Human Beings matter less than Policy!
“These so-called misinformation gurus … are the biggest spreaders of misinformation in Canada, but they are being equipped with incredible powers,” Bridle warned. “They are talking about fining people for disseminating ‘misinformation’ and criminalizing ‘misinformation’.”
“And the big question we have to ask, if that’s the case, is ‘Who are going to be [the] arbiters of truth?’,” he continued. “Is it going to be people like us in this room? Or is it going to be the people who forced all of these draconian policies on us for the past several years?”
“We have to call them out, and we cannot allow them to acquire these powers to criminalize the truth.”
Republican Governor Using Stealth to Put Through Red Flag Gun Confiscation
It seems that the inmates are running the asylum – and some “conservative” Republicans are willing to hand over the keys to the doors. Do not sacrifice individual liberty for a supposed collective good which is a characteristic of a Soviet-style system.
August 26th, 2023
by Kathleen Marquardt
My dear friend, Lucinda Sheth, who is politically active, but not a radical in any sense, has addressed the recent Tennessee issue of a “Special Session to push for an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO)”, better known as Red Flag Law.[1], [2] This session was called by Governor Lee because his ERPO was shot down during the normal Legislature session. This is another sneaky way our governments (local, state, and federal) are making laws without going through the proper channels). Ms. Sheth is right on for calling him out.
If you don’t realize this is a set-up, “Tennessee’s Democrat elected officials will embark upon a statewide bus tour to discuss gun violence, which will end at the state capitol on the first day of the August special session on gun control.” [3]
As Karen Bracken, a great Tennessee patriot, put it, they are … Using the excuse that children being killed by guns in TN is a crisis. Which if you look at the DATA is a complete lie. Perhaps they should look at the cities in which there is strict gun control like Chicago, Philadelphia, Baltimore. Gun violence is a crisis in these cities because only the law-abiding citizens obey the law. Criminals do not and when they know people are defenseless, they get emboldened.”
Sheth’s letter on behalf of the Roane County Republican Women:
“August 11, 2023
Dear Governor Lee:
You took a solemn oath to uphold our Tennessee State Constitution and our US Constitution. The oath you took means that your Special Session to push for ERPO (Extreme Risk Protection Order) legislation will be an Unconstitutional exercise.
State Legislatures have no constitutional authority to enact into Law whatever a loud, boisterous, organized lobby may happen to believe is a good idea. State Legislatures are created and exist BY the State Constitution – and THAT Document, together with various provisions of the US Constitution have only LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to make laws restricting arms.
[1] UNESCO and red flag laws
[2] Red flag laws double speak for gun confiscation
[3] Tennessee democrats reveal gun control bus tour leading up to special session
When a person makes a threat about killing people, the ONLY constitutionally acceptable course of action is to treat THAT PARTICULAR PERSON in accordance with the existing criminal laws of the State. Mental Health Systems already have a 72-hour hold process to deal with people who are a danger to themselves and/or others.
There have already been several documented abuses of ERPOs in Florida, Colorado, Virginia, and among several VA Systems. Your ERPO has the potential for mass deprivation of GOD-GIVEN unalienable rights and civil liberties, and that simply cannot be understated in America’s woke psychosis. Those who stray from the politically correct position on masks, vaccines, ”transgender” rights, Drag Queens in libraries and schools, election fraud, inappropriate pornographic LGBT books in schools, BLM, Antifa, or abortion are already placed on the list of domestic extremists/ terrorists at the DHS website. There is the “E” in your ERPO.
It seems that the inmates are running the asylum – and some “conservative” Republicans are willing to hand over the keys to the doors. Do not sacrifice individual liberty for a supposed collective good which is a characteristic of a Soviet-style system.
Call off this Special Session and revisit the solemn oath of office you took. Your ERPO will violate that oath.”
Feeling that she had more to say to the governor, she wrote another letter that adds a few more both pertinent, and elucidating points:
August 10, 2023
Dear Governor Lee:
The loud, hysterical cries that are demanding that the Tennessee government “do something” about “gun violence” are ramping up in the progressive realms of Tennessee, especially Nashville. You, Governor Lee, have heeded their call and have called for a Special Session to implement your ERPO (Extreme Risk Protection Order)…ahem, don’t call it a Red-Flag law even though the end product is identical.
You must understand that there are dangers in “doing something” when rushing to implement major infringements of our 2nd amendment GOD-GIVEN rights. Your ERPO infringement could NOT get passed when the Legislature was IN session, so you have called a special session to get it done. Your ERPO will also have the effect of negating the following GOD-GIVEN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS (of those accused under Red Flag charges) :
The right to face your accuser. The right to due process.
The right of protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The right to be secure in your person, papers, and things.
Remember when the government was tasked to “do something” after the surprise Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor? The government “did something” by rounding up Americans of Japanese descent, confiscating all their possessions and putting them in camps! That, too, was a rush to “do something” which is parallel to what you want to do about “gun violence”. Pretty shameful isn’t it!
Your ERPO allows judges to issue an order of confiscation “ex parte” (without you being present) and because it is a civil process you will find yourself without a public defender or any opportunity to defend yourself. Pretty shameful isn’t it!
All of these measures in your ERPO fly in the face of our Federal Constitution that you SOLEMNLY swore an oath to uphold, with your right hand raised and your left hand on the Word of our Holy God. Your ERPO also gravely violates our Tennessee State Constitution that you SOLEMNLY swore to uphold via the same manner! Pretty shameful isn’t it!
The core problem is SIN, which is a moral problem. People who have murder in their hearts and want to kill will use any tool to do it. Laws against murder already exist, but murder still happens…because of SIN, a moral problem.
We implore you to call off the Special Session and stop listening to the siren song of tyranny.
Yes, ERPOs have been enacted in other states, but it should be stopped now. ERPOs are just another way the Cancel Culture crew of communist Marxist, one-world order global elite are taking away our property and rights.
Without the right to property, we are slaves. But that is the point of ERPOs, Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), Public/Private Partnerships (PPP), and a slew of rules, law, and executive orders levied on an unsuspecting populace.
Let’s stop this one now. Let the lion roar.
© 2023 Kathleen Marquardt – All Rights Reserved
‘We are winning’: The populist revolt against the global elite’s depopulation agenda
In a recent broadcast, American commentator Larry Alex Taunton describes how he uncovered the real meaning of the fine words used to market a global, anti-human agenda.
Taking in the attacks on food security, the destabilization of nations through mass immigration, and the horrific impact of a deliberate program to reduce the human population, Staunton stresses the importance of decoding the innocent sounding phrases used to transmit this inhuman agenda.
He recounts his experience as “a spy at the World Economic Forum” to anti-globalist Scottish political commentator Jim Ferguson, with both men agreeing that “humanity itself is at stake” in a struggle to establish a Godless world system which sees no essential value in human life.
Taunton was struck by the casual manner in which innocent sounding code words for a terrifying global agenda were exchanged at the WEF’s summit in Davos, Switzerland, which he attended.
‘Human beings matter less than policy’
Speaking in the August 8 interview, both men discuss the means by which this agenda is advanced, and the pleasant euphemisms used by this managerial class to describe things that are truly horrific.
“When they talk about ‘sustainability’ – they mean ‘depopulation’,” says Taunton in his introduction, before explaining precisely why this is the case. His remarks recall the observation of George Orwell, who in Politics and the English Language said:
In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible… Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism.
Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them.
The mental images conjured by “sustainability” and “the greater good” are pleasant, and pass without objection. The true meaning is unspeakable, and so it is never plainly said.
Sustainable depopulation
Both men calmly and patiently recount their reasons for saying these fine words are contrived to conceal an unutterable evil.
Firstly, both Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum are at the forefront of vaccination and “sustainability” programs, whose dangers become apparent when these terms are matched with evidence.
READ: Dr. Robert Malone: COVID jabs were a CIA operation to depopulate the world
Together with the United Nations, the WEF seeks a reduction in human population to a more sustainable number – touted as around two billion. If this seems alarmist, it is important to recall that the 1974 National Security Study Memo 200 – the “Kissinger Report” – recommended that the U.S. government adopt a global population reduction program.
It became a reality the next year, as President Gerald Ford signed National Security Decision 314.
As I reported in January of this year, Kissinger would go on to arrange for the creation of the World Economic Forum – the very type of “international organization” required in the Kissinger Report.
An organization set up by a man whose name is synonymous with the deaths of millions invites the kind of suspicion so delicately expressed by Larry Taunton.
Doesn’t it seem just a little bit odd that the people that we were told to trust concerning the vaccines are the very people who are the most anti-human?
In the case of COVID “vaccines,” Ferguson refers to Dr. Chris Shoemaker’s work in uncovering the alarming rise in myocarditis and the shocking likely death rate attached to the novel mRNA injections.
“Myocarditis was formerly found in one in a million people,” said Ferguson, quoting Shoemaker, “Yet it is now found in one in five” – of the “vaccinated.”
Of these, as Shoemaker argued, half will die within five years of taking the shots. He cited Pfizer’s own documentation of the rollout of the treatments, which saw 100 people die every week over three months. This rollout began almost three years ago, in December 2020.
Read that again; 200,000 in 1,000,000 vaccinated get myocarditis.
Ferguson chillingly concluded that as a result, “in the next two years we might see 24 million people die” in Britain alone.
Taunton and Ferguson reminded viewers this was not their finding – but that of Shoemaker, whose claims rely on data published by Pfizer together with a Swiss study finding a “far higher” incidence of myocarditis in “vaccine” recipients than previously imagined.
READ: Dr. Chris Shoemaker explains shocking dangers of DNA strands found in Pfizer, Moderna vaccines
A criminal syndicate
Ferguson turns to the political system, saying he has little faith in British politicians. Corruption goes to the top, he maintains, referring to the extraordinary case of the unelected British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
“It’s like we are being run by a criminal syndicate,” Ferguson said, recalling that the U.K. prime minister had invested “500 million pounds” of his own money in Moderna, whose only current product is an mRNA COVID “vaccine.”
Meanwhile Sunak was reassuring the British people that the injections were “safe and effective,” whilst almost certainly being aware that they would lead to many deaths and injuries.
Oddly, the name of Sunak’s offshore vehicle is “Theleme Partners” – a name whose search returns results for the occultist “religion” of Thelema, founded by infamous satanist Aleister Crowley.
‘Humanity itself is at stake’
Ferguson believes the stakes could not be higher, and though the enemies of humanity are formidable – he is also convinced that when the people wake up to this agenda, they will fight it and they will win.
Pointing to what he calls a sort of “populist uprising,” Ferguson points to events from South America, to Canada and Europe to argue that this moment may not be long in coming.
He mentions the Nuremberg Code inspired protests in Germany, and campaigns such as that of the Canadian Freedom Convoy as examples of a growing trend of informed and organized resistance to the anti-human globalist agenda.
I think that people around the world are sensing that something very sinister is happening around the world and that it is all being orchestrated by a central body like the world economic Forum
If we can mobilize, inform, equip [and] encourage our side we can immobilize them
I think that will make a huge difference for freedom not just in my country or your yours but around the world.
We are winning
Ferguson smiles when he says that “We are winning the narrative war.” He closes the interview with a promise to photograph himself before the statue of William Wallace, whose famous cry of “freedom” was immortalized by Mel Gibson in Braveheart.
These are two who know the odds and whose commitment to the battle is inspiring. We are, as they say, in the midst of an information war with a political idea which sees its own people as an enemy to be pacified and even liquidated.
Cry freedom, and never give up the fight. As Ferguson and Taunton believe, together we can win.
Greenpeace co-founder: Achieving ‘net zero’ emissions means ‘at least 50% of the population would die’
“If we actually did it, my point would be that if we actually achieve net zero, at least 50 percent of the population would die of hunger and disease,” Moore said in a recent interview with BizNewsTv.
“And no doubt about it, because of just one thing, which is nitrogen-based fertilizer, which won two Nobel Prizes,” he continued. “One for developing the process of combining natural gas with nitrogen in the atmosphere to make ammonia. And the other one, the other Nobel Prize, was for the person who scaled it up to an industrial level.”
Moore stated that “at least 50 percent of the population depends on nitrogen fertilizer for its existence today.”
“And there’s people trying to ban it. And the Netherlands and Sri Lanka have already made these kinds of moves.”
READ: Dutch farmers’ strategy to fight Net Zero policies may have evolved beyond protests
“So it is truly a death wish in disguise,” he continued. “And the disguise is to save the earth. Which doesn’t need saving, particularly.”
Moore mentioned the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder Klaus Schwab as being among the people who are pushing the “Net Zero” agenda, saying that “I think they are our enemies.”
“Not just our enemies, but the Earth’s enemies.”
CO2 is good for the environment, Moore argues
Moore argued that having higher CO2 levels in the atmosphere is beneficial for the environment because “life is made with carbon.”
“They’ve created a false narrative about CO2, which is actually the staff of all stuff of all life,” he said. “It is the most essential part of life. That’s why organic chemistry is the chemistry of carbon.”
Moore furthermore asserted that life on earth could flourish with much higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere than the current 417 parts per million (ppm).
“The life that is here now could flourish in 4000 ppm CO2, which is ten times what it is [now], even after we’ve put all this CO2 into it,” he said. “I don’t think that there [are] enough fossil fuels to get it back to 4000 [ppm] because most of it’s locked up in rocks, in limestone, and in chalk and marble and dolomite.”
Moore expressed his discontent with framing fossil fuels as a “dirty” source of energy, since “putting CO2 back into the environment where it came from in the first place is one of the most important things that has happened in the history of life on Earth.”
“It’s a stupid thing that they’ve been able to get away with calling fossil fuels dirty. Because our food is grown in dirt, it’s ‘dirty,’” Moore said regarding the way words are used to paint certain types of energy in a negative light.
Making the case for nuclear energy
Moore argued that the only way to reduce reliance on fossil fuels without many people starving would be to transition from so-called “renewables” like solar and wind to nuclear energy.
He said that fossil fuels should be mainly used for heavy machinery like “tractors and farm machinery,” while most other things could be powered by nuclear energy, which he argues is very safe.
“There are more than 100 nuclear plants between Canada and the United States,” the Greenpeace Co-Founder stated. “Not one human being has ever been injured by them, never mind killed. Fossil fuels have killed a lot of people in explosions and fires, and we still use it.”
“Why would we ban nuclear power if nobody’s been killed except in Chornobyl? That’s the only place anyone was killed. And it was mainly the firefighters who worked for nine days to get the fire out. And they were right there at the core of the reactor where it was really radioactive.”
“Otherwise, you know, a few children died from thyroid cancer because of late diagnosis. They could have been saved if they’d been brought to the hospital sooner. So it wasn’t like the biggest accident that’s ever happened in the world or anything. Not even close.”
Moore helped co-found Greenpeace in 1971 and has since joined 1,100 scientists and professionals in signing the World Climate Declaration (WCD), affirming that there is no “climate emergency.” He left the global organization 15 years later after left-wing “political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organization to a political fundraising organization.”
He holds a Ph.D. in Forest Biology and is a Board Member of the CO2 Coalition, a scientific organization with the goal of educating the public about the benefits of CO2 and challenging climate alarmism.
RELATED
Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro appeals 8-year ban on running for office
Lawyers are arguing that there were discrepancies in how the elections’ court handled the former president's challenge of last year's election results..
Former Brazil president Jair Bolsonaro is appealing his ban from seeking public office for the next eight years.
Bolsonaro’s lawyers filed paperwork earlier this month with the Superior Electoral Court after it decided in June that he was guilty of abusing his political power and misusing the media.
Bolsonaro, 68, is Catholic. He lost his re-election bid to current socialist president Lula da Silva 50.9 percent to 49.1 percent last October. Bolsonaro challenged the results by filing a 33-page lawsuit, but left-wing Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes tossed it out. Many conservatives believe the race was stolen.
According to Brazilian journalist Fernando De Castro, Bolsonaro’s lawyers are arguing that there were discrepancies in how the elections’ court handled the case.
“There was no real and effective trial of the issue. The participation of the parties was not facilitated, nor was the exercise of a broad defense or contradictory, which are constitutional guarantees assured in administrative judicial processes,” De Castro reported for The Gateway Pundit.
In January, Bolsonaro’s supporters stormed Brazil’s capitol buildings. However, De Castro as well as other reporters believe the attacks were a false flag provoked by liberals to frame conservatives similar to how Democrats in the U.S. have been using the January 6 protests in Washington, D.C., to persecute Donald Trump and his supporters.
After the election’s court handed down its ruling last month, Bolsonaro, who will be 75 when he is free to run for office again, issued a statement insisting he was innocent.
“I didn’t commit any crime… now they accuse me and want to strip me of my political rights on an accusation of abuse of political power,” he said.
Judge Benedito Gonçalves will hear Bolsonaro’s appeal. He was appointed by Lula to the Superior Court of Justice in 2008.
During Lula’s time in office, he has moved Brazil closer to China and the global left. He has also sought to combat the spread of so-called “fake news” on social media and has called for “global governance” to combat climate change.
Before beating Bolsonaro, Lula was convicted in 2017 of corruption and money laundering, for which he was sentenced to nearly 10 years in prison. In 2019, he was found guilty of bribe-related charges in a separate case.
However, a 6–5 vote by the Supreme Court allowed him to leave prison later that year. In March 2021, a Supreme Court judge annulled the charges against him. Weeks later, the Court decided he was free to run in the 2022 election.
Three Canadian doctors and a professor of immunology described to LifeSiteNews staff their resistance to the cult-like acceptance of the mainstream COVID narrative.
The panel discussion took place at LifeSiteNews’ annual general meeting, which this year took place in the days following the July 18 Canadian gala supper at the Hilton Suites Toronto-Markham Conference Centre. Dr. Mary O’Connor, Dr. Mark Trozzi, Dr. Chris Shoemaker, and Dr. Byram Bridle explained to the team what the first year of the COVID pandemic was like for them and how they responded.
Dr. Mark Trozzi began his story by describing his medical expertise. He studied medicine at the University of Western Ontario, practised emergency medicine for 30 years, taught critical resuscitation for about 20 years, taught trauma medicine at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Hospital, worked at several other Ontario hospitals, and taught at three Ontario universities. He says he never had any serious complaints or problems.
Related: WATCH: Three medical freedom doctors share their COVID stories at LifeSiteNews gala
When the COVID pandemic reached Canada, Trozzi initially “just did what [he] normally did … follow the Golden Rule and then try to do a good job.” He went along with the World Health Organization’s version of events at first, but the empty hospitals gave him time to research. Unsurprisingly, Trozzi did not join the dancing-doctor TikTok trend.
“I’m not a good dancer, so I was studying COVID science,” he quipped.
Trozzi discovered from his reading that the official advice (like “locking kids up”) was wrong. Behind closed doors, Trozzi told patients they could take off their masks and warned them not to allow their children to be jabbed with the inoculation that would soon be coming. Meanwhile, he found his colleagues’ slavish obedience to the mainstream COVID narrative very weird.
“I felt like I was…in The Body Snatchers or some kind of movie about a cult,” he said.
The doctor noted that the cult-like obedience to the narrative was maintained with both the carrot of money and a “big stick.” Sensing by the end of 2020 that “they were coming for [him],” Trozzi resigned from all his jobs. He told his colleagues that he was “going to do human rights work … which was true.” Ever since then, he has been “researching, teaching, sharing, and then getting involved more and more in the need for doctors and scientists among our grassroots organizations.” Working at the local, national, and international levels, Trozzi is on the steering committee for the World Council of Health. Working with international partners, he regularly meets with 20 to 30 doctors from around the world.
But it was when he took over seeing vaccine-injured patients from a doctor in trouble with the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons, Trozzi got whacked with the big stick: his license was suspended. However, this is only a secondary concern to him.
“A lot of people think … my main goal right now is to defend my license,” he told LifeSiteNews. “That’s by no means my main goal. My main goal is to defend our grandchildren.”
Dr. O’Connor, a family physician, spent the initial 2-week COVID lockdown watching a lot of television and online Masses. She told LifeSiteNews that she learned very quickly that the mainstream COVID narrative was a scam. She became concerned about the dangers of mask-wearing, and her practise was soon swamped with people asking for mask exceptions, which she gave freely. She was particularly worried about the effects of masks on children.
Dr. Chris Shoemaker had a private practice working with children with ADHD and Asperger’s. When COVID arrived, he was asked to help out in pre-hospital assessment for patients. He advised people to take Vitamin D and zinc; he knew that if he gave them prescriptions for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, pharmacies would not honor them.
“The sad news is these medicines would have made all the difference,” he told LifeSite. “Those medicines would have meant that we did not need a vaccine of any type, especially a vaccine which is totally toxic.”
In Ottawa when the trucker convoy arrived, Shoemaker was spotted with a sign saying “MDs for truckers” and was asked to make a speech with other doctors. He made three speeches, and the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons “did not like” that he said that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were completely safe. After Shoemaker said this publicly for a year and a half, the College took away his license to practice medicine.
But Shoemaker told LifeSiteNews that researchers had stated that both those drugs should be used if there was ever a SARS—that is, SARS-CoV-1—type pandemic ever again. “And SARS-COV-2 [COVID], I think we can say has similar qualities,” he said. The reason researchers recommended them, Shoemaker added, is that “papers showed that the darn stuff worked… But people in science wanted it not to be available.”
Dr. Byram Bridle laid out his impressive qualifications to stress that he knows what he’s talking about when he discusses COVID-19 science, “especially the COVID-19 shots given to people.” He has a B.Sc. in Biomedical Sciences and both a M.Sc. and a doctorate in immunology, and he has completed a post-doctorate fellowship in biotechnology. He is an associate professor of viral immunology and, he told LifeSiteNews, he has received lots of funding to develop novel vaccine technologies, including grants from the Ontario and Canadian governments to develop novel COVID-19 vaccines. He teaches immunology and virology at all levels of university education.
When the COVID-19 pandemic was announced, Bridle endeavored to carry on working as usual. Conscious that his education was subsidized by the Canadian taxpayer and that his salary was primarily funded by taxes, Bridle considers himself a public servant, a scientist responsible to the public.
“And one of the things that any good academic scientist should do is make themselves available to the public when they have questions and make the complex science accessible to the public so they can understand it and … make fully informed decisions,” he said.
“In short … my job is to tell the scientific truth…”
At the beginning of the pandemic, Bridle was much sought-after by mainstream media as an expert. However, this popularity ended when, during a radio interview, he told three scientific truths: that there might be a link between mRNA vaccines and myocarditis; that a Pfizer study showed that the vaccines got widely distributed through the body; and that the spike protein, if it spreads, is “essentially a toxin.”
“They were considered extremely controversial from that point on,” Bridle said and added that he has been actively censored since then. However, he has never stopped telling the inconvenient truths about COVID-19.
“And the reason why I chose to do that is, you know, it’s my job,” he concluded. “But more importantly, my faith compels me to tell the truth.”
Weather manipulation: Globalist effort to help push their dangerous climate agenda?
Note from LifeSiteNews co-founder Steve Jalsevac: Although we might not agree with everything in this article I first noticed on Children’s Health Defense, such as the exaggerated claim of rapid disappearance of species, it still presents important information to consider. A huge topic is introduced that has been suppressed for decades – attempts at military-induced weather modification or geoengineering. Even the WEF has been talking about doing this.
This has been yet another giant globalist project I first learned about in the 1980s from a learned British Campaign Life Coalition co-worker who had been investigating the topic for years.
It is very real, but the full extent of current activity and results of climate geoengineering is difficult to determine because of the wall of secrecy and denials built around it. Even the best people have been convinced to deny their common sense about the unnaturally ordered chemtrails a times in the sky above them because of academic articles and degreed spokesmen presenting allegedly credible rationale for those chemtrails.
The last 3 years should have taught us to be more trusting of our eyes and common sense and to almost totally distrust current government, institutional and mainstream media pronouncements on controversial topics. We should realize by now that many highly credentialed persons are willing to sell their souls for money and status.
Considering the flood of climate change propaganda, we have been inundated with by anti-human, anti-religion globalists to advance their Great Reset re-ordering of life, it is reasonable to assume they would be working to manipulate the climate if such a thing were possible. It is definitely possible. I urge you to read, watch and consider.
The time for ridiculing those who expose this is over. What we need now are many whistleblowers from within this giant industry willing to endure the character undermining and more that will come from telling the truth about what they have been involved in. There is a great awakening on many topics occurring now. Whistleblowers are playing a large role in this. The public must know. Our freedoms and civilization are in great danger from the secrecy around these evil, dangerous projects directed by people acting as though they are gods.
(Unauthorized Science) — Last week, Nobel physicist John Clauser came out of the Clausit to speak his own inconvenient truth about global warming and CO2. No good deed goes unpunished. Another physicist who was a personal hero of mine has expressed similar views. This is a big subject, and I don’t feel engaged enough with the issue to write a book. But I will say a few things about which I feel pretty certain, but to which Right Thinking People may take exception.
Global ecosystems are indeed in crisis, and this is the result of human activity.
But greenhouse gases, CO2 and climate change are peripheral to this story. The net effect of CO2 emission is likely to be beneficial, if at all relevant.
Environmental activism may be the most important movement on the planet today, and its diversion into a narrow focus on carbon is dangerous.
Weather manipulation is a well-developed, sophisticated science being practiced on a global scale, without open scientific backing and without democratic consent. This, too, is a crime and a major danger.
Many people, consciously or otherwise, imagine a transhuman future in which the earth is paved over and food is grown hydroponically. We’ll eat lab-grown meat and live in a virtual paradise, even after we kill the ecosphere. This is a dangerous delusion! All life is interdependent. No species can survive outside an ecosystem. Bacteria manufacture chemicals crucial for life. Insects pollinate. Fungi recycle waste, make atmospheric nitrogen biologically useful, and connect trees underground. No species can exist without a rich ecosystem, and we don’t begin to understand all the connections that create a functional ecosystem. Mankind’s one attempt to create an artificial ecosystem, dubbed Biosphere 2, fell flat on its face within weeks.
In murdering nature, we are destroying the foundation for human life as well.
Carbon dioxide has little to do with this
Dr. McCullough: New COVID jab antibody study may indicate ‘shedding’ of mRNA, spike protein
A recent peer-reviewed study provides evidence that those who received mRNA COVID-19 “vaccinations” are able to transmit resulting antibodies to the unvaccinated through aerosols, that is, through the process of regular breathing.
Yet, Dr. Peter McCullough told LifeSiteNews that another possibility “urgently” needs to be tested, proposing the data may actually indicate “shedding” of the shots’ dangerous lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and “pathogenic” spike proteins “from host to recipient” instead.
The study titled Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Humoral Immunity was published by ImmunoHorizons in May and described the process by which the research team first identified these specific antibodies in surgical masks used for one day by vaccinated laboratory workers.
After these observations, the researchers hypothesized that perhaps such antibodies can also be transferred from one individual to another via aerosols and droplets as viruses are as well.
To test the hypothesis, they collected nasal swabs from unvaccinated children living in homes where parents or family members were either vaccinated, unvaccinated, or had already received a positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
The results revealed that the presence of high intranasal amounts of these specific antibodies in vaccinated parents were “significantly associated” with the presence of the same antibodies “within a child from the same household.” By comparison, the swabs from children of unvaccinated homes revealed a “complete deficit of SARS-CoV-2-specific” antibodies.
In other words, they concluded that antibodies generated as a result of these COVID-19 injections can be transferred from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated or others by means of mere aerosols (normal breathing) in proportion to the amounts present in their nose or mouth.
Yet the researchers also recognize that the correlation they witnessed does not necessarily guarantee their conclusion of the direct transfer of antibodies. “We have yet to encounter an equally parsimonious interpretation, although admittedly this does not mean one does not exist,” they wrote.
McCullough: Data may ‘imply shedding of Spike protein and/or mRNA’ and ‘not transference of antibodies’
In an email correspondence with LifeSiteNews, Dr. McCullough offered a different interpretation.
“I am concerned these data imply shedding of Spike protein and / or mRNA vaccine material from the host to the recipient and not transference of antibodies as the authors have concluded,” he wrote.
McCullough has had a renowned career in the medical field, including authoring 687 articles in scientific peer-reviewed journals, and he remains the most published individual in his field in history.
In an interview last November, McCullough argued that the mRNA itself from the COVID-19 gene-based injections was “transferring from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated.” This would naturally generate the spike proteins with the body responding by creating the specific antibodies identified in the ImmunoHorizons study.
The former editor of two medical journals also cited at the time a paper by Helene Banoun showing that LNPs that carry the mRNA spread throughout the body “have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier.”
“And in a paper by Fertig and Colleagues, the messenger RNA is found circulating in blood for at least two weeks” (here), the physician said. “And the curves were not going down. That’s as long as they looked.”
“Röltgen and colleagues has found messenger RNA in the vaccinated in lymph nodes for months,” he explained. “It looks like the body’s not clearing it out” (study).
Finally, another study “from Hanna and colleagues in JAMA showed that the messenger RNA is in the breast milk of ill-advised women who took the vaccine during pregnancy or afterwards,” he said.
Summarizing these thoughts, McCullough proposed the rhetorical question: “Could you actually take a vaccine inadvertently by close contact, kissing, sexual contact, [or] breastfeeding? It looks like the answer is ‘yes.’”
Furthermore, the mRNA has “never been demonstrated to actually leave the body. They look like they’re permanent, as well as the spike protein that’s produced after them. This is very disturbing,” lamented the former president of the Cardiorenal Society of America.
Dr. Byram Bridle: LNPs and spike proteins may potentially be shed through aerosols, skin. Studies ‘just need to be done.’
Expert vaccinologist Dr. Byram Bridle offered a similar assessment during an in-person interview in July. After addressing LifeSite’s annual staff meeting in Toronto, Bridle referenced biodistribution data (such as this Pfizer Japanese study) that showed the vaccines’ LNPs carrying mRNA “to all kinds of places where it could be associated with shedding.”
These include the salivary glands, the lungs, the large and small intestine, the bladder and the skin. This means there is a “theoretical potential” for shedding from all these areas, including the lungs through mere aerosols.
The spike protein can also be carried by exosomes or extracellular vesicles that are “little fat bubbles” excreted by cells. “They can carry the spike protein” and “there is peer reviewed, published science showing those in circulation,” the Ontario-based virologist, vaccinologist, and immunologist said.
The exosomes are “tiny and can be exhaled in the vapors that we exhale,” Bridle continued. “It doesn’t require coughing and sneezing. The regular aerosols that we would exhale [are sufficient].”
“So, yes, we know shedding happens, at least in breast milk,” and “there’s all this theoretical potential” for other areas of the body as well, but “nobody allows the studies to be done,” he observed. “The studies to prove or disprove this are very simple to do. They just need to be done.”
In his email statement to LifeSiteNews, McCullough agreed with this perspective applying it particularly to the ImmunoHorizons study asserting that further testing must be done to assess the possibility of the vaccinated transmitting LNPs and/or spike proteins to the unvaccinated.
“Detailed assessment for mRNA in the blood and tissues of the unvaccinated is urgently needed,” he concluded.
Bayer executive: mRNA shots are ‘gene therapy’ marketed as ‘vaccines’ to gain public trust
‘We probably would have had a 95% refusal rate’ for these shots two years ago, but the pandemic and marketing of the injections as ‘vaccines’ has made them popular with the public, said Stefan Oelrich.