You are not alone!
You are NOT alone!…
It might, heck, -check that- it does seem overwhelming at times. But that is the nature of this collectivist strategy. That is the purpose of this bombardment. We must hold strong and push back against the lies and manipulations. If you look closely at the attack, it is weak and much of it is psychological bait. Do not fall into the trap of despair.
When I share the message “live your best life”, it is not without purpose. Every moment that we allow the onslaught to deter us from living our dreams, is a moment those who oppose our nation view as us taking a knee. Do not allow this effort to succeed. You might ask yourself how I can, one person, a flea looking into a furnace, retain an optimistic disposition while all around me seems chaotic and mad.
Simple answer, it’s your choice. Two wolves fight – one filled with despondency, isolation, despair and dark imaginings; the other filled with faith, something bigger, unrelenting hope, focus and driven to remain connected. Which wolf will win? The one you feed.
The feeling of isolation begins first with a rejection of God… If you want to shake it, reconnect.
Shake it off. “Get up, get back on your feet, you are the one they can’t beat, and you know it.” WATCH:
The point? It ‘seems’ chaotic and mad because it has been created to appear that way. There are more of us than them; they just control the systems that allow us to connect, share messages and recognize the scale of our assembly.
And here we are… divided by a network of seemingly intoxicating systems; many purposefully driven by the modern dynamic of social media, steering a tribal outcome we are only now just beginning to fathom.
Ultimately the collective weight of progressive leftism is putting us is isolation. There are many historic references to this disconcerting sentiment to review with hindsight. However, ultimately the feeling of isolation first begins with a rejection of God. Defeat it by embracing Him.
We are in an information war
They use false information to convince the world that they are good, and everyone opposing them is bad. Vaccines are good, vax deniers are bad. Mainstream news media is good, alternative media is bad. Governments are good, those who resist are bad. The World Economic Forum is good, and those who say otherwise are bad. The UN and WHO are good, and all who disagree are bad. People who comply are good, those that resist are bad. Scientists who repeat their narrative are good, scientists who present actual science are bad. And so on.
That's why they have deployed fact checkers: to deny all truth that exposes their evil nature, and shift the blame to people who reveal truth.
Everything the dark side does, is focussed on convincing the world that they are good, and everyone opposing them is bad. They need to maintain this clown act by all means, because once humanity sees their true nature, it’s game over for them.
The Covid hysterics will not quit
Three years later, they continue to defend the indefensible - even including hyper-aggressive ventilator use. No wonder they won't tell the truth about the mRNAs.
Dr. Craig Spencer has been a Covid shrieker from the beginning.
Before Covid, Spencer was best-known for wandering around New York City while sick with Ebola, a virus that kills half the people it infects.
But Spencer’s laissez-faire attitude toward infectious disease deserted him when Sars-Cov-2 arrived in New York. At the time, Spencer was an emergency room physician at Columbia University Medical Center, where he treated Covid patients - and, on Twitter, raised an alarm about the coronavirus.
Did he ever.
Friday Funnies: "Feel Free to Insult Me"
Government overreach
Having returned from a California road trip tour for a couple of speaking engagements where I spoke to more people than I can count, I an attest that “California Fleein” is on a lot liberty loving Californian’s minds…
California Fleein' (Mamas & the Papas/Beach Boys Parody) (On Rumble)
How to get Mutant Carrots
Give them an inch and they will eventually try to take a mile. Freeloaders always work that way.
Woke Corporations and how to stop buying from them:
No better way to fight hyper inflation than to stop buying crap from CRAP companies.
Grow your own FOOD
In a recent article, Dr. McCullough said this:
Far and away the most common question I get from those who took one of the COVID-19 vaccines is: “how do I get this out of my body.” The mRNA and adenoviral DNA products were rolled out with no idea on how or when the body would ever breakdown the genetic code. The synthetic mRNA carried on lipid nanoparticles appears to be resistant to breakdown by human ribonucleases by design so the product would be long-lasting and produce the protein product of interest for a considerable time period. This would be an advantage for a normal human protein being replaced in a rare genetic deficiency state (e.g. alpha galactosidase in Fabry’s disease). However, it is a big problem when the protein is the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 Spike. The adenoviral DNA (Janssen) should broken down by deoxyribonuclease, however this has not be exhaustively studied.
This leaves dissolution of Spike protein as a therapeutic goal for the vaccine injured. With the respiratory infection, Spike is processed and activated by cellular proteases including transmembrane serine protein 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin, and furin. With vaccination, these systems may be avoided by systemic administration and production of Spike protein within cells. As a result, the pathogenesis of vaccine injury syndromes is believed to be driven by accumulation of Spike protein in cells, tissues, and organs.
Nattokinase is an enzyme is produced by fermenting soybeans with bacteria Bacillus subtilis var. natto and has been available as an oral supplement. It degrades fibrinogen, factor VII, cytokines, and factor VIII and has been studied for its cardiovascular benefits. Out of all the available therapies I have used in my practice and among all the proposed detoxification agents, I believe nattokinase and related peptides hold the greatest promise for patients at this time.
The first garden strawberry was grown in Brittany, France, during the late 18th century.[3] Prior to this, wild strawberries and cultivated selections from wild strawberry species were the common source of the fruit.
The strawberry fruit was mentioned in ancient Roman literature in reference to its medicinal use. The French began taking the strawberry from the forest to their gardens for harvest in the 14th century. Charles V, France's king from 1364 to 1380, had 1,200 strawberry plants in his royal garden. In the early 15th century western European monks were using the wild strawberry in their illuminated manuscripts. The strawberry is found in Italian, Flemish, and German art, and in English miniatures.[citation needed] The entire strawberry plant was used to treat depressive illnesses.
By the 16th century, references of cultivation of the strawberry became more common. People began using it for its supposed medicinal properties and botanists began naming the different species. In England the demand for regular strawberry farming had increased by the mid-16th century.
GROW YOUR OWN
New Democrat Bill Calls For A Federal Agency To Create "Behavioral Codes," Introduce "Disinformation Experts"
On May 18, two US senators introduced the Digital Platform Commission Act of 2023, a bill that seeks to give powers to a new federal agency that will set up a council to regulate AI, in the context of social platforms.
More precisely, the new body - the Federal Digital Platform Commission - would "rule" on what's termed as enforceable “behavioral codes,” and among those staffing it will be "disinformation experts."
The move by the two Democratic senators - Michael Bennet and Peter Welch - seems to have come in concert with congressional testimony delivered by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, since the bill was presented shortly afterwards, and backs Altman's idea to form a new federal agency of the kind.
A new study has revealed a link between COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ and potential blindness due to Retinal Vascular Occlusion (RVO).
Hundreds of thousands worldwide have faced death or disability from ‘vaccine’ complications.
Taiwanese researchers analysed data from over 95 million individuals, excluding those with prior RVO history or blood coagulation medication.
‘Vaccinated’ individuals had a 2.19 times higher risk of RVO compared to the unvaccinated group at two years.
The risk of RVO increased significantly within the first two weeks ‘post-vaccination’ and persisted for 12 weeks.
No existing treatment can unblock retinal veins, meaning RVO-induced eye damage may be permanent.
At the start of the month, a paper entitled “Risk assessment of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination” appeared in the Nature-branded journal npj vaccines. Its authors used patient data aggregated by the TriNetX network to compare a group of 740,000 vaccinated people to a roughly matched equally sized group of unvaccinated, and found that the vaccinated were 2.19 times more likely to develop this potentially blindness-inducing condition.
Some screen shots from the video above:
NOTE: To save from being de-platformed, I have opted not to post the latest Nation First video on YouTube, so instead watch the video at Rumble or click the image below.
Gender Transition Surgery: Dreams Turned to Nightmares
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Children are increasingly lured into “gender-affirming” hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgeries, are never given appropriate informed consent, and they have no idea what they’re getting themselves into. Many adults even underestimate how difficult and painful it will be
All it takes for a young girl to start the gender transition process to become a boy is a letter of support from a therapist. Typically, the therapist will write a letter of support after just one or two visits. Next, she’ll be sent to an endocrinologist who, after a single visit, will prescribe her testosterone
Some gender transition centers don’t even require any kind of mental health assessment, and several Planned Parenthood clinics are apparently handing out hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prescriptions on the first visit
While some pro-trans advocates insist HRT is harmless and reversible once you quit taking the hormones, this simply isn’t true. The effects of testosterone on a girl can be both profound and permanent, and can be seen within a matter of months
The transgender movement is a stepping stone in the transhumanist agenda. Ultimately, the goal is to get rid of flesh and blood bodies altogether and have our existence either within a synthetic body or as disembodied avatar in cyberspace, or both. Turning humanity into misgendered people incapable of natural reproduction is merely a first step in that direction
In the video above, WhatsHerFace Entertainment dives into the “unspoken reality of transgender sexual reassignment surgery and all of the pain, regret and horrors it entails.”
Most clear-headed adults would realize that surgically and chemically altering your anatomy from male to female, or female to male, is a complex and painful process. The problem is that it’s typically not level-headed adults making the decision to undergo gender reassignment. It’s primarily children who are being pushed into it, and they have no idea what they’re getting themselves into. Many adults don’t even realize how difficult and painful it will be.
As reported by WhatsHerFace, all it takes for a young girl to start the gender transition process to become a boy is a letter of support from a therapist. Typically, the therapist will write a letter of support after just one or two visits. Next, she’ll be sent to an endocrinologist who, after a single visit, will prescribe her testosterone.
While that’s alarmingly lax enough, some gender transition centers have cut through even that tiny bit of red tape. Some don’t require any kind of mental health assessment, and a number of Planned Parenthood clinics are apparently handing out hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prescriptions on the first visit.
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) Is Not Harmless
While some pro-trans advocates insist that HRT is harmless and completely reversible once you quit taking the hormones, this simply isn’t true.1 As reported by WhatsHerFace, the effects of testosterone on a girl can be both profound and permanent and can be seen within a matter of months. Effects of high-dose testosterone treatment include:
Voice deepening
Facial hair growth
Hair loss, receding hairline, balding
Increased libido
Sexual dysfunction
Increased aggression and unpredictable moods
Sterility
Enlargement of clitoris
Vaginal atrophy
As noted by Cleveland Clinic,2 many of these changes persist even if you completely stop taking testosterone. Can a child or teenager fully comprehend what sterility might mean to them later in life? I don’t think so. I also don’t think they can comprehend how other physical and emotional changes might affect them, such as going bald.
Other types of hormone therapy include puberty blockers, which are given to children who have not yet entered puberty. These drugs delay the onset of sex characteristics associated with the gender you were assigned at birth.
What’s particularly shocking is that the adults steering them toward gender reassignment don’t make it a point to thoroughly inform them about the difficulties they might face. Overall, I don’t think children and teens are capable of making the decision to transition, and encouraging or facilitating it really ought to be illegal.
Double-Mastectomies Performed at 15
While you’re considered too immature to get a full, unrestricted driver’s license until you’re 18, and can’t drink alcohol until you’re 21, “gender-affirming” sex hormone therapy can begin as early as 14,3 girls who think they’re boys can get a double-mastectomy at the age of 15, and full sex reassignment surgery is available at age 17 or 18, depending on the procedure, although the World Professional Association for Transgender Health is advocating for surgeries as early as 15.4
The Boston Children’s Hospital requires you to be 17 to undergo vaginoplasty, where a boy’s penis, testicles and scrotum are removed and a vagina is created, and 18 to undergo phalloplasty, the surgical construction of a penis, or metoidioplasty, where testosterone is used to enlarge the clitoris, from which a small penis is then constructed. Prosthetic testicles are also added in both of those cases.
Understanding Female-to-Male Reassignment Surgery
When a biological woman decides to surgically become a man, she’ll undergo phalloplasty, which involves taking large sections of skin from her forearms and/or thigh to fashion a penis. As you can see from the images included in WhatsHerFace’s video, this will leave a very large unsightly scar on one or both forearms, and while the donation site heals, there’s always a risk of infection.
Since the donation site needs to be hairless, electrolysis must first be performed. If electrolysis fails and hair grows back in the donated skin, the trans male may struggle with painful hair growth inside his urethra for the rest of his life.
Trans men who are on testosterone also face gynecological challenges, especially vaginal dryness, and vaginal atrophy, which can be very painful. Pelvic pain and bacterial vaginosis are other commonly reported issues.5,6
Understanding Male-to-Female Reassignment Surgery
During vaginoplasty, which is where a biological male surgically transitions to female, the surgeon will use skin from the patient’s scrotum to create a vaginal canal. If additional skin grafts are needed, they’ll use skin from the sides of their abdomen.
Before the skin grafts are taken, he must undergo electrolysis on the chosen donor sites. However, electrolysis does not always permanently eliminate hair growth, especially not male hair growth, which tends to be more profuse, and if the hair grows back, the trans male can end up with hair growing in his vaginal canal.
Vaginoplasties aren’t always successful, and if they must be redone, a part of the patient’s colon will typically be used instead. A downside of this procedure, called colovaginoplasty, is an offensive discharge odor.
After vaginoplasty, the patient must then dilate the vagina on a daily basis. This basically entails stretching (dilating) the vagina using a lubricated dildo to prevent it from sealing shut. Your body basically views this new opening as a wound and will do what it can to heal it. Trans women must do this several times a day for the rest of their lives.
Dreams That Nightmares Are Made Of
Dilation is one of the challenges of male-to-female sex reassignment surgery (SRS) that most people underestimate. Here’s one testimony included in WhatsHerFace’s video.
“Three months ago, I started this ‘dream’ (nightmarish hell) that is SRS ... Dilating is Hell, everything is sensitive or sore, my ... leg movements are, while better than before, still pretty limited. I feel constant stinging and burning sensations pretty much around the clock in my crotch area.
This is probably the most suicidal I’ve ever been since before I actually transitioned. This ‘vaginal canal’ (which is actually a f***ing open wound) has given me nothing but grievances and Jesus f*** am I tired of it.
I’ve actually been considering asking my surgeon whether or not it’s possible to just close this pseudo-vaginal canal or just get rid of it all together. I wish somebody had told me even just a third of what a hellride this was going to be. But nobody did. And now I’m stuck with this nightmare.
I’m pretty much considering just stopping dilation. ‘The canal will shrink,’ so what? Maintaining it is pretty much keeping my whole ... life prisoner of this thing. While I didn’t like what I had before, at all, it still allowed me freedom ... For comparison, this shit is like going from parole straight into solitary confinement.”
Sure, you might think, but that’s just recovery. Eventually, all will be well. Maybe, maybe not. Here are the words of a trans female who is still struggling three years after her vaginoplasty.
“Suicidal thoughts. Three years post-op SRS and still having discharge and pain ... I had SRS in 2016, August ... and I’m experiencing discharge and pain again from my neovagina after it had gone away for two years. Orgasming is very difficult these days and when I do I feel less than half of what I used to feel down there.
I am normally a very strong person who doesn’t easily give up but over the last couple of weeks I find myself crying myself asleep almost every night. Wondering why I had to get this surgery.
Since the surgery I haven’t dated anyone and everyone I have been on a date with turned me down diplomatically when I came out and discussed that I have a neovagina. I’m not saying no one should get this surgery and I’m sure there are people who have amazing results but far too often I hear that people experience complications from SRS.
I find life very draining these days. I have to clean my vagina with isobetadine to keep smell away and to keep the discharge at bay. I have to dilate once a day still. I should have thought things more carefully through. I thought SRS was a wonderful end point to a difficult journey. It opened up a whole other can of worms.
I could have just had anal sex and left my genitals alone and maybe have the testicles removed. Doing something so taxing as having the tissues inverted turned out to be such a bad idea. I wish I could just have the vagina closed up at this point. I don’t see myself ever having sex again either way. I know I should be grateful for having had a surgery of 22,000 CAD paid for by the government. But I feel lied to. I feel so stupid.”
Parents Are Removed From the Equation
Consider those words, and then consider that pro-trans ideology is now being openly taught in kindergarten through high school across the U.S. Children are being brainwashed into thinking they can choose their own gender and that it’s as easy to switch genders as it is to switch clothes. It’s not.
Yet, the horrors of SRS are being so well hidden that neither parents nor their trans children understand what’s in store, both in the short and long term. While there are cases where everything goes right and the boy or girl finally feels “complete” after SRS,7 there seem to be far more cases where they end up even more miserable.
What’s worse, some states, like Washington, are considering laws that severely infringe on parent’s rights to be involved in their child’s decision to transition. For example, as reported by ZeroHedge:8
“April 12 [2023], House lawmakers debated Senate Bill 5599,9 which creates an exemption for the state that grants it the right to not be required to notify parents of minors who have left their homes because their parents wouldn’t let them pursue gender transition medical procedures ...
Republican state Rep. Chris Corry said the bill ‘erodes parental rights in the state of Washington.’ ‘Essentially what the bill would do would be if a child left a parents’ home for certain medical care and went to a shelter or host family, that shelter or host family would not be required to notify the parents of their child’s whereabouts,’ Corry said.
‘This is obviously a fundamental violation of parental rights and something that’s deeply concerning for parents across Washington state.’ State Rep. Peter Abbarno, a Republican, said the crux of the debate over the bill was whether the state be permitted to ‘essentially hide where the child is.’
Most parents, Corry said, would ‘go to the ends of the earth to find their child’ if they disappeared after an argument. ‘And the fact that we have a bill that may become law that would say, ‘we’re not going to tell you,’ was really just a bridge too far for us,’ Corry said.
Corry told The Epoch Times that, under the bill, a disagreement between a child and parents over the child’s desire for a medical transition constitutes ‘abuse and neglect,’ only because the parent hasn’t ‘properly affirmed what the child wants.’
Corry said there are already laws that protect children from abuse and neglect in the state that require ‘solid and compelling reasons’ why children would need to be removed from their homes. ‘What’s frustrating is even in those cases, the parents still have a right to know where their kids are after they’ve been removed,’ Corry said. ‘In this case, parents would have no idea.’”
Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria: A Social Contagion
According to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, data from Western countries suggest gender dysphoria is now at 8% among children,10 compared to just a fraction of a percent among older adults.11
Kids who question their gender but aren’t good candidates for permanent transitioning may be as high as 1 in 5!12 In the U.S., research suggests 5% of 18- to 29-year-olds identify as trans, compared to 1.6% of 30- to 49-year-olds and only 0.3% of those 50 and older.13
How is this even possible? How is it that so many young people are suddenly gender confused? Social pressure appears to have a lot to do with it, and that includes pressure from adults, such as school teachers. But widespread trauma may also play a role.
According to a 2018 transgender identity study14 described in Psychology Today,15 “rapid-onset gender dysphoria” (ROGD) “appears to be a novel condition that emerges from cohort and contagion effects and novel social pressures.”
As such, its etiology and epidemiology is distinct from conventional gender dysphoria described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Remarkably, 80% of the teens identifying as transgender were girls identifying as boys.
Not surprisingly for those of us who understand how the internet is being used to manipulate impressionable minds, 63.5% of parents reported that shortly before their child announced they were trans, they’d noticed a marked increase in social media consumption. In particular, parents had noticed their child was following popular YouTubers who discussed their transition.
Signs of Indoctrination
Among the many surprises discovered in that study, the investigator, Dr. Lisa Littman, a behavioral scientist at Brown University, found that one of the many beliefs espoused by these trans teens was that anyone who isn’t specifically transgendered is “evil,” including gays and lesbians. As reported by Psychology Today:16
“Parents further reported being derogatorily called ‘breeders’ by their children, or being routinely harassed by children who played ‘pronoun-police.’ The observation that they no longer recognized their child’s voice came up time and again in parental reports.
In turn, the eerie similarity between the youth's discourse and trans-positive online content was repeatedly emphasized. Youth were described as ‘sounding scripted,’ ‘reading from a script,’ ‘wooden,’ ‘like a form letter,’ ‘verbatim,’ ‘word for word,’ or ‘practically copy and paste.’”
To me, the fact that trans teens sound like carbon-copies of each other is a sign of indoctrination. A script has been unleashed, and trans activists are repeating that script with the aim of indoctrinating its audience. We saw the same thing happen during COVID. Mainstream media repeated the script of the official COVID narrative, word for word, day in and day out. Repetition — that’s how you indoctrinate people.
Now, we also have the added pressures of corporations that view the trans agenda as a cash cow (although most who have gone that route are finding out the hard way that trans is still a tiny minority of their customer base, and the rest are not willing to encourage the fomentation of a mental health problem).
Even if corporate CEOs aren’t gung-ho about the trans agenda, many are lured in that direction because they want to optimize their corporate equality index (CEI).
Is Transgenderism a Maladapted Collective Stress Response?
That said, Littman hypothesized that ROGD may be a maladaptive coping mechanism for other underlying mental health issues or trauma. In essence, it may be a form of maladapted collective stress response. Psychology Today wrote:17
“It is clear from Littman’s study that the rise of rapid-onset gender dysphoria, which seems to predominantly involve natal females, points to a complex web of social pressures, changing cultural norms, and new modes of distress and coping that warrant further investigation. For parents, educators, and clinicians alike, caution is warranted in dealing with this growing phenomenon.”
Cui Bono?
So, who benefits from this maladaptive groupthink? Primarily, that would be hospitals, doctors and surgeons conducting gender reassignment surgeries, and, of course, Big Pharma. The cost for a complete sex change costs, on average, $132,000, but can run as high as $200,000 to $300,000 by the time everything is said and done.
Dr. Robert Malone18 recently calculated it would cost $102 billion to transition the current cohort of young adults (a total of 2.58 million kids, teens, and young adults between the ages of 10 and 24) who believe they’re trans. Right now, that’s an untapped market, and it’s quite clear the health care industry is chomping at the bit to get it going.
At present, insurance companies do not have to cover the cost of sex reassignment surgery, but that could soon change, as the Affordable Care Act website is actively encouraging trans people to sue for unlawful sex discrimination.19
What’s Behind the Trans Agenda?
In closing, it’s worth noting that many of the same people who attacked circumcision and fought against body shaming are now promoting transgenderism, which seems to be dehumanizing to the point of self-mutilation.
In the video above, self-proclaimed feminist and investigative journalist Jennifer Bilek discusses the forces behind the trans movement and “gender-affirming medical care” for children.
In short, it’s a stepping stone in the transhumanist agenda. Ultimately, the goal is to get rid of flesh and blood bodies altogether and have our existence either within a synthetic body or as disembodied avatar in cyberspace, or both.
Turning humanity into misgendered people incapable of natural reproduction is merely a first step in that direction. Next comes the melding of man with machine and artificial intelligence. Over time, the flesh and blood part of humans will be reduced while the synthetic parts will increase.
They want the younger generations to get comfortable with the transhumanist idea that gender is fluid and based on how you feel, rather than what you are, as well as the idea that you shouldn’t want to reproduce, because human reproduction will be outsourced to the tech industry.
As explained by Bilek, the trans ideology promotes the idea that you can choose your gender, even though that is a biological impossibility, because that’s a steppingstone to the grander ideology that you can exist without a body altogether, in cyberspace, where you can be whomever you want.
They want the younger generations to get comfortable with the idea that gender is fluid and based on how you feel, rather than what you are, as well as the idea that you shouldn’t want to reproduce, because human reproduction will be outsourced to the tech industry.
Over the past decade, Bilek notes, the trans argument has gone from “some people are born in the wrong body,” to simply advocating for the right to augment yourself in whatever way you see fit, to add or strip yourself of whatever appendages you don’t want. According to Bilek, it’s a fetish-based cult, and seemingly rational people are buying into it, not understanding what it’s all about.
I believe the transgender movement poses a severe threat to mental, emotional and physical health, and must be counteracted by level-headed discourse. How can anyone say they’re concerned about children’s health and welfare while simultaneously promoting irreversible surgeries that will pose lifelong risks to their health and render many of them sterile?
It’s one thing to change a child’s pronouns. It’s another to cut off their breasts and penises just because they say they feel at odds with their — for now — elected gender. The very idea that a child should be allowed to decide with such lifelong implications as mutilating their sex organs is incomprehensibly negligent.
And when you consider the hidden motive behind this movement, it reinforces the anti-human, anti-humane nature of it, because children, who are our future, are being physically and psychologically sacrificed to further an ideology that seeks to destroy the human species and turn it into something it’s not.
- Sources and References
3, 4, 10, 11, 12 AP News June 15, 2022
15, 16, 17 Psychology Today November 28, 2018
Woke’ism inverted reality strikes again…
The punishment of intellectual heterodoxy, the narrowing of the public sphere, the emptying of debate: chanting. It ends in mindless chanting, and had to end in mindless chanting. People who conform their minds to the correct boundaries of thought in the period of manufactured cultural revolution lose the ability to speak. It’s been seventy-four years since George Orwell called the discourse of unchecked radical politics “duckspeak,” an empty noise like an animal’s angry quacking. Look at it and see it. We’re here. These are former people who had the political discipline to empty their minds. They succeeded.
Ideology masquerading as science.
DHS List: You Might Be A Domestic Terrorist If…
Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire
Today, I read that the “bank problem” is happening because of all of us peons who don’t trust the government are taking our cash out of the banks – causing them to fail. Liar, Liar. The Global Elite and the bankers created the “bank problem” ostensibly to introduce CBDCs to gain the final area of control on we the people.
We are told that the COVID vaxx [1] is the only thing that can save us from being killed by a rather mild flu. But the public is waking up (some are really mad because they awakened after the shot). Evil lies.
We are told that the World Health Organization (WHO) needs to take control over our lives if/when there is another pandemic (you know, the one they have scheduled for later this year, or next year if they find need for a delay). Right now, the WHO (under the auspices of the UN and Global Elite) are writing up the edicts that will, literally, give them power over most of the world’s population. They will be able to lock us down (even “up” in gulags/concentration camps, called fusion centers), force the “vaccine” and boosters on us, and control our medical care. (Ah, “care”. That word may no longer be used by awake people when speaking of what is going on in medical facilities, such as hospitals and nursing homes.)
There are many pieces of legislation up now that are wolves demons in sheep’s clothing. One is the TikTok bill. (No, I don’t like TikTok, but this bill is a front to silence us – me, Tom DeWeese, Whitney Webb, Marc Morano, and so many more non-lying patriotic people speaking out, trying to save our nation by telling truths.) Those promoting it were brilliant to use TikTok as the bait – just as was the push for the Department of Homeland Security using 9/11. These politicians know the general public wants to be safe from horrors – real or imagined. Our children are being targeted in so many ways today and, if I didn’t know better, I’d think that our government created TikTok in order to have the excuse to ban free speech. The bill I am talking about is the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act – the RESTRICT Act, S.686. Oh, and it is sponsored by 13 Republicans and 12 Democrats. Bipartisan. The Woke and the RINO-woke. Liars.
A good friend of mine from New Zealand just sent me this article.
It seems an advertising agency was hand-picked by former Police Commissioner Mike Bush for a $500,000 contract to make memes in NZ’s “fight against Covid-19.”
Within a matter of weeks, this assessment was made of the ad agency’s effort:
“They were putting out non-branded shitty memes and we were having to counter them with proper messaging … It was a serious job and their claim to fame was shit memes.”
Here’s how the agency defended its work:
“Sometimes shitty memes are effective.”
There are several angles that could be taken here but I’ll leave you with these takeaway thoughts:
The Powers-That-Shouldn’t-Be have so much contempt for our discernment skills that they often put very little thought into conditioning us.
At the same time, this example highlights just how inept they are.
Therefore, we should stop doom-scrolling and start taking positive actions with winning in mind.
I’ve been saying it for years: The Parasite Class™ is overplaying its hand and it’s up to us to not do their work for them.
MAiD Promotes Suicide
Nobody, besides quadriplegics, needs MAiD to end their lives. A few feet of rope is all anyone needs - and there is no need to ask for anyone’s permission. The importance of MAiD is that it makes ending one’s life easy, painless, and socially acceptable. Doctor-assisted euthanasia is glorified and advertised in creepy commercials, such as the infamous “blue whale”
What We Know About New Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino
I warned that Elon Musk is not one of us though people see him in a similar way to Donald Trump, who is also not one of us. You can tell this by who they hang around and what they engage in. As Musk talked to an NBC ad executive, and a World Economic Forum taskforce chair to become CEO of Twitter, I told you it was evidence that he is not one of us but is, in fact, one of them. Now, he’s made his decision by going with the Mockingbird media ad exec, but don’t think there are not ties to both Trump and the WEF.
Let’s find out exactly who Linda Yaccarino is in reality.
Is he really a champion of free speech? Or was this a plan, all along, to turn Twitter into the American equivalent of WeChat? How much can we really trust him to stand up for the First Amendment?
Let’s look a little more closely at Linda Yaccarino first.
Before moving to Twitter, she was NBCUniversal’s Chairman of Global Advertising and Partnerships. During her decade-plus at NBC, she helped the network transition from a traditional broadcasting network to a modern media company, establishing partnerships with companies like Apple, Snapchat, Buzzfeed, and YouTube to increase NBC’s online presence dramatically.
This is a woman who knows in what direction the winds are blowing and gets things done.
From a purely business perspective, her choice as Twitter’s CEO makes sense. Twitter lost many of its big advertisers after Musk’s takeover. Their revenue in December 2022 was down more than 70% from the year before. Musk needs to start rebuilding his relationships with advertisers, and Yaccarino looks like the perfect person to do it.
Yaccarino has conservative credentials. Liberals hate her. After all, she was a Trump appointee to the Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition. She follows Ron DeSantis and Libs of TikTok on Twitter.
But…
She is also the World Economic Forum’s Chairman of the Taskforce on the Future of Work. The WEF has always favored heavy censorship. In the OP’s January article about the WEF’s annual meeting, we pointed out member Vera Jourova’s hint about illegal hate speech, “which you will soon have in the U.S.” Looking at comments made by Yaccarino, she seems to be on the same page.
In an interview with Musk on April 18, Yaccarino applauded Twitter’s decision to promote “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach.” This means that they will de-amplify voices that violate policies concerning hateful content and violent speech. At this point, I’m pretty sure we all know how arbitrary these usage policies are. They’re just a way to deplatform anyone politically inconvenient.
In the same interview, Yaccarino also made it clear that she wants marketers to have protection for their ad campaigns. She gives platforms to people willing to pay the most. And this mindset is why she’s so successful, but it’s also why mainstream media, in general, seems so monotonous. They’re all selling out to the highest advertisers because that’s how they make the most money. Did Elon Musk pick someone who’s going to stick to ideals for the sake of the First Amendment? No. No, that’s not Linda Yaccarino.
Upon hiring Yaccarino, Musk stated that he was excited to have someone help turn Twitter into the “everything app.”
What does he mean by that? Well, in a May 2022 interview on the All-In podcast, Musk elaborated a little bit. He thinks the U.S. needs a super-app, our own version of WeChat, the app used by over a billion Chinese. It is a one-stop shop, where you can message your friends, book flights, and pay almost anywhere within China. Most people on this website are aware of its use in tracking social credit, too.
An American super-app would be an amazing business opportunity, and Musk isn’t the only person who wants to cash in. Super-apps are becoming increasingly popular in other parts of the world. The trend took off in countries with a high percentage of unbanked people in the population, but has been catching on elsewhere, too.
People love the convenience, but these services don’t come without risks to freedom and privacy. We published an article recently about Ukraine’s Diia app, its “government in a smartphone.” Groups like the World Economic Forum have been aware of this move toward super-apps, and they see it as an opportunity for control, as discussed in the Diia article.
And the WEF brings us right back to Linda Yaccarino.
I have never particularly trusted Elon Musk. Maybe I’m too naturally cynical about rich people? Elon Musk is brilliant and eccentric. That makes him nothing more than brilliant and eccentric—he’s not out to save anyone, though he seems to enjoy seeing himself that way. He is absolutely passionate about free speech for himself, as he made clear in a recent interview, but his passion for free speech does not extend very far. Just look at how he treats truly independent journalists.
I was excited about the Twitter Files. We were finally getting some real information about what actually happens online. We wrote about it at the OP. I started following independent journalist Matt Taibbi more closely around this time because he was one of the first people contacted by Musk to wade through Twitter’s files. After his congressional crucifixion, my respect for Taibbi grew as it became obvious he was willing to take a lot of punches for the First Amendment.
So, how long did this working relationship between Musk and Taibbi last? You can read about the gory details here, though it is paywalled. Long story short, Musk got mad at Taibbi over posting to Substack (a tiny company relative to Twitter), and kicked him off Twitter. Someone that wants to think of himself as a free speech champion kicking off one of the few independent journalists out there? No, I don’t think so.
It’s possible, too, that other forces are at play. On May 9, Tucker Carlson announced that he would be launching his show on Twitter, after his firing by Fox. Is it a coincidence that Musk announced Yaccarino’s hiring four days later? Are other powerful figures pushing Musk to hire someone that could limit Tucker’s reach before the 2024 election?
This may be a stretch, but I don’t think it’s impossible. Enough crazy things have happened in the last few years that I would have previously found unimaginable; this could be another one of those situations.
There are a lot of new alliances out there.
We’ve all seen new alliances emerge, post-Covid. Tucker Carlson’s interview with Russell Brand was very enlightening. Buck Johnson and Naomi Wolf’s interview gave us another example of a liberal and a conservative having a candid discussion and finding many points of agreement. There are many more. The societal disruption surrounding Covid, the authoritarian measures, the constant rewriting of history have had freedom lovers of all political stripes coming together. This has been widely celebrated, as it should be.
I have seen this in my personal life. I had a conversation with a dear friend recently who had a very privileged upbringing in the Northeast; I had a low-income upbringing in the Midwest. Ten years ago, both of us were still products of our childhood. She was very liberal, I was very conservative.
Now we’ve met on the outside. Both of us have to come to the conclusion that the political class is rotten, and that mainstream media is designed to keep Boomers in their ideological comfort zones.
I have thoroughly enjoyed finding common ground with new people. However, lovers of conformity and power are doing the exact same thing. If independent-minded folks are coming together across the political spectrum to talk about new alliances and new ways of living, so are the authoritarians.
Elon Musk has always been somewhat left. He admits voting for Biden (though he also admits regretting it). Linda Yaccarino is a Trump appointee. But these things don’t matter nearly as much as the fact that they wield a huge amount of power online.
And our lives are being pushed more online by the minute. I wish we could all simply go off-grid, but that’s not realistic for 99.9% of us.
It’s natural to see an oddball like Elon Musk as a savior figure. That temptation to want someone big and powerful to come and rescue us peasants is strong. But we can’t rely on anyone swooping in to save us. The best option for most of us continues to be refining our own skill sets and nurturing our personal relationships so that we have more flexibility when things do take a sharper turn for the worse.
The Carbon Dioxide Scam
We keep hearing about how bad carbon dioxide is, but is it really that bad? Is it just a footnote to our doom? Is it being played like a fiddle to destroy our nation? What is carbon dioxide and what has it done in the past and what can it do in the future? Have we been wrongly informed and lied to about carbon dioxide? Why is carbon dioxide being blamed for a climate change that is naturally occurring?
So many questions with few real answers. We should sit back and look at the truth about carbon dioxide, like how it makes tress and plants of all types grow better. Recently, the people at NASA produced a map of the world showing our earth seemingly turning darker green. Why is it doing that? Because the plants and trees use carbon dioxide to grow. If we reduce or bring carbon dioxide to zero, plants, trees and vegetation will cease to exist and, in the result, so will all animals in the oceans and land because we need the oxygen that these trees and plants make out of carbon dioxide.
Whitney Webb On Jeffrey Epstein's Connection With Elon Musk & Bill Clinton
Durham report reveals FBI shut down four criminal investigations into the Clintons
Jordan Dixon-Hamilton
Breitbart
2023-05-18 00:00:00
Special Counsel John Durham's highly-anticipated report on the origins of the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign in 2016 revealed that top leaders at the Bureau shut down four criminal investigations into Hillary and Bill Clinton.
Well, at least John Durham finally released a report exploding the claim that Donald Trump and his campaign colluded with the Russians in 2016. That is the "good news." The charges leveled against Trump and many of his associates since 2016 that he was a tool of Vladimir Putin were in fact the most despicable political dirty trick in history; a mega bomb of calumny. Durham's report lays out in startling detail that the FBI, the Department of Justice and the CIA all played a role in manufacturing a heinous allegation that was nothing more than politically lethal propaganda. Only one little problem — none of the decision makers at the FBI or the DOJ are facing any penalties, neither criminal nor civil. One more thing — I have been warning about this since 2017. That is six years ago for those of you not gifted with math skills.
More troubling is Durham's apparent refusal to look at the illicit activities of the FBI, the DOJ and the CIA prior to the kickoff of Operation Crossfire Hurricane. George Papadopoulos, for example, was identified as a potential target that could be used against Trump thanks to intelligence collected by the NSA and Britain's GCHQ. His calls and text messages to Trump's campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, in August of 2015 put Papadopoulos on the radar as an unwitting actor who could be used to help create the legend of Russian interference.
New York to track residents' food purchases and place 'caps on meat' served by public institutions
Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
Children's Health Defense
2023-05-16 00:01:00
New York City will begin tracking the carbon footprint of household food consumption and putting caps on how much red meat can be served in public institutions as part of a sweeping initiative to achieve a 33% reduction in carbon emissions from food by 2030.
The Cloward-Piven Strategy
The Cloward-Piven strategy was developed by Richard Cloward and Frances Piven in the 1960s. It outlines a strategy for radical social change by way of abusing the system to the point of destruction.
The primary goal of the Cloward-Piven strategy is to create a political and economic crisis that would destroy capitalism and lead to the implementation of a socialist system with a guaranteed income.
The strategy involves enrolling large numbers of people into the welfare system. As many people as it takes to overwhelm and strain the system until it collapses.
Everyone enrolled into the welfare system is also used as an army to carry out the destruction of the current system. They are registered to vote and instructed on how to vote. They are organized and mobilized and made to appear as grassroots organizations demanding more from the system.
The ideal outcome of the Cloward-Piven strategy is to collapse the current system. According to their theory, this will compel the government to implement a Universal Basic Income. Which would shift the US towards a more socialist system with increased government control over the economy.
Everyone is being encouraged to do it. Burn it Down is the new sexy ring.
In High School, they compare it to the American Revolution.
All of this explains the likes of AOC.
Yellen: "More Bank Mergers Necessary" as Banks Lose Tens of $Billions in Deposits the Past Two Weeks
May 19, 2023 5:50 pm
It appears that the Biden Administration is abandoning their rhetoric that "the banking system is fine." CNN reported today that Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen met with CEOs of large banks yesterday and told them that "more bank mergers may be necessary." Her statements killed a stock rally this week that saw the stocks of regional banks increase 10%, in one of their best weeks since 2020. Not anymore. As ZeroHedge News reported today, reports show that $billions of losses in deposits at U.S. banks have occurred in the past two weeks, with over $70 billion lost in large US Commercial Banks.
The Illusion of Consensus
By Rav Arora and Jayanta Bhattacharya. The project of science calls for rigor, humility, and open discussion. The pandemic has revealed the stunning magnitude of the political and institutional capture of science.
They’re Coming To Take You Away
By Michael Lesher. When the monolithic narrative that is all they have been taught lies in ruins, they will replace it not with a rational, informed alternative – for they will know of none – but with whatever satisfies the rage of a population that realizes, too late, that it has been hoodwinked.
Suppose I tell you in advance that the essay you are reading is meant to startle you. And suppose I suggest, by way of demonstration, that two people as loosely connected as the leader of the “COVID Crisis Group” and Joe Biden’s “Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism” – both of whom have recently offered recommendations for improving political life in the United States – are in fact determined to unravel American freedoms.
Would you be surprised?
Well, if so, that is exactly the startling fact I am trying to bring to your attention. True, you may not have heard that the 34 COVID-19 “experts” headed by one Philip Zelikow (last seen justifying the concealment of information about the 9/11 attacks) and anti-Semitism “ambassador” Deborah Lipstadt – perhaps best known for slandering scads of Jewish survivors of the Nazis as “soft-core” Holocaust deniers because they objected to the massacre of 1,462 of Gaza’s civilians nine years ago – are both out to dismantle the Bill of Rights. But if you haven’t, it isn’t because they’ve been coy about their objectives.
Take the Zelikow panel. Its new book on “the lessons learned from COVID-19” openly conflates the federal government’s management of a respiratory virus with “wartime” – thus rationalizing the executive branch’s preemption of democratic government. Not only that, Zelikow and his band of “experts” explicitly call for the consolidation of power in the hands of an unelected “health security enterprise” that would control, among other things, a “systematic biomedical surveillance network.” And in case you can’t guess who is likely to benefit from the snooping, the panel goes on to praise the coercive experimental drug program that gave us the COVID-19 “vaccines” – “a bargain at $30 billion,” according to the editors of the Washington Post – signaling at one stroke the experts’ contempt for the Nuremberg Code and their subservience to Big Pharma.
^^ These people are pushing a biometric ID system that will watch and ‘adivse’ via AI everything you do ^^
What Good Comes from Gain-of-Function?
By Thomas Buckley. Though almost all lab-based scientific research and advancements carry at least a tiny element of risk, nothing like the level of terminal, global, and trans-generational risk of GOF has – to the public’s knowledge – been undertaken since the Manhattan Project and the study of radiation. And even that had very specific, very probable, and very real and tangible benefits (useful for “pure” or basic science, ending World War II, power generation, nuclear medicine, etc.) that GOF cannot begin to claim.
Fauci’s Never-Ending Victory Tour
By Pierre Kory. Anthony Fauci’s legacy is one of narcissism and power. The glorification of his massive ego trumped any scientific or medical data. His policies were giveaways to the pharmaceutical industry, which helped burnish his image and crush dissent. He saw his opportunity for the spotlight and seized it. Now, rather than admit mistakes, Fauci is intent on revising history. Unfortunately for his legacy, we’re all living with the consequences of his hubris, and they are impossible to overlook.
What a dystopian nightmare watching “America’s Doctor” try to continue his Covid victory tour.
In the face of plummeting math and reading scores between 2020 and 2022, Fauci is especially quick to deny his role in the school shutdowns. Last fall, Fauci raised eyebrows for denying that school lockdowns, “forever irreparably damaged anyone.”
Yet as late as September 2020, Fauci recommended that schools only open back up once the virus is “under control.” Earlier in the year, he had chastised Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, warning that premature reopening “likely” led to widespread student infection.
Today, even left-leaning sources concede that, “kids are safe. They always have been.”
It is both shocking and unsurprising that he would do this despite leaving a generation of children with lower IQ scores, a US life expectancy which dropped three years in the span of two, hundreds of thousands of deaths from the vaccines amongst working-age Americans (threatening the life insurance industry), millions of vaccine injured, skyrocketing disability rates, an explosion of cancers, and suddenly plummeting birth rates. So I went after him.
House Republicans on Sunday released new emails suggesting Dr. Anthony Fauci "prompted" or commissioned the drafting of the "Proximal Origin" paper meant to "disprove" the COVID-19 lab leak theory.
Over 50% Of Liberal, White Women Under 30 Have A Mental Health Issue. Are We Worried Yet?
A 2020 Pew Research study reveals that over half of white, liberal women have been diagnosed with a mental health condition at some point. Does this mean there's a correlation between progressive ideas and mental health?
But biology and hormones aside, what about the choices we actively engage in? The behaviors we indulge, the beliefs and convictions we hold as more important than all the others? The people we spend our time with, the actions we devote our energy to, and the news we consume? Is that negatively impacting our mental health, or even more importantly, leading to medical diagnoses?
PSYOP-19 not only had nothing to do with actual science; but, rather, it was an openly anti-science or junk science military and intelligence social engineering exercise.
In a single WhatsApp exchange Matt Hancock had not only admitted to deceiving the public, but he was also tacitly admitted that the virus was intentionally leaked, and that they were deliberately readying their followup variant release(s):
It does not get anymore self-incriminating than this. The above evidence would be an open and shut case for any prosecutor willing to go after a Crimes Against Humanity case in England and/or the Hague.
Not only were these criminals leveraging the political fallout of Brexit, but they were instilling maximum fear as the global stock and bond markets were seizing up at the time; in other words, PSYOP-19 was a multifaceted operation with many coverup layers and eugenics and total population control being its ultimate objective.
The pedophilia agenda
will wake up the world
That's why I made the report about their agenda to normalize pedophilia. It shows to humanity what the real nature is of the World Health Organization and United Nations.
Pedophilia is a topic that causes all mamma bears to stand on their hind legs and show their teeth to protect their cubs. This topic will unite humanity more than anything else.
A vast portion of mankind will never accept the truth about vaccines, because they are simply too brainwashed. They truly believe that all injections offered by the government are for their good. “What the government says is good, all who disagree are bad.” For billions of people, this belief cannot be broken. It’s the core of their mind and heart. The foundation of their existence.
But when they hear how their governments are pushing pedophilia into primary education, many of these people will wake up. Because everyone knows that sexual child abuse is evil. This binds humanity together, and it opens the eyes of the world to the true nature of the authorities they blindly trust.
That’s why I want to encourage everyone to use this report in a strategic way to remove the mask from these criminals.
Grand Jury Summary
Prior to three years ago, this was universally well-received. However, I have now been ‘fact’-checked too many times to count. And the conclusion from each one that has been published was that I had disseminated so-called ‘misinformation’ or, at a minimum, ‘misleading’ information. I have often been asked why I apparently didn’t bother to respond to these. So, I thought it might be of interest to share my behind-the-scenes experiences, which are shared by almost all experts of integrity that have had differences of opinion with the prevailing COVID-19 narrative.
Since these ‘fact’ checks often seem compelling, they can cause people to question even the most honest of experts. So, it has dawned on me that it might be helpful for the public to get a behind-the-scenes look at a personal experience.
Also, not one person who has ever accused me of disseminating misinformation has ever had a conversation with me prior to doing so. Lack of access to mainstream media outlets and active censorship have become the norm for many people who were historically recognized as reliable experts. That alone should be of major concern to the public.
A key and common strategy used by people that ‘fact’-checked me was providing unreasonably short times to respond. In most cases, I was asked to respond the same day. In this example, I was given less than twelve hours.
By the way, published peer-reviewed scientific evidence now overwhelming demonstrates that the three ‘highly controversial’ things I said in the interview targeted by this ‘fact’ check were 100% correct.
Who is actually behind these Fact Chokers ←
Catherine Austin Fitts On The Real Agenda Behind The Great Reset: “They’re After Your Kids” (Video)
Catherine Austin Fitts joins Kim Iverson for a discussion of The Great Reset and what the actual agenda is behind it. This should alert the people to bring justice upon the heads of not only those in the World Economic Forum but also those who claim to represent the people while selling out to this monstrous agenda.
Catherine Austin Fitts began her career on Wall Street and eventually rose to managing director and member of the board of the firm Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. In 1989, she was appointed Assistant Secretary of Housing – Federal Housing Commissioner in the first Bush administration. Following this appointment, Catherine became president of The Hamilton Securities Group, an investment bank and financial software developer based in Washington D.C. She is currently the managing member of Solari Investment Advisory Services, LLC.
Follow Catherine’s work here
https://home.solari.com/
This is on our Bitchute Channel, and will also be on our Rumble, Odysee, and Telegram channels.
Please copy and redistribute freely.
Exploring Biodigital Convergence
Policy Horizons Canada (Policy Horizons) is a strategic foresight organization within the Government of Canada with a mandate to help the Government develop future-oriented policy and programs that are more robust and resilient in the face of disruptive change on the horizon. The content of this document does not necessarily represent the views of the Government of Canada, or participating departments and agencies.
In the coming years, biodigital technologies could be woven into our lives in the way that digital technologies are now. Biological and digital systems are converging, and could change the way we work, live, and even evolve as a species. More than a technological change, this biodigital convergence may transform the way we understand ourselves and cause us to redefine what we consider human or natural.
Straight out of this guys playbook, as promoted by WEF, UN, WHO, solely to watch and control you.
“Last time we were here was Jan 2020 and at that time you told me that you were working on a vaccine, but Covid19 didn’t exist then!”
WAS ELON MUSK A KLAUS SCHWAB WEF YOUNG GLOBAL LEADER?
America Out Loud discovered this old Bloomberg article saying that Elon Musk was a Klaus Schwab young global leader in 2008:
WHO International Health Regulation Amendments
The WHO wants to circumvent human rights and the constitution, period. Here is one of the ammendements
4. If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours , WHO
mayshall , when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it, whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WHO,taking into account the views of the State Party concerned.
The same tendency is apparent in Article 13 paragraph 3; the country no longer asks for assistance and the WHO no longer have to collaborate. The WHO tell the State Party the assistance they will be providing. If the country rejects the assistance, they have to give the rationale for such a rejection - they have to explain themselves to the WHO, as though the WHO was in charge and the nation concerned must justify their disobedience.
Explained in full by:
Give confused and mentally ill folks children and what could go wrong?
Current Meme’s and Programming
How to Quit Cars
They crowd streets, belch carbon, bifurcate communities, and destroy the urban fabric. Will we ever overcome our addiction?
Going where you want, when you want is bad, very bad. Shame shame shame on you.
The World Economic Forum Calls For AI And "Deepfake" Regulation, Has Already Partnered With UK Government
Bills to limit Tik Tok are designed to eventually limit all anonymous internet usage.