Remember that time when if you got the vaccine you wouldn't get covid or spread it to others? It's ok, everyone else forgot that one too.
Another good movie about people
and their injuries...
He called out the misuse of ventilators from the get go, then was relieved of his position in the ER:
Ventilators and Intubation
A Respiratory Therapist's Perspective
Ventilation pressures were higher than safe limit. Why? That destroys lungs.
Ventilator associated lung injury
https://www.wikem.org/wiki/Ventilator_high_pressures
Terminology
An acute lung injury that is suspected to have developed during mechanical ventilation is termed ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI)
If it can be proven that the mechanical ventilation caused the acute lung injury it is termed ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)
VALI is the appropriate term in most clinical situations because it is virtually impossible to prove causation outside of the research laboratory
Epidemiology
1 in 4 mechanically ventilated patients will develop VALI for reasons other than acute lung injury (ALI) or Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)[1]
Pathogenesis
VALI is alveolar injury caused by overexpansion of alveoli (volutrauma), repeated alveolar collapse and expansion (RACE), and cyclic atelectasis
Eventually, in serve VALI/ARDS alveoli edema/bleeding and loss of surfactant can cause complete alveoli collapse[2]
In the beginning everyone was told that if they got the vaccine then they wouldn't get covid and couldn't spread it. We learned that isn't true.
Then there was the remdesvir scam, no? How many were killed by that?
Conversely, the hospitals did receive a massive financial incentive to diagnose patients with COVID-19, administer remdesivir rather ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine and to place patients on ventilators. Here, I do believe the payoff was large enough to argue it influenced medical decision making. - AMD
Dr. Paul Marik is the 2nd most published critical care doctor in the history of medicine with more than 500 peer reviewed papers and books with over 43,000 citations of his work and a scholarly “H” rating, higher than many Nobel Prize winners. - @darkymax
Late last year, in December 2022, my mother went into hospital.
The frail 75-year-old, after 3 years of the pandemic we had to have, finally managed to “catch covid” in hospital. Well, she had a mild sniffle, so two nurses wearing hazmat suits came in to Rapid Antigen Test her. It came up positive. Mum told me that they turned to each other, with fear in their eyes, as if they were in the midst of the grim reaper himself.
Mum was sharing the room with a lady who was half deaf, and who’s TV was damaging her ear drums all day. So, she was quite relieved when they quickly escorted the lady out of the room, to save her from the dreaded virus, and give mum a full week of peace and quiet while in “isolation”.
When I spoke to her on the phone, she said that the nurses and doctors were telling her to not worry, as they had antivirals for her. I told her to tell them that they were not allowed to give her anything without my approval and to get the doctor to call me.
And so, he did, the next day.
From his accent I knew he was from Iran, probably immigrated to Australia relatively recently. He didn’t sound annoyed at having to call me.
He said that they wanted to give mum some antivirals to help her with her covid, but that she had told him to call me.
“I assume it’s either Remdesivir or Paxlovid, you want to give her?” I asked.
“Yes, that’s right, you know about them?” He said, with a hint of pleasant surprise that he might be talking to an understanding peer.
“Yes, I do. I want to be very clear. Under no circumstance whatsoever are you allowed to give her either of those two drugs. In fact, you are not allowed to give her anything without my prior approval. You are only allowed to give her some supplements such as Vit C, D and Zinc. Can you please confirm that we have an understanding?”
I was now expecting some resistance, some indignation, at the very least some attitude. I didn’t get any.
“Yes, I understand. That won’t be a problem.”
This is December 2022. I am sure that if I had tried that moved in December 2020, or even 2021, I would have had the bruised ego of the medical class to contend with. But he rolled over like a puppy.
So, I pressed on.
“I don’t know about you, but neither I, nor more importantly my mother, are afraid of covid. As far as we are concerned, we are happy to treat it the way we would a common cold.”
And here is the punchline, delivered by mum’s surrendered, and frankly quite pleasant, Iranian Australian doctor.
“Look, I’ve had four doses of the vaccine and had covid twice, so I don’t know what to think anymore.”
And with that we farewelled each other.
https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1714957605762724129
I am astonished. Canada’s health regulatory agency has made a stunning admission about Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots. They seem to be grasping reality again; at least for an issue that is a big no-no in the regulation of novel medical products.
First, some background information…
Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots consist of three parts:
A tiny genetic blueprint for the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, which can cause COVID-19 in some people. This blueprint is called modified RNA.
Lipid nanoparticles, which are tiny fat bubbles that carry the modRNA throughout the body.
A carrier solution that allows the first two products to be injected into the body.
RNA comes from DNA. So, for Pfizer to manufacture their modRNA, they used a form of DNA that comes from bacteria. It is called bacterial plasmid DNA. This is used to make many copies of the modRNA that then get packaged into the lipid nanoparticles.
The bacterial plasmid DNA is then supposed to be removed from the material that gets injected into people. Unfortunately, it turns out that this was not done properly. It appears that most, if not all of the batches of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots were contaminated with excessive amounts of fragmented bacterial DNA. A few of the problems is that this DNA…
can be very long-lasting
can be a source of proteins that are encoded in the DNA
has the potential to be incorporated into a person’s chromosomes
can cause inflammation in the body
was not disclosed to anyone receiving the shots
Kudos to Kevin McKernan from the USA, who is a great scientist and the person who discovered this issue.
Now, here is one of the biggest shockers about this contaminating bacterial DNA:
The bacterial DNA contains a genetic sequence called the ‘SV40 enhancer’ (‘SV40’ because it comes from ‘Simian Virus 40’). The virus from which this genetic sequence is derived has been implicated in causing cancers in people. It was odd that this was put into the bacterial DNA because its intended function is duplicated by another non-controversial sequence. Here is where things get really ugly. Pfizer was required to disclose to health regulatory agencies all of the bioactive sequences in the bacterial plasmid DNA that they used to manufacture their shots. Pfizer DID NOT DISCLOSE the presence of the genetic sequence from SV40 !!!
Here is another bombshell. A friend and member of my research team, the incredible Canadian virologist Dr. David Speicher, just released a preprint article today. He authored it with the great Kevin McKernan, awesome Jessica Rose, amazing Maria Gutschi, and fabulous David Wiseman. I can attest to the integrity and intellectual brilliance of each of these individuals.
I would like to point you to a Substack article in which Dr. Speicher provided some personal background information. The preprint article can be found here.
The results of Dr. Speicher’s research are profound. He generated the largest data set to date on this topic, using vials from multiple Canadian batches of both the Pfizer and Moderna shots. Every single one was contaminated with bacterial DNA. He also confirmed the presence of the SV40 enhancer sequence in the contaminating DNA in Pfizer’s Canadian vials. And this is hot off the press: he is the first to test a batch of Moderna’s newest booster COVID-19 shot; it was also contaminated, although Moderna’s bacterial DNA does not contain the genetic sequence from SV40.
Speicher, McKernan, and others sharing these scientific findings have been the focus of attacks from many so-called ‘misinformation experts’; none of whom have been able to refute their findings. Colleagues at my own academic institution even took to attacking Dr. Speicher in social media, at least in part as a way to get at me. Faculty and others attacking a member of someone’s research team is profoundly inappropriate. Most academic institutions would view such behaviour, at a minimum, as a form of academic misconduct.
My intention with this article is not to debate the potential harms of the contaminants. There is no question that the safety issue must be taken seriously and robust research must be encouraged and funded. After all, most people in the world have likely had excessive amounts of contaminating bacterial DNA injected into their bodies and there are multiple potential mechanisms whereby this DNA could cause harm.
What I do want to emphasize is this:
The Epoch Times just published a very important article about this issue. Note the stunning headline…
Health Canada Confirms Undisclosed Presence of DNA Sequence in Pfizer Shot
The article directly quotes an email sent by Health Canada to Epoch Times. Specifically, the following was disclosed…
“Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission"
The ‘sponsor’ in this case is Pfizer.
Health Canada went on to say…
"Although the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing, the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence."
And only because Kevin McKernan and others revealed the unexpected presence of the SV40 sequence…
“it was possible for Health Canada to confirm the presence of the enhancer based on the plasmid DNA sequence submitted by Pfizer against the published SV40 enhancer sequence."
This is an admission of epic proportions, coming from Health Canada. One must wonder why Pfizer would not disclose the presence of a biologically functional DNA sequence to a health regulator when it is clearly their responsibility to do so. I suspect that Health Canada is not happy that their rules were not adhered to and that this was only discovered by objective third-party scientists of integrity who worked diligently despite incessant harassment, defamation, and threats.
Notably, Pfizer has been granted legal indemnity for their shots; something which in and of itself should be a major concern. However, an important court ruling was recently made in Michigan, USA. Specifically, the court ruled that a pharmaceutical company’s legal indemnity was null and void for a contaminated version of the medical product. The product, but not any contaminants are subject to the legal indemnity. And failing to disclose a bioactive component would seem to go one step further. You can read an article about the legal issue here.
So, it would follow that Pfizer’s legal indemnity should be null and void for shots that contaminated with bacterial DNA that included a bioactive sequence that was not disclosed to regulatory agencies.
I wonder what people will think knowing that Health Canada has listened to ‘misinformation spreading scientists’, done their own homework, and then confirmed that they were duped by Pfizer.
If Health Canada was duped, then everyone that received a Pfizer shot was duped.
I call this a proof of principle. What other important information might Pfizer have withheld from regulatory agencies? When someone is caught being deceitful, the onus is not on the one deceived to find a way to trust the deceiver again. Rather, the onus is on the deceiver to earn trust back through a slow, methodical, and repetitious cycle.
This news was broken by Epoch Times several hours ago. This news should be breaking around the world. I just did a search and couldn’t find anything on this from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
This issue can serve as a litmus test in two areas…
If Health Canada does not immediately halt the use of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots and pursue disciplinary action, then they are undeserving of public trust. It would be an egregious ignorance of the sacred precautionary principle.
Any state-funded news agencies that do not broadcast this bombshell information will demonstrate that they have no concern for the concept of fully informed consent, especially as they continue to espouse taking the shots.
For people who have taken the Pfizer shot, please leave honest feedback in the comments…
Did you consent to receiving shots contaminated with bacterial DNA that includes a bioactive genetic sequence for which Health Canada has confirmed its presence and that they were not informed about it, which contradicts their rules?
How does it make you feel that Pfizer duped Health Canada?
How confident are you in the ‘safe and effective’ mantra after learning of these admissions by Health Canada?
I have often been accused of spreading ‘misinformation’, even though my early warning signals, which have always been solidly based on scientific facts, have proven correct over and over again. But, you don’t need to listen to me on this one. Maybe hearing egregious admissions directly from Health Canada will help wake a few more people up to reality.
This news needs to be spread far and wide. Out of fairness, and for the sake of full disclosure, every person that received at least one Pfizer COVID-19 shot deserves to know this truth.
https://rumble.com/v3u7l04-not-safe-for-children-or-pregnant-women-dr.-william-makis.html
Remember this:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523001075
‘Results
Among 30,202 patients for whom information on treatment was available, 191/23,172 (0.82%) patients treated with HCQ-AZ died, compared to 344/7030 (4.89%) who did not receive treatment with HCQ-AZ. HCQ-AZ therapy was associated with a lower mortality than treatment without HCQ-AZ (odds ratio (OR) 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14–0.19). After adjustment for sex, age, period, and patient management, HCQ-AZ was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.45–0.68). On a subsample of 21,664 patients with available variant information, results remained robust after adjustment on sex, age, patient management and variant (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.44–0.69). On a subsample of 16,063 patients, HCQ-AZ was still associated with a significantly lower mortality rate (aOR 0.47, 95%CI 0.29–0.75) after adjustment for sex, age, period, patient management, vaccination status and comorbidities.
See table 2, Figure 1; Four persons died after the first vaccine jab, the remaining case after the second dose. All persons died within the first week
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5#Sec3
Cardiac autopsy findings consistent with (epi-)myocarditis were found in five cases of the remaining 25 bodies found unexpectedly dead at home within 20 days following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember the Horse Dewormer Scam?
Papers reviewed:
2023 Sep.23 – Man-Yuan Li et al – Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lungadenocarcinoma cells
2023 May – Samy et al – Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostatecancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway
2022 Nov – Lotfalizadeh et al – The Anticancer potential of Ivermectin: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic implications
2022 Oct – Jian Liu et al – Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin
2022 Jun – Daeun Lee et al – Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction
2021 Aug – Shican Zhou et al – Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth
2021 Jan – Mingyang Tang et al – Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug
2019 Sep Intuyod et al – Anti-parasitic Drug Ivermectin Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-resistant Cholangiocarcinoma In Vitro
2018 Feb – Juarez et al – The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug
You can see that FULL article over on MakisMD Substack here.
Canadian Oncologist and Radiologist:
You can see that from the Israeli MoH data. But that data was first made public in a tweet from MIT Professor Retsef Levi on March 7, 2023. It made no difference.
1/3 Israel MOH study compares non-COV deaths of vaccinated over days 1-30 vs. 31-60 post dose 2 (Jan-Oct 21). This ignores over 600 COV deaths just post dose 1. But they still have to ‘waive’ the striking safety signal: 540 vs. 1275 deaths (1st vs. 2nd period)! What did they do?
https://twitter.com/RetsefL/status/1633089224353120257?s=20
New Israeli MoH study shows COVID vax increases your risk of death over time.
Here are the two key graphs from that article. Both are day till death if you most recent shot is shot #2:
Figure 1. The death rate 60 days out is double the death rate in the first 30 days. For a safe vaccine, all these bars should be the same height. There is no temporal HVE at all; if there was, the first bar would be the lowest bar. Data first made public by MIT Professor Retsef Levi on March 7, 2023.
Figure 2. This is an expanded version of Fig. 1. Your risk of death after shot #2 peaks at around 100 days (3 months) after the shot. If this were a safe vaccine, all the bars on this chart would be exactly the SAME height. This is a total train wreck. There is a 9X variation here. The medical community is inept. This is a stopping signal.
Trudeau: Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau wrote on Twitter "Got my COVID-19 booster and flu shot this morning. You should get yours, too.";
Someone tell his moronic health advisors Njoo, Tam,Supriya Sharma, these idiots of the highest order, that the booster CANNOT work & is already failed! Did Trudeau decide on his own, no, I can't believe he is that dumb, or did dolt Tam tell him to?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1722349593537474638
What stupid dangersous, reckless people. At this stage telling, pushing people to get a booster that is not needed? this guy is under 70, supposedly healthy, he is NOT a candidate for any COVID shot, far less the flu shot that has never ever worked, that too is a scam! Each time you think he cannot be more idiotic, he reaches into his bag of tricks and outdoes himself! He is quite good at that.
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Njoo, Tam, Sharma et al. at Health Canada and PHAC are among the most specious, misinformed, unscientific, academically sloppy, intellectually lazy, morally bankrupt people to me, to as they continue the lies of COVID. Should we whisper to them about
i)recall antibodies to the intial prime or exposure…ask the dolts which antibodies will be recalled after Trudeau takes these boosters?
ii)original antigenic sin (almost same as #1)
iii)antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (or disease)
iv)viral immune escape
v)immune fixation, immune imprinting, priming, prejudice etc. and what this means in the backdrop of these COVID mRNA vaccines
vi)negative effectiveness of these vaccines
etc. etc.
should we tell these dimwits at Health Canada?
Please help support UGOLINI’s substack, this reporter is fearless and the real deal!
Just give us a number Drs. Malone, Karikó, Bancel, Sahin, Bourla, Weissman, just give us a number of how many you think is ACCEPTABLE, REASONABLE to DIE due to your mRNA technology & vaccine? Just
tell us, we know its your technology and vaccine etc., we don't question you & all we seek now is a number of dead, so we can plan, prepare, understand the scope of the catastrophe due to your work
How many more must die? How many more? How many more must die before we get proper investigations, legal tribunals, court hearings on COVID yet especially on the deadly COVID mRNA technology vaccine?
Is it fair to ask for a number, how many more? Before something is done, how many more? There must be a number, a threshold you researchers and doctors would find unacceptable, or have you not even thought of that? Do you malcreants even care? Do you not understand that we know this rests at your feet? No matter the silence, the ‘buy outs’, the intimidation, no matter how you dress the pig, its still a damn filthy pig that came and gave us something that enriched the pigs with money and fame yet killed us, while the very pig told us they were ‘helping’ us…while all the pigs were doing, several of them,, was MISDIRECTING us, Houdini style.