World Economic Forum Coded Language Explained & A review of COVID-19: The Great Reset, one of the dumbest, most tedious and utterly pointless books ever written.
And how to sell your body for $46million dollars...
In today’s Dose
WEF’s Global Intelligence AI wants to erase parts of the internet to “protect” you.
WHO: Informal Focused Consultation #1
WEF’s AI will also decide which industries to shut down, providing those workers with a UBI that *YOU* will pay for = more taxes and less disposable income. Don’t worry, shit will be cheaper and shittier!!
Latest COVID Shots Sold as Genetic Software Update.
The Terrifying Vacuity of Nazi Youth, Communist Old Guy Klaus Schwab - A review of COVID-19: The Great Reset, one of the dumbest, most tedious and utterly pointless books ever written.
This all goes beyond right vs. left.
How To Sell Your Body For $46 Million
But I did not come up with any of it! I just retold the WEF article and the WEF video. I am not sure if they are serious or are just trolling us, but in the past, they were dead serious about their agenda.
What do you think?
Here’s a video where they try and normalize it for you:
We need to stop economic growth
We need to liquidate entire industries to meet our climate goals
To decide which industries to shut down, we need to use WEF-selected Artificial Intelligence to make the decisions
We need to pay displaced people NOT to work
Does this sound totally bonkers? Not sure about you, but it does sound insane to me. And yet, it is all there in the WEF-endorsed video, and the article is prominently featured on the WEF home page. I did not invent anything, I just understood the article and retold its meaning in plain language.
Some Screenshots from the video above
translation: more video games (metaverse goggles and meta realities) and marijuana (more government sponsored pot head stores).
Traditional farming practices and fossil fuels. Electric cars that pollute the environment even more, destroy entire ecosystems mining for minerals for the batteries and less grass fed healthy meat, replaced by insect protein instead. Are we reptiles now?
WHO: Informal Focused Consultation #1
The World Health Organization will be livestreaming an "Informal Focused Consultation" at 5am Pacific, 8am Eastern, 2pm Geneva time September 21, 2022.
CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE LIVE STREAM OR RECORDING
https://inb.who.int/home/informal-focused-consultations
NOTE: If you watch, please feel free to express your opinion in the comment section below, or
Call +1 310-256-3749 to leave a 3 minute audio comment.
The INB Bureau plans to hold four IFCs, to be held in September and October 2022. The consultations will provide a forum for interactive discussion between Member States, relevant stakeholders and subject matter experts to advance understanding of the work of the INB.
Who Relevant And Other Stakeholders
272KB ∙ PDF File
The outcomes from the IFCs, along with the outcomes from the public hearings, written input from Member States and relevant stakeholders on the working draft, input from the second meeting of the INB, and input from regional consultations, will be utilized by the INB Bureau in its development of a Conceptual zero draft, to be discussed at the third meeting of the INB in December 2022.
Legal matters
Relationship between the pandemic agreement and other instruments, notably the International Health Regulations
Sovereignty
Institutional arrangements and alternatives
Structural and framework considerations
Ratification/accession
Entry into force
ADDITIONAL DETAILS:
This is the infamous grab of power where the WHO wants to control every countries pandemic response in the future, taking away soveirgnty from each country, or state, and transfering that power to a bunch of non elected beaurocrats
Latest COVID Shots Sold as Genetic Software Update
Story at-a-glance
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is now advertising the new COVID booster as an “antibody update” to “recharge your immunity” — as if your immune system were a battery that needs recharging, or your immunity a software system that requires gene therapy “updates.” This is transhumanist lingo that has no bearing on real-world biology or physiology, and proves the FDA is onboard with the transhumanist ideas of technocracy pushed by the globalist cabal
According to a risk-benefit analysis looking at the impact of booster mandates for university students, between 22,000 and 30,000 previously uninfected adults (aged 18 to 29) must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalization
For each hospitalization prevented, the jab will cause 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to three booster-associated myocarditis cases in males
A small observational study led by neurology researchers at the National Institutes of Health found “a variety of neuropathic symptoms" occurring within three to four weeks of COVID injection
Naturopath Henry Ealy and two Oregon state senators, Kim Thatcher and Dennis Linthicum, are trying to compel the state court in Oregon to order the impaneling of a special grand jury to investigate criminal data fraud by the CDC
Just when you thought the U.S. Food and Drug Administration couldn't possibly get any worse, they prove you wrong. Here are two recent COVID booster campaign messages tweeted out by the FDA:
"It's time to install that update! #UpdateYourAntibodies with a new #COVID19 booster."1 "Don't be shocked! You can now #RechargeYourImmunity with an updated #COVID19 booster."2
FDA Now Pushes Transhumanist Pipe-Dream
That's right. The FDA now wants you to believe that your immune system is something that needs to be "recharged," as if it were a battery, or "updated" with mRNA injections like a piece of software.
This is transhumanist lingo that has no bearing on real-world biology or physiology, and proves beyond doubt that the FDA is fully onboard with the transhumanist ideas of technocracy pushed by the globalist cabal. The human body is basically viewed as nothing more than a biological platform equipped with genetic software that can be altered and updated at will.
The problem, of course, is that your body doesn't work that way. You cannot turn your body into a "bioreactor"3 or an internal "vaccine-production facility"4 and expect it to work as intended. The massive increase in disability and sudden death among COVID jab recipients is a testament to the fact that allowing Big Pharma to play God is a bad idea.
Transhumanism as a whole is a pipe-dream, as it fails to take into account just about everything that actually makes us human, including the nonlocality of consciousness, which they irrationally believe can be uploaded to a cloud-based system and merged with AI, or downloaded into an artificial body construct, such as a synthetic body.
Government Study Reveals COVID Jab Problems
A small observational study led by neurology researchers at the National Institutes of Health also brings bad news, as they found "a variety of neuropathic symptoms" occurring within three to four weeks of COVID injection.
FDA Refuses to Release Key COVID Jab Safety Analyses
In July 2022, The Epoch Times asked the FDA to release "all analyses performed by the agency for the COVID-19 vaccines using ... Empirical Bayesian data mining, which involves comparing the adverse events recorded after a specific COVID-19 vaccine with those recorded after vaccination with non-COVID-19 vaccines."
Epoch Times September 10, 2022
In other related news, naturopath Henry Ealy and two Oregon state senators, Kim Thatcher and Dennis Linthicum, have been trying since March 2022 to compel the impaneling of a special grand jury to investigate decisions by federal officials that "significantly compromise[d] the accuracy and integrity of COVID-related data."25
According to the March 7, 2022, petition,26,27 filed in Portland, Oregon, the 30 defendants manipulated statistics to create "a significant hyperinflation of COVID-19 case, hospitalization and death counts," which in turn resulted in $3.5 trillion in fraudulent taxpayer expenditures.
Defendants specifically named28 are former CDC director Robert Redfield and current CDC director Rochelle Walensky, former Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary Alex Azar, HHS director Xavier Becerra, and National Center for Health Statistics director Brian Moyer
CDC Also Refuses to Release Its Safety Analyses
According to the VAERS standard operating procedures cited above, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is also required to perform data mining analyses, using Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) data mining. PRR23 measures how common an adverse event is for a specific drug compared to all the other drugs in the database.
When The Epoch Times asked the CDC to release its results, it too refused. According to The Epoch Times, the CDC "has also twice provided false information when responding to questions":
"The agency initially said that no PRR analyses were done and that data mining is 'outside of th[e] agency's purview.' The agency then said that it did perform PRRs, starting in February 2021. Later, the agency acknowledged that wasn't true.
The CDC has committed criminal data fraud. There are laws prohibiting data manipulation by federal agencies, and laws meant to prevent it from happening in the first place. The CDC violated those laws, not just once, but repeatedly, and must be held accountable.
Ealy is now convinced the CDC is feeling the heat, and urges Americans to sign Stand for Health Freedom's petition to convene a special grand jury to investigate the CDC's conduct during COVID-19.
The more signatures there are on this petition, the stronger the argument that the court must order a grand jury investigation, as it demonstrates that this investigation is important to the American public, and isn't just some pet grievance by Ealy, Thatcher and Linthicum.
The Terrifying Vacuity of Klaus Schwab
In his Captain Picard outfit, former Nazi “youth” and current Communist “old guy”
Like many bad books, The Great Reset lapses into occasional inadvertent autobiography. In the final pages especially, where Klaus Schwab writes of his hopes for a “Personal Reset” through state repression, we catch a glimpse of the man during the first-wave lockdown at his house in Cologny.
Schwab’s core idea is that the pandemic will either remake or reset our world, and thus political and corporate leaders have before them a unique opportunity to Build Back Better and make everything more ESG-compliant. All that’s clear enough, but for a man who put the word “reset” in his title, he seems strangely undecided on what the nature of this reset might be, and what role the virus had in bringing it about.
In the introduction, for example, we find this string of absurdities:
Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never. Nothing will ever return to the “broken” sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory …. Radical changes of such consequence are coming that some pundits have referred to a “before coronavirus” (BC) and “after coronavirus” (AC) era. … (p. 12)
Schwab writes that the pandemic happened because of “a vacuum in global governance” and because “international cooperation was non-existent or limited” (p. 115). He reveals a real childish yearning for “global governance” (p. 118), lest we end up “in a world in which nobody is in charge” (p. 114). The undercurrent of fear returns, and the pandemic recedes from view as a mere example of the kinds of disasters that will befall us if the globalist institutions fail:
There is no time to waste. If we do not improve the functioning and legitimacy of our global institutions, the world will soon become unmanageable and very dangerous. There cannot be a lasting recovery without a global strategic framework of governance… The more nationalism and isolationism pervade the global polity, the greater the chance that global governance loses its relevance. (p. 113)
Schwab even includes a totally meaningless chart to illustrate his beloved hyperconnectivity thesis, via which everything automatically becomes about everything else:
Clearly, very little actual thought went into this graph. You can tell by looking for things that aren’t connected but should be—for example, there’s no line connecting “weapons of mass destruction” to “human-made environmental disasters,” although probably no “human-made environmental disaster” has been more eagerly contemplated than nuclear winter. Schwab is mainly interested in providing his readers with an academic aesthetic and the feeling that they’re reading something sophisticated and learned, even though they aren’t.
Again, one is just struck over and over by Schwab’s apparent ignorance and naiveté, even on subjects at the centre of his expertise. People have long demonstrated that curbs on individual consumption, particularly in the West, will have very limited effects on environmental outcomes. Most emissions come from overseas manufacturing.
So far I’ve tried to focus on Schwab’s core ideas, to show why they’re nonsense even on their own terms. Schwab is wrong about a lot of other things though, and there’s some real howlers in these pages. There is his apparently earnest belief that “the post-pandemic era will usher in a period of massive wealth redistribution, from the rich to the poor and from capital to labour” (p. 77). When you’re done laughing, you’ll see that the statement rests on superficial historical comparisons to things like the Black Death, which drove up the cost of labour by killing millions and millions of peasant farmers and artisans. Schwab can’t see that there’s no equivalence between a plague that kills 40% of the European population and a virus with at best a 0.4% IFR, with deaths concentrated almost entirely in the retired elderly.
That’s how stupid he is.
Schwab is not only wrong; he’s also a creep, but I’m far from the first to notice, and there’s little point in going very far into this aspect of The Great Reset. He eagerly contemplates the possibilities of mass surveillance and has an obvious hard-on for contact tracing apps, perhaps the most openly discredited containment measure of all. He writes happily that the pandemic has given governments “the upper hand” and hopes that “Everything that comes in the post-pandemic era will lead us to rethink governments’ role” (p. 91). He also approvingly cites the theories of economist Dani Rodrik, according to which “economic globalisation, political democracy and the nation state are mutually irreconcilable” (p. 107)—embracing the uncomfortable implications that his programme comes at the cost of national government and our parliamentary institutions.
One of the few things I’ve understood better after reading this dreck is the significance of climate change for globalising institutions. Sustainability concerns are important because they’re the archetypal crisis that cannot be solved without “global coordination.” Combatting climate change is the thing global institutions are supposed to coordinate, and without which they begin to lose most of their justification, because nobody has been able to come up with very many other problems for them to solve.
So what this fat creepy bald old guy is really saying is that he wants our parliamentary institutions based on constitutional rights of the people who tell their government what to do to collapse and out of the ashes (these globalist always like the phoenix rising out of the ashes memes) rises a new technocratic government run by other limp wrist geeks like Yuval Harrari (Home Deus 2.0 transhumanist moron) who sit behind their laptop and program in new commands for AI to run little transhumanist singular robots (you).
Ultimately, Schwab’s importance is elusive. I’d suggest he’s mostly a vessel for the goals and the ambitions of the political and corporate overlords and bankers, who orbit the World Economic Forum. He’s a bad thinker and a lazy intellect, but he’s good at telling these people what they want to hear, and this makes him an interesting window onto their fears, beliefs and tendencies.
The Davos crowd see themselves as post-ideological, technocratic problem-solvers, but it’s impossible to deny that some kind of abstruse, malformed ideological system pervades Schwab’s work. It might be too ungainly and broken to acknowledge or defend, and it’s remarkably hard to describe, but it’s there. Postwar optimism and the generations of uninterrupted technological progress that followed, encouraged some people to believe that we were on the verge of a new world, one where a utopian global order would supplant both nation states and corporations, ushering in a post-capitalist, post-nationalist era, where all our most pressing problems would be solved.
They’ll be defeated. This idea that we will succumb to AI robot integration is absurd. It has to be implemented more subtly, which is will, but it’s still an absurd sell to convince someone that their free will is stupid and some artificial intelligent alexa can better tell them what to do, think and how to act. Of course there will always be some losers who fall for it.
The real purpose of the WEF, though, is to fail so that some other benevolent sounding dictator can arise and solve yet another problem they created.
Funny story huh?
Except it isn’t.
That’s what these clowns want.
Take a look at that man, if you can call him that. He’s a 40 something, balding, limp wristed, skinny fat nerd with moobs. Of course he has wet dreams about augmenting himself with super-human-iron-man-like components so he would finally be able to compete and dominate in life physically, which for him at the moment is an impossibility.
DO NOT COMPLY
How To Sell Your Body For $46 Million
00:00 Intro
01:04 How To Sell Your Body For $46 Million
04:23 Presumed Consent Opt-Out Organ Donation Laws
07:04 Euthanize And Harvest Laws
09:44 Young Blood
17:44 Fetal Tissue Retention Scandals
26:55 Planned Parenthood
29:12 COVID WHO Guidelines; Organs Are Suitable For Transplants
34:14 How COVID Patients Were Over-Treated to Death
40:03 Harvesting Stem Cells From Dead Bodies
Bill Gates gets attention in the Italian Parliament. That was in May 2020, but still very relevant today.
This all goes beyond right vs. left.
"Liberal democracies" are fake democracies. Trump or Biden is not a real choice. Governments are controlled.
It's about humanity staving off the inescapable entrapment of the nazi/eugenicists http://rochester.indymedia.org/node/800
One possible solution is for humanity to know of the option/strategy to restructure all governments from vertical to horizontal
Here are some "smoking gun" verifications concerning what is actually inside the vaccines:
Dr. Sevillano (from la Quinta Columna):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FbOHY0l9TT8M/
La Quinta Columna (from Spain) and Dr. Sevillano were the first ones to discover graphene in the shots, two years ago. This information here is new, no more than a few days old.
Dr. Nagase:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kBZpRPRdFjOh/
MAC address:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XCJnpzgkeMwX/
Academics, activists, scientists, and all you muthafukkers, we need to break through the propaganda machine. Please see if the above makes sense and if so, please help spread this to all your connections, networks, and influential people.
Excerpts from the Lancet Commission Report:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Establish a global pandemic agreement and strengthen the IHR. (page 41)
WHO should be strengthened. (page 3)
The world community should not establish new centres of global health policy and finance that would compete with, or even undermine, the central role of WHO. (page 3)
Countries should maintain a vaccination-plus strategy that combines mass vaccination, availability and affordability of testing, treatment for new infections and long COVID (test and treat), complementary public health and social measures (including the wearing of face masks in some contexts), promotion of safe workplaces, and economic and social support for self-isolation. (page 3)
The WHA should create a WHO Global Health Board composed of the six WHO regions, represented by heads of state on a rotating basis, and selected by the governments of each region. (page 3)
Preparedness plans should include improved surveillance and monitoring. (page 3).
To prevent natural spillovers, governments should coordinate on the global surveillance and regulation of domestic animal and wild animal trade. (page 3)
To prevent research-related spillovers, WHO should be given new oversight authority regarding the biosafety, biosecurity, and bio-risk management of national and international research programmes that are engaged in the collection, testing, and genetic manipulation of potentially dangerous pathogens. (page 3)
WHO, working with the main vaccine-producing companies and countries, needs to intensify its efforts to ensure high levels of immunisation coverage in all countries, especially in the low-income countries where vaccine coverage remains dangerously low. (pages 40-41)
Such strengthening should include new regulatory authority, more backing by national political leaders, more contact with the global scientific community, and a larger core budget to carry out its many crucial responsibilities. (page 41)
The capacity of WHO should also be complemented by far greater international finance to support the health systems, research and development, and biomedical production capacity of Low and Middle Income Countries. (page 41)
Strong monitoring and coordinated surveillance systems around the world need to be established to assess the risks of new waves of COVID-19. (page 40)
We strongly urge the creation of a new WHO Global Health Board to support WHO in its decision making and actions, especially on urgent and controversial matters. (page 42)
We support similar calls by other panels for a Global Health Threats Council or Global Health Threats Board. This WHO Global Health Board should be composed of heads of government representing each of the six WHO regions, and elected by the member states of those regions. (page 42)
Efforts should be made to ensure inclusive decision making, including gender parity. (page 42)
Many reports have called for greater global surveillance and monitoring of disease risks, with WHO as the coordinating power. (page 42)
Scale-up of community-based public health systems, integrated with primary health care, for surveillance, testing, tracing, monitoring (page 43)
FINANCING:
Reforms of WHO should include a substantial increase of its core budget. (page 3)
The Global Health Fund should have its headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, but have strong regional offices in each of the six WHO regions. (pages 3-4)
The United Nations member states, with particular responsibility of the G20 countries, should adopt a new financial architecture to scale up financing for Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) to meet the urgent challenges of pandemic preparedness, the Paris Climate Agreement, and the Sustainable Development Goals. (page 4)
We echo some of the recommendations made by other groups to bolster the role and financing of WHO in preventing and responding to future pandemics and strengthening public health systems globally. (pages 41-42)
A substantial increase to the core budget of WHO is required to increase its effectiveness at its headquarters in Geneva, at regional offices, and in countries around the world. (page 42)
WHO needs the capacity to draw upon large-scale emergency financing in the case of a global public health emergency. (page 42)
An emergency credit line at an international financial institution, designed as a key tool of the new Global Health Fund, could provide the necessary emergency financing channel. (page 42)
The G20 should plan and implement a 10-year effort, with accompanying financing, to ensure that all WHO regions—including the world’s lower-income regions— have the capacity to research, develop, produce, and distribute all of the essential tools for pandemic control, including tests, diagnostics, vaccines, therapeutics, PPE, and human resources for health, among others. (page 42)
Specifically, this initiative should include capacity building and innovations for vaccine producers in Low and Middle Income Countries. (page 42)
More investment is needed to ensure a standing public health capability that can operate effective surveillance systems in each country. (page 43)
We call for the creation of a new integrated and flexible Global Health Fund. (page 44)
The Global Health Fund should be closely aligned with the work of WHO. (page 44)
The Global Health Fund would require annual disbursements of the order of $60 billion per year. (page 44)
This recommended annual funding of $60 billion would be allocated roughly as follows: commodities, $20 billion per year; pandemic preparedness, $15 billion per year; and support for primary health systems, $25 billion per year. (page 44)
The Global Health Fund should be supplemented by an emergency financing mechanism to enable a surge of funding in the face of a global health emergency. Such an emergency mechanism could rely on the borrowing authority of an international financial institution, such as the World Bank, to provide the ability to mobilise at least $10 billion immediately, and possibly far more, in the event of another major global public health emergency. (page 44)
ADDITIONAL EXCERPTS FROM THE LANCET COMMISSION REPORT:
Rapid development of multiple vaccines has been a triumph of the research and development system and the result of long-standing public and private investment and cooperation. (page 2)
Economic recovery depends on sustaining high rates of vaccination coverage. (page 2)
Although we have largely failed in terms of global cooperation during the first 2 years of this pandemic, putting such cooperation into place is still urgent. We remain far from preparedness for future pandemics, and logic tells us that achieving safety will require the reinforcement of basic tools of pandemic control on a truly global basis: (Page 40)
Universal vaccine coverage
Physical distancing
The use of face masks as appropriate
Prudential controls on potential super spreader events
Safe workplaces
Surveillance for new variants
Global protocols for safe international travel
The scale-up of test-trace-and-isolate regimens to be put in place when community transmission is low to ensure that it is kept low.
[The Lancet Commission recommends] the following as some of the core constituents of the new pandemic arrangements. (page 41)
First, bolstered WHO authority, with high-level political support from heads of government in a new Global Health Board.
Second, the right of WHO to investigate in situ any events that could constitute a new global public health emergency.
Third, the creation of a global surveillance and monitoring system for infectious disease outbreaks and transmission, building on existing initiatives—both for disease forecasting and for making informed, data-driven decisions about workplace restrictions, resource allocations, and effective interventions to avoid untargeted, one-size-fits-all restrictions.
Fourth, the approval by WHO, the International Civil Aviation Organization, and the International Maritime Organization of standing regulations regarding the processing and control of international travellers and international freight and shipping under global pandemic conditions.
Finally, the publication of an annual WHO Report on Global Pandemic Preparedness and Response, which should include findings from the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board for review and adoption by the WHA.
The WHA should then establish global health policies to address the gaps and weaknesses identified in the report by drawing on the successes of national and regional health strategies and policies, and adapting them to fit various contexts and country needs.
ONE HEALTH:
The prevention of natural spillovers would require a One Health approach—an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimise the (page 42)
Health of people
Animals
Ecosystems
Strengthening of veterinary services,
Regulation of trade in domestic and wild animals
Wildlife
Livestock rearing,
Prevention of deforestation,
Enhancement of pathogen-surveillance systems in domestic animals and in humans.
Countries must adopt rigorous surveillance over the trade of domestic and wild animals and over research.
Calls for One Health approaches to address the risks of the emergence and transmission of zoonotic diseases are common among reports on pandemic prevention and preparedness, and many reports have called for greater global surveillance and monitoring of disease risks, with WHO as the coordinating power.