Systematic Review of Published COVID-19 Vaccine Serious Adverse Events
2021 Reports Summarize a Cardiovascular, Thromboembolic Safety Disaster
The Power of Your Voice
Parents, friends, community members, Americans and global civilians, our voices and our presence is powerful. Showing up and speaking up works.
below…
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
While many have argued that the public health voluntary adverse event reporting systems represent under-reporting and give scan clinical information, the safety results being published in the peer-reviewed literature cannot be easily dismissed. Despite tremendous editorial bias resulting in rejection of manuscripts on vaccine safety events, the papers that survive to publication tell us just a small fraction of the story.
Yasmin et al reported from 2021 alone, a stunning number of papers with cases describing nothing short of a cardiovascular safety disaster.
A total of 81 articles on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in 17,636 individuals and reported 284 deaths with any mRNA vaccine. Of 17,636 cardiovascular events with any mRNA vaccine, 17,192 were observed with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, 444 events with mRNA-1273 (Moderna). Thrombosis was frequently reported with any mRNA vaccine (n = 13,936), followed by stroke (n = 758), myocarditis (n = 511), myocardial infarction (n = 377), pulmonary embolism (n = 301), and arrhythmia (n = 254). The time between the vaccination dosage and the first symptom onset averaged 5.6 and 4.8 days with the mRNA-1273 vaccine and BNT162b2, respectively.
Keep in mind usually < 50 deaths with a widely used, novel product prompts a worldwide recall. To have 284 well described deaths as a result of cardiovascular and or thrombotic complications is a striking finding in the medical literature for products that are still on the market and promoted by public health agencies all over the world.
The wide range of therapeutics used to treat vaccine injury syndromes indicates there are no simple solutions. We use the drugs disclosed by Yasmin et al in clinical practice, but importantly, have found McCullough Protocol Base Spike Protein Detoxification to be a key basis of support in order to aid in elimination of vaccine Spike protein and ultimately restore the patient to good health. Our goal with this protocol widely applied to the at-risk population is to prevent cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications in those who have had multiple episodes of COVID-19 and or taken mRNA vaccines.
So the next time someone attempts to promote the false “safe and effective” narrative. Feel free to cite this paper that makes the case the vaccines are simply not safe for human use.
mRNA Injury series - Appendicitis after Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine - Most common Serious Adverse Event and it's harming kids - What about Turbo Cancers of the Appendix? (They're happening)
Thousands of Appendicitis cases have been reported after COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines
NOV 16, 2023
Image Sources: Medpage, Tots&moms, Mitchell et al
Papers reviewed:
2023 Jan (Jambon-Barbara et al) - Understanding the variability of pharmaco‐epidemiological studies assessing the risk of appendicitis with mRNA COVID‐19 vaccines
2022 June (Oganesyan et al) - Acute appendicitis following the COVID-19 vaccine
2022 May (Marconi et al) - Acute appendicitis in a patient immunised with COVID-19 vaccine: A case report with morphological analysis
2021 Dec (Mitchell et al) - Appendicitis as a possible safety signal for the COVID-19 vaccines
miRNAs Used in Autopsy Cases after Cardiac Arrest
New Tissue and Blood Diagnostics Identify Gene Regulators Independent of Coronary DiseaseBy Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
We are witnessing an tsunami of cardiac arrests since the advent of the worldwide mass genetic vaccination program. In virtually every case, the COVID-19 vaccination status is not disclosed to the public. Additionally, the general autopsy can be “normal.” I am commonly asked what should a modern COVID-19 vaccine era cardiac autopsy look like:
Gross inspection, heart aorta, great vessels, lungs, pulmonary arteries
Heart weight <250 g for women, < 350 g for men
Coronary slices for atherosclerosis and thrombus
Myocardial slices for evidence of scar, congenital abnormalities, valvular disease.
Myocardial immunohistochemical staining for SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Nucleocapsid, inflammatory cells, amyloid protein
Buccal swab for Arrythmia and Cardiomyopathy Panel (In Vitae or equivalent)
Research assays
Anatomic coronary artery disease is highly prevalent in adults and it may be a bystander and not the direct cause of the arrhythmic cardiac arrest. Di Michele et al reported that small micro RNA fragments that are known to regulate genes, and in this circumstance, genes that control cardiac ion channels, do vary up or down in blood and cardiac tissue and help distinguish between a coronary event and a primary arrhythmic event.
At this time it is possible that mRNA and adenoviral DNA vaccines could influence key miRNA’s in the causal pathway to a primary arrhythmic cardiac death in the absence of clinical myocarditis. So if you are involved in a circumstance with a family member or friend with an unexpected cardiac arrest, please push for the fullest autopsy possible. You will only have one shot.
Outcomes after Early Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin: An Analysis of 30,423 COVID-19 patients
Huge Outcomes Study Delivers Good NewsBy Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
We perform prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to test drugs, vaccines, devices, and other products for safety and efficacy. Randomization is important since it handles: 1) selection bias, 2) all known and unknown confounders. Despite the hundreds of billions of dollars spent during the pandemic, we did not have an investment in large, multidrug prospective, randomized, placebo controlled trials or comparative studies to test the best drug regimens.
In the end, what patients care about is how they feel, function, and survive. When it came to COVID-19, whether randomized or not, if patients survived if they were in the optimally treated group. The only way to assess how a high-risk population faired in the pandemic is to report on a large sample of patients sick with COVID-19 with a large number of the outcome of of interest—death.
Brouqui et al reported from a French database of 30,423 COVID-19 patients of whom 535 succumbed to the illness. In great detail, the investigators report mortality according to ambulatory treatment received, hospitalization, and the course over the following six weeks.
As you can see, the most favored group was those who received the regimen of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin early in the course of illness. Of the 30,202 patients for whom treatment information was available, 191/23,172 patients (0.82%) treated with HCQ-AZM died, compared to 344/7,030 patients (4.89%) who did not receive HCQ-AZM. All the other combinations received are reported in the figure.
Important points:
HCQ+AZM consistently reduced the risk of hospitalization and death
If hospitalized, those pre-treated with HCQ+AZM at home had a greater chance of survival
Critics say this was not a randomized trial. Patients say it does not matter, they just want to survive on HCQ + AZM! When the differences are this large, we go with what is working for patients, not a false narrative from the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex deceiving the population on simple, safe, generic drugs.
Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.Brouqui et al, Outcomes after early treatment with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: An analysis of a database of 30,423 COVID-19 patients, NewMicrobesandNewInfections55(2023)101188
The Power of Your Voice
Parents, friends, community members, Americans and global civilians, our voices and our presence is powerful. Showing up and speaking up works.
November 12, 2023: It’s been more than 3 years since ‘2 weeks to slow the curve’ and many of us medical freedom warriors sometimes experience frustration, wondering to ourselves “With all the sacrifices I’ve made, what has been accomplished?”
Supporters who have been following me since mid-2021, know that since day one - I have not backed down from sharing government and corporate documents, data, and laws to protect us and our children in order to have the entire COVID-19 racket shut down.
When I first started doing interviews, I never even watched them. Not one. I was just constantly researching and preparing. Over this weekend, I went back and found a couple early interviews I did with Stew Peters that resulted in major wins here in San Diego county.
At the time, I didn’t realize the impact that the interviews with Stew Peters had, both here in San Diego and throughout the country.
Consider becoming a free or paid subscriber to support my work.
Upgrade to paid
Acknowledging and Celebrating Victories
In the Fall of 2021, by confronting my son’s school, writing legal letters, and with the help of Stew Peters in exposing the San Diego School District vaccine mandates and testing, the vaccine mandate was not enforced by my son’s school district and the PCR testing was removed from his campus within less than 10 business days of me exposing the illegal genetic testing of students, whose genetic samples were being sent to South Korea.
I understand not everyone has access to a large media audience and wonders if showing up and speaking up matters. It does.
Shutting Down School Monkeypox Screening with No Cameras and No Audience
In August of 2022, I showed up at a school board meeting with a friend to oppose the school’s ‘monkey pox screening.’ No cameras, no crowds, and no script. We were the only 2 non-school employees there. I explained to the school board how they were NOT going to be engaging in inspecting the students chests, breasts, and/or genitals without severe legal ramifications from myself and other parents. The next week the school district announced that they would not be moving forward with the program.
Parents, friends, community members, Americans and global civilians, our voices and our presence is powerful. Showing up and speaking up works. I understand being frustrated and tired and even sometimes scared, but I’m going to keep showing up and speaking up, because it matters more now than ever. Please join me. People are waking up and we need to show up, sharing the truth with confidence and compassion.
The Kingston Report. TRUTH Wins.
Galatians 6: 9-10
Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers.
The following article is a recap of those two Fall 2021 interviews with Stew Peters.
September of 2021: San Diego School District Board Mandates COVID-19 Vaccines for Students as Young as 16
Under the San Diego county (district) mandate, eligible staff and students (including my teenage son) were mandated to be vaccinated by December 20, 2021.
On September 30, 2021, I went on the Stew Peters show to in order expose the the unlawful and criminal San Diego School District COVID-19 vaccine mandates and their delusional idea that they have civil and criminal immunity under the PREP Act. (Interview starts at 15:15 mark)
The night before the interview, I sent the San Diego Unified School District Board and their Medical Expert Panel an email warning them that they were delusional to believe that they had authority to pass the COVID-19 vaccine mandate or immunity under PREP Act.
WARNING: PREP ACT/COVID-19 EUA IMMUNITY IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IMMORAL
MAY 8
Or as Stew summarized the PREP act is stating that, “The PREP Act makes it legal for school boards to commit aggravated assault against children.”
Per the my interview with Stew Peters, and the email I sent to the responsible parties, I informed the the San Diego school board and medical advisors that they were delusional to think they had the authority under the PREPE Act to enforce a student COVID-19 vaccine mandate because they were “following HHS/NIH/CDC guidance.”
Although the county school board passed the mandate in September 2021 (except in my son’s subdistrict), in February of 2023 the California Supreme Court upheld the ruling that ‘the district lacks the legal authority to impose its own mandates.’ (As I said in the interview, school districts, medical providers, and Pharma companies are delusional to think they have immunity under the PREP Act.)
I strongly recommend watching the September 2021 interview, as it is now more legally relevant than ever.
Unvaccinated Students Were Required to Undergo Weekly PCR Tests under the District Mandate
The San Diego School District mandates also included mandatory weekly testing for all San Diego students who were not vaccinated and not eligible for a mandated vaccine due to their age. Mandatory mask wearing was also required (no exceptions).
Parents were never informed of how or when this student testing was going to happen.
In October of 2021, my unvaccinated, mask-wearing teenage son called me saying he was randomly called out of class to get a COVID-19 test and asked if he had my permission to get tested. I told him ‘No’ and then called the school and told them ‘No way are you testing my son.’
The school ignored my demand and tested my perfectly healthy, symptomless son anyway. I immediately got in my car and drove to the school to speak with the nurse and Vice Principal.
I took photos of the outdoor ‘testing centers’ so that I could research the company behind the PCR tests.
The PCR tests (genetic tests) came from a company called GenBody, a genetic testing company based out of South Korea.
GenBody is a genetic testing company based out of South Korea that received a $10.3 million NIH grant to allegedly conduct tests for the dual presence of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B. (I assume to later use this ‘data’ justify the SARS/Flu combo ‘vaccine.’)
Under the FDA EUA authorization for the GenBody tests, the PCR test had to be given, “by a healthcare provider within with 6 days of symptoms onset.”
My son had no symptoms when the school tested him and neither the school nurse nor the vice principal could give me the name of the healthcare provider who ordered my son’s test.
The next day, on October 27, 2021, Stew Peters invited me on to his program to expose this scandal.
“My son is now involved in a $10.3 million clinical trial, without my consent, with gross overreach to gather his genetic material that is being shipped off to South Korea…and no one can tell me who ordered the test or who he was exposed to.”
I wrote a letter to my son’s school and the San Diego County Board of Supervisors letting them know that genetic testing of the students without the parents’ permission was both unlawful and illegal.
Within less than 10 business days of the Stew Peters interview airing, the testing centers were removed off of all San Marcos school district campuses, and PCR testing would only be mandated for students who presented with symptoms as diagnosed by a healthcare professional.
The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.
Philippians 3: 15-120
All of us, then, who are mature should take such a view of things. And if on some point you think differently, that too God will make clear to you. Only let us live up to what we have already attained.
Join together in following my example, brothers and sisters, and just as you have us as a model, keep your eyes on those who live as we do. For, as I have often told you before and now tell you again even with tears, many live as enemies of the cross of Christ. Their destiny is destruction, their god is their stomach, and their glory is in their shame. Their mind is set on earthly things. But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ,
Keep up the good fight!
On sunday, Wafik El-Deiry and Phillip Buckhaults were accused of feeding anti-vax platforms by pointing out some little known details about SV40 Promoters.
What Dan was unaware of, was the mountain of literature cancer jocks have at their fingerprints that points to SV40's roll in cancer is multifaceted but its interaction with the guardian of the genome “p53” is one of the more notable issues.
Yes. The SV40 promoter is known to bind to p53. And just to blow up that sequence so you can see it.
It became the topic of heated debate.
Dan Wilson (Debunk the Funk) came charging in claiming the SV40 Origin sequence doesn’t exist in the SV40 Viral genome in NCBI nor in our Published Pfizer plasmid. I’ve included the SnapGene file for anyone who wants to see whats going on.
After a long embarrassing dialog, it turned out the SV40 origin of replication is at Base 1 and Base 5243 in the viral genome in NCBI. This is normal nomenclature for circular plasmids. You make the origin Base 1. This gets tricky with plasmids that have multiple Ori’s like Pfizer so they decided to make base 1 their Eam1104i cut site.
However this circularity confuses people new to DNA alignment as they try to match the SV40 Promoter sequence against a linear SV40 genome reference and some aligners fail to consider the circularity of the viral genome reference.
Dan raised Parsons et al as one paper that described SV40 in 1990. It ironically had the answer to his confusion right in the figure.
Note the coordinate system goes from 5210 to 30 on the top axis.
Dan downloaded the SV40 reference genome from NCBI that went from 1-5243. The sequence he was looking for was those black arrows which traverse the circularization of the coordinate system. So he couldn’t operate a simple DNA alignment and made a huge spectacle insisting the Director of the Cancer Center at Brown University (who has over 100K citations and recently won the innovator of the year award) was dead wrong.
It was like Simple Jack yelling at Einstein that his E=mc^2 equation was wrong and soon recognizing Simple Jack didn’t know what an exponent was.
Yes, the virus has an Origin of replication and so does the plasmid. The EMA, The FDA and Health Canada have all admitted this SV40 Promoter is present in the Pfizer vaccine and for those not familiar with the nomenclature, the SV40 Ori is entirely contained in the SV40 Promoter. You can’t have the promoter and not have the Ori.
Here is a SnapGene view of the region on a coordinate system from Pfizer. Not as hard to get lost in the circularity issues as Pfizer set their base 1 coordinate anchored on their linearization site (Eam1104i).
The SV40 Origin is annotated in Yellow, the 72bp tandem repeat from the SV40 Enhancer is in Aqua and Pink, and the promoter in white. The Yellow Highlighted bases are the GC Boxes
Dan refused to apologize to Wafik and Phil for his erroneous harassment. Once this thunderous error of his was put to bed his goal posts shifted to demanding we prove the SV40 sequence is harmful and that our qPCR assay was garbage.
We’ll, aside from the integration risks which have been discussed at length elsewhere, let review the papers that speak to p53 binding to the SV40 Promoter.
Many of these papers demonstrate this SV40 Promoter binding to p53 but they also put a lot of attention on the roll of SV40 Tumor-Antigen which is NOT in the vaccine.
The Tumor Antigen just happens to be in 20% of the population according to some seroprevalence studies.
But even if T-antigen isn’t present, we have billions of molecules of SV40 Promoters being injected and if they are a sink for p53, then that gene is wasting its time on decoys.
Any non-disclosed contaminant in the vaccine that resembled prior vaccine debacles (like SV40 in the polio vaccine) and also bound to p53 would be grounds for enough people to say.. yah OK… maybe we should consider some precaution here? This is easy to eliminate and easy to track and monitor. Why are we not being cautious here?
Wasn’t an ‘abundance of caution’ was the most popular phrase in 2020?
Ananda-Amigo Fester’s Niece decided it was time to play plasmid debunk Bingo as the same tired arguments kept getting recirculated once the existence of the SV40 Promoter/Origin was settled.
Lets go over a few of the more credible ones below.
Are the fragments long enough for any promoters to be present?
Yes. While the majority of the DNA is less than 100bp, there is a long tail of molecules. Most ONT runs demonstrate 1/60th of the DNA is longer than 1Kb.
Also, Klinman et al is an important reference in the Speicher et al preprint that goes over integration risks under 200bp and even suggests events as small as 7bp are material.
The promoter, Ori , Enhancer sequences are 358, 136, 192 bases respectively. These are active as small DNA molecules (as small as 72bp for the NLS in the Enhancer) and are in high copy number in the vaccines.
2)Aren’t there only going to be a few of these Molecules per cell?
I would love to know and be able to comfortably assume that but this is not a slow release medicine. It’s a IM/bolus injection. That is not the condition to achieve low multiplicity of infection (Low MOI).
cells close to the injection are likely getting 100s of LNPs.
3) cGAS-STING and other pathways will erase all this stuff.
I’d love to believe that too but the data we have in breast milk, plasma and heart tissues is that this nucleic acid is lasting longer than 48hrs so we can no longer live by this conveniently optimistic ethos. Most studies to date that find persistent RT-qPCR signal used assays that cant discern DNA from RNA in the RT-qPCR (qPCR or DNases and RNases likely required).
It also rubs me the wrong way when people point to a host defense mechanism that defends against their slop. How about we don’t trigger non-specific and unnecessary inflammation? Some people are developing antagonists to this pathway to battle inflammatory disease.
It’s as if every contaminant instantly becomes a beneficial adjuvant the moment its found.
Schrodingers Adjuvant.
When you don’t look, its an unlikely contaminant.
The moment you look, the hand wave condenses into an adjuvant.
The p53 Drayman paper reiterates that SV40 promoters localize to the nucleus and bind p53. If STING were so effective at eliminating this, SV40 promoters wouldn’t be under study as gene therapy tools.
Gosh et al also demonstrates STING is suppressed by p53. So if p53 binds to SV40 in the nucleus and also suppresses the very pathway that is meant to clear out SV40, why are people so certain they understand the outcome of this experiment?
I don’t know what is going to happen in this circumstance. The folks that confidently assure you that nothing will happen lack humility on the complexity of this biology.
The same people that are so certain of the benevolence of this treatment will demand no further questions get asked as it might scare the Plebs.
When science requires a restriction of information flow and a silencing of allowable questions under the banner of protecting the public from their own fear… you are dealing with scam artists, not scientists.
The scam is executed while making a mockery of the publics intelligence. At the core of this ‘Munchaussen’s mutated into my morality mission’ is an elitism mind virus masquerading as a public protector.