URGENT: The Covid vaccine paper on declining sperm counts is even worse than it seems at first.
Brain inflammation and the mRNA vaccines
The Real Reason Elon Musk Bought Twitter Makes A Lot Of Sense When You Connect The Dots.
What is the fourth industrial revolution?
Transitioning into Real Money with Franklin Sanders
Facebook combats "climate misinformation”; Zuckerberg, etc. amass private jet collections
US Patent Describes “Toxic Mosquito Aerial” Program To Spread Chemical & Biological Weapons
Truth-Telling in a Time of Catastrophe
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/andr.13209
Now - after a half-billion men have received mRNA shots - the skeptics appear to be right. Again. The Israeli paper offers hard evidence that the vaccines may present a systemic risk to men’s sperm counts. What was a conspiracy theory is now just a theory. AGAIN.
The paper raises questions about mechanism of action that must be answered immediately. And on top of the myocarditis risk, the finding is more evidence that encouraging - much less forcing - men under 40 to take the mRNA vaccines was a catastrophic mistake.
A Sick and Dying Nation Partakes of a November Ritual Called “Voting” Looking for Change in the Wrong Places
Brain inflammation and the mRNA vaccines
Three large insurance databases showed sharp increases in cases of severe brain inflammation after the Covid mRNA shots, according to a new peer-reviewed paper.
People who received the Pfizer jab or booster had a 40 to 70 percent higher chance over the next six weeks of encephalitis or encephalomyelitis. The Moderna jab carried an even higher risk after the second primary dose or a booster.
Encephalitis is inflammation of the brain itself, while encephalomyelitis is inflammation of nerve sheaths in the brain or spinal cord. Both can range from relatively mild conditions to serious or even fatal illnesses. The researchers reported 47 cases following Pfizer’s jab; they did not disclose an exact figure for Moderna’s.
Though the finding was published in the peer-reviewed journal Vaccine, it has received little attention - in part because the authors presented the findings in a way that made them seem less statistically robust than they were.
The paper’s finding comes after a stream of case reports in medical journals of brain inflammation following the mRNA shots.
The reports have come from physicians worldwide, including Belgium, Japan, Taiwan, Peru, and Thailand - and even the United States, an unusual development since American physicians are often reluctant to publicize serious mRNA vaccine side effects.
—
VAERS, the federal vaccine adverse events reporting system, also contains scores reports of severe cases of encephalitis or encephalomyelitis shortly after Covid shots, although those are not peer-reviewed.
(SOURCE: VAERS case report 2057411-1)
—
Encephalitis and encephalomyelitis are rare conditions that can occur following infections or auto-immune reactions. Both can be fatal in serious cases if untreated.
The most likely mechanism for potential mRNA vaccine encephalitis is that the shots overstimulate the immune system and cause the body to attack its one tissues in what physicians sometimes call a cytokine storm. As Taiwanese physicians explained in describing two cases:
Exposed mRNA or vaccine components may also be detected as antigens [substances that stimulate the immune system], further resulting in aberrant proinflammatory cytokine cascades and activation of immune signaling pathways…
Some patients in the case reports have had complete recovery after treatment with with steroids or other immunosuppressants. Others remained injured or even comatose, according to the case reports.
—
The Vaccine paper appeared online on September 27 and in print October 26. It draws on the Food and Drug Administration’s Biologics Effectiveness and Safety database, which tracks insurance claims in people who have received vaccines or other treatments.
In this case, the researchers followed claims for 17 different potential side effects, including myocarditis, in three large commercial insurance databases including more than 16 million vaccinated people. They they compared the results to the background rates of the conditions before the shots.
This method probably substantially understates the risk of short-term post-vaccine side effects, because people who are ill or feeling ill - seriously or not - are likely to delay being vaccinated. Thus vaccines tend to be given to people at times when they are at lower risk for illness or death.
—
That problem is common to all vaccine safety analysis outside of randomized clinical trials, and essentially unavoidable. But this paper had another issue, one that came directly from its design.
The researchers failed to pool the results from the three different databases. Instead, they analyzed each separately. They also analyzed the Pfizer and Moderna shots separately, rather than together.
As a result, the researchers were examining the post-shot risks using data that they had sliced into relatively small pools. In five of the six pools they checked, the researchers found that people who had received the mRNA shots had a notably increased risk of brain inflammation - ranging from 43 to 89 percent. (The only exception was after the first Moderna shot.)
But the scientists then dismissed those findings. Why? The smaller the pool of data, the more easily researchers can dismiss a finding as due to chance. Scientists generally say a finding is not necessarily real if statistical analysis confirms more than a 5 percent chance that it is due to chance.
Thus the writers simply ignored the excess risk they had found, claiming that it “did not meet the threshold for statistical signal in any of the three databases.”
Their refusal to pool and reanalyze the data was particularly odd in the case of Pfizer’s jab, which showed a remarkably consistent excess of encephalitis and encephalomyelitis not just among the various insurers but after each shot. (Inevitably, the researchers made those numbers available only deep in the paper’s appendix.)
The FDA researchers offered no clear explanation for their failure to pool the claims databases - especially since they noted that all they had analyzed all three databases “using the same protocol, analysis, and programming specifications.”
But if their goal was to make safety signals as hard as possible to find, they succeeded.
If you’re interested in downloading a slew of CohVid19 resources:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NZ28u1yvoXpCyIaaiSN_LxMiC3qp3XLw
The Real Reason Elon Musk Bought Twitter Makes A Lot Of Sense When You Connect The Dots
(TMU – Opinion) The media industry, which spends the most of its day on Twitter, has been fixated on Elon Musk’s intentions since he took over as CEO last week. Is he hoping to eventually rule the whole planet? (lol) The explanation is actually really mundane: it has everything to do with payments.
Of course, Musk is a member of the PayPal Gang, the group of people that created the massive payment network in the late ’90s and became billionaires as a result. Musk has always had a penchant for making payments. For a secret Twitter product he claims would have 104 million users by 2028, he revived the name of one of his early firms, X, a payments company, according to Fortune.
Prominent former Morgan Stanley banker turned stablecoin firm CEO Caitlin Long said she had no doubts that Musk is using Twitter to further his long-held aim to change the payments sector.
Musk’s previous statements are more evidence that he intends to utilize his new acquisition as a means of settlement. Musk has forecast $1.2 billion in payment income for Twitter by 2028, according to an investment document acquired by the New York Times. This would allow him to fulfill his stated objective of making the company less reliant on advertisements.
It also has everything to do with unleashing the everything app. You don’t spend $44billion to forecast $1.2 billion in payment income in 5 years for nothing.
What is the fourth industrial revolution?
According to Wikipedia:
“The Fourth Industrial Revolution, 4IR, or Industry 4.0, conceptualizes rapid change to technology, industries, and societal patterns and processes in the 21st century due to increasing interconnectivity and smart automation. A part of this phase of industrial change is the joining of technologies like artificial intelligence, gene editing, to advanced robotics that blur the lines between the physical, digital, and biological worlds.”
Throughout this, fundamental shifts are taking place in how the global production and supply network operates through ongoing automation of traditional manufacturing and industrial practices, using modern smart technology, large-scale machine-to-machine communication (M2M), and the internet of things (IoT). This integration results in increasing automation, improving communication and self-monitoring, and the use of smart machines that can analyze and diagnose issues without the need for human intervention.
It also represents a social, political, and economic shift from the digital age of the late 1990s and early 2000s to an era of embedded connectivity distinguished by the omni-use and commonness of technological use throughout society (e.g. a metaverse) that changes the ways humans experience and know the world around them. It posits that we have created and are entering an augmented social reality compared to just the natural senses and industrial ability of humans alone.”
WEF chief Schwab has proclaimed that a key element of the COVIDcrisis-fueled “Great Reset” will be to advance and shape this “Fourth Industrial Revolution.” And in public statements, he has explained what this means: merging man with machines. “What the fourth industrial revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity,” Schwab explained in a speech to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
This is not a conspiracy “theory”. Schwab even wrote a book on the subject in 2016 entitled Shaping the Future of The Fourth Industrial Revolution. In it, he explains how looming technological changes will allow governments to “intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior.” The title is a tell. This vision is not inevitable, but rather will have to be shaped if it is to develop in the way that he and his WEF colleagues envision. Once again, a quote from Herr Dr. Schwab, in which this vision is presented as inevitable.
“Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us — they will become part of us,” according to the future envisioned by Schwab. “Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices — from wearable computers to virtual reality headsets — will almost certainly become implantable in our bodies and brains.”
Among those technologies are “active implantable microchips that break the skin barrier of our bodies,” Schwab explains. These “implantable devices,” Schwab continued, “will likely also help to communicate thoughts normally expressed verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts or moods by reading brain waves and other signals.”
Schwab suggests that these technologies would be used by governments to determine who may travel, and even for “pre-crime” purposes.
“As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase,” he explains, adding that authorities might require “a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk.”
One wonders if such a brain scan will pre-identify individuals with socio/psychopathy and/or megalomaniac tendencies? And will this be required for both commercial as well as private jet flights? Or will this be another case of “Good for thee but not for me”.
I think we have seen that movie before, loosely based on a 1956 short story by the amazingly prescient Philip K. Dick, entitled "The Minority Report".
This is a vision of the future which is commonly referred to as “Transhumanism”. The focus of Klaus Schwab and his wingman Yuval Noah Harari seem to be on bringing this vision to maturity, while convincing the members of the trade organization comprised of the thousand largest companies in the world - and their owners- the “World Economic Forum” (or WEF), of how much more money, power, and monopolistic control can be had if they will only get on board with the program.
“It is very likely, within a century or two, Homo sapiens, as we have known it for thousands of years, will disappear,” Harari said at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs recently. “We will use technology to upgrade ourselves — or at least some of us — into something different; something which is far more different from us than we are different from Neanderthals.”
What does jolly Santa Klaus and the WEF envision as the nature of their brave new world? George Jetson comes to mind. By the way, where ARE those flying cars they promised us?
In a post on the WEF website by Danish Parliamentarian Ida Auken, the direction and goals of all this transhumanism become more clear. “Welcome to the year 2030,” Auken writes. “I don’t own anything,” including a home, and “I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded.” But her biggest concern is those who refuse to participate.
“My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city,” Auken explains, noting that some stubborn individuals refused to merge with machines. “Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it.”
If you cannot shake images of the Matrix and Terminator series out of your mind, you are not alone.
What does the social structure of global human society look like as we move into this envisioned Transhumanist/Fourth Industrial Revolution world?
Historically, most political and social scientists from mid-20th century to the present, as well as the corporate media pundits who re-package the work product coming from academe and think tanks, have relied on the conceptual structure of lower, middle, and upper classes as they try to categorize and comprehend political and social trends. In parallel, others use the Marxist terms Bourgeoisie (and the related petty-Bourgeoisie) and Proletariat.
Since a series of radio interview discussions which I had with Mr. Glen Beck about a year ago, I have become convinced that these 20th century frameworks, including the dialectic of Republican versus Democrat (US political parties) or “liberal” versus “conservative” were no longer particularly useful in trying to understand what is happening in the US (and western world) body politic. Back then, I had become convinced that the emergent new tension was between those who were committed to a collectivist vision (lets call them Socialists, or maybe Marxists, for want of a better term) versus those committed to an independent autonomous vision of personal sovereignty (“Libertarian” starts to get at that).
So much time seems to have passed since then, and I am now personally persuaded by an alternative construction of modern social and political reality which is emerging from the fringes of academic and other thought leader essays on Substack and online journals such as UnHerd. That being that society is now being divided into Physicals, Virtuals, Machines (I guess that includes Borg-like transhumans?), and a very small, elite group of “Davos Man” Overlords.
What could possibly go wrong?
In the classic novel “Animal Farm”, George Orwell provides a metaphorical analysis of the Stalinist version of totalitarianism, in which a small caste of Party members lived very well and the rest of the population did not. This is the caste of the Overlords. The book is a warning that ordinary people in society must not give up their power, or a caste of rulers will rise and repeat all the excesses typical of past totalitarians throughout history. Technology may change, and every totalitarian regime is different, but fundamental human behaviors never change. Orwell writes:
“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
See here for further analysis of this famous concluding Animal Farm quote.
As envisioned in Schwab’s transhumanism-dominated future, the “Davos Man” monopolist Overlords will hold all assets, and control all financial transactions. This vision is the origin of the famous WEF phrase “You will own nothing and be happy”. The business model behind this is basically an advanced version of modern corporate rent seeking behaviors, in which a small number of companies and their owners will own all assets. Think BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Bank of America, who are already well on their way to completing this objective. Then these resources will be allocated out on basically a rental basis “for the greatest good for the greatest number”. Utilitarian/Marxism with a dash of command economy thrown in. “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”. At least for the lower castes.
So, now we have defined the Overlords and their machines. What about the Physicals and Virtuals castes?
The battle now being fought, while the Overlords, their databases and machine learning algorithms look on, is between those whose power and interests are grounded in the material world, and those whose wealth comes from the world of ideas. The political analyst NS Lyons characterizes this as a class and culture war between “Physicals” and “Virtuals”.
As nicely stated by Mary Harrington (writing from the perspective of United Kingdom politics), in her essay “Can Sunak end the new class war? A deep divide exists between Virtuals and Physicals”:
What’s key is that the moral outlook is downstream of concrete material interests. Physicals work in sectors such as farming, construction, manufacturing, haulage, mining, and so on: occupations inextricable from the material world. Virtuals, on the other hand, work at a layer of abstraction apart from the physical world: think finance, academia, education, media, tech, and so on.
And Virtuals dominate the elite. For as the West has de-industrialised, Western money and power have drained from Physical occupations toward Virtual ones such as finance and tech. And, as a consequence, Virtuals today hold a near-monopoly on institutional power. Westminster occupational data reflects this: barristers, teachers, solicitors, and journalists are well represented among MPs. Conversely, you can trace the waning power of the Physicals in the total number of MPs who were previously farmers, miners or manual workers. This total shrank by a factor of five between 1979 and 2015, from 142 to a scant 33.
Mary Harrington continues:
Mutinous Physicals may need to learn from the truckers: Trudeau eventually ended the protest by freezing protesters out of their own bank accounts. Even the most capable Physicals can’t easily get by in the modern world without access to Virtual finance and tech.
Another possibility is a more thoroughgoing push to turn what’s left of working-class Physicals into the “useless class“ some predict will emerge if AI and automation replace human-powered jobs. This would represent the final Virtual victory: for without even the option to withdraw their labour, it’s hard to see on what basis such a group could compel elites to consider their political interests. This condition of political weakness would be even more pronounced should UBI replace earned wages: few adolescents, however rebellious, will do more than pull faces at their parents if they’re afraid their pocket money will be stopped.
And heres the rub. Virtuals are deeply invested in the belief that reality is whatever they believe it to be. Truth is relative. There is neither objective truth, reality, nor ethics. In the world of on-line gaming and virtual reality, there is no objective ground truth, no actual physical reality to contend with. Only a sort of “Truthiness”, a sense of “that seems plausible”. And a whole lot of fantasy. And from this perspective, many of the social divides which are tearing up the electorate and redefining politics in the United States suddenly start to make sense. Back to Mary Harrington again for more key insights:
This class-inflected contest between the virtual and the real economies is the core of the class and culture war now being fought across the West. It also helps to make sense of how apparently unrelated issues, such as trans rights and immigration, can become bitter battlefronts in the same war.
Trans rights make sense as a proxy for the Virtuals’ core moral claim: that ideas matter more than the material world. When we consider what a person is in legal terms, do we prioritize the material fact of their biological sex, or their inner, abstract idea of who they are? Understandably, the Virtuals prefer the answer that places their class of work, their worldview and by extension their political interests at the top of the moral pile.
High immigration, meanwhile, is a material positive to Virtuals: more people means more growth. This material upside is then moralized in terms of “openness”, “culture”, “freedom” and so on. For working-class Physicals, though, high immigration means stiffer competition for jobs.
Fortunately or unfortunately, what neither Mary Harrington nor the Virtuals seem to appreciate is that from the perspective of the Overlords, Virtuals are even more expendable than the Physicals are. Someone needs to run the farms, milk the cows (or at least maintain the robotic milking machines), collect the trash, and treat the ill. The Virtuals are the ones at greatest risk of replacement by computational algorithms, and are already finding themselves being made “redundant” at a surprisingly fast rate. They may be the first to be forced into universal basic income slavery allocated via central bank digital currency with a social credit score topping just to make sure that they do not get uppity.
In closing, I hope that readers who have not previously encountered these new ideas of Transhumanism, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and the new caste structure of Physicals, Virtuals, Machines and Overlords can now appreciate that there are fundamental shifts in the structure of modern society which are being actively promoted and imposed upon us by a variety of political and economic actors.
In his book The Revolt of the Elites, Christopher Lasch summarizes the situation nicely.
The thinking classes are fatally removed from the physical side of life… Their only relation to productive labor is that of consumers. They have no experience of making anything substantial or enduring. They live in a world of abstractions and images, a simulated world that consists of computerized models of reality – “hyperreality,” as it’s been called – as distinguished from the palatable, immediate, physical reality inhabited by ordinary men and women. Their belief in “social construction of reality” – the central dogma of postmodernist thought – reflects the experience of living in an artificial environment from which everything that resists human control (unavoidably, everything familiar and reassuring as well) has been rigorously excluded. Control has become their obsession. In their drive to insulate themselves against risk and contingency – against the unpredictable hazards that afflict human life – the thinking classes have seceded not just from the common world around them but from reality itself.
Which are you? Physical, Virtual, Transhuman machine, or Overlord? Which world do you want to live in? The sterilized, depopulated and highly managed city of Danish Parliamentarian Ida Auken’s fantasies, or the physical world for which she has such distain?
And more importantly, what is the world that you wish to have your children inherit.
I have made my choice. I prefer to join Candide and go work in the garden.
What I would like to know is what your positive alternative vision of the future looks like. Whether Physical, Virtual, or a blend of the two, if we want to beat the Overlords (and their transhuman machines), we need our own great narrative. One which evokes Morning in America rather than the Matrix and the Borg as the future of humankind.
And most importantly, what I want to know, is “are you kind”.
Grateful Dead
Well, the first days are the hardest days
Don't you worry anymore
'Cause when life looks like Easy Street
There is danger at your door
Think this through with me
Let me know your mind
Whoa, oh, what I want to know
Is are you kind?
Transitioning into Real Money with Franklin Sanders
By Corey Lynn and James White
What is money? Depending on who you ask, you will receive a variety of different answers to that very important question. Currency, often confused with real money, is the paper notes we hold in our pockets and use for day-to-day transactions; but do those characteristics make that dollar in your pocket, otherwise known as a Federal Reserve Note, money?
Throughout history, governments have used their control of the nation’s currency to not only keep populations in line but also consolidate power by enriching themselves and their associates. Precious metals, however, are a different story.
Franklin Sanders has spent most of his adult life educating people on the importance of precious metals and their value in a society. He has published his Moneychanger newsletter for over 20 years and has helped countless men and women gain a foothold on how to convert their bank notes into real money.
Many people understand that the world is going through a major upheaval that will, no doubt, have an impact on all of us financially. Given that, it’s vitally important to understand the significant role precious metals can play. In this interview, jam-packed with great information on how to protect your wealth, Sanders breaks it all down.
Keep in mind that if you do decide to invest in precious metals, you want to make sure you can physically hold it in your hand. As Sanders says, “I don’t like any kind of paper silver; I don’t like the exchange-traded funds. Gold and silver are the ultimate cash … and you want possession of them where you can have 24-hour access.”
Facebook combats "climate misinformation”; Zuckerberg, etc. amass private jet collections
Here’s how the folks at Reclaim the Net put it:
The world’s largest social network, Facebook, will expand its fact-checking tools by increasing the availability of its “Climate Science Center” (a page that contains “factual resources from the world’s leading climate organizations and actionable steps people can take in their everyday lives to combat climate change”) to 165 countries and expanding its “Climate Inform Labels” (labels that are added to Facebook posts and link to posts from the Climate Science Center).
Meanwhile, in just two months of flying, Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg's private jet emits 17 times more carbon than the average American produces in a year.
He is FAR from the only hypocritical billionaire parasite with his own fleet. Here are just a few examples of other transhumanist vampires who promote climate lies while living a life of decadent opulence:
Bill Gates has a private jet collection worth approximately $194 million and is heavily invested in the production of private jets.
Elon Musk has bought 2 private jets over the past 2 years.
Jeff Bezos owns two $150 million private jets.
Leonardo DiCaprio may not be a billionaire but he’s got the “hypocritical parasite” part down pat.
And then there’s Google which claims to be “carbon neutral” (see screenshot below) but its top executives have amassed a fleet of aircraft that over the years has spewed hundreds of million pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Track their flights here.
Even if — especially if — you trust carbon-centric Climate Science™, surely you can see that the behavior described above demonstrates that your heroes are playing you for the fool. They are either making you bear the brunt of going “green” or openly lying about the role of humans in climate change.
FYI: Now would be a really excellent time to stop taking official narratives at face value.
US Patent Describes “Toxic Mosquito Aerial” Program To Spread Chemical & Biological Weapons
Remember, Bill Gates wanted genetically modified organisms (GMOs) mosquitoes to deliver “vaccines.” Remember also, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who is positioning himself for the White House, allowed millions of these abominations to be released in the State of Florida. Now, documents show “toxic mosquito aerial” program has a US patent that describes use of GMO mosquitoes to spread chemical and biological weapons. What could go wrong?
Ethan Huff has the story at Natural News.
In 2014, a patent was filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that outlines the future – which is now the present – of chemical and biological warfare.
Entitled “Toxic mosquito aerial release system,” the patent, which was issued as US8967029B1, outlines a system of spraying for biological, chemical, or other materials using “unmanned aerial vehicle[s] operable by remote control.”
“It carries a container holding a central processing unit and a mosquito breeding bin, which is a self-contained volume housing mosquitoes and a mosquito food having a toxin suitable to be transmitted by mosquito bite after the mosquito consumes the mosquito food,” the abstract further states.
“A release tube is connected to the mosquito breeding bin and sized to release mosquitoes from the mosquito breeding bin. A valve is connected to the release tube and is operable by remote control so that when opened, the mosquitoes have an open pathway out of the container through the release tube.”
If you read our piece from last week about the UFO-like drones that the Russian military recently spotted over Kherson and other parts of Ukraine, then you are already familiar with the technology. It would appear as though it is already in use after having been patented about eight years ago.
Based on the rest of what is outlined in the patent, the goal of the technology is to use unmanned drones to spray enemy soldiers with chemical and biological weapons as a means of warfare attack. The United States and NATO are apparently in the process of doing just that in Ukraine.
“Throughout military history, the health of one’s troops has always been an important determining factor,” the patent ominously reads. “Soldiers on the ground can only properly function if they are not ill, sick, or dying from a deadly virus or pathogen.”
“A soldier, whose immune system is trying to fight a bug or pathogen, will have no energy or ability to fight other soldiers. Sickness can be a very valuable military tool that can be more devastating than the most up-to-date military guns and equipment.”
Seeing as how making enemy troops sick “is an important military objective,” the patent goes on to reveal, “one must then look at what means are available to get the pathogens, germs, and viruses to the enemy.”
Is the globalist deep state planning to mass-depopulate the world using GMO mosquitos?
You might recall that billionaire eugenicist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates concocted plans years ago for genetically modified (GMO) mosquitos that would fly around poisoning people with “vaccines” while sucking their blood – a concept similar to that of the patent.
Tiny robotic devices that look and behave like mosquitos, we are told, can be deployed in large numbers on the battlefield – this includes the general public since the globalists see as all as dispensable cattle and enemies of the state – to poison and kill various targets.
“Even with all of the sophisticated computer chips and microprocessors, all of these high-tech devices cannot come close to the miraculous technology of nature,” the patent explains about how chemical- and biological weapons-equipped mosquitos can help accomplish the deep state’s genocidal goals.
“Nature has a very highly technical device that can not only carry a sickness agent to the area where the enemy may be located, but these devices can seek out and find the enemy even if they are behind fortifications and are in hiding.”
The patent further explains that these mosquito-infested unmanned aerial drones can be specifically programmed to go seek out an enemy for contamination “with absolutely no warning,” referring to mosquitos as an “ultra high-tech device of nature.”
“If only there was a way for military planners to harvest and use the power of the mosquito, they could easily sicken and kill large masses of enemy troops without even a single shot being fired,” it adds.
After discussing their use on the battlefield to commit what amounts to mass genocide, the patent goes on to also suggest that these GMO mosquitos can also be used in “medicine” to mass-vaccinate the public – including, presumably, “anti-vaxxers” who would otherwise be unwilling to roll up their sleeves voluntarily.
Since mosquitos seek out their targets and attack without notice or consent, they are the perfect delivery vehicle, the patent explains, for pharmaceutical drugs and whatever else the powers that be want to inject into their human cattle herds.
According to documentation, the patent application for this technology was filed by TMARS Associates Trustee for Toxic mosquito aerial release system CRT Trust. Its inventor is listed as S. Mill Calvert.
“In connecting the dots, we find that outlawing of germ warfare research in the USA only caused this to be outsourced to other nations,” wrote a commenter at Natural News. “Ukraine alone had over 30 biolabs funded by the USA before the Russian invasion.”
Truth-Telling in a Time of Catastrophe
Once upon a time, a scattering of people noticed there was something fishy about a certain ‘natural’ catastrophe. They started looking closer. They raised questions. To their surprise, everyone already had the answer. It was that they were wrong. Moreover, they were selfish, cowardly, conspiracy-minded and gullible.
They did research. They came together. They said the catastrophe isn’t where you think it is, it’s in the cure. That’s the purpose of the catastrophe. There are ways to end it, right now, but that’s not what they want. They created this catastrophe to make you afraid, isolated, obedient. And it worked. No, not the truth-telling.
The cure was inflicted on most of the people, some eager, some willing, some reluctant, some without a choice. The Cassandras were in more of a bind. How to tell a friend, this thing you did may have permanently harmed you or your loved ones? Please don’t do more. Who wouldn’t want to shoot that messenger?
And then one day the blame began to flip: “If you knew all along, why didn’t you do everything in your power to warn me … before I lost my husband, my wife, my child, my mobility, my fertility, my heart, my health, my limbs, my livelihood, my life?”
So, fellow Cassandras, be forewarned. You are damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Stay true to yourself and your message but don’t expect applause. Be self-affirming but save the congratulations for another time. That time is coming.
Troy must fall; it’s written by gods who are neither capricious nor vengeful. It’s written by small gods of kindness, the kitchen gods, the gods guarding the cradle. This isn’t the life of stress and servitude they want for you, for your child, for the baby your child is meant to have and hold, not hand over in order to get back to work.
Don’t blame the angel-agents of change—their role is harder than you think. Agamemnon will not return to a warm bed and a welcoming wife. Pity them and wish them well on their journey, never again to haunt your shores.
In this version, you stay behind to help rebuild. And you are believed! Believed when you say there can never again be kings with the power to slaughter, silence critics, command obedience, quell local trade, and control the world in proxy wars.
You are believed when you say that sick care is not health care and we have the wisdom of mothers and witches—medieval Cassandras, who already knew how to heal.
You are believed when you say that men are not laptop warriors but farmers and builders, not couch commanders but fixers and doers. When you withhold your favors from the idle Apollo, this time he is cursed to a life of online porn until he repents.
You are believed when you say that home is the heart of the family, and you don’t sell your heart for a moment of profit, you strengthen the heart so it can hold all you love.
You are believed when you say that we are the teachers and life is the classroom, a school with no borders but passions shared by sibling cities around the globe. Learning is a joy that’s wasted on the young when crammed down their throats and left as a fat debt in the pits of their stomachs, never to be vomited up.
You are believed, you are cherished, you are loved. Believe me now, Cassandra. Let your bitterness die with the embers of what was. What is coming will be better and is inevitable. Herstory awaits.
For a more narrative version of the same message, I think, read Charles Eisenstein’s The Mask of Reason and Caitlin Johnstone’s Separation is the Largest Religion in the World. This poem was inspired by the ending of Robert Malone’s essay, Physicals, Virtuals, Machines and Overlords:
Which are you? Physical, Virtual, Transhuman machine, or Overlord? Which world do you want to live in? The sterilized, depopulated and highly managed city of Danish Parliamentarian Ida Auken’s fantasies, or the physical world for which she has such distain?
And more importantly, what is the world that you wish to have your children inherit.
I have made my choice. I prefer to join Candide and go work in the garden.
What I would like to know is what your positive alternative vision of the future looks like. Whether Physical, Virtual, or a blend of the two, if we want to beat the Overlords, we need our own great narrative. One which evokes Morning in America rather than the Matrix and the Borg as the future of humankind.
And most importantly, what I want to know, is “are you kind”.
Grateful Dead
Well, the first days are the hardest days
Don't you worry anymore
'Cause when life looks like Easy Street
There is danger at your door
Think this through with me
Let me know your mind
Whoa, oh, what I want to know
Is are you kind?
Buckminster Fuller said “You can never change anything by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.” This episode outlines ten universal principles of a new model, including the purpose of government, how to measure its success or failure, what community wealth really is, how to protect and proliferate it, the intergenerational transfer of wealth, and paying your debt to society backwards and forwards. I begin by talking about the spiritual and metaphysical obstacles that keep us from imagining a new model and how to remove them in your own psyche. Based on my book, How to Dismantle an Empire, I end with the three powers that communities require in order to control their own labor: debt & tax & digital cash.
And for a spiritual-psychological approach, this is Winning Hearts, Changing Minds:
The inspiration for this episode is the book Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard by Chip Heath and Dan Heath. They cite The Bad Popcorn Study and why you don't have a people problem, Chocolate Chip Cookies vs Radishes and willpower exhaustion, and how to direct the Rider and motivate the Elephant. I apply these to our mission to change the global economy to enable communities to be self-reliant. In the process, I bring in the world's best flourless chocolate cake, my daughter's wedding, my leaky refrigerator, and aerial ballet Buddhas.And Reversing the Reset:
With the consequences of the Great Reset becoming evident, but even those affected not wanting to see it, what's the most helpful thing we can do? I give the perspective of A Course in Miracles, having just finished the 670 pp manual once again. I look at The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow for an anthropology of anarchy. Vladimir Putin's June 17th address at St. Petersburg was an astute analysis of Europe and the US, with economic policies for Russia that support small business and home ownership. I apply his principles to the micro-communities we may need to start when economies in the West come crashing down, and show why it could be better than we'd dared to hope.