The Dark History of the Royals
How to Survive Healthcare comes last, and the Queen survived it for 96 years…because they have the money to do so…
The Dark side of the Royals
There’s no dark side, right? I mean, she’s the QUEEN right? Kings and Queens have a God given right to rule over us, their subjects. Queen Elizardbeast was revered, loved, brilliant and wise, was she not? She’s just the symbolic head of state for her ‘common’ wealth? Interesting word for “I own everything”
She owns most of everything you think you own, or she did… now her dumb son is in charge. God have mercy on us…
James Corbett writes:
The Dark History of the Royals
by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
September 10, 2022
Queen Elizardbeast is dead, long live King Charles?!
Yes, for those lucky souls who are so blissfully detached from the 24/7 newsfeeds that you haven't heard yet, I bring you the news that the longest-reigning monarch in British history, Queen Elizabeth II, is dead.
It's tempting to interpret the double rainbow that appeared over Buckingham Palace when Her Royal Lowness kicked the royal bucket as a sign that her death is indeed a present from God, but—as I am always at pains to observe upon such occasions—the death of an unrepentant sinner is no victory and there is no solace in the removal of but one of the Hydra's many heads. If anything, the reign of King Charles will doubtless be even more ignoble than that of his mother.
Whatever the future may hold for the loyal subjects of His Royal Highness, the Great Reset-shilling, pedophile-befriending, carbon eugenics-pushing King Charles III, given the disheartening (if predictable) reaction of the normies to this latest royal passing, nothing could be timelier than an in-depth exploration of the lowlights of the British royal family. So, even though I am going to drop an 18,000 word, two-hour documentary conclusion in the next 24 hours(!!!), I have taken time out of my schedule to bring you this.
"Enjoy" is the wrong word, but you get the idea.
The Unofficial History of the Royals
There's a story that's told about Queen Elizabeth. According to this story, when asked about her ideology, she is said to have replied: "We are older than capitalism and socialism."
The story is almost certainly apocryphal. But, like many such made-up anecdotes, it does have a ring of truth to it. Indeed, the monarchs are not socialists or capitalists, per se. They are part of a much older tradition that sees the world in a very different light.
In order to understand this royal worldview, we have to go back to the beginning. No, not the beginning of Elizabeth's reign in 1952. Not the beginning of the English branch of the House of "Windsor" to which she belonged. Not even the beginning of the monarchical system in England.
We have to go back to the beginning of monarchy itself. And, to the surprise of absolutely none of my readers, we will discover that the royal ideology was a forerunner to what we know today as eugenics.
As I wrote in 2016:
The ancient Egyptians worshipped the Pharaohs as progeny of the sun god, Ra. The Japanese were told that their Imperial family descended from the sun goddess, Amaterasu, and the sea god, Ryuujin. In Europe, monarchs claimed that God Himself had directly granted them a "Divine Right" to rule over their subjects. In China they called it the "Mandate of Heaven."
For as long as there have been royalty there have been elaborate theological justifications for why monarchs deserve to rule over the people . . . and there has always been royalty.
It's easy to see why the ruling class has tried to foster this idea of godly rule in culture after culture. After all, if the Kings and Queens and Emperors and Pharaohs were not gods, or at least chosen by God, why would anyone listen to them? The difference between a regal king and a tinpot dictator disappears if the king's divinity is denied.
Even today, in this "post-monarchical" era, ancient superstitions about royal families persist. They are still referred to as "blue bloods" as if the very blood that flowed through their veins is different from yours or mine. There is still an elaborate etiquette for meeting the Queen of England, and it is still strictly enforced without exception. Even Obama had to take a lesson before he could meet with Her Majesty Elizabeth II.
The rituals of class distinction are not merely for show. The royals have always considered themselves of superior stock to the commoners, a breed apart from the poor downtrodden masses who toil in squalor beneath them.
Yes, the ancients were taught to believe that their emperors were literal gods. The European dynasties, meanwhile, flourished for centuries under the mass delusion that these families were specifically selected by God to rule over their people. Should it come as any surprise that at some point the royals started to believe their own propaganda?
But, as these proto-eugenicists soon figured out, if their blood was too precious to mingle with the commoners', then that blood must be kept in the family. And so began centuries of royal inbreeding that resulted in the deformities, abnormalities and genetic weirdness that today pervades the royal bloodlines (congenital haemophilia being just one of the most well-known examples). Perhaps the most notable example of intra-family marriage leading to genetic ruin is that of the Spanish Hapsburgs, who, after 500 years of ruling over vast swathes of Europe, managed to inbreed themselves out of existence.
With this understanding of the proto-eugenical philosophy as our background, we can begin to make sense of the millennium-long story of the British monarchy. Alfred the Great yadda yadda yadda Henry beheading wives and starting a church blah blah blah the madness of King George etc. etc. etc. Mrs. John Brown and so on and so forth all the way up to Eddie (VII, for those keeping track at home) and the intrigues that kicked off WWI and birthed the modern world. You know, that story.
To finish making sense of that history, we just need to add one other element to the story: as it turns out, the "British" royal family isn't very British at all. The House of "Windsor" only became the House of "Windsor" in 1917, after all. Before that, it was Saxe Coburg-Gotha. But the British public were a bit fired up about the Huns because of that whole, you know, WWI thing, so "Windsor" it became.
Noting the true origins of the House of "Windsor" is not just some cheap anti-Germanic slur, of course. It points to something even more fundamental. These royals—connected, as we remember, through inbreeding—had much more in common with their European brothers and sisters, cousins and uncles, than they did with the populations they were supposedly ruling over.
With that historical background in place, we can understand, for example, the Windsors' well-documented fondness for the eugenics-promoting Nazis. Where do you think the Nazis got their eugenical beliefs from, after all? Given the royal pedigree of the eugenic worldview, it is perhaps unsurprising to learn that the pseudoscience of eugenics was pioneered by Royal Medal recipient Francis Galton, himself hailing from the celebrated (and thoroughly inbred) Darwin-Galton line, which boasted many esteemed Fellows of the Royal Society.
The overt ties between the Edwardian (VIII, for those keeping track at home) court and Hitler's eugenics-obsessed regime are well-documented. The covert ties are even more intriguing. (Hmmm, that gives me an idea for a documentary . . . .) But it isn't just the home movies showing the future queen giving the Nazi salute or Edward VIII's hobnobbing with Hitler or King Charles' lifelong friendship with unreformed SS officer (and Bilderberg co-founder) Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands or Prince Harry's predilection for Nazi cosplaying. More to the heart of the matter is Prince Philip's infamous desire to be reincarnated as "a particularly deadly virus" in order to contribute to the depopulation of the planet (a remark that has been fact checked by Snopes, so you know that it's true!).
You see, the royals' blue blood pomposity wouldn't be so bad if they simply felt themselves superior to the commoners in a "What, you groom your own stool? My heavens!" kind of way. Sadly, it is not mere snobbery that motivates them, and their great desire is not simply to be kept apart from the commoners. As it turns out, the royal family doesn't just feel superior to their subjects, they actively dislike them and constantly scheme to subjugate them, rob them, impoverish them and mislead them.
Royal False Flags
There's something quaint about Redditors seemingly discovering for the first time that, far from some cute little old lady who waves to the crowds and enjoys tea and crumpets in pretty English gardens, Queen Elizabeth II was actually the heir to a fortune amassed via the violent subjugation of much of the world's populace and the plundering of their wealth and resources. The fact that anyone could be shocked by this historical reality speaks to the naïveté of the masses, who cannot imagine that ruthless psychopaths conspire to amass more wealth by inflicting suffering on the world. (Just wait until these dear, trusting masses learn about the British East India company and the opium wars and the Bengal genocide and the Boer concentration camps and the Amritsar Massacre, etc., etc., etc. . . .)
But for a prime example of the perfidity with which the British monarchy has ruled for centuries (and which gave rise to the "Perfidious Albion" moniker), one need only look at the history of their speciality: false flag operations.
Befitting the governing monarchy of a nation that has been known for its treachery for centuries, the British royals' use of false flag events to gin up public support for the persecution of their enemies likewise goes back centuries. For one prime example of that, we will have to "Remember, remember the fifth of November."
Outside of Britain, the "gunpowder plot" is known only tangentially through cultural artifacts, like the references to the plot contained in V for Vendetta and the subsequent adoption of the Guy Fawkes mask as the symbol of Anonymous. Even in England, most will only know the official version of the story—the one compiled in the so-called "King's Book" written by King James I himself.
According to that official account, on the evening of November 4th, 1605, Guy Fawkes was discovered with 36 barrels of gunpowder and a pile of wood and coal in the undercroft beneath the House of Lords in Parliament, presumably preparing to blow up the building. After his apprehension, Fawkes was brought before the king and, cracking under the interrogation, eventually led the king's agents to the other conspirators in the plot. As it turned out, the whole harebrained scheme to blow up Parliament as it convened on the 5th of November had been hatched by the Jesuits and carried out by a ragtag group of crazed provincial English Catholics. King James then took the sensible precaution of cracking down on Catholics in England, thus ensuring that Catholic treachery would never again threaten the kingdom.
Of course, this story—like so much of the history written by the winners—is total hogwash. Entire books could be written about the plot, what we really know about it, and how the official version was conjured into existence . . . and at least one book has! It's called The Gunpowder Plot and it was written by Hugh Ross Williamson and published in 1952. Those who are interested in the full story are highly encouraged to read Williamson's account. Although the full truth of the plot will likely never be known—buried as it is in a sea of forged documents, tampered evidence and official secrecy—we can say with certainty that the official story was constructed from torture testimony and forged confessions, that the king's spies were likely involved at every level of the plot, that the band of patsies who were ultimately blamed for the whole affair could not possibly have perpetrated it by themselves and, most importantly, that it provided King James with the perfect excuse to crack down on Catholics in the exact manner he had desired.
Texas Residents Push Back Against ‘Family-Friendly’ Drag Show Guarded By AR-Wielding Antifa Militia Members
In other words, Guy Fawkes was likely neither the radical Catholic terrorist mastermind that the court of King James made him out to be nor the crusading anti-authoritarian hero that V for Vendetta and Anonymous pretend him to be, but rather a patsy, a dupe or a mole who was used by the monarchy as a convenient excuse to enact draconian new laws clamping down on the king's opponents. Go figure.
But the British monarchy's false flag hits don't stop there. Viewers of my WWI Conspiracy documentary will already know the central role played by King Edward VII and his German-hating wife in forging the so-called "Triple Entente" between Britain, France and Russia that paved the way for the "Great" War agains the Huns. You will likely also remember WWI conspirator Edward Mandell House's own account of his rather remarkable conversation with Edward VII's successor, King George V, on the morning of May 7, 1915. As House recounts in his Intimate Papers, the two "fell to talking, strangely enough, of the probability of Germany sinking a trans-Atlantic liner." Even more "coincidentally," House relates that George specifically inquired what would happen if the Huns "should sink the Lusitania with American passengers on board." Later that very day, the Lusitania was sunk and public opinion in America turned decidedly against Germany, preparing the way for the eventual entry of the US into the war on the side of the British.
Coincidence, surely.
As for the false flag attacks of recent decades, not only has the British crown long played with the fire of Muslim extremism—alternately supporting it or opposing it as geopolitical circumstance necessitates—as I have demonstrated in Part 1 of The Secret History of Al Qaeda—but, as I shall demonstrate in Part 3 of The Secret History of Al Qaeda, the royals presided over a UK government that was an active collaborationist with the neocons in the creation and forwarding of the war of terror agenda. (Stay tuned! . . .)
But I'll bet the new king wishes that an uncomfortable million-pound donation from the bin Laden family were the biggest of his political problems . . .
The Windsors' Pedophile Problem
Oh, if only the new king's greatest fault was to have been born into a eugenics-obsessed family.
If only he were the guiltless benefactor of the cheating, swindling, extortion, theft and plunder of his forebears.
If only his worst sin was his ridiculous climate hypocrisy or his campaigning for Klaus Schwab's Great Reset or his attempt to mask cows.
If only he were a regular, run-of-the-mill tyrant, a psychopath who got off on torturing and killing others.
Unfortunately for all of us, it's much worse than that.
The public got a hint of what really goes on behind the royal family's closed castle gates when the Jimmy Savile scandal first came to light a decade ago. If you are able to cast your mind back to the innocent days of 2012, you might recall that, at the time, the existence of high-level pedophile rings (let alone high-level necrophilic pedophile rings) was considered the stuff of tinfoil conspiracy lunacy.
You might also recall that the royal family's relationship to Savile was certainly "problematic" (to use the kids' lingo). But, given what the public then knew, not necessarily more problematic than the involvement of any of the other people who had cozied up to the monstrous pedophile during the course of his career. Sure, the Queen had knighted Savile back in 1990, and any number of photographs could tell you that he was awfully chummy with Charles. Yet perhaps knighthood was to be expected, considering that he had seemingly dedicated much of his life to charity and had made many high-profile friends along the way. In fact, the first hard questions about who knew what when about Savile were asked of the BBC, which certainly did know about the allegations many decades before the disgusting abuser finally died.
But over the years the "who could have known?" routine used by the Windsors' defenders has become increasingly insupportable. First, there was the revelation that Savile was so close to the royal family that he was almost made Prince Harry's godfather. Then came the increasingly damning reports on Savile's close personal friendship with Charles, culminating in the release earlier this year of letters proving that the now-King of England regularly sought Savile's advice on sensitive political matters. And on top of all that there was Savile's own uncomfortable admission that the knighthood had "let him off the hook" for his past sins.
Unsurprisingly, the royal family has never had to respond in any way to public outrage about these reports. No presstitute who wants to keep his job was ever going to dare press Charles on the issue and, since Savile's crimes were only brought to light after his death, the royals could always hide behind the "plausible deniability" that they didn't know what Sir Jimmy was up to. They didn't even need to launch a formal process to strip Savile of his knighthood. For, as it turns out, the honours "automatically expire when a person dies."
But, as I say, the Savile scandal blew up back in the bygone era of a decade ago, when the concept of political pedophile rings was still in the realm of crazed conspiracy podcasts. That all changed, of course, when the Epstein story finally broke into the public consciousness in 2019. And who just happened to be in the middle of that scandal?
That's right, Prince Andrew. The brother of the current king and the eighth in line to the British throne. A man so transparently lecherous that for decades the UK tabloids have mockingly referred to him as "Randy Andy." A man who literally had to invent a scientifically unknown condition of being "unable to sweat" to try to "prove" that the allegations made against him by Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre were false.
I mean, yes, there's the photo of him with his arm around an underage Giuffre (with intelligence handler and convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell hovering in the background), but he doesn't sweat so . . . it's all a lie?
No one buys anything that comes out of the mouth of His Royal Lowness, Prince Andrew, Duke of Dork. After all, you know someone must be a public relations mess when even the royal family is compelled to revoke his titles and royal patronages to keep him out of the spotlight of public scrutiny. As we've seen, the royals didn't even dole out that form of retroactive punishment to Sir Jimmy.
As we all know, the public is no longer as naïve as they were in 2012, and, sadly, the nightmarish reality of protected political pedophile rings is so accepted as documented fact that it is no longer mocked as conspiracy yarn. And, to the surprise of no one who is familiar with the ignoble history of the royal family, the House of Windsor has been implicated in two of the highest profile pedophile scandals in recent memory.
So here's a rhetorical question for you: who in the controlled mainstream media do you think will ever dare bring up this topic up again now that Prince Charles is officially King Charles?
In conclusion
Writing this article feels like I'm telling a child, all in one sitting, that Santa Claus isn't real, the Easter Bunny is a hoax and the tooth fairy is just your mom.
But, in reality, it's worse than that. It's telling fully-grown adults that Santa Claus isn't real, the Easter Bunny is a hoax and the tooth fairy is just their mom and being ridiculed as a fringe loony for doing so.
This isn't my first attempt at opening eyes on this subject, either. Back in 2015, I made note of the absolute madness that took hold of the global media surrounding the announcement of the birth of Princess Charlotte, writing:
So who is going so crazy for this royal baby? Surely no one who is familiar with the real history of the reign of the "Windsors," a reign marked by the tens of millions of lives lost in the First and Second World Wars (in which the royal family had a great degree of culpability), close collaboration with the banksters that have brought us to the edge of the next great depression, the formation of the Anglo-American "special relationship" in common cause with like-minded eugenicists in America like Teddy Roosevelt, the cultivation and protection of pedophiles (of whom Jimmy Savile was just the most noticeable tip of a very large iceberg), the slaying of Diana, and any number of other atrocities that should make this family one of the most reviled in the "commonwealth" they claim to rule over. And yet the media still lauds their every action, sings their praises as a venerable institution at the core of British society, dutifully acts as the royal PR mouthpiece in reporting on their charity work, and marginalizes any talk of doing away with the royal family altogether as "republican rabble-rousing."
Plus ça change . . .
And now once again we have one of these royal events come along to remind us just how many people are still firmly ensconced in normieland. After all the royals have put us through, it's flabbergasting that they're still held in such high regard. It's even more disheartening that there are still vast swathes of people who believe that this family has been chosen by God Himself to rule over an entire nation (or even a "commonwealth").
Here's to the day when this type of article is unnecessary and the death of a ninety-six-year-old in her home is of no political significance whatsoever. One can always dream . . .
Do NOT comply.
So what is a woman? Anyone figure that out yet?
This essay took 7 hours to research and write. You need 7 minutes to read it and 12 minutes to listen.
This metaphor is from the Odyssey. Odysseus told his crew to tie him to the ship’s mast so he could listen to the Sirens without fear that they would influence him.
Our champions are pressed from all sides to desist. But they understand Albert Einstein’s quote, “Those who have the privilege to know, have a duty to act.” My searches for this article turned up a cesspool of defamation and censorship about them.
Here are a few heroes, and there are many more.
PETER MCCULLOUGH, MD, was the first credible source to convince me that Covid and the vax were rotten. But because of the work he has done, he has been repeatedly attacked. For example, the American Board of Internal Medicine is attempting to revoke his board certification. Since he is one of the most prominent living medical academics, with over 600 publications in peer-reviewed journals, this is would be like revoking a merit badge from his Boy Scout days. But it is being used as an attack vector on his credibility.
Worse, someone gave more than $30 million to plaintiffs lawyers to harass him.* Even though the doctor is careful and his patient care immaculate, this kind of money requires defense lawyers costing a fortune. *Source: a friend who spoke to Dr. McCullough.
McCullough has been everywhere telling the truth. His most influential work was his Rogan interview #1747, HERE.
If you, too, have benefitted from listening to him, support him HERE. I did.
PETER BREGGIN, MD, is known as the “conscience of psychiatry.” For decades, he worked tirelessly to expose this corrupt specialty and its toxic medications. Since January 2020 with the advent of SARS-CoV-2, he and his wife Ginger have given most of their attention to the fraud and widespread falsehoods behind the Chinese virus pandemic. They also emphasize the necessity of taking a determined political stand against the authoritarian and totalitarian intentions of those who are driving the COVID attack on our freedom.
They wrote COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, a bestseller that sold more than 100,000 copies so far. Go to Breggin.com to learn more and listen to their excellent podcast.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. is a progressive insider and a member of the dominant 20th-century political family. He has had a productive and storied career. Until recently he was beloved by all. His Wikipedia entry says:
From 1986 until 2017, Kennedy was a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), a non-profit environmental organization. From 1984 until 2017, he was a board member and attorney for HudsonRiverkeeper.[4] Earlier in his legal career, he served as assistant district attorney in New York City. For over thirty years, Kennedy was an adjunct professor of environmental law at Pace University School of Law. Until August 2017, he held the post as supervising attorney and co-director of Pace Law School's Environmental Litigation Clinic, which he founded in 1987.[5]
He was also part of a plaintiff’s lawyer team who won a several billion-dollar judgment against Monsanto. A jury found that their product Roundup causes cancer. This story is ongoing.
Wikipedia is censored to the point of near-worthlessness, so it now also says:
[Kennedy is an] author known for promoting anti-vaccine propaganda and conspiracy theories.[1][2][3]… Since 2005, he has promoted the scientifically discredited idea that vaccines cause autism,[6] and is the founder and chairman of Children's Health Defense, an anti-vaccine propaganda group.[7]
My readers know the truth because I am an “anti-vaccine conspirator” as well. Since nearly everything the mainstream says is meant to distract or confuse, their lies are easy to spot. As George Orwell wrote, “You have to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that: no ordinary man would be such a fool.” Kennedy is falling on a hand grenade to save the rest of us.
Like many others, he had a personal experience that taught him about vaccines. A syndrome called “spastic dysphonia” destroyed his voice soon after he received a flu vaccine.
Click HERE to donate to Children's Health Defense. There is a California chapter as well.
SIMONE GOLD IS A PHYSICIAN-LAWYER who started America’s Frontline Doctors. When I first heard her speak, I thought “with women like this on our side, how can we lose?” Here is her recent email message:
I have been sentenced to 60 days in a Federal Prison.
As you know, January 6, 2021, started with my plan to speak at a rally with President Donald Trump. When that was canceled, a large crowd swept into the Capitol building after the doors were opened from the inside.
I delivered my remarks peacefully from the Capitol rotunda.
I am a victim of selective prosecution. I am being legally attacked for speaking the truth about COVID-19 and vaccines.
I remain committed to activism for physicians’ free speech. As George Washington said, “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”
For over two years now, We the People have been under attack. Our Constitutional rights have been chipped away. The First Amendment has been annihilated. Before 2020, we could have never imagined the government of our democracy stripping away our rights as it has. We have watched the Orwellian scene from a corrupt government unfold before our eyes.
I have funded my legal defense personally, and not one dollar from AFLDS has been spent on my attorneys. However, we must continue AFLDS' mission and keep fighting for Constitutional principles!
We have been shadow banned, censored, threatened, and arrested for speaking the truth. I keep fighting so you can make informed medical decisions for yourself and your family.
If you can, please become a monthly donor of $25, $50, $75, or $100 today to support the mission and work of America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today. We need you to stand with us!
For Liberty,
Simone Gold, MD, JD
Founder
America’s Frontline Doctors
The Trusted Name for Independent Information
DAVID MARTIN, PHD, is actively pursuing criminal cases. See his video HERE. Beware, some of his predictions are x~rated. His website is HERE.
NAOMI WOLF is a prolific feminist writer who identifies as a progressive. But like RFK, Jr., she was thrown out of the cult for speaking the truth. They plastered her with labels such as “anti-vaxer” (how can anyone still believe these lies?). Her recently published book is The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19, and The War Against the Human.
Here is the bio from her website, dailyclout.io:
Dr. Naomi Wolf is a bestselling author, columnist, and professor; she is a graduate of Yale University and received a doctorate from Oxford. She is the co-founder and CEO of DailyClout.io, a successful civic tech company. Since the publication of her landmark international bestseller, The Beauty Myth, which The New York Times called “one of the most important books of the 20th century," Dr. Wolf’s other seven bestsellers have been translated worldwide. The End of America and Give Me Liberty: A Handbook For American Revolutionaries, predicted the current crisis in authoritarianism and presented effective tools for citizens to promote civic engagement. Dr. Wolf trains thought leaders of tomorrow, teaching public presentation to Rhodes Scholars and co-leading a Stony Brook University that gave professors skills to become public intellectuals. She was a Rhodes scholar herself and was an advisor to the Clinton re-election campaign and to Vice President Al Gore. Dr. Wolf has written for every major news outlet in the US and many globally; she had four opinion columns, including in The Guardian and the Sunday Times of London.
You can help her HERE.
VERNON COLEMAN has been censored his whole career. See vernoncoleman.org to access his content, which is some of the best here. He writes:
I was sued by all sorts of people, including a police force. (And I sued one back.) Most of the lawsuits were, I suspect, more to cause annoyance and waste my time. Because of my opposition to vivisection, I had MI5 and private detectives (hired by drug companies) chasing me and tracking me down. My mail was opened and two separate insiders told me that Special Branch had a growing file about me. I was ‘door stepped’ by journalists on more occasions than I like to remember. I was regularly filmed by police forces. I received writs so thick that they wouldn’t fit through the letterbox and had to be pushed through a cat flap. I’ve had papers relating to drug companies stolen from my home. And, of course, my phone has been tapped for years.…
Book contracts were suddenly withdrawn and TV companies canceled invitations. By the late 1990s, for no discernible reason, nasty articles about me started to appear in the national press. A nasty and inaccurate piece about me appeared in The Spectator. It was commissioned by Boris Johnson and written by his sister. (The Spectator had to publish a letter of correction.)
And then came the events of 2020. (To continue, see HERE.)
I couldn’t find a donate button on Coleman’s website, but you can buy his books on Amazon.
STEVE KIRSCH is wealthy, but I am not sure of his numbers. He’s the only Silicone Valley-type who has publicly red-pilled and is actively fighting for our nation, healthcare, and constitution. (WTF is going on with the rest? They are either bribed, cowards, or hypnotized like the sheep.)
People who have met Kirsch told me he is abrasive and does not suffer fools. To learn more about him, see HERE. He says, “I have no conflicts of interest and I cannot be intimidated. They cannot take away my license to practice medicine because I’m not a doctor. I’m worse. I’m an engineer with two degrees from MIT. And I have a lot of smart friends.”
I read everything he writes. Subscribe to him and you will have chances to help him out while you learn. He is one of the major players in our war.
ROBERT MALONE, MD, is universally respected. He is the primary inventor of the innovative messenger RNA technology in the clot shots. Like many others, he only saw the Matrix that he helped create after he had two jabs that nearly killed him. His Wikipedia page says:
Robert Wallace Malone is an American physician and biochemist. His early work focused on mRNA technology, pharmaceuticals, and drug repurposing research. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone has promoted misinformation about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
No editorial comment is needed for my audience.
Malone’s website is HERE. His writing is a little academic, but he did the best Rogan interview ever (#1757), see HERE. Among other insights, this brought Mattias Desmet’s work about mass formation to popular attention. You can help him with a paid Substack subscription to Who is Robert Malone. I did.
PAUL ALEXANDER is a Canadian health researcher and a former Trump administration official at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Alexander was recruited from his position at McMaster University to serve as an aide to HHS assistant secretary for public affairs in March 2020.
From 2017 until December 2019, Alexander was employed by the Washington, D.C.-based Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), where he specialized in systematic reviews. [1] At IDSA, Alexander worked on several clinical practice guidelines.
That was from Wikipedia. I cut out the defamatory parts.
Alexander inserted himself with and reported on Canadian and American trucker demonstrations. He has been involved in dialog with Canadian politicians.
He has also become a force on Substack and writes up to ten times a day. This is too much for most readers. Alexander does not hold back his feelings, which endears him to us. You can help him with a paid subscription.
I’m amazed that Twitter has not censored him.