HORROR SHOW Life Insurance Data: a clear 40% Surge in Mortality Trend in the 18-64 Age Group
Remdesvir Killed People
Introducing: A Rare Mineral That Removes Toxins and Metals in Just 30 Seconds a Day
It’s called —> ZEOLITE← that is all.
Meet the Russians
more below…
Excess Deaths Take Center Stage in First-Ever UK Parliament Debate on the Silent Health Crisis “The experimental COVID-19 vaccines are not safe, and they’re not effective,” (Andrew Bridgen); Vigilant
more below…
'HORROR SHOW Life Insurance Data: a clear 40% Surge in Mortality Trend in the 18-64 Age Group'; stack scholarship by 2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
From Turbo Cancer to Sudden Cardiac Mortality to Excess Non-Covid Natural Cause Mortality: The Never-Ending Adverse Events of the "Vaccinated" & The Global Depopulation Program
…and now we have addition conformation that the democidal depopulation program is accelerating:
Charts from the above X post:
Let us reiterate the admission based on the painfully obvious trends in the above charts:
"The mortality trend was so stark that OneAmerica announced deaths in its group life business had risen a full 40% in the 18-64 age group, a trend that began in the second half of 2021 and continued through the remainder."
—Tim Bischof, chief actuary at OneAmerica
And the low-grade attempt to dismiss these trends by ascribing blame to PSYOP-19 is easily debunked:
The toxin-like effect is due to the toxic slow kill bioweapons, not limited to their cytotoxic spike protein (SP 2) payloads.
Readers of this Substack knew the why years ago.
And readers of this Substack also know full well that these “vaccine”-induced excess deaths from cardiac damage and turbo cancers may be attenuated, and even cured…
Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer
JUL 2
DOXYCYCLINE and CANCER: At Least 12 Anti-Cancer Mechanisms of Action
EXCLUSIVE RESEARCH BOMBSHELL: Possible Treatment Approach for Management of Post-COVID Vaccination Myocarditis
·
OCT 24
And the attempted financial sleight of hand and fantasy narratives…
…rudely collide with the inexorable payout reality.
They want you dead, and the actuaries are paying out for said deaths of the healthiest and most productive members of society (i.e. 18-64 year olds) like never before in history.
Do NOT comply.
Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? 20 Peer-Reviewed Medical Journal Articles!
I’ve covered this topic before but it continues to fascinate me so I’m covering it again and going WAY deeper!
Can Ivermectin treat, stop, reverse or even CURE cancer?
First, I have to give my standard disclaimer:
I’m not a doctor.
I’m not even a scientist.
Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA — but let’s be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right?
Ok, we all good with the disclaimer?
Ok good!
Now, why am I even investigating this?
Because the more I look into it, the more I find!
When I first saw them come out so strong against Ivermectin, I knew it had to be pretty powerful and pretty good for humans in general!
I’ve never seen such an aggressive pushback by BigPharma, so I figured it probably did more than just treat COVID19.
Then I started seeing reports that it could treat cancer.
And I’m not just talking about posts on Twitter or TikTok….I’m talking about peer-reviewed medical journals!
I’ll post my original report farther below, but first I want to show you what I found on ChatGPT.
I installed a special plugin that connects the OpenAI to a database of 200 million scholarly and medical journals and then I asked it to give me all peer reviewed medical journals that suggest Ivermectin can be effective in treating cancer.
I think you’ll find this fascinating — and for those of you who want the nitty gritty details, each article is linked so you can go read the full thing for yourself.
From ChatGPT:
Here are some scholarly articles focusing on the use of Ivermectin in treating cancer, organized by their publication date (newest first):
The Detrimental Effect of Pre-Treatment with Ivermectin on Myocardial Ischemia
Publication Date: 2023-10-25
Authors: Sara Cheraghi, Shabnam Babataheri, H. Soraya
Abstract: This study explores the effects of Ivermectin (IVM) on cardiovascular diseases, particularly focusing on myocardial ischemia in both ex vivo and in vivo.
Neuroprotective effects of ivermectin against transient cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats
Publication Date: 2023-09-27
Authors: Behdad Seyyedabadi, Shabnam Babataheri, Ismail Laher, H. Soraya
Abstract: Not available.
Publication Date: 2023-09-23
Authors: Man-Yuan Li, Jiao Zhang, Xiao Lu, Dong Zhou, Xufeng Deng, Quan-xing Liu, J. Dai, Hong Zheng
Abstract: Not available.
Outcome of Ivermectin in Cancer Treatment: An Experience in Loja-Ecuador (PDF)
Publication Date: 2023-02-22
Authors: Yuliana Jiménez-Gaona, Oscar Vivanco-Galván, Gonzalo Morales-Larreategui, Andrea Cabrera-Bejarano, Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
Abstract: This paper analyzes the use of ivermectin-based antiparasitic as a cancer treatment in the rural area of the Loja province, Ecuador, and the medical opinion regarding its use in humans.
Drug repurposing of ivermectin abrogates neutrophil extracellular traps and prevents melanoma metastasis (PDF)
Publication Date: 2022-09-05
Authors: Hongjun Zhang, Xiaozhuo Xu, Rui Xu, T. Ye
Abstract: This study identifies Ivermectin (IVM) as significantly inhibiting neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation and preventing melanoma metastasis, with a focus on its effects on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and CD8+T cells in a mouse melanoma model.
Ivermectin: recent approaches in the design of novel veterinary and human medicines
Publication Date: 2022-09-05
Authors: M. C. Velho, Diego Fontana de Andrade, R. Beck
Abstract: This review discusses strategies proposed in the last decade to improve the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin and to explore its novel therapeutic applications, including in cancer and viral infections.
Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via mitochondrial dysfunction (PDF)
Publication Date: 2022-08-26
Authors: D. Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Jae Woong Jeong, Woosol Chris Hong, S. Fang, Hyung Sun Kim, Yun-Sun Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park
Abstract: This study evaluates the anticancer effects of the combination of ivermectin and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, indicating that ivermectin exerts synergistic effects with gemcitabine, preventing pancreatic cancer progression.
Forging Ahead the Repositioning of Multitargeted Drug Ivermectin
Publication Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: S. Atmakuri, Shweta Nene, D. Khatri, S. B. Singh, V. Sinha, Saurabh Srivastava
Abstract: This review highlights the role of Ivermectin in unexplored avenues towards the repositioning of this multitargeted drug in cancer, viral, and bacterial infection, and malaria, providing insights into regulatory considerations of drug repurposing and current formulation strategies.
Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment enhances antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer through mitochondria dysfunction (PDF)
Publication Date: 2022-04-30
Authors: Daeun Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Y. Lee, Hyung Sun Kim, Jung Min Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park
Abstract: This study explores the combination of Ivermectin and gemcitabine in enhancing the antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer, focusing on mitochondria dysfunction.
Publication Date: 2022-02-21
Authors: A. Bassi, V. Piccolo, G. Argenziano, C. Mazzatenta
Abstract: This article discusses the use of topical ivermectin as an off-label alternative for treating neonatal Scabies, focusing on the era of permethrin resistance.
Repurposing Ivermectin to augment chemotherapy’s efficacy in osteosarcoma
Publication Date: 2022-01-01
Authors: B. Hu, H. Tan, L. Yu, Q. Liao, W. Guo
Abstract: This research investigates the potential of repurposing Ivermectin to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in osteosarcoma, focusing on its effects on proliferation, migration, and apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells.
Ivermectin induces apoptosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via mitochondrial pathway (PDF)
Publication Date: 2021-12-01
Authors: Nana Xu, Mengmeng Lu, Jiaxin Wang, Yujia Li, Xiaotian Yang, Xiaoshuang Wei, J-L Si, Jingru Han, Xiaojuan Yao, Juanmei Zhang, Junqi Liu, Yanming Li, Hushan Yang, D. Bao
Abstract: This study examines the induction of apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by Ivermectin, focusing on the mitochondrial pathway.
Progress in Redirecting Antiparasitic Drugs for Cancer Treatment (PDF)
Publication Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Haoyang Huang, Qing He, Binghua Guo, Xudong Xu, Yinjuan Wu, Xue-Rong Li
Abstract: This review discusses the redirection of conventional drugs, including Ivermectin, into cancer treatment, focusing on their anticancer potentials and underlying mechanisms.
Computational Drug Repositioning and Experimental Validation of Ivermectin in Treatment of Gastric Cancer (PDF)
Publication Date: 2021-03-31
Authors: Hanne-Line Rabben, G. Andersen, Aleksandr Ianevski, M. K. Olsen, D. Kainov, J. Grønbech, T. Wang, Duan Chen, Chun-Mei Zhao
Abstract: This study focuses on the repositioning of Ivermectin in the treatment of gastric cancer, combining computational predictions with in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches.
Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF)
Publication Date: 2021-03-02
Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee
Abstract: This research shows that Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, demonstrating synergy with immune checkpoint blockade.
Antiviral Drug Ivermectin at Nanomolar Concentrations Inhibits Glycine-Induced Chloride Current in Rat Hippocampal Neurons (PDF)
Publication Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: J. Bukanova, E. Solntseva, R. Kondratenko, V. Skrebitsky
Abstract: This study examines the effect of Ivermectin on chloride currents in rat hippocampal neurons, contributing to the understanding of its potential use in cancer treatment.
Quantitative proteomics reveals a broad-spectrum antiviral property of ivermectin, benefiting for COVID-19 treatment (PDF)
Publication Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Na Li, Lingfeng Zhao, X. Zhan
Abstract: This study identifies ivermectin-related virus infection pathway alterations in human ovarian cancer cells, revealing its broad-spectrum antiviral property, including against COVID-19.
Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF)
Publication Date: 2020-08-24
Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee
Abstract: This research demonstrates how Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, showing synergy with immune checkpoint blockade.
Publication Date: 2020-05-30
Authors: M. Juárez, Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera, G. Domínguez-Gómez, A. Chávez-Blanco, J. Díaz-Chávez, A. Dueñas-González
Abstract: This article supports the clinical development of Ivermectin as a repositioned cancer drug, highlighting its antitumor effects at clinically feasible concentrations.
Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin (PDF)
Publication Date: 2020-01-01
Authors: Jian Liu, Kun Zhang, Lin Cheng, He Zhu, Tianmin Xu
Abstract: This review summarizes the antitumor effects of Ivermectin and its potential roles in cancer treatment, including its impact on various pathways and cellular functions.
I could have kept going but I cut it off after 20 results.
I also asked it to sort the results by date with newest first, and we ended with 1/1/2020, which means these 20 articles all came out within the last 3 years.
How many more do we have in the past decade or two?
A lot.
Now here’s my original report which gives you a ton more information:
Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? New Evidence Might Surprise You!
Let’s get something out of the way right up front in this article….
I’m not a doctor.
I’m not even a scientist.
Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA — but let’s be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right?
Ok, we all good with the disclaimer?
Great!
I’m a reporter and I report on what I see….
And right now I’m seeing a ton of people talking about Ivermectin as a possible treatment for cancer.
Let me give a SECOND disclaimer: do NOT read this article and stop taking cancer treatments or stop doing what your doctor tells you to do.
Listen to you doctor!
But….Ivermectin has been called a “Wonder Drug” (more on that in a minute) and NINE new scientific, peer-reviewed studies are showing it may be effective in treating or curing cancer….AND it’s safer that Aspirin!
So if it were me, and I can only tell you what I would do, but if it were me or one of my family members, we’d listen to our doctor but I think I’d also be taking a high dose of Ivermectin on the side.
Read this for more on how incredibly SAFE Ivermectin is:
Now let’s dig in and I’ll show you everything I’m seeing about Ivermectin and Cancer…
We start on Twitter but we will end with peer-reviewed, scientific studies.
Nine of them, to be exact.
Let’s start here:
Once again, I can only talk about what I would do, but I’m considering going on a high dose Ivermectin treatment once per year as preventative medicine:
And is this why Big Pharma hates it so much?
Now let’s get scientific….
You know, REAL science, not “Fauci-ism”.
From The Journal of Antibiotics, published 2/15/17:
Read the full article yourself here.
“…unmatched value of an extraordinary drug…”
“…Antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent…”
Folks, that isn’t my take or someone on Twitter or TikTok.
That is a medical journal.
Let’s do another one….
From PubMed:
Read the full article yourself here.
“…led many to describe it as a ‘wonder’ drug.”
Let’s do another…
From the NIH.gov:
Read the full article here.
“…powerful antitumor effects…in a variety of cancer cells.”
I repeat, this is not MY opinion, this is a medical journal!
In fact, there are MANY articles that all come to the same conclusion, across multiple different types of cancers.
Here are 9 of them, from VigilantNews:
Papers reviewed:
2023 Sep.23 – Man-Yuan Li et al – Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lungadenocarcinoma cells
2023 May – Samy et al – Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostatecancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway
2022 Nov – Lotfalizadeh et al – The Anticancer potential of Ivermectin: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic implications
2022 Oct – Jian Liu et al – Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin
2022 Jun – Daeun Lee et al – Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction
2021 Aug – Shican Zhou et al – Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth
2021 Jan – Mingyang Tang et al – Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug
2019 Sep Intuyod et al – Anti-parasitic Drug Ivermectin Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-resistant Cholangiocarcinoma In Vitro
2018 Feb – Juarez et al – The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug
You can see that FULL article over on MakisMD Substack here.
We just reported yesterday that a new leaked report says airlines are looking to BRING BACK MASKS in October.
Yes, really.
I fully expect a new “planned-demic” will show up right in time for the 2024 election.
Oh they might not call it “COVID” again and probably they won’t.
But I fully expect a new one to hit.
And I’m going to be prepared this time.
Do NOT comply.
HIGH DOSE VITAMIN C and CANCER - What does latest research show? 3 key papers reviewed
NOV 5, 2023
Image Source: 2021 Oct (Bottger et al) - High-dose intravenous vitamin C, a promising multi-targeting agent in the treatment of cancer
Papers Reviewed:
2023 June (Dianfa Fan et al) - Cell signaling pathways based on vitamin C and their application in cancer therapy
2021 Oct (Bottger et al) - High-dose intravenous vitamin C, a promising multi-targeting agent in the treatment of cancer
2021 Feb (Zasowska-Nowak et al) - High-Dose Vitamin C in Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients
Excess Deaths Take Center Stage in First-Ever UK Parliament Debate on the Silent Health Crisis “The experimental COVID-19 vaccines are not safe, and they’re not effective,” (Andrew Bridgen); Vigilant
MP Andrew Bridgen of UK explains 'excess deaths' to show that the vaccine is linked to the deaths post vaccine; “experimental COVID-19 vaccines are not safe, and they’re not effective,” Vigilant Fox
The issue of “saving lives” has suddenly taken a back seat in the post-COVID world. In the midst of the pandemic, daily death tolls became a familiar feature in media reports, particularly by outlets like the BBC. Yet, the same media outlets have been conspicuously silent about a recent surge in excess deaths — especially after the rollout of the so-called COVID-19 vaccines. MP Andrew Bridgen has tirelessly sought to bring this grave issue to the forefront, facing as many as 20 rejections before being granted an opportunity to discuss the topic. Friday, October 20, Bridgen got his chance to raise his concerns, and to an empty chamber but a large audience watching from afar, Bridgen gave a 24-minute speech on the topic of excess deaths. Here’s a summary of what he brought forth before the UK parliament.’
Meet the Russians
by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
October 29, 2023
Here's a simple observation: when knowledgeable Americans discuss American politics, they can talk in detail about the various fault lines in the American government.
They can expound at great length on the Squad's role in influencing the policies of the Democratic Party, for example.
And they can assess the policy proposals of various third-party candidates.
And they can detail the history of the turf battles between the FBI and the CIA or tell you how the FBI under Hoover differed from the FBI under Mueller.
And, if they're really informed, they can even discuss the role of Citibank or Goldman Sachs or BlackRock in picking the Cabinet of this or that administration and identify the various vested interests that are served by placing, say, Tom Vilsack in the role of Secretary of Agriculture.
Likewise, Canadians will be able to opine on the deeper political significance of Pierre Poilievre munching on an apple.
And Japanese will be able to wax eloquent on the LDP's war on the fax machine.
But ask any of these people about the politics of a foreign country and suddenly everyone will begin talking as if factions, intrigues, infighting and other verities of government don't exist in that faraway land. Instead, that foreign country is a political monolith that can be reduced to a single person.
Case in point: ask the average American on the street what they think about Russia's government. "Russian politics? You mean Putin, right?"
Ditto China. "What do I know about the Chinese government? Well, I know that Xi . . ."
This is precisely how we arrive at the stuck-on-stupid of an "independent" media that portrays Xi and Putin as the multipolar saviours of the coming global world order. Even if it were true that Xi and Putin were opponents of the globalist plan rather than willing conspirators in it (SPOILER: they're conspirators), there's the false implication that Putin is Russia or Xi is China.
Imagine a Russian citizen believing that the entirety of American politics could be boiled down to what Biden thinks about any particular issue. That's how stupid such a "Leader=Country" mentality is.
Newsflash: foreign countries are complex places with all the competing interests, bureaucratic turf wars, infighting, backstabbing and palace intrigues that you find in your own country!
Don't believe me? How many politicians can you name in the Russian government other than Putin? How many of their backgrounds can you elaborate on? What are their ideological leanings? What is their relative influence in Russian politics? Which policies are they responsible for?
Stumped? Don't worry, almost everyone reading this article is stumped, too.
So, can we arrive at a deeper understanding of geopolitics by challenging this overly simplistic "Putin is Russia" narrative? Let's find out!
Subscribe
ELVIRA NABIULLINA
Image credit: nakanune.ru from "Nabiullina — a symbol of economic policy contrary to the interests of Russia"
Americans will likely associate the name "Elvira" with Elvira, Mistress of the Dark. How fitting it is, then, that the witch presiding over Russia's coven of banksters is also named Elvira.
Hailing from Ufa in Soviet Bashkiria (present-day Bashkortostan), Elvira Nabiullina boasts all the credentials that Putin and his globalist cohorts require in a central banker. After stints at the USSR Science and Industry Union in the early 1990s, and—following the dissolution of the USSR—the Russian Ministry for Economic Development and Trade the mid-1990s, Nabiullina then spent two years working with arch-globalist Herman Gref (more on whom later) at Sberbank (more on which later) before returning to "public service" in the 2000s.
In 2007, Nabiullina's career was kicked into overdrive by two key appointments. First, in May of that year, she was selected as a "Yale World Fellow," a position in a four-month leadership program organized by the Skull and Bones-hosting, CIA-recruiting, Ivy League institution that signals Yale's "commitment to be a leading global[ist] university" by creating "a growing network of global[ist] leaders trained at Yale." Then, in a cabinet shuffle in September of that year, Putin appointed Nabiullina to replace his good buddy (and fellow globalist conspirator) Herman Gref as trade minister.
Lest there be any doubt about Putin's endorsement of Nabiullina, he subsequently appointed her to replace Gref as Governor from Russia at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in 2008 before going on to appoint her to chair the Board of Governors of the Central Bank of Russia for not one, not two, but three consecutive four-year terms.
So what devilish brew of sinister schemes has Nabiullina cooked up in her witch's cauldron at the Central Bank of Russia?
Well, as central bank governor, she has presided over the rollout of the "digital ruble," Russia's very own Central Bank Digital Currency that—as Russian Deputy Minister of Finance Alexei Moiseev informs us—is intended as a replacement for cash. And, in direct contradiction to the Z-Anon bloggers who would have you believe otherwise, the digital ruble is thoroughly detested by the Russian people, who understand that the politicians are lying through their teeth when they pinky-swear promise not to use this tool of financial surveillance and control for the purposes of financial surveillance and control. In fact, it seems the only thing that can bring the Russian people together on one issue is the introduction of the digital ruble. It is hated by the Orthodox, pro-Putin, conservative right and by the communist left and by all the economists and political scientists in between.
Nabiullina has presided over a major nationalization of the banking system that has seen the Russian state's share of the banking system rise to 70%. She has even bragged about the progress she has made in "centralizing bank supervision," whereby the unelected witches and warlocks of the Central Bank conclave have taken away even more monetary and banking autonomy from regional governors.
She engineered a market shock that involved nearly doubling interest rates overnight in order to stem a ruble crisis that was caused by Rosneft oligarch Igor Sechin and his shady (Kremlin-approved) bond sale shenanigans.
She also presided over the Russian Central Bank's offshoring of its gold reserves to the globalist West, where it could be more easily sanctioned. According to Yuri Boldyrev, ex-deputy of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, this includes Nabiullina's extraordinary decision to export 240 tons of its gold to London just months before the Ukraine "military operation" began. So inexplicable was this decision that it prompted Boldyrev to call for a criminal investigation of Nabiullina and, perhaps even more amazingly, prompted a crisis of faith among the "Putin-as-4D-chessmaster" narrative proponents in the "independent" Western blogosphere.
Oh, and she was voted "Central Bank Governor of the Year" by Euromoney magazine in 2015 and "Central Banker of the Year" by The Banker magazine in 2017, surely the greatest dishonours a person can receive this side of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Thankfully, neither Euromoney nor The Banker featured a centerfold spread of Elvira to celebrate her bankster victory, but I had the liberty of getting Broc to do up a visualization of what such a glamour shot might look like.
Forgive me in advance for your nightmares
So how has Putin reacted to this globalist supervillain's track record of selling the Russian people down the river? Why, with effusive praise, of course! "The president has repeatedly praised the results of the work of Nabiullina and the central bank as a whole," explained Putin mouthpiece Dmitry Peskov last year.
Indeed.
Those interested in further familiarizing themselves with the witchcraft of this arch-bankster are invited to take a trip down the "Nabiullina's brooch" rabbit hole to see how this practitioner of the dark arts likes to deliver her occult signals at press conferences.
EVGENY DANCHIKOV
Evgeny Danchikov speaks at the BRICS International Innovation Forum panel on "Tech Diplomacy. Unifying Power of Tech"
As head of Glavkontrol, the "Main Control Department of the City of Moscow," Evgeny (or Eugeny or Evgeniy or Евгений) Danchikov is concerned with . . . well, control.
Hence his appearance on the "Control Legislation as a Driver of Economic Growth" panel at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum earlier this year, where he discussed how the Russian government can better control its population through legislation.
Or his appearance on the "Cloud City" BRICS International Innovation Forum panel on "Tech Diplomacy. Unifying Power of Tech," where he discussed how city governments can take advantage of VR, AI, "metauniverses" and other cutting-edge technology to more effectively control their citizens.
But it's another type of control that Danchikov became infamous for during the scamdemic: biosecurity control.
Yes, for those deluded Westerners who believe the valiant Russians (i.e., Putin) are bravely defending the world from the New World Order crowd, I have some unpleasant news for you: Russia is as fervent a proponent of the biosecurity state—with its coerced vaccinations, mask mandates, lockdowns and scamdemic surveillance—as any Davos-attending Western (mis)leader.
And, as any Muscovite will be able to tell you, it wasn't Moscow mayor Sergei Sobyanin in charge of enforcing these mandates but "Head of the Main Control Department of the City of Moscow" Evgeny Danchikov.
For example, when Moscow unveiled its vaccine mandates for "workers in the areas of trade, catering, housing and communal services and energy, education, health and social protection, as well as transport (including taxis)," there was Danchikov, explaining to Russian state-owned news agency TASS the fines that would be imposed on businesses for failing to mandate (and on individuals for failing to take) the clot shot.
And when Moscow unveiled its slave identification system cattle tag system QR code system to "ensure the identification of patients with coronavirus infection," there was Danchikov, demonstrating the technology for the Russia-24 news cameras.
Everything works fine, there are no failures, but if any shortcomings appear, then there is a support service of the information technology department, which quickly works out any shortcomings.
And when one of those "shortcomings" in the system arose in the form of Irina Karabulatova, a disabled university professor who was fined 4000 rubles for failing to install the city's surveillance app during self-quarantine, there was Danchikov, assuring the denizens of Moscow that Glavkontrol would look into the matter.
Not a single unreasonable fine is ignored. All are additionally studied. If the innocence of a citizen is proven, then such fines are canceled.
(And, after it was determined that Professor Karabulatova didn't install the app because her phone couldn't install the app, and, after the case generated significant negative media attention, there was Danchikov soaking up the publicity as he magnanimously canceled the fine.)
Yes, certainly Muscovites can sleep easy at night knowing that their Head of the Main Control Department, Evgeny Danchikov, is on the case, protecting them with his loving vaccine mandates and QR code tracking systems.
SERGEI SHOIGU
Pictured: the completely legitimately purchased $18 million estate of Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu
Speaking of Russia's lockstep participation in the Global (scamdemic) Reset, let's not forget when Sergei Shoigu bragged about jamming the COVID clot shots into the arms of 1.4 million members of the Russian Armed Forces and boasted that, although he "cannot vaccinate everyone by order," not a single one of those 1.4 million human pincushions objected to the vaccine. That's right, folks, this mass vaccination of troops, while strongly encouraged, was totally voluntary. But, in a happy coincidence, not a single member of the Russian military rejected the life-giving vaccine!
So who's Sergei Shoigu, you ask? Good question. Many in the West probably only learned of Shoigu's existence if they happened to catch the increasingly apopleptic rants by Yevgeny Prigozhin in the lead-up to the Wagner mutiny earlier this year . . . but then Prigozhin "blew himself up" on a plane during a coked-up game of hand grenade hot potato, so I guess that's that, huh?
In reality, though, Sergei Shoigu is the Russian defense minister who Prigozhin accused of deliberately sending ill-prepared and under-supplied troops into the meat grinder in Ukraine. But again, Prigozhin is dead, so that's that.
On paper, Shoigu makes for a particularly unlikely candidate to head up the Russian Armed Forces.
Despite dressing up in a cartoonishly decorated uniform . . .
. . . Shoigu never served in the military and has never seen combat. The medals, it turns out, stem not from any battlefield victory or acts of bravery, but from Shoigu's own fascination with the trinkets. Having personally overseen the creation of dozens of completely meaningless awards, including medals "for contribution to the development of the Army International Games" and "for diligence in ensuring road safety" and even "for participation in the military parade on Victory Day," he then promptly bestowed those medals on himself in an attempt to add flair to his stolen valour "military man" cosplay outfit.
Another point in Shoigu's disfavour is that, while he did have the good fortune of being born the son of a regional party official with connections to Boris Yeltsin, Shoigu is the only member of the Kremlin's inner circle who isn't one of Putin's old KGB buddies or St. Petersburg conspirators or judo crime gang cronies. Perhaps what qualifies Shoigu for the position of leading Russia's military, then, isn't military prowess or even personal friendship with Putin, but a demonstrated track record of gloriously cavalier corruption, grifting and grandstanding.
Don't forget that if corruption, grifting and grandstanding are the qualifications to be defense minister in Russia, Shoigu has some pretty big shoes to fill. After all, his predecessor in the position, Anatoly Serdyukov, was summarily dismissed when it emerged that he had "gifted" his mistress with a Moscow apartment, jewelry, paintings and other luxury items valued at over $10 million.
So how does Shoigu rank on the corruption index? Well, a 2015 investigation exposed the existence of Shoigu's luxurious $18 million estate in Rublevka—an estate he first registered in the name of his then-18-year-old daughter and next in the name of his sister-in-law. Then, a 2019 investigation discovered that Shoigu gifted his mistress—a stewardess he met during his time with the rescue corps—with business contracts valued at nearly $70 million! On top of that, one of his two illegitimate children was recently revealed to be a nepo baby "pop star" and a draft dodger who fled to a Turkish resort when his father started drafting kids for the Ukraine meat grinder.
How's that for corruption!?
Now, some of the Z-Anon persuasion might argue that whatever the . . . "eccentricities" . . . of his personal life, and whatever battlefield experience he lacks, Shoigu still makes a worthy defense minister, ably leading the Russian military to its smooth, expertly executed 20-months-and-counting de-Nazification of Ukraine.
So, what's his track record as the leader of the Russian Armed Forces?
Well, we know what Prigozhin thought of Shoigu and his military leadership . . . but, as I say, he's dead, so that's that.
And you might have heard of Kirill Stremousov, the politician whom Russia selected as the deputy head of the Kherson region right before the Russian military bravely abandoned Kherson and left the local Russian collaborators to the mercy of the Ukrainians. Stremousov infamously mused on how Shoigu should shoot himself for how he handled the entire Kherson debacle . . . but now he's dead, too.
And you might have read about General Ivan Popov, commander of the 58th Combined Arms Army, who accused Shoigu of treason for his mishandling of the war . . . and was then summarily fired.
And you may have seen how Shoigu responded when he was asked, point-blank, "Will we win?" by a Rossiya-1 TV channel reporter.
Pictured: The commander of the Russian Armed Forces displaying his combat leadership skills
. . . but that interview has since been scrubbed from the internet, so I guess we don't have to spend too much time parsing whether that was a shrug of indifference, a shrug of confusion or a shrug of fearless military leadership.
That about does it. It turns out there's no one left alive who has any problems with Shoigu's military prowess!
At least Russians can rest easy knowing that their military leader cares exactly as much about them as NATO's military leaders care about their respective countries' populations.
SERGEY GLAGOLEV
Pictured: Russian Deputy Health Minister Sergey Glagolev pining for his unrequited love, the World Health Organization
Sergey Glagolev is the Deputy Minister of Health of the Russian Federation. And he'd like to have a word with all those folks who have fallen for the "Russia is going to exit the WHO" hopium of the Z-Anon crowd.
Actually, he devoted an entire speech to those folks.
Specifically, Glagolev delivered an address to the 76th World Health Assembly in Geneva last May. As the official Russian representative to the WHA, Glagolev made the Russian government's stance on the World Health Organization crystal clear.
I have the honor to congratulate the member countries of the organization and all WHO staff on the anniversary of our Organization from the Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus and to note its role in improving the health of the world's population. We wish the organizations and member countries to develop and achieve their goals, especially the SDGs, the progress towards which has slowed the pandemic of a new coronavirus infection.
Indeed, the Russian government would like it to be known that they are super-duper in love with the WHO, committed to the SDGs, and 100% on board with all the biosecurity state nonsense that is being erected on the back of the scamdemic. And, just to make it clear how much the WHO means to Russia, Glagolev brought up his main concern about the organization: their decision to close a WHO branch office in Moscow and relocate it to Copenhagen.
That's right, in direct contradiction to the "Russia has expelled the WHO" fake news purveyors, Russia has instead formally complained that the WHO moved a branch office out of the country. (But, just for the record, yes, Russia is still a proud WHO member in good standing and has no intention of leaving any time soon!)
And this was neither the first nor the last time that Glagolev talked about the vital importance of Russia's participation in the WHO. In fact, just this past January Glagolev was lamenting how the Ukrainian don't-call-it-a-war-or-you'll-be-fined has gotten in the way of WHO unity: "Russia is committed to the principle of equal cooperation in the field of global health as a necessary element of the protection and provision of human rights, and we regret to note the unwillingness of some countries to engage in constructive dialogue at the WHO," he whined, citing, for one thing, a WHO technical conference that was called off because of Ukrainian objections and, for another, "a refusal by the WHO Collaborating Centre located in the US and the UK to provide the Russian scientific institute with a reference sample of the influenza virus."
And of course Glagolev isn't the only Russian politician pledging his fealty to the dark overlords of the biosecurity state.
Remember when Moscow mayor Sergey Sobyanin thanked the WHO for helping inspire the lockdown of his city?
And remember when Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova gushed that the "WHO identifies the best practices of all countries of the world and helps to solve the most difficult tasks" and stressed that everything promoting WHO unity was an "invaluable factor" in promoting global health?
Yes, sadly—and in complete contradiction to the "4D Chessmaster Putin" fantasists of the bought-and-paid-for "BRICS-as-saviour" blogosphere—Russia will not be leaving the WHO anytime soon.
HERMAN GREF
Pictured: Two globalist buddies conspiring over AI, biometrics and mRNA vaccines.
"Hey, wait a minute, James!" I hear the devil's advocates out there objecting. "I know this Gref guy. He's the Sberbank guy, right? He's not a part of the Russian government!"
Gref may not be a member of the Russian government anymore (unless you count his role as 1st class Active State Councillor of the Russian Federation), but, as noted above, he did serve as Minister of Economics and Trade from 2000 to 2007 before being replaced by Elvira, Mistress of the Bankers.
But claiming someone isn't a part of the political scene because they don't hold a formal office is a red herring anyway. It's like insisting that Heinz Kissinger ceased presiding over the American deep state when he was ousted as National Security Advisor in 1975, or that Dick Cheney wasn't a political player when he was working for Halliburton between his stints as Poppy Bush's Secretary of Defense and Bush, Jr.'s VP.
You see, Russia, it turns out, is like every other "modern liberal democracy": a fascist merger of state and corporate power. And Russia (just like the US and every other state on the planet) boasts a plethora of politically connected players like Gref who slip seamlessly between roles in governmental positions and corporate boardrooms.
Besides, Sberbank is majority-owned by the Russian government's National Wealth Fund, so it really is just another branch of government.
So, what power does Gref wield as CEO of Sberbank, Russia's largest bank and financial services company?
Well, you know the biometric ID control grid nightmare that the globalist technocrats are shoving down the public's throat right now? Predictably, the Russian government is using Sberbank as the vehicle to foist that agenda on the Russian people.
For example, in 2016, when the government greenlit the introduction of biometrics into local schools, there was Sberbank, installing the palm scanners that allow students to pay for their school lunches with a swipe of their hand! "Using the Ladoshki system, parents will get rid of the necessity of giving cash to their children and they will also be able to monitor the kids' school meal spending by visiting their personal page on Sberbank's website," a Sberbank press release bragged. It continued: "Additionally, parents can monitor what exactly their child has eaten and if necessary, they can forbid the child from buying chips or chocolate." (Yay! Technocratic tracking of children!)
Pictured: A typical Russian student enjoys another happy biometric transaction in jail school
And when, after years of conditioning school children to accept their fate as biometrically tagged cattle in the Russian slave state, it was time to introduce this biometric slave state to the general public, there was Sberbank, partnering with Visa to create a face-scanning payment technology dubbed, infuriatingly enough, "Smile to Pay!" It "uses a 3D camera with high detection accuracy and depth capture, enabling easy and quick facial recognition that takes into account a person’s height and changes in appearance." First trialed in 2019, the technology is now rolling out in more and more businesses across Russia.
Pictured: A typical Russian shopper enjoys another happy biometric transaction in jail the supermarket
Luckily, this biometric ID technology experience prepared Sberbank to quickly roll out Russia's QR code tracking system during the scamdemic.
Speaking of the scamdemic, you know the genetic slurry clot shots that are being foisted on the world population? Any guess who's financing the Russian side of that globalist operation? If you guessed Herman Gref and Sberbank, then give yourself a cookie!
Yes indeed, Gref was there from the very beginning of the scamdemic, generously offering to cooperate with the Russian government in providing grants to Russian scientific institutions working on experimental coronavirus vaccines. And when Russian scientists were busy copying AstraZeneca's clot shot formula and marketing it as Sputnik V, there was Gref, bragging that it was Sberbank who responded to "a government request" to help create the clot shot and bring it to market. (Of course, the Russian Ministry of Health won't let Russians see the results of Sputnik V trial data, but don't worry, you can totally trust that the hard-working WHO-lovers in the Russian government and their state-owned megabank have Russians' best interests in mind!)
So, how about the AI / biotech / transhuman nightmare?
Let me put it this way:
Who can forget when Gref joined his old buddy Putin on stage at the AI Journey Conference in 2021 to discuss how AI can be used "to address social issues"? (And remember when Putin gushed that Gref was "using ground-breaking solutions [. . .] to adapt Sber’s entire ecosystem to serve people" before noting how "Big Data and artificial intelligence are playing a key role" in transforming Russia's economy, government and civil society?)
And who can forget when Gref took to the stage of the 2022 Russian Educational Marathon (after a bizarre dance performance featuring pyramid-holding cyborg schoolchildren in Tron-inspired technofuturist outfits) to tout "artificial intelligence, high-speed Internet (5G / 6G), cloud computing, web 3.0, virtual and augmented reality, quantum computing and biotechnology" as the "seven key technologies" that will provide "maximum benefit to business and society" in the fields of "lending, healthcare, unmanned transport and cybersecurity"?
And who can forget when Gref laid out his vision of the future at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) earlier this year? You know, that vision of the future that involves replacing bureaucrats and managers with AI algorithms provided by companies like Sberbank.
I keep saying "Sberbank," but, as we all know, Gref shortened the company's name to "Sber" a few years ago to reflect the fact that this is no ordinary bank. No, it's a public/private techno-transhumanist monstrosity that's hell-bent on reducing people to a database of palm prints and iris scans, injecting them full of clot shot poison, and replacing them with robots. So, in other words, a perfect fit for the globalist Russian government's long-term goals.
You think I jest? Hardly. Putin not only continues to embarrass himself by heaping praise on Gref and Sber but keeps appointing Gref to the supervisory boards of his various pet projects.
Oh, and did I mention that Gref is a long-time World Economic Forum partner, having served on their board of trustees for years and collaborated with WEF on its Cyber Polygon false flag drill? And that he's also a member of J.P. Morgan's International Council alongside Putin's "old friend" and frequent guest, Heinz Kissinger? Cuz he is.
CONCLUSION
"My mission is to help Mr Brzezinski to move the figures on the chessboard." -Alexandr Dugin
I could go on.
I haven't even gotten to Mikhail Murashko and his "digital genetic passport" scheme to create genetic profiles (including genomic sequencing) of all Russians, starting with newborns.
Or Igor "Strelkov" Girkin, the pro-war ultra-nationalist who took credit for launching military operations against the Ukrainian government in 2014 and who was promptly arrested when he started criticizing the incompetence of Shoigu and his minions in the waging of the 2022 not-war.
Or Alexandr Dugin, whose muddle-headed ramblings on geopolitics are taken seriously by the equally muddle-headed Evola devotees of the alt right despite the fact that there's ample evidence that Dugin is Brzezinski's minion and no evidence whatsoever that he's "Putin's brain."
You DO get the point, don't you?
No, the point is not that James Corbett knows everything about everything and thus you should blindly believe anything he says about Russia (although I wouldn't argue the point too vociferously if you really pressed it!).
And no, the point is not that Slavsquat is right and that you should subscribe to him right away (although he is right and you certainly should subscribe to him right away).
The point is that Russia is like every country on the planet: an oligarchy run by incompetent kleptocrats and cruel kakistocrats who, while they have diverse backgrounds and different political leanings, are in service to the broader globalist agenda to the precise degree that it helps their career and lines their pocketbooks. It is also like every other country on the planet in that the average Russian knows that the average Russian bankster or technocrat or political stooge is a corrupt oligarch who does not have the Russian people's best interests in mind.
The galaxy brains of the "BRICS will save us!" blogosphere play on the ignorance of the average American (or Canadian or Japanese . . .) about the realities of Russian politics to lure them into a hopium narrative about Putin and Xi saving the world from the very globalist policies that they are working so hard to put into place in their own country.
As always, today's exploration is just a starting point for a real investigation into the Russian political scene, not its endpoint. By all means, continue researching and compiling information and expanding your knowledge of Russia and China and Saudi Arabia and Israel and all of the other "other countries" that we in the English speaking world generally know so little about.
But at the very least, now that you know a little bit more about the world of Russian politics, you won't be so easily duped by one-dimensional narratives about the 4D chessmaster in the Kremlin foiling the globalist agenda, will you?
The transition to CBDCs will be completely voluntary, though. You needn't worry!
Same Team
Different Jersey
Anthony Fauci needed to use all his moxie and all his esoteric bureaucratic manoeuvres—mastered during his half-century at NIH—to win FDA’s approval for his vanity drug, remdesivir. Remdesivir has no clinical efficacy against COVID, according to every legitimate study. Worse, it is deadly poisonous, and expensive poison at $3,000 for treatment. In fact, remdesivir’s wholesale cost is roughly 1,000x more costly than hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. The challenge required Dr. Fauci to first sabotage HCQ and IVM. Under federal rules discussed earlier, FDA’s recognition of HCQ and IVM efficacy would automatically kill remdesivir’s ambitions for EUA designation. And even if Dr. Fauci somehow finagled an FDA license for remdesivir, demand for the product, which doctors were administering late in the disease, as it had to be given through an IV in the hospital, would plummet if either HCQ or IVM stopped the COVID-19 infections early.
Why would Dr. Fauci care to undermine any medicine that might compete with remdesivir? Might it have something to do with NIAID and CDC having just spent $79 million developing remdesivir for Gilead, a company in which the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation owns a $6.5 million stake? The BMGF is engaged in other large drug development deals with the company, including a co-funded $55 million investment in a malaria treatment being developed by Lyndra Therapeutics. Gates has also funded the promotion of Gilead’s Truvada in Kenya. Another Gilead partner, the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Ft. Detrick, Maryland (USAMRIID), where the drug was studied in monkeys, also contributed millions to remdesivir’s development. At the outset of the coronavirus plague, remdesivir was just another pharma-owned molecule that FDA had never approved as safe and efficacious for any purpose. In 2016, remdesivir demonstrated middling antiviral properties against Zika, but the disease disappeared before the expensive non-remedy got traction. After the Zika threat vanished, NIAID put some $6.9 million into identifying a new pandemic against which to deploy remdesivir. In 2018, Gilead entered remdesivir in a NIAID-funded clinical trial against Ebola in Africa.
This is how we know that Anthony Fauci was well aware of remdesivir’s toxicity when he orchestrated its approval for COVID patients. NIAID sponsored that project. Dr. Fauci had another NIAID-incubated drug, ZMapp, in the same clinical trial, testing efficacy against Ebola alongside two experimental monoclonal antibody drugs. Researchers planned to administer all four drugs to Ebola patients across Africa over a period of four to eight months.Read ←
But in 2023, death is normalized, and anybody who gasps before it is a danger to the Gaza parking lot future, and the Zero Covid future. “It must be done,” is the driving esprit. Get out of our faces with your disingenuous sympathy, they say. Not realizing our sympathy is quite real, as is our shock.I just watched this video. I have avoided this filthy business of the UN Pandemic Treaty out of sheer dread. Listening to the WHO crowd, I feel always that I am listening in on some kind of ritual incantation ceremony, and all the participants are under the influence of something that has blocked all meaning when they speak. Meaning, but not ritual. The words are being used as something, but as what? They’re incanting to one another. All the time. Why are they doing that? I used to watch them do this at “International AIDS conferences” in cities around the world between 1988 and 1999, when it was the worst part of my job to have to attend those things.