processes? We have to make a deadly weapon because we heard they were making a deadly weapon and we have to defend ourselves against their deadly weapon by making our own deadly weapon.
This new pre-print pretty much summarizes my next article...
Jessica Rose
October 18, 2022
This new pre-print pretty much summarizes my next article...
There’s a new pre-print that came out on the BioRxiv pre-print server on October 14, 2022 entitled: “Role of spike in the pathogenic and antigenic behavior of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 Omicron”. A bunch of people at the National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories of the Boston University Level III lab did the lab work described in this article.
Read full story
The PCR ‘tests’. Don’t get me started. Forget the fact that PCR is simply an amplification technique, forget the fact that it is not, and never was, designed as a diagnostic tool, forget the fact that the primers they are using might not be sufficient, and forget the fact that they ordered cts of 45 cycles, if the PCR ‘test’ concept had not been incepted and forced on everyone, the concept of a ‘COVID case’ and ‘COVID death’ would not have been possible.
Everyone would have done what they always do and all would have been fine. Doctors would have doctored, nurses would have nursed, and with proper off-label drug use and conventional antibiotic prescribing and care, the world would have kept spinning as it always did. What bugs me the most about this is that our elders would not have been abandoned and treated like they had the literal plague, and many who died miserable deaths - alone, wouldn’t have.
Is the ‘cabal’ trying to kill everyone and reduce our numbers to 500,000,000?
I don’t think so. I think it would serve the bankers better if we were perpetually sick, rather than dead. You can’t enslave and exploit a dead person, after all. Take note of the fact that these shots are inducing autoimmunity and dysfunction in our immune systems.
Having said this, it is very clear that ‘they’ do not care if we die. We are collateral.
Please have a read of this article I wrote a little while back.
Spike-mediated (CTL)-mediated immunity is NOT autoimmunity
Jessica Rose
·
Sep 9
Spike-mediated (CTL)-mediated immunity is NOT autoimmunity
This article is really important and draws attention to the distinction between autoimmunity and acquired T and B-cell-mediated immunity. We can define the difference using only two words: self and foreign. I wrote these words before here: “The thing that people are talking about with regard to injection-related spike embedded cell destruction, is not a…
Read full story
How should we all proceed then, in the wake of so much loss and lingering sadness and desperation? I mean, it’s almost impossible to afford to live in Canada now, even if you have a good job. Rent and the cost of food has exploded. This all fits nicely into the idea that people will eventually be forced into accepting government handouts. Good for government sanctioned serfdom - bad for people. Those government handouts will probably include a hit of heroin and a leaflet on how to MAID yourself. If you’re in Canada anyway.
MAID in Canada. Now that’s some dark-ass humor.
I say we proceed by using cash, refusing to have our earnings stolen under the guise of necessities for city infrastructure, saying a solid ‘NO’ to any attempt at an imposition on our physical movement, jobs or personal health choices.
People’s lives have been destroyed because of the measures taken to counter something the ‘leaders’ referred to as a zoonotic pathogen.
They lied. And people died. People continue to suffer. And justice needs to be served up hot and covered in thick coconut curry sauce.
Speak out. Share your stories of injection injury and loss with whomever will listen. You matter. Your personal story is important. Do not let them censor you.
We the people have the power. Do not forget this. Take it back. ‘Their’ (the bankers) control over you is an illusion. Learn to say no, and mean it.
That’s what I would do. I love you guys, by the way. I don’t say it enough.
NOW is the time for us to come together in order to oppose the ongoing negotiations of the United Nations and the World Health Organization.
The international agreements that the World Health Organization is “negotiating” are NOT what most people think that they are.
If you have not yet read this article (ThePeoplesDeclaration.com) please read it.
Help spread the word by recording a video of your own personal version of The People’s Declaration in opposition to the ongoing negotiations of the United Nations and the World Health Organization.
Please watch the videos below to understand what is really going on.
Maria Zeee and James Roguski
EXCERPT: https://www.bitchute.com/video/QB7PprXiGbCd/
FULL INTERVIEW: https://rumble.com/v3g35om-uncensored-un-to-declare-permanent-covid-measures-this-month.html
CLICK HERE to review Australian gain-of-function research
James Corbett and Meryl Nass
EXCERPT: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gh0zoK2CMZlj/
FULL INTERVIEW: https://rumble.com/v3g8uvs-bioweapons-of-mass-destruction-with-james-corbett.html
CLICK HERE for Meryl Nass’ article.
Catherine Austin Fitts and Sasha Latypova
EXCERPT: https://www.bitchute.com/video/QP8LJxhumq9Q/
FULL INTERVIEW: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jBn5Zt0tdWcQ/
Margo Knorr
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MFUxl8RCs1Gv/
I encourage everyone to record your own “People’s Declaration.”
Here’s one of mine from September 13, 2022:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/68noiys4ufyP/
Please read the articles below…
The People's Declaration
·
SEP 4
Screw The WHO
·
SEPTEMBER 9, 2022
ThePeoplesDeclaration.com
ExitTheWHO.org
ExitTheWHO.com
StopTheGlobalAgenda.com
StopTheAmendments.com
StopTheWHO.com
ScrewTheWHO.com
MaskCharade.com
RejectDigitalEnslavement.com
HealthFreedomBillOfRights.com
PreventGenocide2030.org
DoorToFreedom.org
By: James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
⭐️ BREAKING NEWS⭐️ — Appellate Court Judges to the White House: YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE FIRST AMENDMENT.—The FLCCC News Capsule for September 10, 2023
⭐️A BIG WIN AGAINST CENSORSHIP ⭐️
Late Friday, a three-judge panel of the The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, mostly upheld a lower court’s preliminary injunction in The State of Missouri et al v Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al.
The complaint alleged that the U.S. government was not only threatening and coercing social media companies to censor Americans on social media, but they were also working with social media companies to accomplish that goal.
Judges Edith Clement, Jennifer Elrod, and Don Willett held that the federal government violated the First Amendment by causing social media platforms to block posts on various topics:***
“We find that the White House, acting in concert with the Surgeon General’s office, likely (1) coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions by way of intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences, and (2) significantly encouraged the platforms’ decisions by commandeering their decision-making processes, both in violation of the First Amendment.”
While the ruling enjoined the White House, the Surgeon General, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and the FBI, it also removed also some agencies from the order. These included the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency and the State Department. The judges ruled that those agencies were “permissibly exercising government speech.”
“In the end, this is a big win against censorship because it upholds the tenets of free speech as specified in the First Amendment,” said Dr. Pierre Kory, FLCCC chief medical officer and Dr. Paul Marik, FLCCC chief scientific officer. “We believe the social media censorship experienced by the FLCCC has cost tens of thousands of people their lives. Users of social media were essentially blinded to the rigorous science supporting proven therapeutics for COVID-19 disease. The strong-armed tactics of the federal government were what ultimately doomed the lives of so many. In this case, as in others, censorship had fatal consequences.”
*** These were the same judges who, last week, reversed and remanded a lower court ruling dismissing the suit of three doctors suing the FDA for damages resulting from its public campaign against ivermectin—exceeding its authority.
The New York Times has published a guide called “Vaccines for Fall” which includes a listing of vaccines and treatments that purport to reduce risks from all major viruses—including COVID, flu and RSV.
Though COVID cases are rising in America, the Times writes that, “the good news is that there are vaccines and treatments that reduce risks from all major viruses likely to circulate this season.”
Is this really good news?
A review of the Times’ guide in The Defender cautions that “None of these experts in the Times’ article addressed any of the potential safety risks posed by these vaccines."
In the Defender article, our Dr. Pierre Kory goes even further. "We simply do not know enough about the COVID-19 vaccines to make such broad recommendations,” he said. “Additionally, COVID-19 is highly treatable in children and poses very little risk to a healthy child.”
Nirav Shah, M.D., J.D., principal deputy director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that Americans receive the trio of shots for COVID, RSV and the flu. Then he said this: “Do you want to see your grandpa … [and] grandma? Are you really sure you’re not going to give COVID to them?”
Dr. Kory responded to Shah’s guilt-shaming ploy, saying “There is so little data available on the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in children that to give blanket recommendations like Shah is doing creates an unnecessary risk to children’s health.”
Last week’s FLCCC Weekly Webinar is an absolute must-watch for everyone.
Drs. Pierre Kory, Paul Marik and Joe Varon joined host Betsy Ashton for a detailed review of the FLCCC’s latest protocol, Sepsis Care: A Guide to Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment.
The doctors discussed how to best manage treatment and recovery. Sepsis is a life-threatening medical condition that occurs when an infection triggers an extreme response in the body. Sepsis is related to more than 1 in 5 deaths globally.
It is estimated that annually:
• At least 1.7 million American adults develop sepsis.
• At least 350,000 adults who develop sepsis die during hospitalization or are discharged to hospice.
• 30% of patients who die in hospitals had sepsis during their hospital stay.
Our Dr. Paul Marik wants you to know how important Vitamin D is to your health.
In a new interview, Dr. Marik said, “I think everyone on the planet should take vitamin D. There’s a linear relationship between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. And the further you go away from the equator, the less UVB you get from the sun, the greater your risk of cancer. This has been well established.”
He also shared that there is ample science to support the need for everyone to ensure that their Vitamin D levels are within healthy range.
“There is really good data, really good data…that if you take vitamin D, it prevents cancer.” Dr. Marik explains how a daily regimen of taking Vitamin D, fish oil, and a simple exercise program could reduce your risk of cancer by 60%.
Dr. Marik also shared that Vitamin D provides additional health benefits. “Did you know vitamin D is highly effective for the treatment of depression?” Dr. Marik asked. “It’s also very important for the immune system and can reduce the risk of many diseases.” SO good to know!
This is Rebecca Charles's account of her daughter Danielle's treatment when she was hospitalized for COVID.
It isn't misinformation. It's simply a report by Rebecca about Danielle's experience.
”My daughter was abused, neglected and betrayed by the hospital system. They tortured her. And finally, they killed her. Now, I know they were delaying my daughter lifesaving treatment because they needed to make the most money. Danielle was worth more dead than alive."
Here is another expert review of emerging science by our Dr. Been!
In this episode of Long (COVID) Story Short, Dr. Been says that although data for hypertension after COVID vaccination is mixed, overall there does seem to be an increase in the number of people experiencing high blood pressure. This can also occur after acute COVID infection. Important information for everyone.
By now, most of you have read about last week’s “Reverse and Remand” order from a federal appeals court in a now landmark case against the FDA brought by Drs. Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and our own Paul E. Marik.
The doctors contended that their reputations and livelihoods were harmed by the FDA’s public campaign against ivermectin, and filed the appeal after the initial complaint was dismissed by a lower court last year.
A date for the start of the trial has not yet been set, but from the jump, Kevin McGill, writing for the AP, reported the story by including well-worn, tired tropes about ivermectin that simply are not true.
He writes: “The FDA has not approved ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment because studies have not proven it is effective.”
That is a patently false statement.
Clearly, Mr. McGill, you either copied and pasted that line from the many previous reports filed by journalists in captured major media; or worse, you did not bother to do a reporter’s homework to learn for yourself that the statement you wrote is not true.
Consider:
From the amicus brief by FLCCC attorney Alan Dumoff sent to the appellate court:
“Because the FDA does not have the statutory authority to dictate how doctors can practice medicine, even regarding off-label use of drugs, and failed to follow its own regulatory scheme before issuing either a drug warning or ruling on a new indication, its effort to do so was without authority. An “ultra vires” action through which the FDA ‘exceeded the authority granted to it by Congress, and its action cannot stand.’”
The appellate court agreed, saying, “The FDA does not restrict physicians from prescribing an otherwise FDA-approved drug for an off-label use.”
Ironically, the war against ivermectin began in earnest with Mr. McGill’s AP colleague, Beatrice DuPuy, who interviewed Dr. Kory just after his December 8, 2020 testimony at the senate hearing about ivermectin. In her story (which has been taken down), she completely disregarded the robust evidence which Dr. Kory presented to her during the interview. (Then, DuPuy was a “fact-checker” for the AP. In this instance, she acted as a “fact-wrecker.”)
Wrote DuPuy: “There’s no evidence ivermectin has been proven a safe or effective treatment against COVID-19.”
The FLCCC quickly dispatched a complaint to AP executives, asking for an urgent retraction and immediate correction of the story.
Dr. Kory wrote to John Daniszewski, the AP’s Vice President and Editor at Large for Standards at the Associated Press:
“Ms. Dupuy’s recklessly inaccurate words were disseminated worldwide, and the FLCCC is now on the receiving end of undeserved ridicule and dismissals in public discourse. The ripple effect of her refusal to cite even a single word of the irrefutable science in our manuscript, and her pronouncement that “there’s no evidence ivermectin has been proven a safe or effective treatment against COVID-19”, is that more people will be consigned to unnecessary death. Please understand why we are asking you to act with such urgency: Our doctors are forced to witness and hear about these tortuous deaths from suffocation daily in ICUs throughout this country and many others, while knowing that an effective preventive and therapeutic agent has already been identified.”
Tragically, Dr. Kory’s prediction was correct. Untold tens of thousands in America died for want/need of ivermectin. The AP never retracted its story despite the science they were sent. (We wonder if Mr. Daniszewski ever saw this or this or this.)
Though the kicking of the case back to federal court for trial is a “win” of sorts in the war against government-sponsored misinformation, the fight rages on. Once this trial commences in federal court, it will likely receive widespread media coverage. Please watch the stories on this closely as they come in, and let us know what you are seeing. Remember, the issue in this case is not only ivermectin; it’s really the ability of doctors to have the freedom to prescribe the medications they believe are best for each of their patients.
The FDA is not your physician, nor should it ever be—though it thinks it belongs in the examination room with you and your doctor. They do have a lane—but being your prescriber is veering way, way out of it. —JK
As soon as COVID symptoms hit, she immediately started taking ivermectin. Her doctor had her take it for 10 days.
You know this ends happily…right? Watch this MyStory HERE.
The FLCCC & YOU: We ARE the disrupters.
You see, while our government, public health agencies, and the pharmaceutical industry seem determined to keep citizens sick and uninformed, the FLCCC is dedicated solely to your health and well-being. Thanks to your partnership these past 3 years, we have been able to grow and expand our influence so that today, we are ALL disruptors of a system that is irretrievably broken.
Please join us, fellow dissidents, on a journey over the next two weeks, as we highlight the disruptors in our midst and celebrate their contributions to health and medical freedom. Make a gift in their honor, and help us continue to rattle the cages and ensure that people around the world have access to the information, education, and resources they need to be healthy, happy, and free.
⭐️ GREAT NEWS! ⭐️
Now through September 15, all gifts to the FLCCC to support our legal and legislative efforts will be matched dollar for dollar, thanks to the incredible generosity of The Carter Family Foundation!
mRNA Vaccines Go Airborne: How to Protect Yourself from Involuntary Vaccination
Is it hard to believe that the people who were willing to take away your job or deny you a life-saving operation for being unvaccinated might also try to surreptitiously vax you against your will?
Originally Published on Vigilant News
(Note: Thank you for supporting this sponsored message, which helps keep this Substack running to bring you uncensored news.)
Imagine this: You’re tasked with vaccinating the population, but there’s a large swath of people, no matter what you bribe them with or take away, who simply won’t go along with the program. This noncompliant demographic (the unvaccinated) represented somewhere between 19% and 30% of the U.S. population during COVID-19, depending on how you do the numbers, as reported by The Epoch Times.
So, what do you do about the noncompliant?
Well, researchers at Yale have recently made a scientific breakthrough. According to their paper titled, “Polymer nanoparticles deliver mRNA to the lung for mucosal vaccination,” they successfully developed a new airborne method of delivery for mRNA vaccines.
The researchers in this study developed an inhalable form of an mRNA vaccine for pulmonary diseases, including COVID-19. Using biodegradable nanoparticles, they successfully delivered mRNA to cells in the lungs of mice. The mice were reported to be successfully immunized after two nasal doses. Yale researchers concluded that this aerosol-based method was both “safe and effective,” representing a significant advancement in vaccine delivery methods. After showing the ability to deliver mRNA to lung cells in mice, human trials are planned next.
Dr. Panda’s Newletter reported, “Professor Mark Saltzman, one of the study’s authors, said that the new method of delivery could ‘radically change the way people are vaccinated.’ He added that it could make it easier to vaccinate people in remote areas or those who are afraid of needles.”
Upgrade to paid
This raises the question: Would they vaccinate us against our will?
The U.S. government has a history of experimenting on citizens without their prior knowledge or consent. This includes but is not limited to the Tuskegee Experiment, Operation Big Itch, Operation Drop Kick, Operation May Day, “Green Run”, Operation Top Hat, etc.
But it’s not just the history of experimenting on citizens that’s worrying.
A growing thought in the scientific community is that “Compulsory moral bioenhancement should be covert” rather than overt.
Parker Crutchfield, Ph.D. and Associate Professor of Medical Ethics at Western Michigan University, wrote this in 2019:
“Some theorists argue that moral bioenhancement ought to be compulsory. I take this argument one step further, arguing that if moral bioenhancement ought to be compulsory, then its administration ought to be covert rather than overt. This is to say that it is morally preferable for compulsory moral bioenhancement to be administered without the recipients knowing that they are receiving the enhancement.”
Many thanks to The Epoch Times and Dr. Panda’s Newsletter for sounding the alarm on this disturbing perspective.
Add in what happened with COVID “vaccine” mandates, is it hard to believe that the people who were willing to take away your job or deny you a life-saving operation for being unvaccinated might also try to covertly vaccinate you against your will?
The possibility is there — and it has people worried.
During an interview with OAN news anchor Alison Steinberg, Dr. McCullough said, “Genetic vaccines so far have turned out to be a disaster. Given systemically, they’re either likely not to work or cause additional problems if given by other routes of administration.”
“Nasal mist vaccines, although they are mechanistically attractive, they haven’t worked out too well for so many respiratory illnesses. The dose can’t be controlled, and it doesn’t mimic the type of natural immunity we get with the viral infection. People are concerned that they’re going to lose their bodily autonomy if vaccines are put in the food supply, in the air, or water,” he added.
So, what can we do to protect ourselves?
Dr. McCullough mentioned the first-ever spike protein detoxification protocol ever published in a U.S. medical journal.
The detoxification protocol allows individuals to proactively address both involuntary spike protein exposure and spike protein syndromes head-on using three natural substances, nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin, which are all available over the counter.
Although the protocol has not yet been scientifically validated through double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, Dr. McCullough has argued that clinical observations indicate a positive impact.
The Protocol
The recommended doses in the protocol are as follows, per Dr. McCullough’s Substack:
• Nattokinase: 2000 fibrin units (100 milligrams) orally twice a day without food
• Bromelain: 500 milligrams orally once a day without food
• Curcumin: 500 milligrams orally twice a day (nano, liposomal, or with piperine additive suggested)
Further details on the protocol can be found here.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The U.S. government is rolling out a new COVID shot this fall that is recommended for all people, including those who have not taken the initial series
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has “approved” the reformulated shots by Pfizer and Moderna for individuals 12 years of age and older, and “authorized” them under emergency use for children between the ages of 6 months and 11 years
The new shots are formulated to include a single mRNA corresponding to the Omicron variant XBB.1.5., the dominant variant in the U.S. for most of 2023, but which has since been replaced by other variants
The FDA anticipates the COVID jab will be updated once a year going forward, just like the seasonal flu vaccine
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has denounced mask and vaccine mandates, saying any renewal of such federal mandates will not be enforced in Florida, now or in the future
As you’ve likely heard by now, the U.S. government is rolling out a new COVID shot1 this fall that is recommended for all people, including those who have not taken the initial series.
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,2 the reformulated shots by Pfizer and Moderna are "approved" for individuals 12 years of age and older, and "authorized under emergency use" for children between the ages of 6 months and 11 years.
This despite the fact that no emergency declaration exists to warrant it. The federal COVID-19 public health emergency declaration ended May 11, 2023.3 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s advisory panel has not yet announced its official recommendations,4 but per the FDA:
Individuals 5 years of age and older, regardless of previous COVID jab status, will be eligible to receive a single dose of the reformulated shot. Those who have received previous shots should wait at least two months since the last dose.
Children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years who have previously received one or more COVID shots will be eligible to receive one or two doses of the updated jab, depending on the last injection received.
Unjabbed children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years will be eligible to receive three doses of the updated Pfizer shot or two doses of the updated Moderna jab.
FDA Continues the Propaganda Spin
The new shots are formulated to include a single mRNA corresponding to the Omicron variant XBB.1.5., the dominant variant in the U.S. for most of 2023, but which has since been replaced by other variants.
As explained by the FDA, they anticipate the COVID jab will be updated once a year going forward, just like the seasonal flu vaccine, which, by the way, is notoriously ineffective due to mismatched strains. Will the reformulated shot be any safer or more effective than the previous ones? I doubt it. As noted by the FDA:5
"The updated mRNA vaccines are manufactured using a similar process as previous formulations ...
[The] extent of neutralization observed by the updated vaccines against currently circulating viral variants causing COVID-19, including EG.5 and BA.2.86, appears to be of a similar magnitude to the extent of neutralization observed with prior versions of the vaccines against corresponding prior variants against which they had been developed to provide protection.
This suggests that the vaccines are a good match for protecting against the currently circulating COVID-19 variants. The benefit-risk profile of previously authorized and approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is well understood as these vaccines have been administered to hundreds of millions of people in the United States."
Those familiar with the evidence will of course realize that, a) previous shots have been woefully ineffective, offering minimal protection at best, and only for a short time, and b) the benefit-to-risk profile is "well-understood" to be markedly skewed toward "high risk" and "minimal benefit" for most people.
Adults 60 and over are also encouraged to get the flu shot and/or a vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) concomitant with the COVID jab to prevent a "tripledemic." Pregnant women are also encouraged to get all of these shots, which really ought to be considered a crime at this point.
As for cost, the updated COVID shots will have a price tag between $110 to $130 per dose. The flu shot will cost anywhere from $20 to $70, depending on the vaccine you get, and the RSV vaccine is predicted to run anywhere between $180 and $295.6 All three shots are covered by private insurance, Medicaid and Medicare, but for the uninsured, getting all three could get costly.
Where Have We Heard This Before?
As expected, Pfizer and Moderna are also spinning the same old weave, claiming the reformulated shots are "effective" against several Omicron strains, including XBB.1.5, BA.2.86 (nicknamed Pirola), EG.5 (Eris) and FL.1.5.1 (Fornax).
Interestingly, they’re not bragging about percentages this time. Instead, we’re simply being told the shots are "significantly effective" or just "effective," whatever that means.
Remember when Pfizer and Moderna claimed their shots were 95% effective and had no serious safety concerns?7 Fast-forward to February 2023 and data from the Office of National Statistics in the U.K. revealed the shots have increased all-cause mortality for all age groups while doing nothing to reduce deaths from COVID.8,9,10,11,12,13,14
Pfizer documents released by the FDA in response to a lawsuit have also revealed that in the first three months of the rollout (December 2020 through the end of February 2021), Pfizer received 42,086 adverse event reports, including 1,223 deaths.15,16 The 1976 swine flu vaccine was pulled after only 25 deaths.
We’ve also learned that Pfizer documented17,18 no fewer than 158,000 different "side effects of special interest" in its trials, all while claiming there were no safety concerns.
The first side effect on this shockingly exhaustive list is a rare condition known as 1p36 deletion syndrome. This condition, caused by the deletion of DNA in chromosome 1p36, results in developmental delays, severe intellectual disability, seizures, vision problems, hearing loss, breathing problems, brain anomalies, congenital heart defects, cardiomyopathy, renal anomalies, genital malformation, metabolic problems and more.19,20
Life expectancy depends on the amount of DNA that has been deleted. This, at bare minimum, sounds like something a pregnant woman might want to know before she gets the shot.
Pfizer also claimed its shot was 100% effective in children between 12 and 15,21 but according to a June 2022 paper,22 the vaccine effectiveness against infection in children aged 12 to 17 ended up being only 64%.
Not only did breakthrough infections occur in "fully immunized" adolescents,23 we also started seeing a rise in multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS24) and myocarditis, both of which can be life threatening, whereas COVID poses a negligible risk to children, adolescents and young adults.
Download this Article Before it Disappears
Mouse Experiments Tell Us Nothing
The bivalent boosters25,26 were tested only on mice before they were rolled out, which tells you nothing about their safety, and effectiveness is based on antibody titers alone, which doesn’t tell you anything about effectiveness in the real world.
Moderna now claims "clinical trial data" prove their new shot is effective27 against several of the strains in the Omicron lineage, but they haven’t released any details. Was it done on mice or men? Pfizer, meanwhile, admits its claims are based on mouse trials.28 Considering how far off the mark they were when they were actually doing human trials, how far off do you think they’ll be when all they’re basing their claims on are mice experiments?
FDA Refuses to Provide Safety Data
The fact that the FDA is refusing to provide safety data for the shots is another red flag. In January 2023, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., asked the FDA to release the results of its Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data analyses.29
As previously reported by The Epoch Times, the first time the CDC ran a proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis, hundreds of signals were triggered, and more than 500 of them have a stronger safety signal than myocarditis.
The FDA has conducted a different kind of analysis, called Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining. According to former CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC’s PRR results "were generally consistent with EB data mining, revealing no additional unexpected safety signals."
When Johnson wanted the CDC to clarify what Walensky meant by no "unexpected" safety signals, they pointed him to the FDA, which in turn told Johnson they can’t give him any data because the "FDA’s EB data mining analyses of adverse events contained in VAERS reports for COVID-19 vaccines are currently the subject of pending FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] litigation," and that "FDA is unable to ... provide information or data that is currently being considered in pending litigation."
The litigation the FDA refers to is a lawsuit filed by Children’s Health Defense. The CHD had filed a FOIA request for the EB data, and when the agency refused, CHD sued to have them released. In a September 5, 2023, response to FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf, Johnson wrote:30
"As you are well aware, Congress has a right to information contained at U.S. federal agencies as it conducts its constitutional oversight responsibilities. It is outrageous that FDA would assert that pending litigation, and particularly FOIA litigation, would allow your agency to obstruct my congressional oversight.
Any pending litigation FDA may have relating to its EB data mining records has no bearing on its responsibility to comply with a congressional request.
The notion that FDA is actively hiding information about vaccine safety signals from Congress and the American people is beyond despicable, particularly given the fact that COVID- 19 vaccine adverse events can and do occur.
According to VAERS, as of September 1, 2023, there have been 1,589,970 adverse events and 36,080 deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines."
Johnson gave the FDA a deadline of September 19, 2023, to hand over the EB data mining results.
Florida Surgeon General Warns Against New COVID Shot
In a September 7, 2023, "Mandate Freedom" press conference in Jacksonville, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis denounced mask and vaccine mandates, saying any such federal mandates will not be enforced in Florida, now or in the future.31
"They are trying to do this again, and here in the state of Florida, we will say ‘No,’" he said.
DeSantis called it "troubling" to see states starting to push for mask and jab mandates again when the evidence is now in. We know masks don’t work. We know the efficacy of the COVID jabs becomes negative over time and that there are serious side effects.
They’re not trying to follow the science. They’re trying to follow a narrative. They’re trying to follow an agenda. ~ Gov. Ron DeSantis
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo also warned against the new COVID shots, saying there are "no clinical trials in human beings" showing that they’re safe and effective. "They actually cause cardiac injury in many people," he said, adding that several studies have shown the shots increase your risk of contracting COVID. "There are a lot of red flags," he said.
Indeed, there are. We now also have a clear view of how COVID was (and still is) used to usher in the idea that we need more centralization of power and social control, and that we must relinquish freedom, human rights, privacy and bodily autonomy "for the greater good."
That’s what all the hysterical fearmongering over colds and flus is all about, so I’m grateful that Florida will not go along with this moving forward. Hopefully, leaders in other states and countries around the world will do the same, and call on their people to just say no, because that’s what it’s going to take to stop the global takeover.