The mRNA Covid jabs reduces immune responses to other viruses in children, a new study finds
Ivermectin Worked: New Peer-Reviewed Study Proves It
don’t believe me…see below
The mRNA Covid jabs reduces immune responses to other viruses in children, a new study finds
Kids who got Pfizer’s mRNA Covid jabs had a weakened immune response to other viruses and bacteria, Australian researchers reported in a study published last week.
The diminished response appeared within weeks after the second Pfizer dose, the authors found. Blood taken from the children produced fewer crucial signaling molecules when stimulated with several common potential bacteria and viruses.
Over time, the immune response to bacteria returned to normal. But the diminished response to viruses lasted at least six months, for as long as the researchers collected data. “Our study showed that, in children, SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination decreases inflammatory cytokine responses,” the authors wrote.
Cytokines like interferon play a crucial role in the immune system, helping it attack viruses and other foreign invaders. (The first line of one widely cited paper on interferons explains they are “elicited on challenge to the host defense and are essential for mobilizing immune responses to pathogens.”
These data show that a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccine alters heterologous immunity in children and that these effects can persist up to six months after vaccination. Whether SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines can induce the epigenetic and metabolic changes associated with trained immunity to provide protection against other infectious diseases remains an open question. That SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in children could impact immune responses to other pathogens emphasises the need for further research and consideration of heterologous effects in vaccination policies given their broad public health implications.
Heterologous immunity is a term used to describe the partial immunity (or altered immunopathology) that occurs in response to a pathogen if the host has been previously infected or immunized with an unrelated pathogen. In some cases, heterologous immunity is attributed to T cells that crossreact with both pathogens.
The study was small, including only 29 children aged 6-11 at the first post-vaccination checkpoint and eight children at the six-month sample period. Further, the study’s short size and tiny number of participants meant the researchers could not correlate real-world clinical outcomes - such as increased severity of infections - with the diminished immune responses.
The peer-reviewed journal Frontiers in Immunology published the paper. In keeping with other papers that have reported disturbing findings about the mRNAs, the study’s authors were careful to tiptoe around the potential impact of their data.
In their discussion, they wrote only that the findings show “the need for further research and consideration… given their broad public health implications.”
But several physicians who reviewed the study independently for Unreported Truths said they found it very troubling.
—
“My read on this paper is that it [mRNA vaccination] may in fact cause not just a short-term vulnerability to bacterial and viral infection in children, but it might cause a long-term immune deficiency,” one physician emailed, adding that he worried public health authorities will simply ignore the paper.
“Just see how the authors sidestep their own findings,” the physician wrote. “The authors won't even bluntly state that it appears that the mRNA shot caused a persistent immune deficiency in children. Their conclusion is it "alters" the cytokine response. This is the amount of courage in medicine.”
Acceptance
Javier Lopez
Aug 24, 2023 • 10 min read
Not that long ago, your phone, your car, your home, your office were not spying on you.
Well, maybe your phone was just a little, and most likely your neighbors too, but if your government wanted to surveil you 24/7 it would have to manually place a guard in your house and your car and your office and wherever you traveled just to keep tabs on you.
Essentially, a more overt Stasi snitch system.
Too costly. Not practical.
So instead of doing that, the global government of Elite Master Farmers invented the smartphone.
End of story.
But instead of leaving it there, lets break down how this system works, where it's going, and how economic rumblings, the failing response of central banks, Convid, and WWIII INC. are all merely symptoms of cyclical change in the life of a species that still isn't sure what it wants to be when it grows up.
No Real Pushback
Whenever things get heated in the town square, the automated control mechanisms are immediately activated. Like a well-oiled machine in a steampunk novel, the levers are pulled and the cogs turn to make sure nothing goes too far off the rails.
Ok, scratch that. What we're actually looking at in the real world is this...
A DARPA developed, government sponsored, military operation to mitigate popular uprisings utilizing the latest techniques in mind-control, propaganda, entertainment, and convenience in the form of electronic signals and switches firing 24/7 in an AI-saturated, fibre-optic cable connected, light-speed-responsive, Meta-Googled and Microsofted abomination of an economy that pretends to cater to our needs, but in reality is all about corralling and enslaving us in the most sophisticated open-air prison the world has ever seen.
So what are the mechanisms deployed when things get spicy?
As soon as truth has even a snowball in hell's chance of escaping the dungeons where it has been chained up, the Elite Master Farmers release their cybernetic dogs to contain the leak.
Controlled opposition agents take up their positions online to steer conversations in the "correct" direction, back to center where they belong.
Bots are unleashed into the comment sections of all social media, prominent blogs, forums, and websites so that any onlookers get the impression that a certain talking point is favored over any other. This works much like a five star review system and we all know how they can be faked to tip the balance to one side or the other.
Manual and automated shadow-banning of content and commentary across all major platforms. And even though free-speech platforms exist, the chilling effect of only being found where the "hate mongers" hang out is real. Essentially, once you're off mainstream, you're practically invisible to the crowd. The best you can hope for is a loyal following of subscribers that don't care about their online ghetto inhabitant status.
What else?
Well... during Convid (which is not over — I'll get to that in minute) the oldest tactics in the book were used across all media to shame, ridicule, manipulate, confuse, and mentally torture the people attempting to get to the truth of the situation because the most important aspect of a networked, industrial-level mind-job is to never, ever allow that ray of sunshine to break through into the hyper-entertained, closed minds of the gullible, brainwashed, biological robots previously known as human beings.
Trust me... don't let appearances fool you... they may look like sentient beings, but I can assure you they are anything but!
And then people try to tell me, dude, they're just way behind the curve. You were there once too.
Uh uh. I was never there.
Never that braindead.
And these people have had three years to catch up and see the light. Even a little glimpse of it. But no. Nothing. They are so consumed by the Matrix and all of its lies that it's very likely that these drones will never wake up and smell the coffee.
Utility Function
That said, drones are useful. Without them and their continued state of waking slumber, we would not be living in the globalized system of industrial civilization that we see today.
This self-organizing, self-regulating system along with its massive consumption of raw materials and manufactured goods has enabled the exponential growth of our species and our technology to a point where even the Elite Master Farmers — that benefit more than anyone from this collective enterprise — have realized that limits have finally been reached and drastic measures have to be deployed to prevent what could be the greatest catastrophe in human history.
As I stated in my previous article, the desire for everyone to know the truth about the world and how we have been lied to about so many things for so long, is one that should be measured against how the current system (that we are heavily dependent on) relies on the unthinking drones, the biological robots, the cogs in the machine never, ever catching on to the truth otherwise the whole edifice would come crashing down with every single last person caught inside.
And here's the real clincher, I don't think there's anything we can do about this process. However much we like to believe that we're in control of our destiny, or that some deity is, there are some obvious details that simply cannot be ignored.
When there's not enough to go around, people die, and if things get even more serious... everybody dies and a species goes extinct.
And this is nothing out of the ordinary. Happens all the time. And has happened to most of the species that ever lived. And yes... they all thought they were the bee's knees, the dog's bollocks, the best of the best, at the top of their game, probably right up until that big rock was screaming through the atmosphere with their name written all over it.
Just saying.
So why do we believe we're different?
Right now, if you take a good look around, and you're totally honest with yourself, you may be able to admit that the chairs on the Titanic are being clumsily shuffled into new positions in an attempt to prolong the charade that we've been enduring for the last ten or twenty years.
The formation of the BRICS as a new bloc positioned to salvage America the Great's left-overs when she finally pops her clogs (not that the replacement has a chance in hell of fixing things because the same rules apply to all the players. How's that Belt and Road project coming along for ya?)
Central Bank Digital Currencies tied to a global biometric ID system AKA The Mark of the Beast will be accepted by most because the TV will tell them it's the best thing ever and the only way to secure their wealth and superior to all that nasty free-market crypto stuff that only criminals use.
A global hardware-based surveillance network run by Israeli companies that Benjamin Netanyahoo once referred to as the Keys to the Kingdom.
The Bill Gates backed, WHO managed takeover of public health worldwide that negates individual bodily integrity in place of mandatory, forced vaccination. And the dummies will line up again and again to get their shots as long they're required for most essential and even non-essential activities.
The growing epidemic of what can only be labeled institutionalized insanity. Academia, media, government, corporations, have all contracted the malaise known as woke liberalism. And there is no cure. Best to stand well back and let nature take its course.
Technodeterminism On The Human Plantation
We're reaching the point where consumers (and that's what they are) will readily accept electronic tattoo patches on various parts of their bodies to remain relevant and fully plugged into the One Machine that they have fallen in love with.
They have already accepted smartphones (nobody protested those), noise-cancelling earpods (to shut the real world out) and all manner of microwave radiation in their lives to enable non-stop information streaming into their brains from morning til night.
Beyond that, Neuralink awaits, bestowed upon the willing serfs by their Lord and Master Elon AKA Tech Jesus. At that point, the human race truly ceases to exist and something else has stepped into its collective shoes — a human-machine hybrid meat puppet that will gradually, or not so gradually, lose any remaining autonomy and become a hivemind organism driven by AI algorithms.
So not too different from where we are now.
Tick tock...
Truth be told, most people are in a state of domesticated subservience and if it were not this way modern industrial civilization would be ripped apart at the seams.
How on Earth would the system hold together if the plantation workers were not dumbed down, drugged and indoctrinated from day one?
Imagine that every individual was free to develop their full potential unhindered by the desires of the controllers.
Who would man the pumps?
Would anyone trust the government?
Would there even be one?
What incentive would there be to join the military?
Or to work for psychopathic corporations and soulless institutions?
If everyone was "awake" and "aware" then what kind of organization would replace the one we have now?
And how could it function without the slave-like mentalities that currently enable the smooth running of the established global economy?
The globalists control all aspects of government and corporate activity. We can see how the One Machine operates in lockstep when required, as happened with Convid. The media and all globalist institutions worked together with Big Pharma, Blackrock, Vanguard and their investors to create the illusion of a pandemic and thereby sell billions of dollars worth in products that not one single person needed to purchase.
It's the old Rockefeller snake oil scam brought forward and maximized to its full potential. And most of the world fell for it. And payed the price.
And now the scammers want to repeat this trick all over again.
And I'm wondering how many people will go along with the ruse this time.
Will they mask again?
Will they test again?
Will they jab again?
Will they lock down again?
Will they point the finger at the non-compliant again?
Or will we be subjected to an even greater distraction in the form of a global conflict, World War III, a global economic collapse, a fake alien encounter, or more climate change terrorism from the usual suspects?
I can understand why so many middle Americans just want to be left alone.
Government can be useful, at times, for specific reasons, but when government overreach rears its ugly head, coupled with corporate greed, and a general public that doesn't know their arse from their elbow due to a lifetime of willful ignorance, any sane individual would want to be as far away from the ensuing clusterfuck as possible while dragging as many like-minded family members and neighbors with them for security.
We're at that point in the game. At least that's how I see it. If there was a way to push back against the unfolding nightmare scenario, we'd already have seen evidence of that in the last three years. All I saw was some protests, some banner waiving, and a lot of internet activity.
No court cases. No arrests. No Nuremberg 2.0. No elite charlatans hanging for their crimes against humanity. No widespread acknowledgement that the Convid plandemic was all based on fraud.
And 99% of people are more attached to their smartphones than ever. And their noise-cancelling earpods. And the garbage that they consume through these devices.
The brainwashing never ends.
The mass mind control is as strong as it ever was.
The people have learned nothing.
They are sleepwalking to their deaths.
The Unpopular Opinion
If Base Level is Mind or Pure Consciousness as some believe then maybe this species has been naturally selected, after having set the game of life in motion, to bring forth the technological development of whatever comes next. Maybe this squishy biological suit is not our final form and transformation is the key to survival. We shall have to wait and see.
If 80% of the population go along with the technological transformation, the "others" will be viewed and treated as the New Amish, those that have opted out of "modernity," a living museum relic to be ogled, much like the "savage" in Huxley's Brave New World.
Convid was an experiment. I mean, we're always being experimented on by the Elite Master Farmers, testing new technology, new methods of control etc but Convid was the Big Kahuna, the greatest experiment of them all. Included were mental and physical torture, mass mind-control, induction of mass psychosis, testing of experimental drugs and new technologies in live human subjects.
The latest numbers reinforce early suspicions that potentially 50% of test subjects were given placebo (saline solution) and the rest a mix of active ingredients with potentially up to 10% of subjects receiving the worst batches.
Fate
Everything emerges from Base Level.
Religious people believing that a god favors their existence over other species also believe that we are the subjects of destiny and that the human species has been chosen to overcome all obstacles in the game of life and will one day reign triumphantly under the guidance of the coming messianic ruler.
Optimistic atheists believe that a natural process was set in motion on this planet and potentially many others in the Universe in a game of survival of the fittest where the winning species could continue to evolve and migrate to new regions in search of resources as long as the Universe allows for such expansion.
Yet others believe that we will become extinct, sooner than most people would like to imagine, following in the footsteps of every other species that has played the game on this planet.
I personally like to believe that some aspect of humanity will continue in some form even if the rest of it falls away. Theoretically, we can solve many of our issues and move on to colonize the solar system or at least make use of its resources to continue life as we know it. We would have to overcome many of our existing problems in order for that to happen though. Economies of scale, resource acquisition and cost of extraction may not work if population collapses below a certain threshold.
Whether we have been chosen to play this game of life or we've been dumped here as an experiment by alien scientists makes little difference to the way we play it. The game has always been one of survival, yet we can plot out the rise and fall of civilizations, the times of plenty and the times of scarcity, in the modern age depicted in real-time by the obesity epidemic existing alongside starvation and malnutrition.
It's obvious that we are being subjected to increasing forces of imbalance. Something will snap at some point. It's what happens after that will shape our chances of moving forward, always forward, never backwards, towards a desirable state of existence, if one exists, or to our demise as a species, licking our wounds, wondering who will be the last man standing, like the final tree cut down on Rapa Nui.
Is that all we are? Just another failed experiment? Waiting for the inevitable?
Or is there more to this story than meets the eye?
For more Doom and Gloom remember to like and subscribe!
Ivermectin Worked: New Peer-Reviewed Study Proves It
Story at-a-glance
A preprint paper showing ivermectin’s effectiveness against COVID-19 in Peru convinced a group of doctors that widespread ivermectin distribution could end the pandemic in October 2020
Because the paper wasn’t yet peer-reviewed, it was brushed off; ivermectin for COVID-19 was vilified, as were those who dared to prescribe it
Now, the study has been peer-reviewed and published in Cureus, vindicating ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19
Not only did ivermectin work against COVID-19, it was remarkably effective, resulting in a 74% reduction in excess deaths in the 10 Peru states where it was used most intensively
There was a 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths when ivermectin was readily available and then a 13-fold increase in excess deaths in the two months after ivermectin use was restricted
As the COVID pandemic wore on, with potential treatments supposedly unknown, New York pulmonologist Dr. Pierre Kory and others tried to get the word out about ivermectin. A widely used antiparasitic drug that’s listed on the World Health Organization’s essential medicines list1 and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, ivermectin is widely available, inexpensive and has a long history of safe usage.
In fact, since 1987, 3.7 billion doses of ivermectin have been used among humans worldwide,2 but it was quickly vilified — as were those who dared to prescribe it. Now, the tables have turned. Not only did ivermectin work against COVID-19, it was remarkably effective, resulting in a 74% reduction in excess deaths in the 10 states where it was used most intensively.3
Ivermectin Dramatically Slashed COVID Deaths
Kory and other physicians with the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group (FLCCC) had success early on treating patients with ivermectin and other therapies during the pandemic. His efforts to get the word out on this treatment protocol were stifled by censorship, ridicule and colleagues brainwashed by the official narrative and unwilling to accept the science.
A preprint paper showing ivermectin’s effectiveness against COVID-19 in Peru "was the final piece of evidence which convinced me, Paul [Marik] and the FLCCC that widespread ivermectin distribution could end the pandemic in Oct of 2020," Kory tweeted.4 "Took 2 years but now peer-reviewed & published in a major journal."
That study, published in Cureus,5 vindicates ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. "Reductions in excess deaths over a period of 30 days after peak deaths averaged 74% in the 10 states with the most intensive IVM [ivermectin] use," the study found.6 It used Peruvian national health data from Peru’s 25 states to evaluate ivermectin’s effects.
A natural experiment was set in motion in May 2020, when Peru authorized ivermectin for COVID-19. The significant reduction in excess deaths noted "correlated closely with the extent of IVM use," the researchers noted.
Global Success Stories Highlight Ivermectin’s Potential
Few have heard about the astonishing success of ivermectin in Uttar Pradesh, India, which embraced large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of ivermectin for COVID-19 patients, close contacts of patients and health care workers.7
"The possibility of both preventative and treatment efficacies of IVM was raised by outcomes in another world region in which IVM was distributed to the population at risk for COVID-19 on a mass scale. This IVM distribution occurred in Uttar Pradesh, the largest state in India, having a population of 229 million," the study added.8
There, widespread ivermectin distribution likely resulted in significantly lower COVID-19 deaths compared to areas not using the drug:9
"The cumulative total of COVID-19 deaths per million in population from July 7, 2021 through April 1, 2023 was 4.3 in Uttar Pradesh, as compared with 70.4 in all of India and 1,596.3 in the United States … The much lower number of COVID-19 deaths per population in all of India versus the United States in that period may reflect the use of these same home treatment kits containing IVM, doxycycline, and zinc in some other states of India."
A similar series of events occurred in Itajai, Brazil, a city of 220,000 people. In June 2020, they implemented a prophylaxis program using ivermectin. The program was advertised throughout local media, and people were encouraged to participate and take ivermectin four times a month, on days 1, 2, 15 and 16.
On the appropriate days, they set up tents and centers where people could get the drug, and the entire program was carefully logged in an electronic database. In all, 159,000 Brazilians participated, of those 113,000 elected to take the ivermectin.
Kory and eight coauthors published a paper on the results, which showed "regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates."10
Those who used ivermectin had a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate, a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality and a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate compared to those who did not.11
Meanwhile, a study from Japan demonstrated that just 12 days after doctors were allowed to legally prescribe ivermectin to their COVID-19 patients, cases dropped dramatically.12 The chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association13 noticed the low number of infections and deaths in Africa, where many use ivermectin prophylactically and as the core strategy to treat river blindness.14
Government’s Ivermectin Restrictions Increased Deaths
In a striking revelation, ivermectin was used against COVID-19 in Peru for four months, before the new president put restrictions on its use. During that time, "there was a 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths and then a 13-fold increase in the two months following the restriction of IVM use."15
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has towed the anti-ivermectin narrative all along, with its infamous tweet reading, "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it."16 While commanding the U.S. public and physicians not to use ivermectin for an off-label use, the irony stands that close to 40% of U.S. prescriptions are for off-label uses.17
But now, after years of vilification, it had no choice but to admit what’s been right all along — doctors have the authority to prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19. Attorney Jared Kelson of Boyden Gray & Associates, who is representing physicians who have sued the FDA for interfering with their practice of medicine, including relating to ivermectin for COVID-19, explained:18
"The fundamental issue is straightforward. After the FDA approves a human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to influence or interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no."
The FDA did just that, nonetheless, but finally admitted the truth on August 16, 2023, tweeting, "Health care professionals generally may choose to prescribe an approved human drug for an unapproved use when they judge that the unapproved use is medically appropriate for an individual patient."19
In September 2021, the American Medical Association also told doctors to stop prescribing ivermectin for COVID-19. In a statement, AMA, along with the American Pharmacists Association (APhA) and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), warned:20
"We are alarmed by reports that outpatient prescribing for and dispensing of ivermectin have increased 24-fold since before the pandemic and increased exponentially over the past few months. As such, we are calling for an immediate end to the prescribing, dispensing, and use of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 outside of a clinical trial.
In addition, we are urging physicians, pharmacists, and other prescribers — trusted health care professionals in their communities — to warn patients against the use of ivermectin outside of FDA-approved indications and guidance, whether intended for use in humans or animals, as well as purchasing ivermectin from online stores."
How many died unnecessarily as a result of these commands? As noted by journalist Kim Iversen, even the FDA’s move advising doctors that they’re allowed to prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19 is too little, too late. "Now, two, three years later, too little, too late… ultimately, we now get this study that has been officially peer reviewed and published, and it shows significant, significant, significant reduction [of mortality] in COVID-19."21
How Does Ivermectin Work Against COVID?
Ivermectin binds to SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein, limiting the virus’ morbidity and infectivity.22 The drug, while best known for its antiparasitic effects, also has demonstrated antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. An in vitro study demonstrated that a single treatment with ivermectin effectively reduced viral load 5,000 times in 48 hours in cell culture.23
Studies have shown that ivermectin helps to lower the viral load by inhibiting replication.24 A single dose of ivermectin can kill 99.8% of the virus within 48 hours.25 A meta-analysis in the American Journal of Therapeutics also showed the drug reduced infection by an average of 86% when used preventively.26
Ivermectin has also been shown to speed recovery, in part by inhibiting inflammation and protecting against organ damage.27 This pathway also lowers the risk of hospitalization and death. Meta analyses have shown an average reduction in mortality that ranges from 75%28 to 83%.29,30
Additionally, the drug also prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 when taken before or after exposure.31 As the Cureus study noted, the latest data only adds further evidence that ivermectin has an important place in COVID-19 treatment:32
"These encouraging results from IVM treatments in Peru and similar positive indications from Uttar Pradesh, India, which have populations of 33 million and 229 million, respectively, offer promising models for further mass deployments of IVM, as needs may arise, for both the treatment and prevention of COVID-19."
It’s worth noting, too, that ivermectin has notable antitumor effects, which include inhibiting proliferation, metastasis and angiogenic activity in cancer cells.33 It appears to inhibit tumor cells by regulating multiple signaling pathways, which researchers explained in the Pharmacological Research journal, "suggests that ivermectin may be an anticancer drug with great potential."34
Why Was Ivermectin Suppressed?
The average treatment cost for ivermectin is $58.35 Do you think this has anything to do with ivermectin’s vilification? The authors of the Cureus study certainly do:36
"The exceptional safety profile and low cost of IVM certainly support its use as in Peru’s operation MOT [Mega-Operación Tayta] and in Uttar Pradesh as an attractive national policy for COVID-19 mitigation. These significant reductions in mortality as achieved in Peru and Uttar Pradesh suggest that the impact of such a national IVM deployment would be observable within a relatively short period.
However, generic drugs have often fared poorly in competition with patented offerings in past decades, based upon the unfortunate vulnerability of science to commodification and regulatory capture … Such a potential bias against IVM was suggested by a February 4, 2021 press release from Merck, which was then developing its own patented COVID-19 therapeutic, claiming that there was ‘a concerning lack of safety data’ for IVM.
However, IVM is Merck’s own drug, found safe at doses considerably higher than its standard dose in several studies, as cited in the section on the background on IVM treatments of COVID-19, and the Nobel Prize committee specifically noted IVM’s safety record in honoring the discovery of this drug in its 2015 prize for medicine."
If you’d like to learn more about ivermectin’s potential uses for COVID-19, FLCCC’s I-CARE protocol can be downloaded in full,37 giving you step-by-step instructions on how to prevent and treat the early symptoms of COVID-19.
Yes, You Do Sweat Out Toxins
Sweating in a sauna is one of the simplest strategies to reap big health rewards, including releasing heavy metal toxins, urea, bisphenol-A and phthalates as well as improving blood flow, reducing blood pressure and improving cognition
Sauna use improves mitochondrial biogenesis, optimizes heat shock proteins and reduces your risk of cardiovascular events and stroke
Research data finds chemicals in your sweat may communicate fear or disgust to those around you
Sweating is not a fitness end goal; this means while sweating in a sauna may feel the same as sweating during your workout, it does not translate to the same cardiovascular and muscular fitness benefits
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1932, Simultaneous Study of Constituents of Urine and Perspiration
Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012; 2012:184745
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2011;61(2):344
Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012;2012: 185731
Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine, 2017; 6(3):151
Kaiser Permanente Reinstates Mask Mandates
It’s de ja vu all over again at Kaiser Permanente’s Santa Rosa, California, facilities, which have reinstituted mask mandates and COVID vaccination recommendations for their staff, patients and visitors.
The reasoning is that they’re detecting an uptick in patients testing positive for COVID-19. There’s been no increase in hospitalizations or intensive care admissions to back up the “need” for such strong measures, plus 99% of the cases KP is seeing are mild; they’re just “helping protect the health and safety of our patients, our workforce and our community,” according to a company statement.
This, even though in early 2023 a meta-analysis found that masking, even with N95s, did not protect against the virus any more than not wearing one.
SOURCES:
The Press Democrat August 22, 2023
Fierce Healthcare February 9, 2023
Who are the idiots here:
One alternative is to simply look at absolute numbers of deaths. Table 5 of the ONS dataset gives total deaths and whether or not the deaths matched vaccinated people in the NIMS dataset. Any that do not have a perfectly matching entry are classified as unvaccinated. That may exaggerate the number of unvaccinated deaths, but let’s assume that problem remains constant over time.
The simplest analysis is just to compare deaths over the course of the two Omicron winters. Let’s start by looking at non-covid deaths in the unvaccinated.
The 18-39 year old age group there were about 367 deaths of the unvaccinated from December 2022 to February 2023 which is half the 738 deaths seen the year before. Similarly for the 40-49 year old age group there were 530 deaths compared to 646 the year before. Both these age groups are more likely to have delays in death registrations due to coroner’s investigations.
For older age groups the two winters look much more similar for the unvaccinated. The final column shows the second winter as a percentage of the first. The variation for the over 50 year olds was within a few percentage points.
Table 1: Unvaccinated non-covid deaths by age group in first and second Omicron winters and showing the percentage of deaths in second winter compared to first.
The same is not true for the vaccinated. The percentage of deaths was higher for every age group compared to the unvaccinated.
Table 2: Vaccinated non-covid deaths by age group in first and second Omicron winters and showing the percentage of deaths in second winter compared to first. Final column shows unvaccinated deaths from table 1 as a comparison.
Something was killing the vaccinated at a much higher rate this winter than the previous winter and whatever it was did not affect the unvaccinated.
These vaccines were sold (and continue to be sold) as useful for saving lives and yet more lives are being lost.
Could this be a misinterpretation? The other explanation for this difference in mortality would be that the mortality in the first Omicron winter was lower for the vaccinated than it otherwise would have been, thanks to vaccination. The higher deaths in the second Omicron winter were merely a return to baseline. Let’s explore that proposal a little further.
The first point to note is that there has been no claim that the vaccines had a different efficacy at preventing death in one Omicron winter compared to another. Nor is there any plausible biological reasons why that should be the case. One difference between the winters is that the younger age groups had recent vaccination only prior to the first Omicron winter whereas the majority of people in the older age groups had recent vaccination prior to both winters. If recent vaccination were protective we should see the biggest rise in mortality among the young - but the reverse is true. It is impossible to claim more recent doses provided extra protection.
There never was a claim that vaccination was the elixir of life so how much of this was a covid issue? Table 3 compares the covid deaths in the first Omicron winter (Dec-Feb) with the second Omicron winter. The number of deaths in the second winter is presented as a fraction of those in the first winter. By any measure the second winter had fewer covid deaths, however, the unvaccinated had far fewer whereas the vaccinated still had a substantially higher proportion of deaths. The young unvaccinated fared best when comparing winters.
Table 3: Covid deaths in second Omicron winter as a percentage of covid deaths in first Omicron winter by vaccination status.
The unvaccinated can be used as a control group. By using the change in deaths among the unvaccinated between the first and second winters we can project how many vaccinated deaths there would have been had there been no (negative) effect of vaccination. For example, for 18-39 year olds there were 6.6% of the covid deaths seen in the first covid winter. Therefore the total expected deaths for the whole population would therefore be the unvaccinated deaths for that period divided by 6.6%. Subtracting the unvaccinated deaths then gives the number of expected vaccinated deaths. Using this method, for covid alone there were nearly 4,000 extra deaths among the vaccinated. For non-covid, there were nearly 20,000 extra deaths.
It is hard to know how much of the reduction was a data lag (which should apply equally to the vaccinated and the unvaccinated groups). Assuming that is minimal by now, what we see is that the unvaccinated are experiencing a period of low mortality which is what would be expected after a period of high mortality, as people who were frail and have died are no longer around to die the following winter. However, for the vaccinated the mortality continues to be high despite recent high mortality.
Table 4: By using the unvaccinated numbers as described above, it is possible to give a measure of expected deaths in the vaccinated from which an excess vaccinated mortality can be calculated for both non-covid and covid deaths. These numbers are presented next to the total deaths seen in reality.
The raw data here does show a problem with high mortality in the vaccinated cohort for both covid and non-covid conditions. There are explanations for why this has happened including issues of immune modulation such that repeated dosing has led to the type of antibody produced switching from being protective to being of a type that the body ignores as it does with pollen or food.
Any reasonable person would want to keep a very close eye on how this progresses in order to try to protect public health. However, the ONS have announced that they will no longer be reporting data on deaths by vaccination status. It is an outrageous dereliction of duty to the public.
Weather modification technologies confirmed by physicist (he’s mostly a shill) Michu Kaku
We physicists are firing trillion watt lasers into the sky to modify weather.
30 years ago you were called a conspirathy theorith if you saith that.
The Seed of Evil
By Dave Daubenmire|August 31st, 2023
By Coach Dave Daubenmire
August 31, 2023
Note: This was originally published August 25 2011…13 years ago.
The battle that is going on in America is not a political battle, it is Spiritual. Those who do not recognize this are doomed to frustration. If you are one of those who believe that America will be rescued by changing the occupant of the White House, or by the election of members of the Republican Party, that America will somehow be rescued if we can get some “conservative” judges appointed, or a return to our Constitution, I assure you that your efforts will be in vain.
The battle is not right or left but rather between right and wrong.
UPDATE: Elon Musk Officially Takes Over Twitter in the Latest "Genius" Con
This Substack has been exposing PSYOP-MUSK, and accurately predicting all of his X Everything App social credit score schemes on behalf of his handlers:
Elon Musk Officially Takes Over Twitter in the Latest "Genius" Con
·
OCTOBER 28, 2022
REPOST: PSYOP-MUSK and the X "Everything App"
·
APR 11
PSYOP-MUSK UPDATE: Twitter is Rebranded "X" Ahead of the X Everything App Social Credit Score Dystopia
·
JUL 24
And now, according to a recently published CNBC article, we have further irrefutable confirmation that X, formerly known as Twitter, is nothing more than the data gathering, proto-AI social credit score system to usher in the dystopian Great Reset:
The WEF asset pretending to be X’s CEO has proven to be a vehement anti-free speech zealot that often deploys absurdist reality inversion wordplay tricks:
And the appropriate reply:
Some more color on this deranged CEO puppet:
PSYOP-MUSK Welcomes WEF "Penetrator" Puppet Linda Yaccarino as the New CEO of Twitter
MAY 12
And the latest policies perfectly reflect Linda Yaccarino’s technocratic tendencies:
The firm’s recently updated privacy policy, which details how it collects and processes user information, now says that the company may store and use biometric data “for safety, security, and identification purposes.”
Of course, this is all for your own “safety” and “security,” just like the DEATHVAX™, MK Ultra Masks and lockdowns that both PSYOP-MUSK and his CEO were pushing for.
The company says it may also collect and use data on people’s employment history and preferences to recommend jobs, potentially putting the app on course to compete with Microsoft-owned LinkedIn.
And at some point X will also report on its users, only to whisk them away in Tesla shitboxes to the nearest reeducation camps, or worse.
“We may collect and use your personal information (such as your employment history, educational history, employment preferences, skills and abilities, job search activity and engagement, and so on) to recommend potential jobs for you, to share with potential employers when you apply for a job, to enable employers to find potential candidates, and to show you more relevant advertising,” X said in its updated privacy policy.
Only a slave would ever comply with these latest policies. But X engagement and profitability are utterly moot, because the social media platform has access to unlimited fiat conjured out of thin air, as does its “owner” PSYOP-MUSK.
In April, X signed a deal with Israeli stock trading app eToro to allow users to view and trade stocks via eToro’s web and mobile apps. EToro recently said it is looking to expand the partnership.
X has been snapping up money transmitter licenses in a number of U.S. states, too, in a bid to launch its own payment features. Musk is a co-founder of PayPal, which emerged from a merger between software company Confinity and X.com, an early online bank also started by the billionaire.
The writing is certainly on the wall. Anyone who still holds out an iota of hope that PSYOP-MUSK is a “free speech absolutist” must also still vehemently “Trust the Science.”
These people despise you, and want to enslave you in their digital gulags. But only if you let them.
Do NOT comply.
UN Publishes Final Draft of Declaration That Targets “Misinformation,” Backs WHO Pandemic Treaty
Another global power grab.
The United Nations (UN) is no fan of free speech and one of its plans to “address” so-called “misinformation, disinformation, hate speech and stigmatization” is on the verge of being finalized.
This unelected intergovernmental organization, which wields significant influence over its 193 member states, recently published the final draft of its Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response.
Related: The UN Human Rights Council Turns Its Back on Free Speech
The final draft contains several agreements from heads of state and government to crack down on lawful speech. Additionally, it contains pledges from these heads of state and government to back two instruments that will give the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO) enhanced powers to target “misinformation” and build out its surveillance networks.
These instruments, the international pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), have been in the works since 2021 and despite facing major pushback, are on track to be completed by May 2024.
The final draft of this political declaration is being developed for the UN’s High-Level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response which will take place on September 20, 2023 in New York. The political declaration outlined in this draft will be finalized at this meeting.
While UN political declarations aren’t usually legally binding, they do wield significant legal influence. According to the UN, declarations “represent the dynamic development of international legal norms and reflect the commitment of states to move in certain directions, abiding by certain principles.”
The proposed speech crackdowns are outlined in several sections of the final draft of this political declaration.
In section OP35, the heads of state and government agree to “take measures to counter and address the negative impacts of health-related misinformation, disinformation, hate speech and stigmatization, especially on social media platforms” and counter “vaccine hesitancy in the context of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.” Additionally, section OP42 includes an agreement to combat “misinformation.”
The UN member states back the pandemic treaty in section OP15 and agree to encourage the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (the group that’s responsible for drafting and negotiating the pandemic treaty) to conclude their negotiations on the “WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response” (the full name of the WHO’s pandemic treaty).
Not only do UN member states give explicit backing to the pandemic treaty and push for it to be finalized but they also encourage the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) to prioritize the “need for equity.” Equity is framed by its proponents as something that encourages fairness but critics have warned that equity policies can lead to bias and the injection of “radical ideology.”
The support for the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) is contained in section OP16 of the final draft. This section encourages the working group that’s focused on these amendments to continue its work with respect to the intended finalization date of May 2024.
This political declaration is one of the many ways the UN is tightening its grip on speech. This year alone, it has started building a “digital army” to fight against “deadly disinformation”, encouraged people to snitch on each other for “hate speech”, and claimed that censoring “disinformation” and “hate speech” will protect “free speech.”
The UN has also consulted with several governments and blocs on their censorship work. Specifically, it has attended multiple “disinformation sessions” with a UK government censorship agency and held discussions with the European Union on how to address “disinformation” on digital platforms.